A guy betting .005 a game isn't winning 85%. He would be betting the max if he were a winning gambler 85%.

Today's free prediction:

PFC Ludogorets 1945 Razgrad vs. Inter Milano

Prediction: Inter Milano
Odds: 1,64

Bet at Nitrogensports: https://www.blockz.network/out/nitrogensports
or
Stake: https://www.blockz.network/out/stake

There are currently 3 other bet's we're betting onto today, will update the results of them here today evening.

I clearly mentioned that the 85% win rate is insane and tough to believe which is why I guess you misunderstood my post. I don't believe anything until adequate proof is available.

This is the problem right here. 1 week of experience is nothing basically. If you want people to show interest in your offer, your contact would need to provide his 8K bet history with a 85% win rate as I mentioned in my post earlier. Its all about the proof(Legit).

it looks like that you are ignoring the question of most users here? We would like to see proof but not only for one week
sure you can ignore also my question for the real proof

Not sure this is how its being done, just reminds me of an old scheme that was common for years probably is still being used somewhere with new punters maybe.   The idea is to predict the result to various penny stocks going up, getting good news and gaining 1000% say; this performance is possible and it does happen just like great betting streaks can happen.   The trick is to make a prediction for a thousand stocks and then only in retrospect mention to buyers of the newsletter the ones that went up as proof of your ability to see the future not the ones that went broke.   Similarly here, the proof could be to record every combination of match result and then just select after as proof the one that proved correct in retrospect and not mention the others.    I doubt its the case as its such a well known known trick, but I always thought that was a funny little easy money earner people pulled and worth mentioning.

Don't say that you actually believed this advertisment. 85% win rate is crazy and although this number attracts player they will soon realize that is not going to happen. This is not going to make you rich so don't waist your time and money.

Todays match predictions:

Bet proof: http://prntscr.com/r4oaua

Pierre-Hugues Herbert 2:0 Mikhail Kukushkin: Win
Dennis Novak 0:2 Egor Gerasimov: Win

This match is currently running:
Pierre-Hugues Herbert v Mikhail Kukushkin
Prediction: Herbert wins

Match Live Stats:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Pierre-Hugues+Herbert+v+Mikhail+Kukushkin&rlz=1C1CHBD_deDE789DE789&oq=Pierre-Hugues+Herbert+v+Mikhail+Kukushkin&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

You mean that they do suspend belief, I agree with you, this is quite the claim and needs a lot of proof. The whole proof via telegram and not showing any in the announcement feels like it's just hoisting up more red flags. 85% win ratio and they won't need to sell shit, they'd be in Vegas making millions.

I have been against about buy sports predictions always. A question always around on mind especially when I see any prediction sales thread. Same question to you as well, if you have 80% win predictions then why are you going to sell it instead of make huge money buy yourself? Just play yourself with your predictions and enjoy luxury life. Who will be responsible if players lose fund even though you are give it free for test. Money for test ? No question.

80% says nothing, if you don't know the average odds You can win 95% of your bets and still be a losing player. For the rest see here.

---

@OP

Just linking to your website and expect people to make the effort to figure out themselves, is probably not what will help you a lot with getting new customers. Post free picks here for some time and make a weekly update for (all) your bets here - including staked, W/L, yield etc. statistics. It's some work, but will help in getting people interested in your service