lol i can say i really never look at anyones profile, but cool hope dot take you no 2-3 months like you menthined. Just make sure you keep us posted on progress as you go through the wait game Will do. Can't wait to get one and try it out, haha. |
|
|
|
Which wallet is this?
The new v0.10 Bitcoin-Qt wallet. |
|
|
|
Wow that was embarrassing.  I'm so sorry I'm not fully awake yet. No worries, happens to the best of us.  |
|
|
|
So you can only fund it with 0.1 not more??
You can fund it with as much as you want, but its's face value is 0.1 BTC so it's recommended to not fund it with more. |
|
|
|
And if anyone loses money in a ponzi because they couldn't tell if it was legitimate or not, that's your fault for posting negative trust ratings on every ponzi you see. Some people won't go and dig deep, some will just look and see every single site has -4 and will pick one and hope for the best. I hope you think about that also. I have warned them it's a ponzi and not trustworthy by putting up a negative rating which turns your trust red. If they ignore that and/or search for a ponzi with the lowest negative trust and gamble their, it's not my problem if they lost their BTC. They have decided to ignore all the warnings and gambled. You're proving to everyone why you shouldn't be apart of default trust right now. Glad you are showing your true colors to us all that your trust ratings are biased. If I'm biased because I give negative ratings to all ponzi's, than so be it.
I will keep in my mind what you said and think about it. I might change my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Please see my edited message. Also, if people lose money because they gambled with ponzi's, it's not my fault. It's theirs.
|
|
|
|
So why hasn't this guy gotten his money yet? This guy already sent in 0.02 after the first 0.00023 guy. 0.00023 BTC is a lot lower then 0.00100 BTC. Can't you math? |
|
|
|
|
I don't care if you are legit, honest, fair, etc. A ponzi is a ponzi and I warn users for that by marking you red. They can always decide, based on posts, if they want to gamble or not. However, I might change the description added to certain Ponzi's.
|
|
|
|
lets see if this site is just like the others than runaway with the money or it will be honest on paying Well, they earn more if they stay honest, so running away would be stupid. |
|
|
|
Some faucets are scams, they don't pay and disappear in weeks. If you visit longstanding faucets, they do not scam. You will not get rich form faucets, it is a start for newbies. Well, yes, of course, they exist, but that's not what this article is about. It's about all faucets in general, which makes their claim ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Faucets were originally made as a scam. Unfortunately for some users, faucets have become a base to where these users rely solely on faucets to earn. They are tricked, click after click, into visiting these faucet pages, which in the end are really scams. For the love of god, don't make me laugh. A faucet could never ever be a scam and it seems that BTCFEED doesn't know the definition of the word scam: scam (skăm) Informal
n.
A fraudulent business scheme; a swindle.
tr.v. scammed, scam·ming, scams
To defraud; swindle. |
|
|
|
Eindelijk, weg met die PsychoticBoy :-) Nou nou nou. Niet zo grof hé? |
|
|
|
scrypt is cool share it? It does look different than the one available on Github. I guess it was found somewhere else, as I have seen it before. |
|
|
|
|
I could get it for you for 25 euro.
|
|
|
|
I was just in a signature campaign that ended that was paying that amount. Unfortunately it's closed for right now. Really? Could you please tell me which one? I can't remember any campaign that paid that much, which is strange because I manage the "Signature Campaign Overview"-thread. Pretty bad, don't you agree? |
|
|
|
|
You want 0.004BTC per post? Good luck, the best rate I have had was 0.0013BTC and that was when the Signature Campaign payments were at an all time high. Nobody will rent your signature with that price.
|
|
|
|
How is the winning number raffled?
Using PHP code inside the script to generate a random number. Ah, I see. Well, I won't be playing than, because your game isn't probably fair. It's easy to say that it's random but you have no way to proof it without a probably fair system. Also, I really hope that you guys use something else than rand() because that isn't random at all. |
|
|
|
Oh, I see. Well, time to check it out and maybe even order one! Thanks for your review!  i really hope you not in the usa cause they dont send cards to the usa, you can use them in the usa with not fees if currency is usd but wont ship to usa  If you looked on my profile you would hag known that I'm from the Netherlands, Europe. So all good. |
|
|
|
Allright, put me down for one 2014 coin.
I live in the province of Utrecht. The city Utrecht would be a good place to meet. We will discuss it later. Well, just so you know, I can easily meetup in Utrecht. Putting you down for one right now. |
|
|
|
If any accounts that he previously used have been banned, then this could be considered as ban evasion as he has posted outside of meta. Most likely yes, however, that is not for me to decide. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
