i am not falungong member,

but i know their story from very original, the case in 1999 in  my home town in my university

i know chinese politics much better and much more than you, no need discuss on this , baby

Falun Gong outside China[edit]
Main article: Falun Gong outside mainland China

Falun Gong practitioners outside China hold events such as this group exercise in Los Angeles.
Li Hongzhi began teaching Falun Gong internationally in March 1995. His first stop was in Paris where, at the invitation of the Chinese ambassador, he held a lecture seminar at the PRC embassy. This was followed by lectures in Sweden in May 1995. Between 1995 and 1999, Li gave lectures in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Switzerland, and Singapore.[12]

Falun Gong's growth outside China largely corresponded to the migration of students from Mainland China to the West in the early- to mid-1990s. Falun Gong associations and clubs began appearing in Europe, North America and Australia, with activities centered mainly on university campuses.[231] Falun Gong volunteer instructors and Falun Dafa Associations are currently found in over 70 countries outside China.[8]


In Houston, Li Hongzhi (right) gets special recognition for his teachings.
Translations of Falun Gong teachings began appearing in the late 1990s. As the practice began proliferating outside China, Li Hongzhi was beginning to receive recognition in the United States and elsewhere in the western world. In May 1999, Li was welcomed to Toronto with greetings from the mayor and the provincial governor general, and in the two months that followed also received recognition from the cities of Chicago and San Jose.[232]

Although the practice was beginning to attract an overseas constituency in the 1990s, it remained relatively unknown outside China until the Spring of 1999, when tensions between Falun Gong and Communist Party authorities became a subject of international media coverage. With the increased attention, the practice gained a greater following outside China. Following the launch of the Communist Party's suppression campaign against Falun Gong, the overseas presence became vital to the practice's resistance in China and its continued survival.[12] Falun Gong practitioners overseas have responded to the persecution in China through regular demonstrations, parades, and through the creation of media outlets, performing arts companies, and censorship-circumvention software mainly intended to reach Mainland Chinese audiences.[223]

A body of scholarly work has been published on Falun Gong ever since it began. Most of these have been created by social scientists, who investigate the social conditions that lead to the creation of the movement.[233]

International reception[edit]
Since 1999, numerous Western governments and human rights organizations have expressed condemnation of the Chinese government's suppression of Falun Gong.[234] Since 1999, members of the United States Congress have made public pronouncements and introduced several resolutions in support of Falun Gong.[235] In 2010, U.S. House of Representatives Resolution 605 called for "an immediate end to the campaign to persecute, intimidate, imprison, and torture Falun Gong practitioners," condemned the Chinese authorities' efforts to distribute "false propaganda" about the practice worldwide, and expressed sympathy to persecuted Falun Gong practitioners and their families.[236][237]


Candlelight vigil in Geneva, 2001.
From 1999 to 2001, Western media reports on Falun Gong—and in particular, the mistreatment of practitioners—were frequent, if mixed.[192] By the latter half of 2001, however, the volume of media reports declined precipitously, and by 2002, major news organizations like the New York Times and Washington Post had almost completely ceased their coverage of Falun Gong from China.[192] In a study of media discourse on Falun Gong, researcher Leeshai Lemish found that Western news organizations also became less balanced, and more likely to uncritically present the narratives of the Communist Party, rather than those of Falun Gong or human rights groups.[192] Adam Frank writes that in reporting on the Falun Gong, the Western tradition of casting the Chinese as "exotic" took dominance, and that while the facts were generally correct in Western media coverage, "the normalcy that millions of Chinese practitioners associated with the practice had all but disappeared."[238] David Ownby noted that alongside these tactics, the "cult" label applied to Falun Gong by the Chinese authorities never entirely went away in the minds of some Westerners, and the stigma still plays a role in wary public perceptions of Falun Gong.[239]

To counter the support of Falun Gong in the West, the Chinese government expanded their efforts against the group internationally. This included visits to newspaper officers by diplomats to "extol the virtues of Communist China and the evils of Falun Gong",[240] linking support for Falun Gong with "jeopardizing trade relations," and sending letters to local politicians telling them to withdraw support for the practice.[240] According to Perry Link, pressure on Western institutions also takes more subtle forms, including academic self-censorship, whereby research on Falun Gong could result in a denial of visa for fieldwork in China; or exclusion and discrimination from business and community groups who have connections with China and fear angering the Communist Party.[240][241]

Although the persecution of Falun Gong has drawn considerable condemnation outside China, some observers note that Falun Gong has failed to attract the level of sympathy and sustained attention afforded to other Chinese dissident groups.[242] Katrina Lantos Swett, vice chair of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, notes that most Americans are aware of the suppression of "Tibetan Buddhists and unregistered Christian groups or pro-democracy and free speech advocates such as Liu Xiaobo and Ai Weiwei," and yet "know little to nothing about China’s assault on the Falun Gong."[243]

Ethan Gutmann, a journalist reporting on China since the early 1990s, has attempted to explain this apparent dearth of public sympathy for Falun Gong as stemming, in part, from the group's shortcomings in public relations. Unlike the democracy activists or Tibetans, who have found a comfortable place in Western perceptions, "Falun Gong marched to a distinctly Chinese drum", Gutmann writes. Moreover, practitioners' attempts at getting their message across carried some of the uncouthness of Communist party culture, including a perception that practitioners tended to exaggerate, create "torture tableaux straight out of a Cultural Revolution opera", or "spout slogans rather than facts". This is coupled with a general doubtfulness in the West of persecuted refugees.[244] Gutmann also notes that media organizations and human rights groups also self-censor on the topic, given the PRC governments vehement attitude toward the practice, and the potential repercussions that may follow for making overt representations on Falun Gong's behalf.[242]

Richard Madsen writes that Falun Gong lacks robust backing from the American constituencies that usually support religious freedom. For instance, Falun Gong's conservative moral beliefs have alienated some liberal constituencies in the West (e.g. its teachings against promiscuity and homosexual behavior).[56] Christian conservatives, by contrast, don't accord the practice the same space as persecuted Chinese Christians.[245] Madsen charges that the American political center does not want to push the human rights issue so hard that it would disrupt commercial and political relations with China. Thus, Falun Gong practitioners have largely had to rely on their own resources in responding to suppression.[245]

read before you ask please

 mainland china will be totally free , sooner or later, no doubt


obviously you think in wrong direction

真是对不起，把你射墙上了，摔疼了吧，傻逼五毛

oh yes!!!  that is why your bullshit  mainland china government make harassing phone calls to my cell phone everyday.

as german citizen i will co-operate with german police for further investigation on this case...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1086925.0

德荷足球友谊赛因安全原因临时取消

巴黎恐怖袭击发生4天后，出于安全考虑，定于本周二晚间举行的德国与荷兰国家足球队的友谊比赛在开赛前一个半小时被临时取消。

http://www.dw.com/zh/%E5%BE%B7%E8%8D%B7%E8%B6%B3%E7%90%83%E5%8F%8B%E8%B0%8A%E8%B5%9B%E5%9B%A0%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E5%8E%9F%E5%9B%A0%E4%B8%B4%E6%97%B6%E5%8F%96%E6%B6%88/a-18856678

（德国之声中文网）这场比赛原定于周二晚间20点45分开始。在19点15分左右，比赛举办地点——德国汉诺威的警方宣布，取消这场比赛，但一开始没有说明具体的原因。

当时离开赛还有一个半小时，体育场内几乎还没有观众。扩音器里播出了比赛取消的通知，并请求观众有序离开体育场。据官方说法，体育场内人员被疏散。警方随后称比赛受到“具体的威胁”。

在此前一小时，因在赛场外发现一件可疑物体，体育场周边区域被暂时封锁，但稍后警报解除。多家媒体报道称，可疑物体是一个无人认领的手提箱。赛场周围街道上行驶的车辆被严格检查，造成交通堵塞。

汉诺威警方负责人克鲁弗（Volker Kluwe）周二晚间接受北德意志电视台采访时称，安全部门接到消息，有人计划在足球场内制造爆炸袭击。“我们在体育场打开大门允许观众入场15分钟后接到了这一重要信息。”德新社也援引安全部门圈内人士报道，警方获得了伊斯兰主义极端分子计划在足球赛场引爆炸药的线索。

最后的退堂鼓
在巴黎恐怖袭击事件中，德国队与法国队进行比赛的足球场也是袭击目标之一。因此汉诺威警方加强了赛前的安全措施，大量全副武装的警员在市内巡逻。德国总理默克尔和其他一些政界要人都准备到汉诺威观看比赛。宣布比赛取消的消息时，其中一些人已经来到体育场，他们也被警方撤离。

巴黎恐怖袭击发生后，亲身经历了恐怖威胁的德国国家队是否应该按计划与荷兰队踢这场比赛，本来就存在争议。当德国国家队成员从巴黎返回德国时，主教练勒夫坦言自己当时觉得"和荷兰的比赛不能也不应该举行"。但此后德国足协与荷兰方面商议的结果是，坚持原计划。

德国国家队经理比尔霍夫强调，这是为了"发出一个明确的信号并承担社会责任"。而勒夫则称这是"自由和民主的象征"。德国足协临时主席劳巴尔（Reinhard Rauball）在此前就已经宣布，"绝不向恐怖主义低头"。

德国国家队发言人格里特纳（Jens Grittner）当晚在推特上发布消息称，德国队在前往赛场的途中在警方引导下改变方向，并被带到一个安全地点。“我们不能谈更多的情况，希望大家理解。”

Hannover bomb threat - live updates

http://www.dw.com/en/hannover-bomb-threat-live-updates/a-18856763

Germany's match against the Netherlands has been called off after a bomb threat at Hannover's main football stadium. The area has been evacuated and spectators have been moved to safe areas.

All updates in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC)
Germany remains on alert after the friendly international match between Germany and the Netherlands was called off at the last minute on Tuesday evening due to a bomb threat.

The game was due to be played at the main football stadium in Hannover, just four days after the Paris attacks - some of which targeted a France vs Germany friendly match at the Stade de France.

Volker Klume, Hanover's chief of police, told German TV that a device was found that was "intended to be set-off inside the stadium."
Police ordered the stadium to be evacuated and fans were instructed not to hang around the area.

Police vans with loudspeakers ordered fans to leave and the city's TUI multi-purpose arena was also evacuated, where a concert was about to start.

Local media reported that an ambulance had been found close to the stadium packed with explosives, although this has not been confirmed.
Later the main train station in Hannover was closed due to another security alert.

Chancellor Angela Merkel along with several other ministers were due to attend the match. She had not yet arrived at the stadium when the game was called off.

Germany's Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere held a press conference following the bomb scare.

Earlier on Tuesday, seven people were arrested in the western German city of Aachen in connection with last Friday's Paris attacks but they were released a few hours later without charge.

21:15: Hannover chief of police Volker Kluwe says German authorities "had concrete warnings that someone in the stadium wanted to detonate explosives."

"We received a serious indication that a bomb attack was planned inside the stadium tonight," he tells German public broadcaster ARD.
21:10: A second stadium in Hannover has been evacuated. Fans had been waiting to see German band "Söhne Mannheims."
20:46: Pistorius: Security efforts couldn't have been faster #gerned
20:42: Pistorius: "Contrary to reports, no explosives have been found."
20:42: Lower-Saxony Interior Minister Boris Pistorius: no arrests have been made until now and no explosives found.
20:40: De Maiziere: "There have not been any arrests made."
20:38 Rauball: "German players on way back to club teams, Dutch flying home." #GERNED
20:37: de Maiziere: "Information came from a foreign source. Central station partially closed off as are some public transport stops."
20:27: de Maiziere has confirmed he recommended cancelling tonight's game between Germany and Holland.
20:25: A press conference is underway in Hannover with German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere.
20:15: Police in Hanover have closed a section of the city's central train station as another object has been discovered.
18:52: Fans are asked to evacuate the stadium in an orderly fashion and not to remain in the area amid an ongoing safety alert.
18:33: Police say the match between Germany and the Netherlands has been called off for "security reasons."

this bitch belongs ISIS,

what?

china and russia?

two bitches only

 dear bitch,

i am so sorry, i had no faccebook accout, no twitter acount

but if you wanna kill me physically ,  i would like to tell you my home address.

how many Moschee in Europe??

so many!!!!!!!!!!

western world gave so much respect and encourage multi-culture,

the problem is on islam world

NO ! that is totally another thing, you try to mix them.

freedom of speech , it belongs to individuals as one of human rights.

but,  if a member of ISIS said something here in this forum, his or her speech did not belong to individuals any more!

their speech represent their evil group and their dirty work against human beings

why ISIS killed people?
whom were killed by ISIS?
why NATO killed people?
whom were killed by NATO?

i know in your mind that is the same, but in fact it is quite different.

comparing the volume people dead could not figure out the key point.

德语媒体：“北京继续允许酷刑”

http://www.dw.com/zh/%E5%BE%B7%E8%AF%AD%E5%AA%92%E4%BD%93%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E7%BB%A7%E7%BB%AD%E5%85%81%E8%AE%B8%E9%85%B7%E5%88%91/a-18855952

本周二（11月17日），联合国反酷刑委员会在日内瓦商讨关注中国监狱中的酷刑问题。中国政府代表也必须就此给予解释。德语媒体关注到，虽然中国的法律命令禁止刑讯逼供，但酷刑虐待在中国仍然是“家常便饭”。
 
（德国之声中文网）德国《日报》本周二（11月17日）发表了题为"北京继续允许酷刑"（Peking lässt weiterhin foltern）的文章，认为中国虽然形式上取消了"劳教"制度，但仍然有受害者表示遭遇了系统性的酷刑。如今，联合国反酷刑委员会将关注商讨这一问题。

生活在北京的作者在文章开头写道："他在骗人吗？这是视而不见？还是他真的不知道这个国家的监狱里是什么情况？中国外交部发言人上周四否认系统性的实施酷刑在中国仍然是常规做法。在面对外国记者的提问时，他表示'中国法律命令禁止刑讯逼供……我们将继续改善有关人权和法律保护的规则，让每个人受到公平、平等的待遇。'"

作者继续写道："有关指责确实很严重。大赦国际组织上周公开的纪录记载了许多囚犯在狱中受酷刑的情况。这一人权组织的报告内容令人震惊。不仅仅是监狱的情况非常糟糕。嫌犯经常要面对数个小时的审讯，挨打挨踢。不让他们睡觉，也不给他们提供水、食物和药品。他们必须在事先起草好的认罪书上签名。如果不服，警察就会动用其它的酷刑。"


中国官员必须做出回应
本周二，联合国的反酷刑委员会在日内瓦关注中国监狱的现状。这个联合国委员会负责监督遵守联合国反酷刑公约的情况，将在讨论过程中注意到大赦国际以及其它人权组织的有关报告。中国1986年签署了反酷刑公约。所以，政府代表必须于本周三就相关指责做出回应。

作者随后引述中国维权律师余文生在狱中遭遇酷刑的经历写道："余文生不是个别现象。仅今年一年，中国安全部门就逮捕了大约300名律师和其工作人员。许多人都表示遭受了酷刑和严重的虐待。大赦国际的中国问题专家潘嘉伟（Patrick Poon）表示：'如果律师都会受到酷刑的话，那在这个体系中的被告们还能抱什么希望呢？'"
 
文章指出："中国国家领导人习近平三年前上台后，多次强调依法治国，承诺提高司法和政府机关的透明度。他取消了臭名昭著的'劳教所'。在那里盛行的酷刑手段本应一去不复返。但人权组织'人权观察'继续向中国发出严厉的指责。人权问题专家理查森（Sophie Richardson）批评称'酷刑仍然是中国的日常现实。'她呼吁中国政府回答，'为什么这些问题仍然存在'。"

律师们遭遇的酷刑待遇
《法兰克福汇报》不久前也发文关注中国监狱里的酷刑问题。该报指出，虽然官方严禁实施酷刑，但在中国的监狱和拘留所中，犯人仍然会饱受折磨，在暴力下被迫认罪。大赦国际组织11月12日公布的一份报告指出，中国司法体系仍然相信那些通过虐待和酷刑手段所签署的认罪书。同时，那些为异议人士和国家机关为所欲为的受害者辩护的律师们也成为了被实施酷刑的对象。

随后作者详细列举了几个受害律师的经历。包括"律师唐吉田原本计划2014年考察一处劳改机构的现状，他被捕后被绑在一个铁板凳上，挨打直至失去意识。一个来自湖南的律师声称，他被挂在一块木板上好几个小时。另外一名律师说，被戴上手铐的他要面对难以忍受的疼痛。国际大赦组织在报告中提及了37名中国律师，他们受到了酷刑包括不准睡觉、不准进食进水。"

[摘编自其他媒体的内容，不代表德国之声的立场或观点]
DW.COM

https://www.hrw.org/zh-hans/news/2015/11/11/283362?utm_source=hootsuite

中国：面对联合国审议应说明酷刑真相

承诺问责是遏止虐待关键



（纽约）－人权观察今天表示，中国政府不仅对人权展开二十年来最严酷的打压，面对关键性的联合国酷刑审议也未坦诚应对。中国将于2015年11月17到18日在日内瓦接受禁止酷刑公约第五次审议。

此次审议前，中国已连年承诺加强防范普遍刑讯逼供常常造成寃案的问题。

唯有当中国官员愿为各项审议提交可靠信息，当有志参与审议者不必担心报复，当所有被害人看到虐待他们的人被检控，我们才会知道中国领导人确实认真要消除酷刑。

索菲・理查森
中国部主任

 “酷刑在中国仍旧司空见惯，在此关键时刻，北京应就此一状况为何持续存在的尖锐问题做出答复，”人权观察中国部主任索菲・理查森（Sophie Richardson）说。“官员若以虚伪、回避或蒙混的态度面对审议，只会加深酷刑受害者的伤痛。坦诚沟通，致力对酷刑加害者追究责任，才可能减轻受害者的痛苦，展现出改革的诚意。”

此次审议将全程直播，时间是11月17日中欧时间上午10点到下午1点（中国标准时间下午5点到8点），以及11月18日下午3点到6点（中国标准时间晚上10点到次日凌晨1点）。

禁止酷刑委员会上次对中国进行审议是在2008年。该委员会由国际专家组成，负责评估各国履行《禁止酷刑公约》的情况。自上次审议迄今，由于国内媒体揭露多起犯罪嫌疑人遭严重酷刑导致寃错、死亡案件引起公愤，中国政府已着手实施一系列刑事司法制度改革。

Related Content

老虎凳与牢头狱霸
然而，根据人权观察在2015年5月发布的一份关于中国审前羁押人员所受待遇的145页报告，酷刑仍是中国刑事拘押场所的常规做法。到目前为止的各项刑事司法改革，例如引进“非法证据排除规则”──即禁止采用直接通过刑讯逼供取得的证据，很容易遭到规避。中国政府经过多年仍未落实禁止酷刑委员会提出的大部分建议，包括修改国内法对酷刑的定义以充分符合《禁止酷刑公约》的规定，尽管中国早已于1988年批准该公约。北京向来不承认其重要相关法律未经落实或修正，也不承认其制度无法令施刑者尤其是安全部队成员负起责任。

人权观察在向酷刑委员会提交的意见中指出，中国政府对酷刑委员会2015年问题单的书面答复并未提供酷刑委员会所要求的一些重要数据资料，并且做出许多毫无根据的陈述，整体上忽略中国国内法规与具体实践当中的巨大落差。例如，中国政府在答复中声称，“小号”（即国际法所禁止的羁押期间单独监禁）只是用来做为一种“管理措施”而非“惩罚措施”，这种说法并非事实。不论在实践上或相关规定条文上，单独禁闭都被用来惩罚违反监规的在押人员。此外，中国政府在答复中说它没有使用“老虎凳”而是使用“符合国家标准的讯问椅”，这也是误导的说法，实际上两者没有差别，都是用来实施酷刑。

自从国家主席习近平于2013年3月正式掌权，其政府还拘押或监禁了数以百计的维权人士。其中许多人实际或可能遭到酷刑，特别是那些被禁止与外界联系的在押人士，包括人权律师王宇和王全章。

考虑到曹顺利死亡的前车之鉴，人权观察也对那些试图参与2015年酷刑审议的中国人士可能遭到的报复感到关切。曹顺利曾于2013年向当局施压，要求让公民社会独立人士参与中国普遍定期审议，即四年一次审核所有联合国成员国人权纪录的机制。2013年9月，她在前往日内瓦途中于北京遭到拘留，并被禁止与外界联系长达月馀后以“寻衅滋事罪”起诉。当时她在看守所中身患重病，当局却拒绝让她接受适当医疗照护长达数月，直到2014年3月才终于将她转送医院，但在数日后病逝。

在中国准备2015年禁止酷刑委员会审议的过程中，据维权网纪录，共有数十位维权人士提交百馀份政府信息公开的申请材料，试图厘清中国政府提交禁止酷刑委员会报告中的疑点。中国政府拒绝了他们的申请，声称相关信息超出被申请机关的权限或根本“不存在”。已知至少五人在提交申请材料后遭到北京和江苏公安审问，并在2015年8月到9月遭到短暂拘留。

人权观察要求酷刑委员会利用双向对话查询上述维权人士所受的对待，并重申在联合国一切程序与审议中公民社会真正参与的重要性。

 “中国公民社会成员参与禁止酷刑委员会的审议，不应面对被剥夺自由或生命的危险，”理查森说。

人权观察呼吁中国政府在此次审议中承诺彻底改革，让律师、司法机关和独立监察员都能善尽职责抵制酷刑。中国政府应当：

确保任何人被警方拘留后尽速移送法官审问，一般应在被捕48小时内；

修改《刑事诉讼法》，确保犯罪嫌疑人接受警方任何讯问或审讯时均可有律师在场，并规定嫌疑人在接受讯问时有权保持沉默；以及
将看守所的管理权由公安部移到司法部。
 “15年来，禁止酷刑委员会、公民社会和许多其他人士不断催促北京着手上述根本改革，但中国当局悍然拒绝，”理查森说。“唯有当中国官员愿为各项审议提交可靠信息，当有志参与审议者不必担心报复，当所有被害人看到虐待他们的人被检控，我们才会知道中国领导人确实认真要消除酷刑。”

1:15PM  17.Nov.2015

+49 38129830218

德语媒体：“只有傻子才会相信北京”


http://www.dw.com/zh/%E5%BE%B7%E8%AF%AD%E5%AA%92%E4%BD%93%E5%8F%AA%E6%9C%89%E5%82%BB%E5%AD%90%E6%89%8D%E4%BC%9A%E7%9B%B8%E4%BF%A1%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC/a-18853849



德国媒体从习马会的角度关注习近平最近的功绩，指出改革停滞不前让许多人感到失望。而且在习马流露真情，亲密接触的同时，台湾人不应该抱有幻想。
 

（德国之声中文网）《南德意志报》周一（11月16日）发表了题为"改革受阻"（Im Reformstau）的文章，其中指出，由于中国经济增长继续放缓，北京政府无法按时兑现加大市场自由度承诺。这抑制了国内外企业的发展，也会让贫困阶层蒙受损失。

文章在开头写道："在新加坡的握手对于中国国家主席习近平来说是一次成功的经历，也是过去几个月来少有的几次成功经历之一。和台湾总统马英九在一个中立的地方见面给许多人留下了积极的印象，好像这两个宿敌不再针锋相对，而是终于开始相互接近。 "

"就算对于实行威权统治的总书记习近平来说，在一些关键的政治领域取得进展也不是一件理所当然的事情。原本应该促进自由竞争，减少政府干预经济的改革进程到目前为止让许多人感到失望。北京方面不仅仅没有提速，反而退挂一档--经济发展的压力让许多决策者不敢有所作为。"

文章随后写道："不仅仅是外国企业已经开始失去耐心，而且这种强势干预本身也会给政府带来许多经济上的成本。中国的经济分析人士也呼吁应该加快市场自由化的进程，因为只有提升竞争压力才能提高国企管理人员的纪律性和企业的效率。同时，欧美政府又希望中国能够加速实现结构转型，因为它们认为自身的经济发展能够从中国的结构转型中获得新的动力。"

作者指出："有关中国改革的讨论从90年代中期就开始了。直到几年前，许多人还认为光说不做不是什么大问题。但现在时间紧迫。这一世界上第二大经济体的发展势头每年都有所减弱。虽然对于某些企业来说仍然非常有吸引力，仍然能够在自己的业务领域实现增长。但中国的社会稳定和发达国家水平的低速增长无法相依并存。（中国的）收入太低。所以必须对许多领域进行整改并重新规划，目的就是不让保证未来经济发展的因素继续受到限制。而且，2008年金融危机爆发后，几乎无条件的向政府机构提供贷款的做法让债务负担越来越重。"

文章在结尾写道："到目前为止，（改革）并不成功。在金融市场上，虽然出现了一些显著的改变，利率垄断逐渐瓦解，债券市场进一步发展，而且从2020年开始，人民币将可能实现自由兑换。但这所有的一切既不能减缓其它疲软领域和出口贸易所面临的压力，金融领域的改革也无法长期可持续地为经济发展增添动力。与之相补充的政治改革，比如说结束严格的户口体制，不再按国民的出生地给予其不同社会福利的改革，仍然没有到位。"


"只有傻子才会相信北京"
"习马会"落幕不久后，德国电视一台发表了题为"只有傻子才会相信北京"（Nur ein Narr würde Peking vertrauen）的评论文章。作者指出，中国和台湾的历史性会晤总体来说虽然友好。但借鉴香港的发展状况，台北应该有所警惕。因为"只有傻子才会相信中国的共产党们。"

评论文章在开头写道："中国和台湾开始相互接近。谁不会为此高兴呢？几十年来，这两个中国对手一直处于冷战状态，而这种冷战许多次都差点演变成真正的热战。北京有1500多枚飞弹对准台湾，直截了当的发出了入侵的威胁，前提是台湾宣布独立。而台湾则一直要求美国对台军售，为的就是在一定程度上抵御大陆不断增长的实力。一场台湾战争有可能让中美这两个大国陷入军事争端。一场噩梦。"

"看到新的对话渠道正在打开，中国国家主席习近平打破禁忌，和台湾人正面相对。而且在和马英九会面的时候，几乎能感觉到双方的一种真情，是一件令人高兴的事情。在如今变得越来越不太平的世界里，看到人们能通过握手、对话与合作，心平气和的解决冲突，谁又会不为此而感到高兴呢？！这是一个好的发展势头。不是吗？许多台湾人对此次会晤和接近中国的政策持怀疑态度。他们有充分的理由这样想：中国维护领土主权，希望实现统一的诉求固然可以理解。双方确实在历史和文化上有着紧密的根源。但如今台湾所关注的不仅仅是国家和历史上的对抗，而是民主和自由。台湾是该地区内的一个榜样型民主国家。一个已经从蒋介石建立的独裁体制中摆脱出来的岛屿。"

作者最后写到："所以台湾人在解读这位北京强人（习近平）的表态时应该谨慎小心。在有关自由的问题上，相信中国共产党的人是一个傻子。（Ein Narr, der den chinesischen Kommunisten vertraut, wenn es um die Freiheit geht.）一大部分台湾人已经估计到了这一点。明年一月，这个岛屿将举行选举。民调结果显示，对中国明显更持批判态度的民进党有可能赢得大选。到那时，马英九的亲密路线也就走到头了。"

"台湾目前能够争取到的最好状况就是保持现状：和大陆维持和平与经济往来，放弃名义上的独立，但也和北京保持政治上的距离。台湾只能希望，习近平会对此满意。"
[摘编自其他媒体的内容，不代表德国之声的立场或观点]