Yeah, but when does it go up??? I don't care if it goes down, this is stupid. Traders are destroying the protocol by selfishly selling for tiny profits every single time we get any kind of rally started.
Dude, it's not a rally. It's whales going back and forth. This shit is not organic, so stop calling it a rally like the community is coalescing around an agreed price or bottom. If the whale has enough $ ( which he has) and decided for a bottom... |
|
|
|
|
You can even short with leverage if you have the balls.
There are serveral sites like btc.sx
|
|
|
|
I hope.he can bring it down to 330 thats my next target  |
|
|
|
|
I tbough that was the reason we got neodice assets.
Neo dice assets will pay out dividends
|
|
|
|
The next few days will be critical exponential   |
|
|
|
Speaking of whale and price crashing...I don't, but in the event it ever happens I have a large number of bitcoins, 30k for instance, and I get a great deal on my own island or a castle or a mega business or whatever and want to "cash out" - what is the best way to do that without crashing the price?
Is it just the amount of bitcoins available via the exchanges being bought and sold that make up its price or does the price include/impact bitcoins held in offline wallets? I keep hearing the suggestion to leave it offline so it doesn't affect the price but not sure how that works.
Selling large amounts of bitcoin or higher valued/priced coins for hard assets, real estate, cars, houses, etc. usually can't be done for now directly with bitcoin so it has to be sold and traded back for fiat. Just need the best way to do that so it doesn't cause one of these events.
Thanks
Trades on exchanges are much more visible then OTC trades, but both influence the price to a certain degree. The best way to sell a large chunk of btc would prolly be a otc trade. You avoid slippage and alot of security risks regarding exchanges. /edit i went to bed after the wall shrunk from 26 to 16 k.  |
|
|
|
This is a nice zone fore shorting for the people who went long around $280-320, it might still go up a bit but I don't think it will hold for a long time.
Yes i agree good point to taking safe profit now. Im was thonking about it too but my balls of steel didnt agree |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is dead 200 1$ soon Blablablabla LoL Suck it bears |
|
|
|
Seems weird that international sepa proceeds instantly
Fiat rocks
Maybe we don't need Bitcoin after all. Nonsense. Long before Bitcoin was a thing, I dreamed of money with wildly fluctuating buying power. I imagined a world where it took an hour to buy a cup of coffee, an hour to gas up your car, an hour to buy a bag of groceries... Because math. Zero confirmations duh. Volatility is a problem because btc is in its infancy. With increasing adoption the swings will be smaller and smaller |
|
|
|
Seems weird that international sepa proceeds instantly
Fiat rocks
Maybe we don't need Bitcoin after all. Ask him about fees. And then think twice . |
|
|
|
Paying premium for OTC trades is a common thing. Just try to do it |
|
|
|
|
National sepa transfer from and to the same bank takes usually 2+ days in germany.
And im talking about volksbank, deutsche bank etc.
Seems weird that international sepa proceeds instantly
Fiat rocks
|
|
|
|
Actually, this might be genius. Stamp volume has slowed to a crawl, but the other exchanges are still trading. He might be accumulating at $302 everywhere else.
no way he'd be losing a lot more coins then he is buying up anywhere else. this can't be... actually no if hes buying from himself on stamp |
|
|
|
|
so going leverage long seems wise right?
|
|
|
|
Maybe a silly question, but why not introduce a fee for placing an order?
Let's say 50% of the current fee which we have to pay to the exchanges. The exchange gets the other 50% when there is a buy/sell.
This way ONLY the real asks and bids will be at the exchanges. No playground for people like Nemesis (if he's the right person), cause he'll lose (a lot of) money to place such an order in the first place...
I think it could be better for the near future of BTC (new money).
Itīs actually quite the opposite. A lot of exchanges now use maker/taker system, which means that the own who placed his wall actually getīs paid for it cause he improves liquidity on the exchanges. Which makes sense in my opinion. There is nothing wrong with placing huge walls on an exxchange, itīs a free market, if someone wants to buy/sell into it, he can do. If someone is using it to manipulate the price he is risking his stash USD or BTC. biggest problems are players who sell/buy into themself. i dont see a problem in huge wall either, but buying/selling into your own orders should not be possible. but i guess this is impossible. |
|
|
|
|
NEW VOTE PLEASE:
350 BY TOMMOROW?
1. YES
2. NO
3. 400
|
|
|
|
fuck it i shoulda have bought all i could afford, now im kinda sad  |
|
|
|
325330 PING PONG  |
|
|
|
stamp pushing to 320  |
|
|
|
hi mat, you did good in selling around 600 but i think it's a good time to give bitcoin another chance now  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
