Ognasty, Hilariousandco. Please look into my thread and help me out since Lauda doing bundled of shit works with her power. I request the other ALU team members, please do not troll me. I have added on SMAS list by last year and since I have problem to getting project and community works I have requested lauda to take a quality review on me but she did not replied for more than three days. After that I sent the remainder pm to her. She replied this below. https://imgur.com/a/HyKTjUOThen I have quoted on SMAS light version about this issue. If after that also she did not care about the query. Check all the information discussed on SMAS thread below. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.msg35633164#msg35633164Since she is being in SMAS manager list. I did not get the properly from Lauda. Next day I have wrote a feedback about how she responded to me on her feedback with the proper reference. Without proper reference she snipped my sent feedback, she tagged says 'Leaving false retaliatory feedback, i.e. spreading lies after spamming me with requests and their nonsense Avoid this toxic member unless you want trouble'I hope DT and moderators need to more loyal not like this person. I have sent the pm to hilariousandco also about this issue. Hope he will do remedy for me. Please tag the Lauda since she n number untrusted feedback and sending the incorrect feedback to normal forumers.Laugh out Loud! Most of the DT members are part of the trust abuse syndicate! I've been ripped off by members of the SMAS group several times and when I complained, they sicked their sock puppets on me ---> Don't be fooled, they're only in this to propagate their scams. However, Ognasty and Hilariousandco are a couple of the more legitimate members on the forum --- >they just don't have the power to prevent the group of other DT'ers from coordinating their attacks. Just realize that the trust system was designed to reward the better thieves in the crypto-economic space ---> That's no secret, so just ignore the trust ratings because those with green paint are the least trustworthy on the site. Don't trust anybody here until they've earned your trust personally, and build your own trust network because the scammers are in control here and nobody can prevent it. They all go back and forth giving each other green trust for pulling off big scams while making false accusations and marking their competitors campaign members with red trust for simply participating in a competitive campaingn. @moderators. -snip- Moderators don't deal with anything in the trust system. Scams are not moderated. Trust is not moderated. The only thing moderators cover is anything that violates the rules (i.e. spam, wrong section, explicitly illegal content). The aTriz case is indirectly linked to Lauda. Yup....first honest thing you've said that I can relate to here. The SMAS group has been abusing the trust system and ripping people off for years and nobody says a thing about it ---> In fact, they rip people off, give their victims red trust when they complain, then give one another green trust so that they can pull off better scams. And it's all done with the blessings of the site moderators. It's funny how obvious it is when you guys cover one another's dishonest behavior by giving each other green trust, like you congratulating yahoo62278 ( and by proximity --> master-P), after they pulled a couple huge exit scams. So, yup, I agree ---> scams are acceptable here but bad posts are intolerable. Last time you marked me for not providing enough proof ---> I have the proof if you want it. It's obvious you're butthurt over your red trust but let's not drag me into your delusional thought process. I by no means have ever pulled off or tried pulling off any exit scam. Masterp and his bs had nothing to do with me except his retarded ass robbed me of 7btc
|
|
|
No segwit addresses will be added, and if you're not in the sheet you're not in. It's not hard to open a spreadsheet n read
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified
|
|
|
Why should I pm satry while in fact satry and I are officemate, and one more thing I don't have any concerns with satry cause she's not the campaign manager.
Yet you posted your chat logs. Why should you chat with Satry if you are "officemates"? It's a laughably irrelevant excuse in lieu of a simple yes/no answer. Funny how you ignored the last part, i.e. how did you send the text of the message to Satry? You probably already explained this to yahoo who seems to be satisfied so why don't you explain it everyone else as well. Try to construct a good paragraph cause your English is very hard to understand!!
My offer with crayons still stands. Mate. This was already done and proven. Yahoo has given them a chance to prove themselves that they're not the same person using telegram. Now in both cases, you can just judge their posting styles but not their accounts anymore. There's no need for you guys to be clarified as well for the reason this forum is running anonymously for its members. AND FOR THE NOOBSSaying that my account was also an alt. Prove it. I'll gonna come into your shitholes with my BOOM BOOM POW . Investigate my account, if you can see anything fishy and proof that this an alt, I'll quit this forum and even leave my campaign to yahoo. But if not, maybe you should be the one to quit here for speaking non sense. I DARE YOU SHIT NOOBS. Now, I'm done here. The PharmacistNow, I guess we're right eh? This issue has been cleared. Time to deleted those redmarks... You are acting pretty muck like a prick here. Might wanna tone it down a bit. The Pharmacist is correct in his assessment, he has the right to keep his tag there. Just because they have convinced me they are 2 different people, doesn't mean they have convinced anyone else. It is their job to convince the whole forum however they can. My opinion has nothing to do with whatever anyone else thinks
|
|
|
Sheet has been turned in to Baryom
|
|
|
I have spoken with what seemed to be both users who are accused here and am satisfied that I believe they are 2 different people. The whole reason for this thread was not to get everyone to be on my side and share my point of view, but to give the accused a chance to prove their case.
The 2 pms looked pretty curious, and there were some great arguments for and against these 2. Giving them the benefit of doubt here.
I appreciate everyone who made a post here and value every opinion that was given. You obviously will make your own conclusions here and that's 100% fine. I am just glad everyone gave me some points to consider
|
|
|
Payments were sent to those who qualified
|
|
|
Those two PM's are damn similar to each other. I think that nobody will hold a grudge against you for flagging those members. Such coincidences are rarely, truly coincidental Yet, as a prof of multi-account... tough nut to crack. If I were you, I would just ban them from my campaign and that's it, no extra red or accusations but that's just me. Maybe a simple PM from you with reprimand, rebuke and reprehension will make those guys behave? You are a busy man, probably no time for a good investigation, I'm sure community will deliver I'm not worried about anyone holding a grudge. Many people like me as well as a few don't, life goes on either way. I have made thew accused aware that this thread is here and that he may respond. As far as his neg goes, if the community deems these are not alts I will remove his paint. If the majority agrees as I am pretty sure will be the case, then his neg stays because IMO cheating any campaign is grounds for a neg.
|
|
|
Normally I don't look for the communities opinion on much but in this case I would like to hear some reactions and thoughts. I was in the middle of grading Byteballs twitter campaign when I received these 2 pms within a few minutes of each other. As you can see the messages are pretty damn close to the same. Should their neg trust stay? Are these pms enough to prove they're the same person? I'll leave this open for discussion for 24 hours
|
|
|
Just spoke with Tony and he says this will last probably another month
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified, as far as I know this campaign is continuing. Tony has not said stop yet. I'll confirm and repost later today
|
|
|
Payments have been sent to those who qualified, this campaign is now closed you may remove sigs
|
|
|
Sheet has been turned into Tony. Everyone should be paid within 24 hours
|
|
|
Hello sir, please take a look at my profile. I am low rank but I have 139 earned merits.
Btctalk name: bitmover Rank: Member Current post count: 482 BTC Address: 3JKX8dcFaPKZ5iQAmRp5D2PVjPUHSWVP6r Wear appropriate signature: Yes Wear avatar: N/A
Added
|
|
|
Sheet has been updated with new members, still accepting a few guys
|
|
|
Sheet has been sent to owner, congrats to pitiflin, Indrawan77, St4yInTh3D4rk, and Findingnemo for this weeks bonuses
|
|
|
Some of my post is already deleted and I don't know why. The date I start in this 8th round was April 18 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2869690.msg35002713#msg35002713), and it's already number 10 count except this post. But when I check the spread sheet, my start post count is 334 and when I check my total post count its only 340 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile ). Which mean, it only counted as 6 post and 4 post count is missing or already deleted. Losing some post is real, can anyone explain about it? Thanks in advance! Thinking that I need to put some extra effort just to reach the target post. The moderators are cleaning the forum,they deleting those thread that might have huge numbers of comments or those post that has the same topic or issues.so expect more deletion so what to do is be obedient checking your post counts from time to time and add some extra post for completion. But i believe Yahoo is the best manager,and i know that he will give you justice if he sees it's reasonable..your lucky having yahoo as cmpaign manager A lot of us are being affected by this clean up. A few weeks a go Yahoo was explained that the responsibility is on us to ensure that we meet the post count. But this clean up is just too much. One solution is to actually start the post count for each week, to at least see if we completed the quota for the week. Because posts from 3 months back, when deleted will affect our overall post count. I for example I am on negative for the week despite posting more than 50% for the weeks quota. You honestly must have no clue. Take a look at all the past spreadsheets. Hell take a look at spreadsheets from all my campaigns. If you did, you would see that every week is manually counted, so old posts deleted do NOT mess with your post counts at all. All your posts are looked at for the current week. If you're going to make a comment trying to help, your information should at least be accurate. The only time the current week is messed with is if posts from the current week were deleted. That, then is on you. You made the decision to post in shit spam threads or mega threads
|
|
|
Anyone who wants to change wallet addresses pm me. I'll allow you to switch to the byteball wallet
|
|
|
|