I wasn't expecting clean 2-0 sweep, tbh but the odds wasn't the motivation for my decision either. The only thought in my head was about it being a final and Na'Vi wouldn't risk anything, like picking a map they are terrible on 

Another Global Pandemic on the horizon  




Na'Vi!!! And what a way to win the tournament "We Play Clutch!, s1mple with the clutch, 1 vs 2 mir and iDisBalance  

Let's Do This For The Culture!!!

If I were you, on the other hand, I would have gone with Madrid win or -1.5 handicap (to meet the minimum Odds allowed for the promo), that'd be edging my personal against my pocket  I'd to see Real Madrid win but having to lose some free money in the process would be worse 

---

I also wanted to put out here that I have completed the wagering requirement and was able to withdraw on Betnomi with zero issues, 

And just a review as well, the navigation system on the sportsbook needs a lot of improvement, It's so very hard to switch to yet to be started games as navigate between sport types, over the next few I hope I'll be able to write this review rather more detailed and constructively as possible.

Thanks for the promotion 

Two things I hate about CSGO;

1. You post shill about Furia, I'm always compelled to put a few on them 

2. Seeing Na'Vi play, Although sometimes I'm able to avoid betting on them at all, but I can't seem to bring myself to bet against them often, even when it is the most logical thing to do 

That being said: It's Furia ML, FaZe and Ence over 2.5, then Na'Vi -1.5 (wasted money, ikr  )

From what I can tell, whether or not you deposited directly or from coinswitch as you've said;

From the transactions I posted in my first response, It shows that:

1. All Addresses involved in those transactions are Legacy (starting from 1...) which means they are likely controlled by one person and the outputs linking addresses from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd transactions to the Bitcasino's address further increases the likelihood of that.

2. There is no point of splitting coins between several of one's addresses with a very low fee before combining unconfirmed input to make a deposit to Bitcasino if the purpose wasn't to double spend to begin with.


The best case scenario in your defense would have been if you had purchase the coin from a local vendor and perhaps, the vendor was aware that you're making deposit to a casino, and while hoping you'd lose, he decided to play both parties... This being said is very unlikely

...And if this deposit had come from coinswitch, of which I think is not true, reason being Coinswitch would not initiate an exchange with unconfirmed tx, so they wouldn't spend an unconfirmed transaction, and they surely wouldn't send way below the regular fee for a transaction.

I really want to believe you don't know what this all means, and for the sake of giving you the benefit of doubt as well, I'll explain further in more simpler terms all possible scenario of what could have happened, but only if you can answer this question first,

Did you send the deposit to Bitcasino address yourself or you withdrew/purchased from someone/somewhere to the Bitcasino address directly ?

Currently, it's based on the first 3 to complete the maximum 10 points and post it on the thread, so come 7 days, it's still going to be aboutbwho gets to 100 points first and post, or who ranks the highest first if no one manages to reach 100 points.

There sure can be some improvements to the contest format, and Hhampuz will surely figure something out, I reckon! 😉

I'm confirmed 2nd place then 

Another nice one from ROO!!!

Username: Harkorede

1.

Bet ID: 5ef7b4b83ccecf00abcb7a06



2.

Bet ID: 5ef7ca013ccecf070bcc1c93



3.

Bet ID: 5ef7cc963ccecfa5f8cc23c2




4.

Bet ID: 5ef7d36c3ccecfa90acc3842




5.

Bet ID: 5ef7d7dd3ccecff5f2cc444f




 

I have completed the $25 on at least 1.5 odd wagering requirements, can I use the funds I have left to bet as I see fit, I mean on any odds value even less than 1.50 ?  

Bet Roll ID: #1663738
Multiplier x5

---

---

It would have been great if users are allowed to claim multiple (but different Roll Multipliers )

What is the maximum amount one can win from the bonus ? Let's say a user meet all the requirements and wins $500 from the $5 bonus, would he be able to cashout all $500 ?

Username: Harkorede
Guess: 251,734,567

Username: Harkorede

Great intel mate! I didn't know the game was starting that early but I managed to join before half of the first map Not so bad 

G2, Vitality and BiG tomorrow


I'm so looking forward to NiP vs Heroic, but I'm not particularly sure who to ride with here

What are your intels man ?!

Hi Everyone,

I think I have some findings that could be of help to this thread/Issue

Addresses that are of worthy note

1. 3PqZ8bsdV91X2PSZeTFGj78jabJbiBuH5f Bitcasino's

2. 1P8p24gbmhgxS2gPJjZJwYS4KDUiTcqd4c and 3. 1NCjM2vqdoJ5BX6wEN1j23cUCthA3QGRH3 OP's which combined inputs for the deposit



Firstly, I'll start from this "Transaction A" TXID from 15gekRPKCyetqS2jJf85fXuvzjDcooCEbN majorly to 1EaAQ8iqdPMvCGkrkMpMkpoW5LLjwcZ6xu (0.75216549 BTC)
and some change to 13N2CFwTLobJihSGQUYmWk8VrsyRqDicSp (0.00217148 BTC), with transaction fee of 2.547 sat/B. Time stamp of transaction is 2019-04-07 20:28

Secondly, a similar "Transaction B" happened from the major of the output above 1EaAQ8iqdPMvCGkrkMpMkpoW5LLjwcZ6xu here majorly to 128pfpJvTPhweAEHRzBv1q5DSvawpjTCSB (0.74890254 BTC) and another change to 1FvUNiDDdyRsLSuzEDVatcpMXJUGXaihsw 0.00325722 BTC, with the same transaction fee of 2.547 sat/B.

Then thirdly "Transaction C", the major address from "Transaction B" 128pfpJvTPhweAEHRzBv1q5DSvawpjTCSB sent here to 1CjYNz5Bat5RkP69msyY4QiXUBrARZgky7 and 1NCjM2vqdoJ5BX6wEN1j23cUCthA3QGRH3 ³ which is the second address that combined input to fund the deposit, with a fee 143.462 sat/B (but the fee here definitely wouldn't matter with two parent transaction of 2.545 sat/B pending right ?)

The major odd thing is that the both addresses that received small changes from "Transaction A and B" 13N2CFwTLobJihSGQUYmWk8VrsyRqDicSp (0.00217148 BTC) and 1FvUNiDDdyRsLSuzEDVatcpMXJUGXaihsw 0.00325722 BTC combined inputs to this address 1P8p24gbmhgxS2gPJjZJwYS4KDUiTcqd4c  ² which subsequently combined with 1NCjM2vqdoJ5BX6wEN1j23cUCthA3QGRH3  ³ to fund the deposit and So, those coins never actually moved elsewhere until more than half of it had funded the deposit.


I strongly believe that Transaction A, B (2.5 sat/B) and C are most probably a decoy, just to reach the end goal for funding the Deposit Address (relatively high fee) while some of the parent transactions aren't confirmed.

Some how Na'Vi managed to get the job done, I'll be staying clear from the henceforth (unless there are some reasonable odds of 1.6 or more that could be worth the hassle, not this 1.3 isshh giving me an headache 😡)

I could have been having a flawless day with an EZ 2-0 from fnatic and Na'Vi coming through in the end, but meh Team Secret losing 2 - 0 to Team Liquid, I'm sure no one saw that coming, I mean Liquid to steal a map would be very close to 2.0 odds right ?  Damn!

Just I like I guessed, it's a 3 map affair for FTM vs Nigma, I hope Nigma sees this through 😊

June 30th, for now.  it's stated even in the title of the thread.

^

I couldn't agree more, they board are indeed making good deals, and Chelsea could be terrific and a team to beat come next season. However, I'm not seeing much positivity with the Kepa sale and Onana as replacement, except if they're making some financial profits with the trade.

Fixture would be so late into the night here, so I might catch it and put a few in as well  



I just tuned it to catch some actions but guess what ? Na'Vi are fxxking at it again, getting battered by Nemiga :