Since newbies can't post images.

Screenshot order:
18, 19, 20, 21, 13, 14, 15, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17 as per request of Ghzoan (OP)

If, as you say, the problem lied with Betsoft vs jasonort, then why did you deliberately change the terms of service to act as if jasonort did not meet the requirements to win the jackpot, and intentionally did not change the "Last updated" date until far after the incident was "resolved"?

Did you lose any of your deposits in that timeframe? Do you have transaction ID's to prove that you deposited? (As irrelevant as this question may seem, it carries some weight)

The amount is tipped to you, i.e your account. You should be able to withdraw at that point.

I think perhaps now you're starting to form the picture here. Hypothesize: if the player was in fact cheating but Edward paid him the coins, what then? Instead, if you can link the coins to someone whom you can penalize (perhaps legally) then you are able to recover the coins and also deter future cheating.

Irrelevant with what I stated. It doesn't matter whether you played with 0.01 until 80 BTC or if you went and doubled or anything else. It's still 8000x the original deposit. At the very best, a 1 in 8167 chance when playing at Primedice. It was probably an even lower chance if they wagered more, due to house edge.

You realize that although the amount you won is higher, the % increase is much greater from OP's bets?

140 / 0.2 = 700x your original deposit
80 / 0.01 = 8000x the original deposit.

If you won as many times as OP did, then you would've finished with 1600 bitcoins, more than 10x what you say that you returned with.

Even if you bet at 4950x in Primedice and then 1.617x which gives you about 8000x, that's a 0.012244% chance of happening - a 1 in 8167 chance. For someone to win at those odds and that initial deposit, it obviously seems suspicious.

You would literally be more than 5x as likely to win betting on a number twice in American roulette than you would be to win that much.

Seems like all Betcoin can do is reply with ignorance and pretending like they're above everything, acting as if nobody knows what's going on (or that they're trolls and spammers deliberately trying to slander their name).

Even as ungod brings up decisive evidence, Betcoin Jessica tries their best to try and pretend like the correlation is absent. The only thing that's stark is their conscience. The continuance of this corruption is unacceptable.


I guess Betcoin wants to try and wrassle as much money as they can out of their players before they all leave, instead of trying to create a fair platform to keep them there.

Waiting for an update from coinmillions.com.

Their account was last active today at 12:30 forum time, so they've been on BCT. It's been two days since they've stated:

How are you able to create constructive posts when you reply within minutes of each post that you make? If there are clearly posts that have explained what you've stated, then there isn't a need to recycle that content and post it again and again.

This post:

requires no thought whatsoever to construct it and you're not offering anything.

---

---

Likewise:

---

Where are you pasting it? Nowhere?

---

It seems like you think that spacing out your one-liner into three lines means that it's not a one-liner anymore.

I don't know anybody who can post 156 posts in 24 hours and still think that they're not spamming. That's only the average, too. In your peak times, you whip out posts like they're nothing!

---

EDIT: 6:27 PM Forum Time

I found this. Why are you replying to an archival thread?!

Why do you deserve a warning for doing something that is clearly indicated to be not permitted in the signature campaign guidelines?

If you are put on the blacklist then it should be explicit as to why you were. Some users create posts leading up to just the character count that a signature campaign requires. If you look at a couple Meta threads about signature spam, you'll find that some people copy & paste, use a lot of recycled content, and sometimes literally repeat something they're quoting.

The following are some examples of garbage:

Well, now you've redeemed a good chunk of your bankroll. What are you at now? I'm estimating ~800 mBTC?

It's actually kind of amazing how much you've managed to recover from your fall. Maybe at this point it's time to play it safe so you don't go back down.

It's quite interesting seeing the opinion of someone who was given negative trust, for them to return positive messages to the ones who had sent it to them. I quite like how you understood the underlying factor of how they were against the promotion of scammy sites.

If only more people were like you (reasonable) then perhaps the forum could return to a better state.

I agree with the decision of permitting red trust. Negative feedback is given to those you cannot trust. If someone is selling an account and (directly/indirectly) causing scam/spam behaviors across the server, then it encourages that behavior. Likewise, the promotion of HYIP. Now, you choose where to place your money, so I'm fine with discrete investments so long as they aren't promoting (i.e. replying to the thread, participating in promotions, etc.) because obviously, it won't bring forum attention to it.

The only problem here lies in when someone defaults a loan and the loaner accepts the account as collateral. Is it the fault of the loaner for accepting the account? I'm not stating my opinion on this question.

I feel like you guys are seriously over-inflating the ratings of some of these sites. I see so many 9/10 ratings it's uncanny. Nowadays, everything is driven so high. Why?

Username: actmyname

• Satoshi Dice
• Nitrogen Sports
• Sportsbet.io
• Crypto-games

All the reviews have been accepted and paid for.

Transaction ID: d1ce585c9f03aac3b160f2dc45b0620cbf4d1e437a55a29ec3a0f5fff8e0a9b2

Address: 1ActBTCi5XUMjqnyFxVWgSfE5xWicj8g3o


EDITED: [June 11 18:33 Forum Time]

Looked over his posts. Definitely bad.

The campaign is 0.25 usd per post, and 0.0005 usd * total posts daily.
So that would be... approximately 0.1344 BTC from the posts and about 0.0033 BTC from the daily counts. The coinroll payments are manually paid every week, so notifying the campaign manager might be good. I'll do that right now.

There's replies every single minute! Even sometimes there's two replies in the same minute! It's all oneliners spaced out to look like they've posted more.

Total tally for the past 2 days as of this edit: 1:15 PM, EST - 337 posts from July 9th to July 10th

When you are wearing a signature, you're advocating for that product. You're encouraging the use of it, and what if the source is not reliable? This seems as if it's a personal attack, but a part of the problem lies in the fact that as EcuaMobi stated earlier:


Although the only explicit issue you can find about Betcoin is the Betsoft situation, research is still a necessity especially since TwitchySeal has laid out all of it on a thread. Doesn't the jasonort problem at least raise any alarms as to the fact that there might be something else going on? Even though he got his "settlement" (which is definitely a fraction of what he should have gotten) the entire situation started off with Betcoin's ignorance, which has happened on many occasions.

It also feels like 98% of all of the long-term offers topics are absolutely terrible attempts at scams, and more than half of them are made by fresh accounts.

Perhaps instead of banning newbies from the main loan section, you ban them from the long-term offers subsection? The thing is, this also applies to the Securities section (which is, when offered by newbies, the same as an investor-based games topic). I don't know.

It just seems like because of the constant amount of scam attempts, the REAL newbies don't get a chance.

Oh, and another thing: these newbie threads can be home to lots of sig spamming for: "you need collateral" 5 times by different people or "nobody will give you this loan"

Although I would agree with this concept in its foundation, I do think that there are two ways to do this:

If you create a blacklist, you would need to constantly add people to it but one of the pros to this is that you won't overlook anyone who posts good content.

If you create a whitelist instead, you can more easily create the list (it would be far smaller), however, it would also take some time to scour all the campaigns for high-quality posters.

Both of these take time, but you need to decide on one. Honestly, they're quite equal.

I would say that an appeal thread might be a good idea for users that wish to either leave the blacklist or get on the whitelist

It looks bad until you zoom out. That's what happens when you focus on a small portion of time vs price. You can pretty much take any trough from a random daily point and make it look like it's a staggering crash. Don't extrapolate from a few points of data. Otherwise, you make a fool out of yourself.

https://xkcd.com/605/ is pretty relevant.

How did the server make you lose 10 grand?

... and how did Stunna have anything to do with that?
Since: