Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 08:53:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 »
561  Economy / Services / Re: [Looking for] Php Coder on: May 30, 2013, 11:51:04 AM
<?php echo 'I code PHP for Bitcoins'; ?>
562  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Two new MtGox phising websites, always check for HTTPS on: May 29, 2013, 07:34:33 PM
Did Mtgox confirm it was a scam?
I don't think they did.

If you want to check it download this files (they are viruses):
hxxp://mtgox.de/MTGOX_Wallet.exe
hxxp://mtgox.org/MTGOX_Wallet.exe

If you do not execute them you are fine.
Your AV will notify that they are viruses.

In 4 minutes I will upload the virus to virstotal.

Please upload it to https://malwr.com also and if possible zip it and send it to me for manual analysis.


This zip contains the two MTGOX viruses:
(CAUTION, VIRUS)http://xena.ww7.be/wsj/trojan.zip (CAUTION, VIRUS)

https://malwr.com/submission/status/MTEwZDcyNTM2ZTYzNGVmYTljNTMwMDBkOWU0MTVkNzU/
https://www.virustotal.com/es/file/d262bb2faf6d0bcd7064e0b51509dbbca7c8c90ac97d4e07fc97e527fa915833/analysis/1369856227/
563  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Two new MtGox phising websites, always check for HTTPS on: May 29, 2013, 07:11:45 PM
omg, I accidently clicked mtgox.de today, but I closed it like in few seconds? Should i worry about it? Could I have virus by now?

If you dont use Internet explorer and you do not downloaded any .exe you are fine.

You can always run a virus check  Wink
564  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Two new MtGox phising websites, always check for HTTPS on: May 29, 2013, 06:45:46 PM
UPDATES:
mtgox.de is now in the phising list (blocked by most browsers)
new phising domain hxxp://mtgox.net
new phising domain hxxp://mtgox.co.uk
565  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Two new MtGox phising websites, always check for HTTPS on: May 29, 2013, 06:34:34 PM
Did Mtgox confirm it was a scam?
I don't think they did.

If you want to check it download this files (they are viruses):
hxxp://mtgox.de/MTGOX_Wallet.exe
hxxp://mtgox.org/MTGOX_Wallet.exe

If you do not execute them you are fine.
Your AV will notify that they are viruses.

In 4 minutes I will upload the virus to virstotal.
566  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Two new MtGox phising websites, always check for HTTPS on: May 29, 2013, 03:46:43 PM
Hi,
hxxp://mtgox.de and hxxp://mtgox.org are SCAM websites.
Do not download any EXE, they are virus.

The original URL is https://mtgox.com (remember HTTPS and .COM).

Proof of virus in .de and .org domains:
hxxp://mtgox.de/MTGOX_Wallet.exe
hxxp://mtgox.org/MTGOX_Wallet.exe

PLEASE DO NOT EXECUTE THIS VIRUSES


PLEASE REPORT THIS WEBSITE TO GOOGLE PHISING, THIS WAY IT WILL BE BLOCKED IN BROWSERS
1.- Go to https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/?hl=en
2.- Write mtgox.org in the phising url field
3.- Write this in comments: "mtgox.org is a phising site of the real mtgox.com website".


1.- Go to https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/?hl=en
2.- Write mtgox.de in the phising url field
3.- Write this in comments: "mtgox.de is a phising site of the real mtgox.com website".


UPDATES:
mtgox.de is now in the phising list (blocked by most browsers)
new phising domain hxxp://mtgox.net
new phising domain hxxp://mtgox.co.uk
567  Other / Meta / Re: Minor change in Bitcointalk profiles inside a topic on: May 28, 2013, 07:30:48 PM
Maybe a consistency score would be better. Like # of weeks in which you have at least one post.

Fine  Wink
568  Other / Meta / Minor change in Bitcointalk profiles inside a topic on: May 27, 2013, 07:48:16 PM
Insert the date of registration inside the profile tab in the topics.

Example:


This can be useful to trust some users (exchanges, services, ...).
Yes, people can scam with old accounts but this is not so common.

A Feb 2009 with 5000 post is more trustable than a Feb 2012 with 5000 posts.
569  Economy / Services / Re: I translate your Website/Software/Aplication to Spanish on: May 26, 2013, 06:33:01 PM
If you are not a BitcoinTalk member you can contact me at
570  Economy / Services / Re: <?php echo 'I code PHP for Bitcoins'; ?> on: May 26, 2013, 06:32:39 PM
Really love your title, made me smile =).

Bookmarked for future reference.

Thanks  Wink
571  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [INTEREST CHECK] Full Create Your Own Cryptocoin Guide on: May 26, 2013, 06:15:27 PM
I want one free  Wink
572  Economy / Gambling / Re: FREE 0.0001 BTc to first 50 reply. on: May 26, 2013, 02:42:20 PM
Free dust
 Wink

1R2sWeVhFitB8zVbkrmdSoXzaQRsw6cfh
573  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Introducing the POOP Coin on: May 25, 2013, 06:15:08 PM
-These joke posts are getting just as annoying as the new alts coming out every 5 minutes......

Hey, someone is inserting ASCII messages in the POOPchain...
dust  Angry
574  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Introducing the POOP Coin on: May 25, 2013, 06:11:38 PM
Warning, premined.


PD: transfer me some  Cheesy

transfer 1,000,000 to rme

Transfer 1,000,000 to Jessi

51% attack

transfer 2,000,000 to DiamondCardz

Fail, the genesis block is already created  Grin
575  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Introducing the POOP Coin on: May 25, 2013, 06:10:39 PM
GENESIS BLOCK OF THE POOPCHAIN

Quote
576  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Introducing the POOP Coin on: May 25, 2013, 06:08:12 PM
Warning, premined.


PD: transfer me some  Cheesy
577  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alt-coin creation tutorial on: May 23, 2013, 05:11:07 PM
I want a easy method to create an alt coin.  Wink
578  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: [ANN] btczz.com brazzers passwords service on: May 23, 2013, 05:04:52 PM
Spammer, I have seen that post like 10 times on reddit.  Wink
579  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / [DEVS] Idea for improving Blockchain download and verification speeds on: May 23, 2013, 02:42:03 PM
Currently, the blockchain size is 7.5 GB (235.000 blocks) and it takes more than 24 hours to download and verify with an average home connection.

My idea does not need any type of hard-fork or change in the protocol, It can be implemented in alternative clients or in Bitcoin-QT today without any incompatibility.

Downloading the whole blockchain for an average user at 20mbps should take 50 minutes but the Bitcoin-QT checks every single transaction since the genesis block.


Implementation in clients (Bitcoin-QT):

Every 4032 blocks (28 days in average) a Blockchain Block Checksum is generated by a trusted developer and included in the Bitcoin Client.

This Checksum consists in a hash of the blockchain at the actual length. For security, 6 hashes are involved.
Example of a Blockchain Block Checksum:

Quote
SHA512
SHA256
SHA384
SHA1
MD5
CRC32
Quote
ee26b0dd4af7e749aa1a8ee3c10ae9923f618980772e473f8819a5d4940e0db27ac185f8a0e1d5f 84f88bc887fd67b143732c304cc5fa9ad8e6f57f50028a8ff
768412320f7b0aa5812fce428dc4706b3cae50e02a64caa16a782249bfe8efc4b7ef1ccb126255d 196047dfedf17a0a9
9f86d081884c7d659a2feaa0c55ad015a3bf4f1b2b0b822cd15d6c15b0f00a08
a94a8fe5ccb19ba61c4c0873d391e987982fbbd3
098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6
accf8b33

You can try to obtain a collision that matches one hash but the probabilities that you find a collision for 6 hashes is near 0.

Also, this Checksums expire in 168 days (6 months aprox.) (if they do not contain any of the last 24192 blocks they are discarded). This is done to prevent a long time attack trying to find a collision in a old blockchain block checksum and to reduce the number of checksums hardcoded in the Bitcoin-QT source (only 6).



So, your Bitcoin-QT client has a list hashes of the Blockchain at different heights, what for?

People can start uploading Blockchain backups (one backup every 4032 blocks)  via Torrent, HTTP, FTP or sharing a HardDrive and you can just download it and move it to your Bitcoin directory.

When you start your Bitcoin-QT client it checks that the Blockchain Backup is valid and it has not expired (more than 6 months old).
If it is valid the client does not need to verify every single transaction and can just start downloading the remaining blocks. (If it is the lastest checkpoint backup you only have to download and verify 4032 blocks).



Pros:
- Less download and verify time to get the Blockchain

Cons:
- A developer can hard code an untrusted hash. (If you do not trust the person who codes Bitcoin-QT you cannot use it, he can just change other part of the code).



Summary:
A criptography secure method to download the blockchain via torrent or other method and do not need to verify every single transaction (only the last 4032 blocks are verified).
For additional information read the whole post.
580  Local / Esquina Libre / Re: Ripple vs Bitcoin - Quien gana la batalla? on: May 23, 2013, 05:14:32 AM
Ripple como moneda es una estafa pues no fue diseñado para eso sino para intercambiar monedas unas por otras.
Las XRP solo se usan para pagar fees, con 100XRP tienes para toda tu vida pero no se deberían vender.

XRP NO ES UNA MONEDA Y NO SE DEBERÍA VENDER.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!