In simple words, exchanges aren't using any coins' blockchain in the trades within the platform, they're only displaying the balances and trades "visually" not on-chain... in exception to withdrawals.

It will stay in that BTC address if they didn't already moved the balance. | Yes

To understand this, in your own wallets (ex. core or electrum), you have the total control over the private keys of your addresses.
In exchanges, they are only giving you the address (they have the PrivKey) which they issue when you want to deposit your funds that will be "recorded" to their database as your balance.
After that, they can move the funds from that address whenever they want, however, it will not affect your displayed balance in your exchange account.

You can check this your own by checking your deposit address in any blockexplorer like blockchain.info.
You will notice that sometimes the balance is still there even if you already traded your Bitcoins.

You seems to be picky when it comes to choosing "meritable" posts, especially the author's rank (According to your Merit History).
Do not hesitate to send your sMerit to Full Members and above, they also need it (actually more than Juniors need it).

Anyways it wont hurt to make another Merit Giveaway Thread as long as you're good at "sniffing" account farmers.

Here's my list:

• To a Newbie: Bitcoin fundamental value derivation expert opinions needed!
• To a Junior: Why are people so negative about mining? Stop it...
• To a Member: Jihan Wu (BitMain) - the Monopoly of Crypto Currency World

If you want to find something from the Development & Technical Discussion Thread,
here is the link to my merit history: nc50lc's merit history.
As you can see, I'm sending my sMerit as soon as I acquired 2 Merit, you should, too.

In blockchain.info average transaction graph, move your mouse pointer away from the edge by a few millimeters until you reach the previous date as the hovered Time & Date, the result would be 176,563 transactions.

The latest date displayed in the graph is 04-10-2018 has not even ended in other Timezones (it's still Tuesday in some parts of the world)
That value must be a quarter to half average of the final result.

Check it again tomorrow and if still displays sub 50,000s, there's really a huge drop in activities by Bitcoin wallet/node users.

Electrum v2.4.1 may be safe from the bug but it's outdated, what's keeping you from upgrading to the latest version?

---

-update-
Hey, how is it possible that your reply to the thread "Electrum synchronizing too long" has the same exact Title of this thread?
That thread's reply should be RE: Electrum synchronizing too long, right.

I am sure that this thread is a continuation of his thread: When new coin mined, if some address receives share of it.
That's why he mentioned "How Pool implement this part?"

What they answered you is "How to send Bitcoin to two or more addresses" because of the incomplete/incomprehensible information you provided in the OP.

Sorry to day this but, I'm noticing a lot of thread started by you here in the D&TD Board which seems like in broken pieces or in continuation of the rest of it.
My advice for you is to read the rest of the Bitcoin Wiki and compile all your related questions in one thread, ask a follow-up reply if you need more information.
You can always bump the thread every 24hrs if you need to display it in the first page as "unread" topic.

Including the post above ^
What is the Coin/Algorithm you are currently mining?

The problem is, you just provided us limited information and you immediately going for the first few replies.
Please provide us the complete information so your rig's issue might be resolved in one-go.

In continuation to this: (excluding the 1st one which is presumably resolved)
Which of these "Claymore Miner" is the one you're using: list of miners created by Claymore?
Because some are only capable of detecting Nvidia (CUDA) Miners, not together with AMD by default.

If you are using: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.6 (Windows/Linux), you can. Just read the whole thread.

This really shows how cheap those materials used to build that shit.
They're selling it high last week because of the fake supply shortage they (Bitmain and Baikal) made.

Great move to Monero, the change in POW will guarantee that those botnets and compromised rigs sneaked with cryptonight miners will still be profitable.
Buy hey, this garbage is still worth it for mining shitcoins with shit developers, who are taking Crytonite ASICS too lightly.
Like E...ehm..Ele..ctr...oneum.

As far as I know, Links from a newbie account will be replaced by *Suspicious link removed* text, only juniors can provide a link.
If this will be applied to Junior members, any starting business account will have to wait for 2-months and unnecessarily participate to topics in order to gain (10) merit, just for their initial purpose: to display links to their site.
With this, scammers will not only participate in scams but to spam as well.

Whatever the dark side is, I can agree with this, since the workaround "Copper Membership" is cheaply available to legit ones.

I'm able to reproduce the bug using v3.1 on a Windows7 PC. To be precise, I took screenshots of what the OP is saying:


Return to the Main Screen and Right-Click any previous transaction to open the context menu, then select "Edit Description".
That should make the Default Description of the address or the transaction editable but instead, the USD value is the one that became editable:

t.n: I've written texts on the images.

---Edit---
The bug is now resolved.

This "Shepherd's Game" isn't limited to cryptocurrencies.
Sheep do not complain being herded as long as they "live", because it's the best they can do.

"Any man with a billion dollar ambition backed up by his brilliant mind can make it work, not by himself alone but by using all the available resources he can get."

Just envy him if you feel it, do not despise what he did.

• The First question was covered by my first statement.
  
• Perhaps, a competition (Another Huge ASIC Manufacturer) or more.
  Remember, this is just the beginning, somewhere in the future there could be hundreds of ASIC Manufacturers selling better varieties than the others'.

Bitcoin wasn't designed to be a $1000 worth asset, but the way we "rank" the price was too easy to manipulate and it can directly affect the whole "mining" economy.
If you can think of a workaround to this, join the development.

I'm going to lock this thread for now.

If anyone already got images or a draft regarding this:
Send me PM to unlock this thread or send that directly to Theymos.

Different pools, different methods.
Read this article from Bitcoin wiki: Comparison of mining pools

That (block reward mincing) was not a part of the blockchain, also it's not the traditional "mining" method.
For information about that, you can ask a Mining Pool Engineer or a Pool Expert.

Try your luck here: Altcoin Mining >Pools (Warning: it's full of shit)

Even out of Bitcointalk rules, plagiarism is a serious crime. It's a common "legal" knowledge.
In some cases, you might go to jail when caught copy-pasting articles by some over-the-top serious professionals or corporation.

Luckily, Bitcointalk has been lightly punishing users for doing that actcrime.
Pick one: A Permanent Ban or Something else?

P.S. "Banneded",  

I'm positive that everyone's Birthday isn't displayed in the user's profile and it's for "privacy" reasons, right?
But when the time comes, an obvious date of birth icon will surprise you in your profile page.
It's displayed even when the profile was viewed as "Guest".

Like this one in my profile: (Local Date April 08, 2018)
https://i.imgur.com/R94pZT1.jpg

So, thanks for the cake!
I'm not totally bothered by my date of birth shown in public but some more private users might take this as an issue.

Take note: Please do not spam this thread by just saying Happy Birthday or anything insubstantial, TIA.

This one was left unquoted.
Quoted and Verified

---

The initial verification isn't really "that" important, this thread only requires the user to type (stake) his Bitcoin Address  to be quoted by the next poster as stated in the OP.
What they really need is to know how to Sign a message and which wallets have a user-controlled PrivateKeys.
If not, they must be a total newbie and their staked address will probably be useless when needed, but we can use it "for future reference".

My previously staked address was a bech32 SegWit address which can only be verified using Electrum might be invalid for account recovery.
Here's a legacy address for future verification issues:
Please quote and verify.

The problem is there's only one Moderator in this Board but, you can use the "report to moderator" button to request those threads to be moved to Altcoin Discussion or request to nuke the thread if necessary.

He got the resources but Batman is always busy protecting Gotham.

Hey, before you decide to answer a question from an old thread, check out its date!
Both are from January 25 which is when the merit system was introduced, those questions are totally covered by those hundreds of thread here in the meta board.

Quoting post and posting the same reply in each is obviously not a double post accident.

What the hell?

That's troublesome and an eyesore. Just hit Ctrl+F type your username, enter.
@0t3p0t Try to look for "Find in Page" or similar option in the browser's menu.

That is definitely worth an upgrade.
And looking at the current number of Lightning hubs which is opened solely by bitcoin nodes (sub 4.5k).
I'm sure this number will skyrocket once Electrum release a LN compatible version.