In this last filling by Satoshi, he gave 1600 address that he claims he owns and that hold bitcoin he mined, the total amount is approx a bit over 1,000,000 BTC
So if Craig is lying about that, why the real owners of those 1600 address don't move their coins?
So is Craig telling the truth? he owns the satoshi address? he is satoshi?
There's no way Craig is Satoshi. If he was really Satoshi he wouldn't have felt the need to tell dozens or even hundreds of lies over the year. He wouldn't have perjured himself in court, or made idiotic statements defaming others (such as theymos and sirius, two of the original members of this forum), which caused the judge to enter into a default judgment for the plaintiff. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.377.0.pdfCraig is a con man. People buying SV are buying into a con. It will end poorly for them. |
|
|
|
You're being played - same as when Bruno sold one account to SuchMoon and then carried on as though nothing had happened.
 We both know that's not exactly what happened. What's more likely is you're letting your penchant for indulging in paranoid fantasy and conspiracy get in the way of your ability to think rationally, as you are wont to do. If you can produce anything concrete other than a single shared date, you would have by now, but you can't, because Bruno and CH are not the same people. |
|
|
|
Bad day for Bob. Frustrated getting the right polish on an audio project I'm working on, and angry with myself being lazy mixing in headphones in bed, when I really need to be working in my studio with proper monitors and a sub. Bleh.
Putting the finishing touches on a new dubstep banger? |
|
|
|
I must be the only one that can see:
Sometimes a coincidence is just a coincidence. Why would Bruno be nice to me as Phinnaeus Gage and a raging asshole as TOAA? Makes no sense. Regardless, TOAA already has a confirmed alt: cryptohunter. And as I said before, Bruno never kept his alts a secret or denied they were his. |
|
|
|
Too much sentimentality come from old users. Everyone should do its own research and invest according to it. just to be clear, i've never bought any BSV, but there is one fact which is really unacceptable for me regarding BSV: EXCHANGES delisted it because of the statements of one person... Thats a very unprofessional, more like a joke.
Sometimes one person knows more than a thousand, or even a hundred thousand. Wake me up when Craig signs a message from the Genesis block. Frankly any address with untouched Satoshi stash coins will do, so long as he signs it for all the public to see. Until then, he's still a fraud. |
|
|
|
From a PM: You put Inactive flags on our project! Can I find out the reasons? You come from the opinion of one person to whom someone paid money to make us a bad recommendation to the community! As we suspect, Barsban did all the fake correspondence! We didn’t deceive anyone from our community, we are moving according to the roadmap and we have an officially registered company https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/FilingDetails.aspx?eFNum=111163058065213096200065184127032021035173224095 we are fully open to our community!After we closed the topic from the correspondence of bots that belong to Barsban, apparently he paid money to put a bad trust on us! Please take into account our appeal to you! And draw the appropriate conclusions! Here's the reasons. 1. You don't have a public team. What are you hiding from? 2. You hired a bump bot service to promote your thread. 99% of the time, only scammers do this. What were you thinking?? "Barbasan" (whoever that is; don't know, don't care) didn't pay me shit. If you produce a publicly verifiable team and stop paying your thread bumping service, I may remove my negative trust from your account. I won't remove my support for Lauda's flag, however. What's funny is I didn't put the flag on you, Lauda did. I didn't support it until after I read your PM BTW. Consider it active. |
|
|
|
If boasting about wealth/imagined riches is crass then stop doing it because it is pathetic, and what is even more pathetic is the fact that you're likely lying about it all but if you want to prove me wrong go ahead or just leave and we can all go on thinking you're a liar and you can go on living in fantasy land with your very wealthy and very stable genius imaginary boyfriend.
 Bravo good sir, this was epic, and eloquently summed my own thoughts exactly. I owe u some merits. Should be getting a refill in a couple of days. That's one thing that money can't buy. Unless you head over to Fiverr. But that's another story. |
|
|
|
Since July 2019, this project has sold only 4.2% of the tokens necessary to reach its hard cap... The token sale ends after the hard cap has been reached... So that's roughly 8.4% of the hard cap per year... That means this token sale should be over in about 11 years, or 2031!    Sure everybody who invested in this has to be happy about that!
I guess it's possible that we will see bull market only after halving. So maybe it will be the best time for CKM to make IEO?
I can't get it. Where will it be bitcoin halving? And what influence on crypto market will it have? The Bitcoin block mining reward halves every 210,000 blocks, the coin reward will decrease from 12.5 to 6.25 coins. It will happen 14 May 2020. So we need to wait 4 months more for the real bull run or do you think, it can start earlier? This isn't a real job, and I can't believe you get paid for doing this nonsense. I'm only here because I know your company usually promotes scam projects. That means in all likelihood this project is a scam. |
|
|
|
|
He should definitely be banned. He should have been banned months ago. Take a look at his post history. Not one actual meaningful contribution. Certainly nothing insightful about bitcoin, the blockchain or cryptocurrency. Over a thousand posts of trolling and spewing vile hatred. He didn't change anybody's mind about anything. He didn't have an impact on anything.
Theymos what are you waiting for?
|
|
|
|
In one of his latest thread he said that he won't return after 2 days. Just ignore him for the coming 48 hours and see if he is provably (dis)honest. We shall likely NOT return at all again after the next 2 days.
He'll be back. He has absolutely nothing better to do than be a dick to strangers on the internet, as demonstrated by his hundreds of thousand-word, rabid squirrel diarrhea posts that nobody reads. You can't take anything he has to say seriously. |
|
|
|
Hi. My list is once again confirmed that I add all the alts correctly, even without direct evidence. My methodology is based on comparing korner and his alts behavior, and it is always the same. The nicknames change, and the behavior and thinking are the same.
...
korner's alts put many flags on different users. Check who supports them. That's basically the korner's alts, especially if they're from a list of 57 accounts, it's probably them.
Check this out, he's been talking to himself in the new Bitcoin SV thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211986.msg53592925#msg53592925What a nutjob. |
|
|
|
I think if someone has proofs of the connection he would open a thread about it with something solid. Bumping this thread is purely equal to stirring unnecessary drama.
You don't see any irony in your comment? There is no concrete "proof" of the matter -- there is only varying degrees of evidence, most of which hasn't been posted. If you do the research yourself you might stumble upon it. There's also no "proof" that gravity is real. |
|
|
|
|
Does anybody think TOAA is not a troll?
|
|
|
|
I’ll continue to encourage everyone to ignore TOAA and report all off topic posts. Theymos quoted his number of deleted posts before and warned TOAA that if it continued then action may happen. So everyone please do not encourage the troll by engaging in conversation. Just report all posts that are in any way off topic (all of them)
Reported. He's clearly breaking your local rules. He has no respect for the forum, or anything. Don't know what he's trying to accomplish besides getting everybody to hate him (which is one of the definitions of a troll if I'm not mistaken). |
|
|
|
TOAA is NOT Bruno. No chance in hell. Take it from someone who knows Bruno personally that they're not the same person. Bruno never disappeared -- he was quite active in my BSV Scam Accusation thread until very recently.
OK, I'll take your word for it then. It isn't just the grudge thing, it's also their style of writing which borders on craziness at times. I've always respected Bruno for his detective work in busting scammers, which I remember from my early days on the forum. Even with my suspicion that he was behind the CH/TOAA accounts, I'd hoped it wasn't true because those two members are just being vicious against members who don't deserve it. I didn't figure Bruno would stoop to doing that even if he did feel like he was being attacked some months back, but it did make me wonder. Anyway, as I said I'll take you vouching for Bruno as fact and I'll put it out of my mind. Thanks... I like Bruno quite a bit, I know him IRL, I know most of his alt accounts, so it doesn't make sense that I would say I think TOAA is a complete ass nozzle. Having said that, yes, Bruno is batshit insane sometimes, albeit in a more sophisticated and entertaining manner. A big difference between Bruno and TOAA is Bruno actually had a positive impact here (or any impact at all, really). Bruno always admits when he's posting from an alt, as well. A stark contrast from CH. Sorry TMAN, this is my last one. |
|
|
|
They're not even cryptohunter. Not that cryptohunter wasn't a nobody, which he was.
I'm pretty sure they're the same person, and I've had a suspicion for a long time that that person is Bruno. Funny how one disappeared with a grudge against the forum and another appeared, also with a grudge against the forum. According to TOAA, they're not the same person, but of course in reality they are. TOAA is NOT Bruno. No chance in hell. Take it from someone who knows Bruno personally that they're not the same person. Bruno never disappeared -- he was quite active in my BSV Scam Accusation thread as Phinnaeus Gage until very recently. Also, Bruno doesn't have a grudge against the forum. Just certain moderators. He also feels his tags for account sales are unjust, and it was discouraging for him. Kind of knocked the wind out of his sails. After having been a scambuster for 6 years and receiving no compensation for it in the process, he doesn't feel he has anything to gain from continuing to post here, given that busted scammers were harassing him and his family, trying to make his life difficult in any way they could. Please, don't compare Bruno to this useless asscrack. |
|
|
|
The title of the article is grossly misleading. It's not that he "won't forfeit" the bitcoin, its just that the Head Judge (sic) overturned the Vice Judge's (sic) ruling -- for now. In the far off, million-to-one, basically implausible scenario that Craig actually does have the Satoshi Stash private keys (he doesn't), he will definitely still owe Kleiman half of it, as a new ruling will be made that says so. I covered it extensively, because, that's what I do: Much like the whole white paper copyright registration fake news, this is simply a pump capitalizing on false pretenses. This time, Craig's defense says the judge's sanctions were inappropriate because he could not disclose his bitcoin holdings until after receiving "the remaining cryptographic slice" from the bonded courier. The appellate court overseeing the issue agreed that they should wait until February 3rd for the courier to appear before slamming him with a half million bitcoin debt to Ira Kleiman. However, most of what the court had to say about Wright wasn't very kind. The Court notes that although the Defendant was ordered to produce all documents related to the blind trust by May 9, 2019, the Defendant had still failed to timely produce all documents that he had in his possession as of the evidentiary hearing date. In fact, as late as January 6, 2020, it was the Plaintiff who advised the Court that the Defendant produced another document purportedly related to the blind trusts. Plaintiffs advise that the Defendant has not provided any explanation as to the document’s late disclosure. At the status conference on January 9, 2020, Plaintiffs also called into question the document’s authenticity. ...the sole evidence put forward to establish the Defendant’s claim of impossibility, his own testimony, was found not to be credible by Judge Reinhart... (“I completely reject Dr. Wright’s testimony about the alleged Tulip Trust, the alleged encrypted file, and his inability to identify his bitcoin holdings . . . During his testimony, Dr. Wright’s demeanor did not impress me as someone who was telling the truth.”). The Court has also reviewed the transcripts from the Evidentiary Hearing held by Judge Reinhart and agrees with his credibility findings relating to Defendant. Indeed, in answering opposing counsel’s questions, the Defendant was evasive, refused to give and interpret words in their very basic meanings, was combative, and became defensive when confronted with previous inconsistencies. ...the Court has no doubt that the Plaintiffs were prejudiced by the Defendant’s antics. It is clear to the Court that the Defendant’s conduct was anything but substantially justified or harmless. Defendant’s conduct delayed and obstructed the discovery process of this case, wasted valuable time and resources in litigating this issue, and prevented the Plaintiff from obtaining evidence that the Magistrate Judge found relevant to the Plaintiffs’ claims. Therefore, the Court rejects the Defendants’ argument that no prejudice has been suffered by the Plaintiffs as a result of the Defendant’s conduct. Such argument is entirely devoid of merit. Finally, the Defendant argues that at minimum he “should have been afforded the opportunity to wait until [the date the bonded courier is set to come] to see if he receives the key slices to generate the list of his bitcoin holdings, which he could then provide to plaintiffs.” Defendant contends that in the event this occurs, “even plaintiffs would have to concede that Dr. Wright’s inability to do the impossible and comply with the discovery order caused them absolutely no prejudice.” Given the Defendant’s many inconsistencies and misstatements, the Court questions whether it is remotely plausible that the mysterious “bonded courier” is going to arrive, yet alone that he will arrive in January 2020 as the Defendant now contends. However, given that the Defendant maintains that he should at least be afforded this opportunity, the Court will indulge him this much. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.373.0.pdfThe court order, while stating that Judge Reinhart's sanctions on Wright had been "improperly imposed," is still just a slam on Wright that is being cleverly re-interpreted to fool people into thinking that Wright is going to produce evidence that a bonded courier is scheduled to deliver cryptographic "slices" proving that he owns Satoshi's bitcoin stash. Spoiler alert: He won't. Basically, nothing new here. Short BSV if you can. |
|
|
|
LOL. Those are all alts of korner (Bitcoin SV). The Bitcoin SV account has been temp banned, so he is doing a lot of talking to himself. The irony is I bet he doesn't even own 1 BSV. He's just a nutcake with way too much time on his hands. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
