Restrikcije su jako dobro kratkoročno rješenje ali mislim da će dugoročno donjeti puno više patnje većem broju ljudi pa i državi. Takav udarac na ekonomiju ne mogu izgurati ni puno "jače" ekonomije a pogotovo naša hrvatska di pola ljudi živi od turizma. Da, restrikcije su vjerojatno spasile dobar broj života trenutno ali nitko nikada neće izbrojati koliko će ljudi izgubiti život tokom sljedećih 10 ili 50 godina kao posljedicu ovih restrikcija.
A da ne pričam uopće o tome koliko će pasti kavaliteta života velikom dijelu populacije. A još imamo i problematiku osobnih sloboda i privatnosti koja je u najboljem slučaju nepovratno narušena na jedno duže razdoblje.
Ne kažem da nije tako... Moguće da će puno ljudi umrijeti kao posljedica krize (ne kao posljedica restrikcija nego kao posljedica krize) koja će uslijediti nakon korone. Ali naša ekonomija je toliko u banani da vjerujem da bi završili u krizi bez obzira koliko stroge ili blage restrikcije uveli. Prema tome, ajmo pokušati spasiti što više života tako što ćemo ostati doma. Zar je kava, piva, šetnja parkom stvarno toliko važnija od života nečijeg bake ili djeda? Istina, svi koji su do sad umrli imali su kronične bolesti. Ali vjerujem da bi njihovim obiteljima ipak bilo draže da su poživjeli još koji mjesec ili godinu. Recimo moj tata je tlakaš. Prema tome automatski je u rizičnoj skupini. On se s visokim tlakom nosi dobro jer uzima terapiju i siguran sam da će živjeti još puno godina. A tko zna što bi bilo da se zarazi... Ali poanta mog posta nije bila u propitivanju trebaju li nam restrikcije ili ne i u kojoj mjeri. Poanta je bila da mi (tu mislim na Hrvate kao narod, ne na kolegu Rikafipa) uvijek samo volimo kenjkati i nikad nam ništa nije dovoljno dobro. Sad smo pri dnu po broju zaraženih i umrlih ali imamo jako restriktivne mjere. A da imamo manje restriktivne mjere i da smo pri vrhu po broju zaraženih i umrlih, onda bi opet kenjali kako Vlada ništa nije napravila da zaštiti narod. Jer onda bi za primjer uzimali Vladu neke druge zemlje koja je pri dnu po broju zaraženih. |
|
|
|
imamo najvece restrikcije od svih zemalja u odnosu na broj umrlih i nama je to dobra stvar
Čekaj, stvarno? Pa zar bi to trebala biti loša stvar? Zar bi bolje bilo da imamo blage restrikcije uz veći broj umrlih? A da je među tim umrlima (ne daj Bože) netko od tvoje obitelji? Onda bi isto tako mislio? Ova tvoja izjava je samo dokaz da nama nikad ništa nije dobro. Sad nije dobro što imamo najveće restrikcije uz najmanje umrlih. A da je obrnuto onda bi opet pisali kako Vlada (opet) ništa nije napravila da se situacija s koronom ne dovede pod kontrolu  EDIT: Znam da ovim postom samo otvaram mogućnost rasprave do unedogled, ali nisam mogao šutjeti. Da je situacija takva u Italiji, a kod nas da je situacija iz Italije onda bi svi pisali kako je Vlada opet prekasno reagirala i kako su talijani super to izveli. |
|
|
|
The exchange does matter because it creates the volume of that coin. A good exchange means that the coin is serious with what they are working with. Unlike the other coins that lists their coin everywhere and mostly unpopular exchanges, they just want to get rid of it as much as they can because they don't want investors to be the first one to dump it off and that's the main agenda of the developers. But, if they are serious and looking long term for the coin, they'll create a good volume through listing to a good exchange.
I don't agree. I think that a good project doesn't have to be listed on a good exchange (I guess that by a good exchange you mean Binance). I think it's better for a team to focus on the development and not on the listing. It's better to pay more money for a good developer than for a listing on Binance. And if you create a good project, then it will be listed on Binance sooner or later, and without paying the listing fee. I think that too much focus in crypto is on listing on Binance and other "good" exchanges. More focus should be on having a good idea for a project and a good team that will support the project. Well, I agree with @batang_bitcoin, I think what he meant by a good exchange means that it should be listed in an exchange where it is most likely used by a large number of users. It has a positive effect wherein it has more potential to be invested by large investors. You are mixing up paying to get listed on an exchange and paying for marketing. I think that paying for the marketing is by far better than paying for a listing. Especially if exchanges want several hundreds thousands for a listing. And multiply that by the number of exchanges... And now imagine what would a good marketing specialist do with that amount of money? |
|
|
|
Ne znam što su to popustili... otvorili trgovine nekoliko sati duže tri dana prije Uskrsa? Ne vidim kakve koristi ima crkva od toga. A ako misliš na procesiju 'za križen' s Hvara, čini mi se da je na procesiji sudelovalo manje ljudi nego što napravi đir splitskom rivom u jednom satu.  Ne, ne, nisam mislio na taj izolirani slucaj sa Hvara, nego se zadnja dva dana toliko ljudi pojavilo na ulice da je to nenornmalno, cak su popustili sa pregledima propusnica Ljudi su vani i druze se kao da se sve pomalo vraca u normalu a mi na vrhuncu epidemije Zasto? Zato je se uskrs mora proslaviti? Pa mogla se nacija strpiti jos desetak dana i popustile bi mjere, bojim se da nam nove rigoroznije mjere ne ginu od sredine iduceg tjedna na dalje Ne bih rekao da je Uskrs glavni razlog za popuštanje. Mislim da je jednostavno ljudima dosta izolacije. Nisu navikli na to, a sjedeći doma jednostavno izgubiš svijest o tome kako je virus i dalje "vani" te je i dalje opasan. Ja gledam po sebi... Zadnja tri tjedna radim od doma i jednostavno sam nekako manje opterećen virusom i bolesti. Naravno, to ne znači da izlazim van ali jednostavno ne razmišljam više o paničnom pranju ruku nakon svakog dodira kvake. Osim toga, ovo s propusnicama je takva glupost da to nije normalno. Ne kažem da je nepotrebno nego da se provodi bez veze. Jučer sam pročitao da je izdano nešto manje od milijun propusnica. E, MILIJUN propusnica u državi koja ima četiri milijuna stanovnika. Pa koji će nam vrag propusnice ako ju svatko može dobiti? Što se tiče Crkve (namjerno sam napisao velikim slovom jer mislim na instituciju, a ne neku građevinu), osuđujem svakog svećenika koji zanemaruje pravila Stožera i svejedno planira održati misu. Vjernik sam ali svejedno mislim da je tako nešto nedopustivo! |
|
|
|
The exchange does matter because it creates the volume of that coin. A good exchange means that the coin is serious with what they are working with. Unlike the other coins that lists their coin everywhere and mostly unpopular exchanges, they just want to get rid of it as much as they can because they don't want investors to be the first one to dump it off and that's the main agenda of the developers. But, if they are serious and looking long term for the coin, they'll create a good volume through listing to a good exchange.
I don't agree. I think that a good project doesn't have to be listed on a good exchange (I guess that by a good exchange you mean Binance). I think it's better for a team to focus on the development and not on the listing. It's better to pay more money for a good developer than for a listing on Binance. And if you create a good project, then it will be listed on Binance sooner or later, and without paying the listing fee. I think that too much focus in crypto is on listing on Binance and other "good" exchanges. More focus should be on having a good idea for a project and a good team that will support the project. |
|
|
|
|
I'm more concerned will the transition to the PoS finally solve the scaling issues than what will it to for the price of Ethereum. Of course, I would love if Ethereum could make 10x but let us focus on developing rather than on the price. Price increase will come if the devs manage to make a smooth transition to Ethereum 2.0
|
|
|
|
IEO didn't put an end to the scam. IEO promoted scam tokens to a new level when you look at how many projects cts have exit scam since the onset of IEOs. Exchnage were supposed to do a thorough background chack before carrying out any IEO for any project but some exchnage doesn't.
That is why you should not join the IEO of small and bullshit exchanges in this market. Most of the IEOs on small exchanges are scams, you cannot get a profit by investing in projects there. If you want to make a profit from IEO then you should join IEO of the leading exchanges in this market, you will definitely get a profit because those are good projects. If a team conduct an IEO on Binance, it doesn't mean they have a good project. It just means that they have more money to pay for the IEO. Don't be fooled by thinking that every project that has IEO on Binance (or any other "leading" exchange) is a good project. Besides, even good projects can turn out to be a failure if a team behind it isn't good enough. Binance has a lot of money, so they won't need the money for new projects. If you want to be IEO at Binance exchange, your project must meet their standards. They will have multiple tests on your project before making final decisions Warren Buffet has a lot of money too, but don't expect him to do something free of charge. I'm not saying that Binance will reject an IEO of a good project. I'm saying that if someone pays them enough money, they will surely conduct an IEO for them. They will not risk their reputation with IEO. I think that to be IEO at Binance exchange, projects have to spend a lot of money, but their projects must be of high quality. I have looked at most of the already IEO projects in binance, all of them are the best projects in 2019 Were those the best projects in the 2019. or they brought the most money to the investors? That's not he same. Of course that projects that conduct an IEO on Binance brings the most profit to the investors because an IEO on Binance brings hype to those projects. But I don't think that a project is good just because it conducts an IEO or gets listed on Binance. Why wouldn't a project be good if it conducts an IEO on some small exchange? Good project is a project with great team and that solves a real world problem. It doesn't matter where they conduct an IEO or gets listed. |
|
|
|
IEO didn't put an end to the scam. IEO promoted scam tokens to a new level when you look at how many projects cts have exit scam since the onset of IEOs. Exchnage were supposed to do a thorough background chack before carrying out any IEO for any project but some exchnage doesn't.
That is why you should not join the IEO of small and bullshit exchanges in this market. Most of the IEOs on small exchanges are scams, you cannot get a profit by investing in projects there. If you want to make a profit from IEO then you should join IEO of the leading exchanges in this market, you will definitely get a profit because those are good projects. If a team conduct an IEO on Binance, it doesn't mean they have a good project. It just means that they have more money to pay for the IEO. Don't be fooled by thinking that every project that has IEO on Binance (or any other "leading" exchange) is a good project. Besides, even good projects can turn out to be a failure if a team behind it isn't good enough. Binance has a lot of money, so they won't need the money for new projects. If you want to be IEO at Binance exchange, your project must meet their standards. They will have multiple tests on your project before making final decisions Warren Buffet has a lot of money too, but don't expect him to do something free of charge. I'm not saying that Binance will reject an IEO of a good project. I'm saying that if someone pays them enough money, they will surely conduct an IEO for them. |
|
|
|
IEO didn't put an end to the scam. IEO promoted scam tokens to a new level when you look at how many projects cts have exit scam since the onset of IEOs. Exchnage were supposed to do a thorough background chack before carrying out any IEO for any project but some exchnage doesn't.
That is why you should not join the IEO of small and bullshit exchanges in this market. Most of the IEOs on small exchanges are scams, you cannot get a profit by investing in projects there. If you want to make a profit from IEO then you should join IEO of the leading exchanges in this market, you will definitely get a profit because those are good projects. If a team conduct an IEO on Binance, it doesn't mean they have a good project. It just means that they have more money to pay for the IEO. Don't be fooled by thinking that every project that has IEO on Binance (or any other "leading" exchange) is a good project. Besides, even good projects can turn out to be a failure if a team behind it isn't good enough. |
|
|
|
USDT is the leading stablecoin in this market, and its 24h volume is even higher than bitcoin. So why do you doubt it? If you don't trust USDT, I think you shouldn't trust any other project, even bitcoin. You should leave this market as soon as possible if you dont trust this market
Well, actually, crypto should be a trustless system so users shouldn't have to trust no one. When you have a centralized crypto project (like Tether), then users must trust the team behind the project. That trust is (at least for me) broken for Tether. True, all stablecoin pairs have the best volume with Tether, but I would never leave my money in Tether for the long period. I trust USDC and I use it as my favorite stablecoin. True, it is another centralized system, but they have monthly audits that show that they really have $ in the amount of USDC. |
|
|
|
The altcoins that we need to watch this year is ethereum it is very highly recommended coins of the crypto investors.
As we see right now in the market the movement of ether is going up and once a bitcoin increase it increase more ethereum.
But having only 1 altcoins is not enough for us to get enough profit I guess this year just buy coins in the rank 20.
1-5 alts if you have good amount to invest, 3 of your coins should be inside the top 20 alternative coins while those two you can choose one IEO and one ICO as you there's still chance that some of those projects from initial offering can still deliver good benefits. I woudn't participate in any IEO or ICO. It is just to big risk as there is really only a handful of projects whose ICO/IEO succeeds and bring profit for those who participated. Unfortunately, there are many more scam projects than legit ones and this is really bad for crypto in general. As for advice... If I would have to choose 5 projects to invest into, I would definitely choose BTC and ETH with 50% of my portfolio (I know OP wanted advice for altcoins but BTC should be "a must" for any serious investor), 35% of the portfolio would go to two or three of the top 20 CMC projects. I would "gamble" with the last 15% of my portfolio and invest into some low-cap projects that could bring me great profit. |
|
|
|
You need to check each coin if they are available for mining. But for coinmarketcap, they have this list of new altcoins that just recently added to their platform and that could be potentially new for their launching too. If you want to check them out, you need to individually check each of them and verify if they are available for mining or what's the algorithm or consensus that they have. https://coinmarketcap.com/new/I can't believe that I didn't know about this CMC feature. There is really a lot of new crypto projects every day. How are all those projects expecting to succeed? Starting a new project is not (at least it shouldn't be) like starting a new company. |
|
|
|
Patenti su vrhunac socijalističkog etatističkog monopoliziranja proizvodnje.
Jep, jedna od gnjusnijih umotvorevina u povijesti čovječanstva. Apsolutno sam za to da netko monetizira intelektualno vlasništvo, međutim za sve bi trebale postojati neke granice. Netko može patentirati pročišćivač vode (bubam bezveze), to može spasiti milijarde a on može zahtijevati 10 milijuna dolara za filter koji u proizvodnji košta dolar i pol. Bravo za svijet. Istina. Nisam baš previše upućen u sve te cake oko patenata, ali mislim da ne možeš patentirati sam posao pročišćavanja vode. Možeš patentirati specijalan način pročišćavanja vode, ali ne posao pročišćavanja (dobivanje čiste vode iz prljave). To bi bilo glupo i mislim da se to ne može. E sad, ako netko smisli revolucionarni proces pročišćavanja vode, naravno da će ga patentirati i pokušati zaraditi na tome. Ali to ne znači da će svi ostali načini pročišćavanja vode postati zabranjeni. Ovo gore ne znači da se slažem s time, ali mislim da bi svijet bio puno manje razvijen kad ne bi bilo patenata. Jer da ne postoji način zarade kod stvaranja novih stvari, vrlo malo ljudi bi se time bavilo. Vjerojatno bi to bili neki entuzijasti ali većinu ljudi ne zanima posao na kojem ne mogu zaraditi. |
|
|
|
Ono sto u ovoj slici nije navedeno je da smo prvi po striktnosti proporcionalno broju zaraženih. Da imamo jos 100m ljudi, ne bi bili na toj lisit a kamoli prvi
Pa da imamo još 100 milijuna ljudi, onda bi i broj zaraženih bio proporcionalno veći od trenutnih 1000. Jer postotak zaraženih bi (vjerojatno) bio opet isti (0.025%) pa bi umjesto 1.000 zaraženih imali 26.000 (ako mi je računica dobra). Da imamo 100m ljudi, imo bi veci broj budala koji bi vikali da im se sa karantenom krše ustavna prava (ko što rade u americi) i bilo bi veće sranje Ma joj... Baš sam jutros čitao neki članak (ne mogu sad pronaći link) da Švedska ima 3.5x više ljudi od Hrvatske, a ima 35x više zaraženih baš zbog načina kako su pristupili epidemiji (boli nas kuki, ajmo se svi zaraziti pa ćemo steći imunitet krda). Pa i Britanci su isto tako počeli pa im se evo i premijer zarazio. |
|
|
|
To je radio NiceHash dok sam ga koristio. Rudario je trenutno najisplativiji coin, a isplatu vršio u BTC. Ne znam kako sad radi jer sam to koristio u samim počecima (mog) rudarenja. Nakon što sam shvatio da mi je bolje rudariti izravno neki coin, prestao sam koristiti NiceHash. To je (sva sreća) bilo prije onog hacka.
Ma NiceHash i slicni su sasvim dovoljni za nepismenu ekipu, a takve ima, vjeruj mi. Evo jedna "štorija" koja se desila prije cca 2 godine. NA FB sam bio u grupi oko rudarenja, i vidm lik postavlja pitanja i moli za pomoc. Ajde, nebudi lijen, pm-am ja lika, i idem ja njemu pomoci. Ukratko, lik je nepismen totalno da osnove PC-a ne kuzi, a ukrko je jedno 5 hiljada eura u rig jer mu je susjed rekao da se time stvaraju pare. Nakon jedno sat vremena teamviewer sessiona s njime, i nakon sto on nikako nije mogao skuziti kako radi Claymore, installirao sam mu NiceHash i rekao "klikni start" i to je to. Vjerujem. Upravo na takvim ljudima je NiceHash zgrnuo hrpu para. Jer ljudi su čuli da se rudarenjem možeš obogatiti pa su kupovali rigove za tisuće eura ali nisu znali ništa oko njih. Tako sam i ja. Počeo sam s jednom grafičkom i rudario preko NiceHash-a, a na kraju sam ih imao mislim 8 i rudario ono što je trenutno bilo najisplativije po stranici WhatToMine. |
|
|
|
Ono sto u ovoj slici nije navedeno je da smo prvi po striktnosti proporcionalno broju zaraženih. Da imamo jos 100m ljudi, ne bi bili na toj lisit a kamoli prvi
Pa da imamo još 100 milijuna ljudi, onda bi i broj zaraženih bio proporcionalno veći od trenutnih 1000. Jer postotak zaraženih bi (vjerojatno) bio opet isti (0.025%) pa bi umjesto 1.000 zaraženih imali 26.000 (ako mi je računica dobra). |
|
|
|
To je onda opet ona ista stara diskusija. Po meni uvijek rudariš ono što je najisplatljive a onda prodaješ i kupuješ ono što misliš da ima najveći potencijal rasta u budućnosti. Stvarno nema smisla rudariti coin koji daje manje od maksimuma osim ako ti cilj nije zarada već sigurnost mreže/podrška baš tom coinu. Ako netko ovdje ima takve osjećaje prema BCH ili BSV molim da se javno očituje kako bi ga mogli staviti na mass ignore i izolirati od ostatka zajednice  Ovo gore! Naime, cak i većina tih aplikacija za minanje na kompu, ti odma converta u BTC sve kaj izmajnas. Naravno, po nepovoljnom tecaju, al ipak, 99% ekipe to preferira neg neke glupe noname coine koji trenutno imaju medijski hype To je radio NiceHash dok sam ga koristio. Rudario je trenutno najisplativiji coin, a isplatu vršio u BTC. Ne znam kako sad radi jer sam to koristio u samim počecima (mog) rudarenja. Nakon što sam shvatio da mi je bolje rudariti izravno neki coin, prestao sam koristiti NiceHash. To je (sva sreća) bilo prije onog hacka. |
|
|
|
This is an example how to have fun gambling. Until you are doing it for fun, you will be OK. But it depends on person's self-control. When you get a big win, you could think "hey, I could make money with this". And when you start thinking like that, it's game over for fun. For this word, "hey, I could make money with this", I've done that in a few years ago but that doesn't make me win more money, but coincidentally, I have to get lost the money. After thinking for a while, I realize that word can be a trigger for a gambler to feel that he is superior and unbeaten in the gambling, so that can attract him to play longer with more money. Thus, after that experience, I never tried to follow that word again because that could I makes me lose the money, and I cannot enjoy my winning money. From that moment, if I win or lose, and the time is enough for me to playing gambling, I always stop gamble and leave the sites because I don't want to get more losses. That's great! You sound like a person with a lot of self-control. Not all gamblers are like that and that's when gambling addiction starts. I agree that gambling should be fun. It's not always about the winning. Sometimes it's in the thrill of expectation will my team win. |
|
|
|
Am just learning about this. There might be chances that UK government a taking in consideration the possibility of getting scammed. You can find gambling site asking for very private information about your credit card with intentions of Internet robbery.
Well Bitcoin paying site will still go on which is the reason some of us are here
I saw that one user wrote that people will be able to use their debit cards. Do you think that a credit card info can get stolen and debit card not? I think there is no difference. If someone steals your debit card number, exp. date and CVC, they can steal your money too. |
|
|
|
As I go thru the link I found this on the details of Wiki. Children aged five are permitted in casinos. That is because the younger children (babies) do not know the meaning of money. Somehow it is a good explanation. Parents won't give them money since they know nothing about it. How could they bet on something if they don't know the purpose of money or they don't even have the right amount? But when the kid goes 8-15 years old then he knows it. That means they could gamble their way if they have the amount needed. There is also a chance they will make that money with bad ways. There is worse than this. Gabon - There is no official gambling age, although many incorrectly believe it to be 18. True... They don't know the meaning of money. But neither does a 3-year old kid and yet he is forbidden to be in a casino. That's why I think it is a stupid rule. Either way, I think that any underage person have nothing to do in a casino. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
