όσο πάει γίνετε και καλύτερο
https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/Παράθεση
SUMMARY:
Yes, this is a scam. Not maybe. Not possibly.
Wright is pretending he has Satoshi’s signature on Sartre’s writing. That would mean he has the private key, and is likely to be Satoshi. What he actually has is Satoshi’s signature on parts of the public Blockchain, which of course means he doesn’t need the private key and he doesn’t need to be Satoshi. He just needs to make you think Satoshi signed something else besides the Blockchain — like Sartre. He doesn’t publish Sartre. He publishes 14% of one document. He then shows you a hash that’s supposed to summarize the entire document. This is a lie. It’s a hash extracted from the Blockchain itself. Ryan Castellucci (my engineer at White Ops and master of Bitcoin Fu) put an extractor here. Of course the Blockchain is totally public and of course has signatures from Satoshi, so Wright being able to lift a signature from here isn’t surprising at all.
He probably would have gotten away with it if the signature itself wasn’t googlable by Redditors.
I think Gavin et al are victims of another scam, and Wright’s done classic misdirection by generating different scams for different audiences.
για όποιον δεν ξέρει ποιος είναι ο Kaminsky
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Kaminsky
Show Posts
ο τύπος τους δουλεύει όλους ψιλό γαζί και απλά επειδή είναι άσχετοι και καθαρά από κομπασμό σαν μεγάλα μέσα πλέον δεν παραδέχονται άμεσα τα προφανή αλλά το πάνε σιγά σιγά.
Πάντως ο μεγάλος χαμένος στην υπόθεση είναι o Gavin που έπαθε μεγάλο στραπάτσο και προσωπική αποτυχία. Μέχρι και στο r/btc δεν τον υποστηρίζει κανείς και δέχεται τεράστια κριτική. Δεν ξέρω αν μπορέσει ποτέ να επανέλθει από αυτό το λάθος.
