Well, it's not "done", it's just completely flushed out and very robust. I know how to write it and the whitepaper is finished. PHWARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Evan you are amazing!
|
|
|
haha nice try.
There is no substitute for Darkcoin - its the original and the best.
|
|
|
I would say this is going to keep rising till open source.
Then adoption will make it rise even faster before open source hahaha
|
|
|
to the person who took a massive chunk out of that wall - you are my hero
|
|
|
can somebody please go on Mintpal and knock down that wall ! tx
0.00800000 17150.33239954 137.20265917
|
|
|
DRK still looks cheap below $300 $300? $500 is the first stop for me mentally, it's the figure I use to calculate my mining profitability for the farm. Hey Ignition - I remember you said you were going on a jihad for Dark marketing/adoption - I think the time is approaching to unleash you
|
|
|
Let's get this party started.
Except it looks like there is already another 137 btc sell wall up. Lol thats deliberate to keep price down. I would be really careful if I was that seller in how bullish this market is...can be snapped up in a single buy and he will be left with his pants down.
|
|
|
http://www.forexminute.com/bitcoin/darkcoin-makes-quick-adjustments-kristovs-report-44595ForexMinute.com – Darkcoin core developer EDUFFIELD, in consent with his team and community, had hired the renowned Bitcoin security and privacy expert Kristov Atlas to figure out the security lapses in Darksend. Last week, Kristov uploaded an exhaustive review of this anonymity-offering technology, whist bringing its voids to public.
It might be the first time in the history of cryptocurrencies when an altcoin has specifically conducted an open audit to figure out its security loopholes. Darkcoin, for most of us, is one such altcoin, which is offering transparency where it is much required, especially in times when even the most promising looking altcoins are failing in terms of security. EDUFFIELD not only made the Kristov’s repot public but also fixed most of the issues highlighted by the security expert.OPEN THE FLOOD GATES
|
|
|
I'll just leave this right here... Cryptsy crossed today as well.
Um, all the green bars represent a positive macd. Not quite, they represent when the macd is greater than the signal. Look at the 1d chart and zoom out and you can see what I mean. The macd is plotted with the y axis being the numerical macd value, and the bars being it's relationship to it's signal. Which by definition is a positive MACD. Its your wording that is off in terms of what you are pointing out. The 1d macd signal line just crossed the centre line (y-axis), which has not happened for a long time. Long term positive trend reversal is here
|
|
|
DRK still looks cheap below $300 Once certain "markets" adopt Darkcoin when open source - $300 will be the norm
|
|
|
Amazinggggggggggg
Open source means trust and adoption for everyday use.
There ain't many coins left on the market. Get em while they are hot
|
|
|
Just a question.
When DRK goes open source, what's to stop someone setting up a masternode service for the Bitcoin network so that anyone that wants to can "anonymise" their holdings in the background without the need to actually convert their holdings to another cryptocurrency ?
Dont think it can happen - theres Dark Wallet which is a centralized mixing service and you risk losing your funds if they shut up shop when their steal quota is met. If they were to setup a true masternode network for bitcoin just a few thoughts - may be way off but: * How would the masternodes get paid? Theres no incentive to run one, they arent getting a reward from the mining, unless they take a percentage cut of the mixing which sounds like it can be exploited. * How would they secure the masternodes to have cold wallets and have a financial incentive to own a masternode (1000coin etc) to circumvent bad actors * They would need to create a decentralized method for users to send their funds and not lose them, multi sig etc Overall I dont think it can happen without breaking the core value of decentralization as its not attached to the core mining/blockchain network.
|
|
|
DARKCOIN: Private instant transactions RIP Bitcoin, ...
Why RIP? If this invention is easy to implement and don't require even hard fork - then every other coin just say "thank you" and will use it. So it may be great for whole cryptoworld - but how it will help DarkCoin to compete? I don't mean it isn't great - it is great for everybody! But how it can help RIP or at least beat other coins? Evan needs to open source darksend to ensure trust and validate there are no backdoors. He could choose to keep the instant transaction source closed as this is a propriety feature of Darkcoin. This is all dependent that he could separate the code :/ But I would suspect from his words that this involves the use of Masternodes and have a high barrier of adoption for other copy shitcoins. "instant and will cost a ton of money to subvert"
|
|
|
9/14 8:51 pm <evan82> I just solved one of the largest problems facing Bitcoin. Instant transactions. I know how to do it... 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It'll be compatible with Darksend too. So we'll have anonymous instant transactions. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> Oh and there will be no bloat, that is the problem with POS. I bet we can get a confirmation within 10-20 seconds in most cases. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It also fixes the finney attack, which is another huge problem for bitcoin 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> =) thats some good news 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> lemme know when you need testers 9/14 8:57 pm <evan82> Yeah, I'm obviously pretty excited about it. I just had a eureka moment 9/14 8:58 pm <evan82> It's simple, elegant, instant and will cost a ton of money to subvert. Perfect 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> does that have any technical implication on how transactions are processed and blocks? 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> from a pool standpoint 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> nope. 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> It's not even a hard fork [...] 9/14 9:25 pm <moli> interesting.. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4942/what-is-a-finney-attack9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> It could possibly stop a finney attack. It's funny you post that, it's what I'm thinking about righ now 9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> right* 9/14 9:28 pm <evan82> It can definitely stop all other double spends, but finney attacks require the client to reject blocks. OMG insanely awesome .......holy grail here we come I guess Evan will concentrate on getting RC5 finally polished and delivered and then perhaps an announcement for plans for RC6 will come. I was so excited by RC5 open source, but now I cant wait for RC6
|
|
|
9/14 8:51 pm <evan82> I just solved one of the largest problems facing Bitcoin. Instant transactions. I know how to do it... 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It'll be compatible with Darksend too. So we'll have anonymous instant transactions. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> Oh and there will be no bloat, that is the problem with POS. I bet we can get a confirmation within 10-20 seconds in most cases. 9/14 8:52 pm <evan82> It also fixes the finney attack, which is another huge problem for bitcoin 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> =) thats some good news 9/14 8:56 pm <eth2> lemme know when you need testers 9/14 8:57 pm <evan82> Yeah, I'm obviously pretty excited about it. I just had a eureka moment 9/14 8:58 pm <evan82> It's simple, elegant, instant and will cost a ton of money to subvert. Perfect 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> does that have any technical implication on how transactions are processed and blocks? 9/14 8:59 pm <eth2> from a pool standpoint 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> nope. 9/14 8:59 pm <evan82> It's not even a hard fork [...] 9/14 9:25 pm <moli> interesting.. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4942/what-is-a-finney-attack9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> It could possibly stop a finney attack. It's funny you post that, it's what I'm thinking about righ now 9/14 9:27 pm <evan82> right* 9/14 9:28 pm <evan82> It can definitely stop all other double spends, but finney attacks require the client to reject blocks. OMG insanely awesome .......holy grail here we come
|
|
|
What going on DOGE. Megapump ?
Started with Doge/CNY on the merge mining with LTC. Its a China controlled pump. Actually, most of crypto movements, recently, are taking place in China And I'm willing to bet 10 DRK with someone these last couple of months have been a Chinese LTC whale keeping DRK at .5 of LTC with bots... Looks like there's more and more buy pressure to get the price moving. The whale can only sell and keep the price down for so long. As soon as the open source date and announcement - boom. I would say this is the prime time to buy the last batch of coins at these prices.
|
|
|
And this is why Monero is and will never go ANYWHERE.
It can be hacked by script kiddies as the code was written on the back of a napkin.
It has ZERO, I repeat ZERO infrastructure to support its growth.
Its a shitcoin, period.
|
|
|
No shilling of copycoins
So no Monero allowed? I also vote Monero should be banned
|
|
|
Yep Evan has already fixed one of the identified weaknesses. Nothing else is major in my eyes as Kristov states it has significant anonymity. Once Kristov finishes the code review and open source goes smoothly, the adoption phase can commence to cement its value. Fuck the moon...this is going beyond.
|
|
|
|