This one looks like the miner's mistake, he might have entered an invalid bitcoin address in his mining console or configuration.

Yup, the "orphaned blocks" creates a "mini-blockchain" which are "short" because almost all of the nodes are invalidating it and after the remaining ones that validates the transactions in those blocks (considered as running a new coin's blockchain: a hard fork) stopped, that new/incidental/accidental "hard fork's" blockchain has ended which makes it "shorter" than the valid chain.

BitcoinCash and other "Planned Hard Forks" however, got a considerably high amount of nodes to continue their own blockchain.
And as bitmover said, it is now a different coin in a different blockchain.

<edit: fixed quoted msg>

The author have access to his 2FA wallet, he/she wants to spend the balance from his android electrum wallet which is a "read only" standard wallet due to what he stated in the OP.

And as I said,
What he needs is the SEED or it's Master Private Key (Master Extended Private Key) to make a spendable standard (address "1") wallet.

Ok, your desktop electrum's addresses starts with "3" And your android starts with "1".

Just follow this: (in your PC)

• Get your F2A Electrum wallet's Seed.
• Click New/Restore
• Select" I already have the seed", Standard wallet and the standard address in your android electrum should be included there.

The problem here is, by using the Mater Public Key, you will not be able to spend the bitcoins in it because it is a "Read-only" wallet.
You need the SEED or the Master Private Key to make a spendable wallet.

If that's the only transaction in your history and the amount is displayed as "+0.01" then, that must be your withdrawn funds from Kraken and you still got your $100 in your wallet.
Your current balance is displayed just below (lower-left edge) your Electrum GUI.

It's either you didn't broadcast your "send" transaction to Coinpayments, You're offline/not connected (red circle) [But it should be displayed in the history tab] or more likely, you've opened a different wallet file.
You can check if you have another wallet by clicking "choose" button on Electrum's Password screen/Open menu.

How many echos (send&receive) your command prompt received? Four? (four can't even define the average)
If yes, try to increase the number of ping request to 100 or 1000 and increase the buffer size from default 32 to 128bytes:
Then look for the Maximum and the Average, it must be Maximum: <120 ; Average: ≤100.

This belongs to: Computer Hardware Board under Marketplace/Goods.
There's a "Move Topic" button below (bottom-left) the page, Select: Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Goods > Computer hardware when prompted.

---

You may have to provide more information about the Rigs (PSU/GPU/SDD Brands & Estimated usage time, etc.), your location and your personal warranty.
If you're accepting crypto, escrow service is must because of your rank and fresh trust rating.

Are you sure that that was the correct tx id?
That looks like a "Batch" withdrawal from an exchange, there's too many outputs and among them, there are two addresses that's within the category ($100 received transaction) which are: 15osvZgQXXU91ghVnAE4QmW1zC8z2u3mDU - (Unspent) | 1NkUYdAhCKgGGj9TdYDWudhzKC2J1ivWhR - (Unspent) 0.01636 BTC.

That looks like a "receiving" transaction.
In the history tab, if it says ex. "+0.001" you are the receiver, it it displays "-0.001" you're the one that sent it.

Can you provide a screenshot of your Electrum's History tab?

Not as an in-game currency, that's a horrible idea even if LN became free of transaction charge.
Lightning Network can be used as a payment method to purchase in-game credits an alternative of credit cards and game cards.

The best candidate of all the cryptocurrency-related technology we have now for in-game currency is: Smart Contract - Tokens.
Potentially, it can make the in-game economy hack-proof, hyper inflation-proof and duplication-proof.
Too-much-proof but imagine if an item like a Rare Sword can be limited to 20 units represented by a token with a hard cap of 20, the same limitation can be applied in the game's currency using another token (Initial supply will be distributed among NPC traders).
The problem is trading them, it's going to be slow, so the whole game must act like an exchange when it comes to trading items and currency, nothing is traded onchain within the game, but the items can be traded outside the game if they requested to take it out (withraw).

LN however, can't be used as part of a game's economy.

On scenarios when your printed/written seed phrase is in a risky hiding place, this could be a good layer of security.

With a "noise paper" as your stored backup (in a vault), even if someone get access to it, he will find it harder to (or never) be able to read the written/hidden seed.
But this could backfire to the user, according to the site:
If you lost your revealers, there will be no way for you to recover your seed unless,
you have another non-encrypted copy of your seed somewhere (but if have one, why did you even use a revealer?).

Here's my honest opinion: The "revealer" thing is just a gimmick, like Hardware Wallets.

Have you tried linking your Trezor to Electrum (view-only using the "hardware wallet" option)? Or restore using your seed? Use the correct derivation path for SegWit addresses,
Enable the tab "console" type:If it said "true" the address belongs to that seed.

---

Why is it still receiving small amount of Bitcoins until this week?

Seems like coinpayments doesn't accept direct transactions from exchanges, batch transactions might cause an issue to them.
and/or
Kraken deducted the withdrawal fee from the value you requested making the final sent balance short from coinpayment's merchant requested BTC amount.

Which of those outputs is your coinpayment deposit address and how much BTC they're expecting?

Some beginner's mistakes I can think of are:

• Mistaking Bitcoins as BitcoinCash or BitCore.
• Sending late to an invoice (temporary) address.
• Misconfigured his wallet's Satoshi value (BTC, mBTC & μBTC) thus, sending the incorrect amount.
• Sent BTC to a fake site.

But I'm going for this:
Wrong copy or "clipboard hijacking" incident.

You can use these if you want (Black-Gold Theme). I made it using Adobe Photoshop CS6.

---

There's no copyright issues aside from satoshi's bitcoin logo (site's favicon)

I can make a different color/theme for free if you like, as long as I have spare time.

Is this really a Hacking incident or maybe his fault?
Can you please tell us the Bookmarked link of Crytopia in your browser, it might be a fake site.

What doesn't add up is his given address in the OP,
If it is an exchange wallet, the transactions will not look like that.
It looks like an address within a wallet, and some transactions indicates that the address was used as "change" address sometime.
Was it the culprit's address?

This is from the "accidentally released" UI of v3.1 from the post: How to use the 'Revealer' plugin in Electrum 3.1?

That was shown last v3.1 update (Around March 8).
Here's the post that clarifies the OP: xdrpx's reply

---

Also, this thread belongs to Electrum Child-Board.

We already have the Scam Accusations Board where you should post those scam alerts.
It's under Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Trading Discussion > Scam Accusations, and I'm sure that your post wont easily get "invisible" even after a week 'coz there aren't any Megathreads in that board.

The issue submitted by Mageant (Bug: Editing Description from Context Menu) has been resolved.

I can confirm it using Windows Stand-alone Version 3.1.3.
Now the context menu "Edit Description" is working as intended when any Fiat currency was selected in the preferences.

Once or twice it got passed to a Coin Mixing Service, it will be harder for you to find the culprit via following the traces of transactions. Even the remaning unspent balance.

I bet the culprit didn't used an exchange to shapeshift your Bitcoins.
Exchanges are requesting verifications (for KYC) and it's an obvious wrong move for him.

If he does use an exchange, contact the administration and request to track down any deposits that came from your suspected addresses.
But the thing is, most of those exchanges' customer service are crap, others have been known for neglecting reports from customers for months.

Good Luck.

I see 

Anyways, the good news is: They (Moderators) are now responding to "lock thread" requests.
I tried it twice (With the right reasons) and afterwards they locked the reported threads.

In one instance, I PMed the Author right after using the "Report to Moderator" button.
After a few hours the user had sent me a PM saying that "a mod already locked his thread".

You can lock the thread now.