Jutros sam pokrenuo Ledger Live program i javilo mi je da je dostupna nadogradnja. Naravno, pokrenuo sam nadogradnju i nakon što se nova verzija instalirala, Windows Defender mi je javio da je otkrio prijetnju u datoteci "Uninstall Ledger.exe". Naravno, odmah sam isključio Ledger ali nije mi jasno kako si jedna takva tvrtka može dopustiti da joj antivirus pronađe prijetnju u datoteci. Malo sam googlao i otkrio da je netko već prijavio to kao bug. Rekli su da će ispraviti u verziji 2.2.3 ali očito problem i dalje postoji jer imam tu verziju, a vidim da je još netko prijavio da ima isti problem i s najnovijom verzijom. Ali i dalje mi nije jasno kako si jedna tvrtka koja se bavi sigurnosti može dopustiti takvu situaciju  Uglavnom, iz Ledgera kažu da je to "false positive" te da se Ledger Live može koristiti normalno. Ja ću ipak pričekati da riješe problem... |
|
|
|
Stable coin doesn't solve hyperinflation at all, because :
1. The stablecoin issuer or creator could add new more stablecoin supply anytime. It happens many times with Tether stablecoin
2. Stablecoin is only as stable as asset/fiat which backed it. If the asset/fiat experience inflation, the stablecoin also got inflated.
Thanks. We have : 1.commodity pegging such as gold standard 2. Fiat pegging such as US dollar standard. 3. Cryro-pegging such as ethereum or bitcoin standard What if we use god which is relatively stable to peg stablecoins, won't it be stable or decrease in rate of fluctuations? While gold is relative stable, it doesn't solve 1st problem i mentioned. Besides, the transparency of token creator/issuer and whether the gold actual exist/not is questionable. There are alternatives like DAI that is keeping it's price stable with algorithm. But those stablecoins too have their own problems. How does that DAI keep its price stable through algorithm without being backed up by things with relative stability. Pls, kindly explain how that work. It's a simple Google search to find that answer. Here, I "googled" that for you: https://www.google.com/search?q=how+does+dai+keep+it+value+stableThere are several articles that explain that, but you'll have to read carefully because it's not that simple. |
|
|
|
But to the contrary, I don't use a VPN since I am really not willing to hide what I am doing to my ISP provider. Can I ask why not? I don't know which country you are based in, but the majority of ISPs the world over keep tabs on what their customers are doing, which sites they are visiting, etc. Using a VPN which isn't linked to your real identity in any way (and therefore paid for in thoroughly anonymized bitcoin) is a good way to prevent this if you don't want to use Tor. I personally don't use VPN to stay anonymous simply because I don't trust that VPN company won't keep logs of who am I and of my activity. True, there are bunch of them saying they don't keep logs, but who says they won't give everything to the authorities once they come knocking on their doors? I only recently found out that Brave browser has integrated private browsing using Tor network. Did anyone try it? It looks like a really easy way to browse the Internet using Tor network. |
|
|
|
Stable coin doesn't solve hyperinflation at all, because :
1. The stablecoin issuer or creator could add new more stablecoin supply anytime. It happens many times with Tether stablecoin
2. Stablecoin is only as stable as asset/fiat which backed it. If the asset/fiat experience inflation, the stablecoin also got inflated.
Thanks. We have : 1.commodity pegging such as gold standard 2. Fiat pegging such as US dollar standard. 3. Cryro-pegging such as ethereum or bitcoin standard What if we use god which is relatively stable to peg stablecoins, won't it be stable or decrease in rate of fluctuations? While gold is relative stable, it doesn't solve 1st problem i mentioned. Besides, the transparency of token creator/issuer and whether the gold actual exist/not is questionable.This is the biggest problem not only with stablecoins pegged to gold but with every stablecoin that is pegged to something (fiat or precious metals). There are alternatives like DAI that is keeping it's price stable with algorithm. But those stablecoins too have their own problems. |
|
|
|
The biggest problem is that I think every gambler (even an addicted one) will say that gambling is fun for them. That's because almost all addicts can't or won't admit that they have an addiction. Maybe addicted gamblers think that gambling is fun, but when the game stops what stays? If he spent money for food and other family needs? What if he spend entire savings? Will it be fun? I don't think so! My opinion is still the same, addicts and potential addicts don't think about consequences of their gambling, they are ego maniacs! And that is the biggest problem, they only think their own fun for a short time! Normal person would never do something to hurt his closest ones! Addicts only think about their own addiction! I believe it's same with drug addicts, but I don't know that for sure, I never tried drugs. I agree! Nothing is special with gambling addiction. It's like any other - drug, alcohol, cigarette or any other addiction. Drinking alcohol too can be fun if a person drinks occasionally. But when it becomes too often, than that person is an addict. The same is with gambling. If it's occasionally, than it's fun. But if it's too often and if gambler spends a lot of money, then it stops being fun and becomes a problem. |
|
|
|
Naša tvrtka je uzela taj software za pronalaženje kontakata na internacionalnom tržištu.
Mining je opcija, kao što je i btc tržište opcionalno .
Sve je ok.
Jebo me pas ako sam ja shvatio što si ti ovdje napisao. Tvoja tvrtka je uzela software kojeg OP spominje da pronađe kontakte na internacionalnom tržištu? Kontakte za što? Osim toga, što će jednom takvom programu mining BTC-a? I što uopće znači "mining je opcija, kao što je i btc tržište opcionalno"? |
|
|
|
The biggest problem is that I think every gambler (even an addicted one) will say that gambling is fun for them. That's because almost all addicts can't or won't admit that they have an addiction.
It's not just about the gambler. Gambling is fun for almost everyone n the plant of earth. The addicts will understand about the addiction, but only when they are fallen info it and can't even help themselves to stop it like falling into swamp. Yeah, that's true. For an addict it's really hard to admit that they have a problem. And even when they do admit it, then it's already late. But then there should be family and friends who will help an addict to fix his problem. |
|
|
|
Ja imam valjda 50 tih ljubičastih, to sam taman kupovao po tih 100-150 F-coinsa  Prodaju li se na marketu? Ja sam vidio samo da ljudi kupuju legende i pokojeg Elite igrača. ne vjerujem da plaćaju ljudi eth za njih, ali ako se omasovi igra, vjerovatno hoće, jer će elite i legendi biti malo uz ovakvu produkciju. Dobri su ljubičasti za farmati fcoinse na world turnirima. Ali uz ovakvu cijenu, to postaje teško novim igračima. Ma nikad se igra neće "omasovit" kako ti kažeš... Jednostavno je razvoj prespor da bi se igra počela masovno igrati. Jedini način kako bi se igra mogla početi masovno igrati je kompletan redizajn sučelja (ovo sad je jednostavno ultraružno) i ubrzati razvoj. A za ubrzani razvoj potrebno je više developera koji će doći samo ako tim uspije pronaći nekog investitora. |
|
|
|
~ snip ~
Yeah, unfortunately there are many gamblers still difficult to have good self-control. They always dream to win after put more money, and they believe if doing more attempts, then the chance to win higher. In theory they are right but in fact they just get more losses. I think in this case, they need the role of family and their closest people to advice them. And where self-control comes from? I think some people just don't wish to learn to be patient, to have self-control and to not be greedy! It's something you get from experience and rethinking about consequences of your actions! Clearly some people are ego maniacs, they think only about their own satisfaction! Gambling should be fun! It's something we all agree with! But for some people and their close ones gambling can be a threat! I am in the first group, for me gambling is fun activity, and I think it's ok to gamble from time to time with money you can afford to lose! The biggest problem is that I think every gambler (even an addicted one) will say that gambling is fun for them. That's because almost all addicts can't or won't admit that they have an addiction. |
|
|
|
in the long term you can't beat the house on the games based on luck. But I know few people (but only few) who manage to stay on the plus side year after year. But they gamble only on sport and play poker. They never play games based purely on luck.
How it will be possible for those few people. If there is an exception in luck based gambling that could be due to some illegal methods or due to some extraordinary super power. I agree that sportsbetting and poker are skill based gambling on-which anyone could stay profitable for year after year. But, like you mentioned on your first statement I guess it would be too difficult for anyone to be profitable in long run with luck based gambling. I do not agree with OP. In my opinion, no one could win consistently yes even with skill based gambling. Because, for consistent winning you must have high level of discipline which may not be possible with an entertainment because there are plenty of chances for you to slip down somewhere when you are too excited about your entertainments. Oh man, is my english really that bas that no one understand me? I said (the part in bold) that those people gamble only on sport games and play poker. So I don't understand where you read that they play luck based games? |
|
|
|
Unless, it is not the kid that is gambling but someone at a right age that doesn't wanna get tracked down right? Well, the point is, the age restriction system will not really work here unless they implement KYC system with real time verification. Because merely, an ID's could still be used to steal identity to a person if they really want to gamble with a restricted age. I actually didn't think about it before. Thanks for sharing a different point of view. Also, agreed that KYC implementation make users more 'vulnerable' to data leaks but in general KYC is needed for projects that aim to be legal and fair. But what keeps a kid from faking his ID making it look like he's old enough? I saw many KYC procedures that asks that a user uploads he's ID front and back side and that's it. What is keeping a kid to "photoshop" his ID to show he was born in 2000. and not in 2010.? |
|
|
|
Just like trading, most people lose because they don't understand what they are getting into. They don't understand odds and risk management, they don't understand that the odds are likely to be against them.
However, just because most lose, doesn't mean it can't be profitable. You just need to be aware that more likely than not, you're going to lose more than you win, or possibly even bankrupt yourself.
When it comes to games related only to luck and having a house edge, it is mathematically obvious that the longer someone plays, the more certain their loss is. Only in games where, apart from luck, experience and knowledge that allow you to gain an advantage, can it be profitable. That's why I think that in games related only to luck, such as, for example, slot machines or roulette, there is no possibility that they will be profitable over time. Games such as betting on sport or poker, along with growing experience and knowledge, can be profitable. I agree that in the long term you can't beat the house on the games based on luck. But I know few people (but only few) who manage to stay on the plus side year after year. But they gamble only on sport and play poker. They never play games based purely on luck. |
|
|
|
Not everytime or all the time, it depends on the kind of approach you will take and the strategy you will employ.
That might sound interesting, but is there an appropriate strategy to return the funds we have spent on gambling? So far I only believe that there is no right strategy to apply to gambling if it is not balanced with good control. Do we have to have a target of how much money we can get every day on gambling to return the funds we have spent? For example 2-5% of the capital we use. I don't think that there is a proven strategy that works when you want to cover your loses. If there is, then no one would be losing and casinos would have to shut down. Casinos live out of people that wants to cover their loses. However, there are people that have good self-control and are able to end one period (a year) on a plus side. But in order to do that, gambler should not try to cover their loses but play each ticket like it's a first one. |
|
|
|
But for those who gamble occasionally or just use their extra funds to play will have more peace of mind and they will enjoy the gambling itself. And I think, I am included in the latter part. If I don't have extra, I prefer to spend it in more important things now that almost all of us are in bad situation.
Same here. I also played gambling only with my extra money. Extra money means not big amount of money. I know it will kill my family if I played with all my funds (money). Never forget about the most urgent needs although the gambling games are really interested to play more and more. Self-control should be the key to prevent from playing excessively, and don't follow the emotion. Yes, but there is a lot of people who can't control themselves and after few winnings they start thinking "oh man, if only I put more into those winning bets, I would have been rich". And then they start raising the amount of money they gamble. Then they start losing that money and then start to gamble even more to cover for that losses and so on... In the end, they can't get out of that circle. |
|
|
|
|
I have two suggestions:
1. You could add column in which you would write currency in which rewards is payed. I know there are not many altcoin campaigns that pays in BTC or ETH but they occasionally show up.
2. It would be great if there would be a column that shows if project's token/coin is already listed on some exchange. With my experience in altcoin campaigns, I would never participate in a campaign with project that's not listed anywhere.
|
|
|
|
Inspiracija potječe odande definitivno, ali definitivno ne bi rekao da kopiram
Ma nedaj se obeshrabrit. Ako projekt zgotovis i bude nesto od njega, super. Ako ne, bar ti nije dosadno. Moj problem je sto imam hrpu ideja, no na pola puta dobijem novu ideju, pa nikad nis ne zavrsim  E vidiš... A moj problem je što mi svaka ideja zvuči glupo. Recimo da mi je netko prije 20 godina došao s idejom da napravi stranicu gdje će ljudi stavljati svoje statuse i slike, a ostali će to pratiti i komentirati, rekao bi mu da se najeo ludih gljiva. A vidimo sad koliko su Facebook, Twitter i ostale društvene mreže popularne. Istina, sad se preko društvenih mreža može puno više od obične objave statusa, ali tako su krenule. |
|
|
|
Ne znam može li se odjednom napraviti i otvaranje i zatvaranje pozicije na Bybitu, po helpu koji sam malo pogledao ne bih rekao, na Binance ne može. Ne vidim ništa čudno u tome jer ni na jednom klasičnom exchangu nisam vidio da možeš kupiti i prodati u jednoj operaciji, tako nešto radi scalping bot.
Drugo što uvijek jako zbunjuje je Buy/Long i Sell/Short, negdje piše isključivo tako i nikad ne može biti Buy/Short i Sell/Long. Meni to nije logično jer uvijek se prvo kupuje neki contract i tako se otvara pozicija, a zatvaranje pozicije je prodaja. Moju logiku ne moraju svi prihvatiti, ali očito istu koriste u spomenutoj telegram grupi pa sam zato to naglasio, sve njihove objave počinju sa BUY LONG ili BUY SHORT.
Zašto bi to bilo logično? Meni je logično da mogu postaviti limit order po nekoj cijeni i odmah postavim uvjete za zatvaranje. Ako se limit order izvrši, onda se izvrši i postavljanje uvjeta za zatvaranje tog ordera. Iako, istina... Na "običnoj" burzi ne možeš postaviti buy order i odmah postaviti sell order koji bi se izvršio u slučaju da prođe buy order. Ja sam ovo spomenuo zato što na burzi koju koristim (neka lijeva burza na kojoj sam u promociji dobio par USDT pa se igram s time) to mogu napraviti. |
|
|
|
big_daddy vidim da još ne razumiješ, dobro su napisali BUY SHORT: 6870-6920$
Moj je savjet umjesto da čekaš sljedeću dojavu da probaš napraviti bilo kakav trejd pa će ti sigurno biti jasnije.
Da bi napravio cijeli trejd moraš prvo kupiti (long ili short), uvijek se prvo kupuje. Ako si uspio kupiti vidjećeš svoju otvorenu poziciju i probaj je zatvoriti bilo kako, imaš opcije limit ili market.
Ne moraš iz 3 puta zatvarati niti čekati neku cijenu, napravi sve to u par minuta, ne možeš skoro ništa izgubiti ako staviš par dolara i niski leverage. Najbrže i najjednostavnije da kupiš s opcijom market i prodaš isto market.
Možeš i pročitati na Bybitu help, za početak je dovoljno: How To open a position i Position Closing.
Ovaj boldani dio mi nije jasan. Istina, nisam još probao trejdati na Bybit platformi ali svejedno mi zvuči čudno. Znači prvo moraš postaviti short/long order po nekoj cijeni i čekati da se ispuni. I tek kad se ispuni cijena, odnosno order prođe, tek onda možeš određivati na koliko će ti biti "take profit" i "stop loss"? Ne možeš to odmah podesiti pa da se automatski postave uvjeti zatvaranja? |
|
|
|
wow, šta je ba ovo, tek sad viidjeh, kakve su ovo nagrade za euro cup. 29 000 za prvog?? ovi baš hoće da naprave razliiku između prvih 4-5 i ostalih da ih nitko nkad ne može stići. Da nije žalosno, bilo bi smiješno. Ja trebam iigrat mjesec i po dan i inoć da bih zaradio koliko će kerka, prince ili sloth zaradit od jednog turnira.
Ni meni se ovo ne sviđa, te nagrade su puno previlike za turnire. Trebali su povećati nagrade iza finalne recimo. Npr. da se dobije 100F već za samo sudjelovanje, Pa čim prođeš skupinu već malo bolja nagrada i tako. Također ne mislim da moja ekipa može nastaviti osvajati te turnire redovito a ja sam sada za 3/4 osvojena u zadnja 2 mjeseca zaradio koliko će Kerka od ovog prvog sljedećeg. Jedno pitanje jel netko vidio moj post sličnog sadržaja ovome jučer ili prekjučer? Siguran sam da sam ga napisao a nema ga nigdje kao niti poruke da je recimo obrisan.Nisam vidio takav post. Moguće da si ga napisao, stisnuo Post ali je forum možda izbacio upozorenje da je netko u međuvremenu nešto napisao, a ti nisi opet stisnuo Post. Meni se to znalo dogoditi pa sam mislio da sam napisao post, a ono nema ništa... |
|
|
|
Znate li da Gmail ne radi razliku između e-mail adresa s točkom i bez točke? Na primjer, imate e-mail adresu ime.prezime@gmail.com. U isti inbox ćete dobiti poruku poslanu na imeprezime@gmail.com. Već dugo vremena znam za ovu foru, ali tek sad mi je palo na pamet da bi moglo biti korisno ljudima koji žele imati dva različita accounta na jednoj web stranici ali s istom e-mail adresom. Ne znam funkcionira li s nekim drugim besplatnim mail servisima, ali za Gmail znam da radi jer sam upravo probao  Zasto samo dvije adrese? Mozes stavit tocku iza bilo kojeg slova. Nije da mora biti bas izmedju imena i prezimena. Ako imas dugacak Email to ti je mozda i 10 razlicitih mail adresa. Zar ne? Ma naravno. Ovo sam samo uzeo kao primjer da vidite što znači da Gmail ne radi razliku u adresi s točkom i bez. Vjerojatno ima još kombinacija (možda dvije točke za redom) pa se može dobiti hrpa adresa koje vode u isti inbox. Je li netko probao na nekom drugom mail servisu? Iskreno, toliko sam navikao na Gmail da niti ne znam koji još mail servisi su popularni. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
