If you asking from the guy who are provided you the service.
Off course, they're gonna say that, because is a business scheme (You never say anything bad about your product). But, If you ask from regular person they're gonna tell you different things.
If there has some machine that can make us (Regular) person, verify the RTP and others thing is same. We will believe that, just like "Probably fair" for hash game while we can verify the result by our own check.
That is a bit of a sceptic approach and I wouldn't blame you. In this case demo and real are different because demo is fake money, so that alone should be a good reason not to see them the same because nobody would gamble with fake money just as the same when they are gambling with real money. This is why I really hope that you do not end up with any misunderstanding but if demo and real are said to be the same, I would assume it could actually be the same. Why would there be difference anyway? It's gambling, you should be aware that you are going to end up losing money, that shouldn't be a secret to you, nobody should think that there is "maybe" a chance that they could profit in the long run. |
|
|
|
We all start to make money and to quit,we already know it before starting to gamble but as soon as we see our balance increase the human nature which in our depth has greed as the primary motor comes into play and we continue to play trying to make more money until we lose everything 99.99% of the time and only 0.01% someone of us may hit a really huge win.
I was playing slots yesterday and I played more than 1.5 hours in a game and only got two times the bonus round,two times in 1.5 hours is extremely bad but I knew when to quit as soon as my bankroll was going to that point I quit despite in loses and withdrew my money.
That is if we think the money is sufficient enough or we can at least withdraw it but if what we win is still small because we budget our bets to last long, then we are forced to continue for more in hopes of winning again but most of the times the previous balance that we already build are going to be depleted. This is the hardest or the most annoying part when trying to make money in gambling. You didn't get a win on your session but I can feel that you get enough because 1 hour in gambling is long already compared to other activities that we are doing and the good part is that you have something left with you. Not all can be able to do that. |
|
|
|
I know ITS risky, but i rather trade with 20% pmp or dmp with 20x-40x leverage futures then waiting for btc or other top coins to make their 5% move in average 24h time duration.
Im here for in crypto for money for income not for becouse i understood crypto or Im interested about crypto only i see IS the profit i make daily out If crypto
We get that you "rather" do that, but you are rafering something that is terribly dangerous and shouldn't do that. I understand that some people like to take more risks, and that’s fine, nobody could stop you and you should do whatever you want to do. But that doesn't mean that you have the right to do something that is risky to a fault. Taking "some" risk when you are trading would be fine, but that doesn't mean that you should be taking risks that are useless. Calculate the profit possibility and the risk possibility and if the risk is too much and the profit is not, that would not be possibly a good thing and shouldn't be really your aim. |
|
|
|
Currently I am doing a personal strategy with a compendium of many techniques, I say that it is a technique because I am doing short-term trading, and whenever the plot is changed, from medium- or long-term trading to very short-term trading. short-term, it is something that always has its impacts, besides I am not doing short-term trading of crypto or BTC, I am doing it in forex because it has a more consolidated volume and has a very peculiar behavior, the volatility is not much, it can that some theoretical things work faster in this type of market, what happens is that I have not been able to reach my total personal set.
That is a smart decision because in the end if the market is so volatile then so should we. If you have a strategy that changes based on what you see at that moment in the market, and what your needs are, and what the news are saying and all of that combined, that means you will be able to change according to wherever it is going. People who are stuck at just one strategy could make money when things are going well, but when things are at unexpected levels that means they are not going to end up with any profit at all and would be losing a lot because they didn't expect it. I respect your decision to have a flexible method because it sounds like it could work out much better for any trader. |
|
|
|
I accept the fact that the entire cryptocurrency industry is speculative, but also it is more speculative to those who make it a short-term priority to predict the price and those that fall into that category.
1: passive traders, because they always base their entry on
speculated Bitcoin price.
2: short term investors
But as a long-term Bitcoin holder, you will become less concerned with the short-term price but become more focused on Bitcoin's long-term value.
Making it short term means that you are a trader and some traders are doing it as a job, so I understand them. It’s not easy and it's totally speculative but at the same time it’s a job, and every job has benefits and difficult parts, speculation is the difficulty for the trader but without it then it would have been too easy to make money and there is no such thing as easy money. However, the benefits outweight the difficulties if you make money because in the end it's you, in your home, in your pajamas, in front of your PC and making money via a few trades each day. This is only possible if you are good at it of course and unfortunately not many people are. |
|
|
|
Mohammad Salah is coming back in form but sadly now we are going back on vacations which is going to be around 40 days so hopefully now when we will back things could be in positive way because after this break things could be tough and race could be also fast for having better and positive results Liverpool which is already behind needs to have better results for going above in ranks, and they are looking for better results from their Premier player Mohammad Salah.
Graham Potter done good job in early matches but now suddenly momentum is changed and Chelsea is back on decline which is surely the biggest concern for management after sacking Tuchel most thinking was now they could be improved but nothing positive happening which is bringing moral also down and if we have not good timely changes then surely things could be worst from bad for them.
They really need him to be doing a lot better and considering he will not be really playing as much as he could potentially play in this 40 days, that means he is going to once again lack match shape and may need to restart his run again. It’s not easy to be a LFC fan right now I assume, being the team that was second in EPL and finalist in UCL means even though you didn't really win anything, you were almost winning two major titles and just at the start of next season you start to suck and be bad. Salah is not the only reason they are not doing great now, the whole team is and they really needed the break to maybe reflect on life and feel better? Who knows. |
|
|
|
@CLS63 you’re absolutely correct and Hamilton could have broken that record, but the officials stole his victory in the final race in a controversial fashion and sadly there’s nothing that can be done about it now. Furthermore I believe that Max will not only break that record, but he’ll create a new record which won’t be broken for a very long time. I still do not think that it was a "steal", it could have gone either way, just because of "one lap" that decided it and there may or may not be a wrong decision there, doesn't mean stealing. Stealing is something much bigger, Max went in the last race with literally the same points, Max kept up within 10 seconds or so if I am not wrong, say 20 seconds at worst, and even another regular crash with all right decisions, Max could have won it as well. Having the title decided on the very last lap means Max deserved it as much as Hamilton. Of course Hamilton deserved it too, nobody can deny that, but that doesn't make Max not deserving neither. It was equally theirs, and I would literally see them share a title to be fair, and would be the first one but totally makes sense to give them bot the title looking at last year. |
|
|
|
But most people are hold their coins on centralized exchanges which kill the purpose of Bitcoin, the exchange aka third parties has a control over their coins and they will ask the user KYC since it's their rules.
Likely an exception. Most of the traders prefer a volatilty, convenient, fast way of appreciating their asset like bitcoin so to do trading on market with high volume they register there. OP probably didnt see that. Bitcoin is decentralized outside these cex and that should be prioritize which the government seeks not to happen but do a regulation about it. Yeah, I think it's base on individual preferences, majority of us here doesn't want to complicate things, so either we just buy on CEX nad left it there (although this is a bad practice), or just HODL on a wallet that we have total control of private keys and mnemonic phrases. As for bitcoin being the preferred choice, it's easy, the gold standard of crypto, the top one, and the prime mover. And for those who have at least seen a full cycle, we know how big it's going to be, and the potential profit that we are going to make resulting in economic freedom. I know it’s a bad practice, but what could happen to your bitcoin and ethereum if you keep it in binance? I get that it's "not yours if you don't own the key" but I am fine with it inside binance as well. They are as good as it gets and I trust them more than I trust myself and it's very rare that someone gets their binance account hacked that easily when you have 2fa as well. So, I agree that we do not like to complicate things, just buy some of the top coins, put them in binance, and wait for it to grow, that’s a good idea. It is an idea that will make you rich in the very long run, not going to be something that is quick, but in many years, you will see the benefits of it. |
|
|
|
Latest update: All balances you get from rains, free spins will be added to the bonus balance (new feature)
to release the bonus balance you have to wager 20x of the total bonus you get using the main balance
For the bonus/prize you get from the competition, you don't need any wager, this update has been implemented since yesterday.
@Dewi Aries this is a very nice update, but I hope that user’s will remember that they need to wager 20x otherwise we’ll see many user’s complaint here about not getting their bonus money. This is not a very nice update if you are a player in the blackjack.fun because the old bonus doesn't have any wagering requirements. Winning on the free spin is already very hard for a penny. Adding a 20x wager on that small bonus is almost telling those small players to stop participating on getting that free spin. @Dewi does the free spin reward come from tournament doesn't need wager? So this free spin that needs wager are those came from the events such as hourly chat and highest profit event only. It is not about making it easy, it is about making you wager, a casino earns money as much as you wager and if you do not wager then they won't make any profit at all. What’s the point of having a casino where people do not gamble, so all of the promotions would always at all times will be about making you gamble more, that is the whole point. Sometimes it requires a lot more, sometimes it doesn't require that much but it is always about needing people to wager. That is why all those wagering competitions exists as well, because they want you to gamble as much as possible. When you gamble a lot, there is a chance you may win, but there is a chance you can lose it all as well. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that most cryptocurrencies are turning less-decentralized by the day, as governments continue to make pressure on the industry. Major projects have abandoned PoW as their consensus algorithm in favor of PoS which is carbon-neutral (at the cost of centralization). The most well-known smart contracts platform in the space (Ethereum), has copied its competitors by adopting a PoS algorithm in order to please the regulators. There have been reports that the biggest validators on the ETH blockchain are two entities: Lido and Coinbase. The puts the level of ETH's decentralization in question. If ETH proclaims itself to be "a platform for unstoppable applications", then how can Web 3.0 have a future if everything is turning centralized? We may be going back to square one, where the Web is dominated by a few players in the industry (Web 2.0 again?).
It definitely does. These type of increases do not really matter because in the long run there is nothing wrong with it. I am not saying that it will be the main way people use internet, of course there will be plenty of websites without it. But that doesn't change the fact that WEB 3.0 is here to stay and it will only grow bigger. It has opened the door to many new inventions and that’s going to be a key factor going in with this situation. Obviously not that many people are involved right now, but the more people who are amazing developers and designers end up going into this, the more amazing projects will come out of it and it will get bigger and bigger. |
|
|
|
a friend of mine came to me and he asked, is it possible to invest in bitcoin and crypto for the short term,? which is to meet daily needs, and I am confused to answer because I am still a beginner in bitcoin and crypto. and I want to ask everyone about it?
Looking for profits in crypto especially Bitcoin in the short term in my opinion is not very effective. But maybe if your friend understands spot trading with all the good strategies, that's fine. Or trying to trade Futures? Unfortunately, everything that is targeted in the long term, especially just to satisfy needs, is not the right place because it has a higher prestige. In addition to the risk, in the end your friend will meet a deadlock and it can be a loss. Short term trading in the crypto world is like paddling against the waves in the sea. If you are really good then you could potentially still do it, there is nothing that say it’s impossible, but it is also very hard to do so if you are a newbie then you are going to just get dragged along where the price is going. However, investing long term is like sailing with the right wind, you will go wherever you want to go without ever touching a single paddle, the winds will take you there even while you are asleep and not doing anything. Some people prefer to do the harder one, no idea why but I guess they want a quicker result, but people like me prefer to work with the wind. |
|
|
|
Liverpool's success in the group stage of the Champions League because their competitors Rangers and also Ajax did not provide a competitive rivalry, making it easier for them to pass this group stage. The real test for them is in the current round, which is the round of 16. All who qualify are the best teams in their respective groups. Now they will have real competition. If they fail to improve their performance then they will be eliminated in this round easily. I'm looking forward to the draw to see who will be their opponent in the round of 16.
Ajax is understandable to be fair, because they sold players that are worth over 200+ million euros this year, from antony to martinez to haller to ryan and many others. It means that it’s understandable for them to not be as good as they normally are, I am not saying that it would be simple or something like that, it will be very difficult and they lost their manager as well, but I am sure they will recover, it’s not simple but it's Ajax and they have a system in place that makes sure that they always get some good players. God knows how many amazing players got their start in Ajax first, and then went to be a great player in Europe, they are just beast when it comes to raising new talent. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't say that it will have more impact on Real Madrid, for me Ronaldo is a complete player and he has a lot of history, he is also highly respected, but Vinicius is going through a great moment in his career, but he couldn't compare with anyone yet , because everything can change, a player begins to buy when at least in 5 years he has remained in the top 5 of the best players in the world, such as the golden balls, who wins many champions, leagues, who is an outstanding player among the most famous players, who is in this case more outstanding than Mbappé, than Haaland and all those who will come from now on.
I do not think that Ronaldo would come back and play instead of Vini jr at all. I believed it would be more like changing with Rodrygo instead. Imagine the current situation, rodrygo plays, asensio plays, they do not really have the forward trio covered at all times. Sure, the vini-benzema-rodry trio is good, but that three can'play every game. Plus, we are talking about a ronaldo that would be 38-39 years old so even he would agree that he can't start every game, and would probably play more on the cup games and league games before or after UCL games and be a bench player that may come in at 70th minute or after during UCL games, that means he would play like 20+ game worth of minutes, even if he doesn't start all of them. |
|
|
|
in the Champions League Barcelona are not as vicious as in La Liga, defeats are so easy to come by which makes them have to be eliminated from the Champions League in the group stage. It seems that Barcelona has not been able to move on from last season's failure, Xavi, who is expected to be able to take Barcelona further in the Champions League, is unable to meet expectations.
While in La Liga Barcelona is still capable of being the toughest competitor of Real Madrid, in the standings Barcelona is only one point adrift of the leader of the standings. Barcelona still has a chance to win La Liga this season, what Xavi needs to do is to maintain the appearance and mentality of his players to always give the best performance. The quality of the squad that Barcelona has this season can still compete with Real Madrid, the defeat in El Clasico is the only defeat that Barcelona have just received in La Liga. Xavi must continue to maintain the opportunity to get his first trophy as Barcelona coach.
I think it could be a bit about the way they are playing in the league is not working out very well in the UCL at all, because in the league they are playing very technical, not just about the physical part of the football world but more about the technical "mind" related parts, and they are playing a foodball that is both fundamentally amazing and also great to watch. However, in the UCL there is a bit fairer share of physicality involved, it’s not like Spanish football, it means there are more shoulder to shoulder, and harder tackles, which Barcelona is not ready for, Real is known for it for example, Barcelona is not. That part is the part that impacted them a lot, and will continue to impact in Europa as well. |
|
|
|
They missed the UCL because so long not to come, so Man City bought Haaland for quite a expensive. Pep really longs to be able to bring a big ear to Man City. If I'm not mistaken, Man City have never been able to win when coached by Pep. I agree that those three teams have a great chance of advancing to the semifinals. But I'm a big favourite with Man City, although there may be a lot of surprises that I can't predict. I'm looking forward to the draw for the first knockout round. When will it be done?
Oh for sure. Did anybody itt see the video when they got eliminated at the semi final? I think it was the UCL season before the one last year or was it the other year.. But anyway, in the video Pep and his coaches were thowing and smashing stuff in frustration and shouting 'why is the Champions League hard?'. Something like that. And I'd argue that the price tag for Haaland is 'expensive'. I mean yes it is but City get what they paid for which makes it worth it. So in the long run the club will reap more than the expense. That is normal reaction because they have been awesome for so many years now, I do not remember how long it has been but it has been about at least 5 years right? Or maybe even more too, and Pep has done everything right, and dominated the league as well and basically playing the way they should play, yet they are still failing to win UCL. Look at how amazing they are in premier league, they are winning by big margins sometimes, they are champions almost every season and still failing in UCL and it is normal for them to not understand why UCL is harder than Premier league by that much. I do not understand it neither but that’s normal  If Pep doesn't, how could I, lol. |
|
|
|
spot traders sometimes forget the cut loss function. I sometimes only trade regular spots without using a cut loss target. it is risky to lose more if the market situation goes against our predictions. I've experienced it myself.
so for those who still remember the use of cut loss, I think you will be fine with your trades. even though we lose, we can plan according to our ability to be able to lose.
Not only spot traders but also the margin traders. I've seen a few of them in a certain trading group that they've forgotten to do it and then they're liquidated. With just simple mistake of forgetting of setting an SL, their funds have been burned and liquidated. All of those experiences are burying to each other and that's making them learn that setting it is important. Unfortunately margin and future traders are taking a huge risk if they don't use a stop loss. Normally in a spot trading you could lose maybe 10-20% in a day at max when you do not look, there are situations where it's going to be more but it's rare, which means that we are not going to see it go down that much. But with a futures or margin trade, you could lose 100% if you are not careful and there are plenty of people who are not careful at all. That is why it's quite important to use stop loss when you have a chance to lose all of your investment in a single minute if you are not careful. I personally only trade in spot, but still use stop loss carefully if I ever need it. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is becoming more and more popular and applicable everyday and there are plenty of companies and businesses accepting it as a common type of payment. However, when digital money is globally accepted, would there still be a need for cryptocurrency exchanges? Any thoughts on this?
I think we already have plenty of crypto exchanges, and they have trading pairs with stablecoins and often with fiat as well. In fact, I believe we have more crypto exchanges than the current level of adoption of Bitcoin as payment calls for. However, exchanges are very convenient not only for trading but for switching from one coin to another, so exchanges are needed, and I think the demand for them will remain. If the op is referring to CBDCs by 'digital money', then it should be said that they aren't a big thing yet, and that when they become a big thing, I see no reason for them not to be on exchanges. The amount of exchanges is a lot, but there are only a few that is used a lot, the rest are not really used as much and combined do not make up for the top 3. This means that there are just a few big ones, and if we look at how they could do in the future, we could literally see them bought out by a bigger company as a whole, and then they would be able to continue profiting for that bigger company instead. Look at how banks are approaching these exchanges, if banks are ever allowed to be crypto exchanges with regulations, they could just straight up get together and buy out binance and that would be very bad because banks are the reason why I ran away from fiat. |
|
|
|
Well, they seem got a hold of it because they manage to defeat the New Orleans Pelicans earlier today. It was a crazy game but it's undeniable that the Lakers is quite different now and Westbrook already got used to his role as he keeps on laying the table for his teammate to score. Pelicans was shocked as the gaps of their score becomes wider as the first half finished, they managed to chase the Lakers in the 2nd half but Lakers was so determined to put a win today.
While he is getting used to his new role, the Lakers are gaining momentum to make straight wins but the real test will be in their next game vs the Utah Jazz where undeniably one of the best in the west. But the Lakers will gonna do their best and will try everything they can to keep winning every single game from now on. So it's better to assume that they will gonna fight for it and let's just hope no injuries will haunt them sooner since they are now obviously making difference from their last games. I get that they won 2 in a row but not like they really looked that great. If you ask me, they did not looked that great and I believe that we should wait a few more games. This is the team that lost 5 in a row at the start, just because they won 2 in a row doesn't suddenly make them "oh they figured out it" type of situation. The best thing to do about Lakers is to wager against them for the time being, would make a lot more sense. I get that they have Lebron and people trust him a lot but he is old enough that he doesn't realy have any say in the way they are losing, it was like that on his first year, and it was like that last year as well, and will probably like that this year too. |
|
|
|
Marketing is important no matter what are the conditions on the market. As soon as they deploy and make the project live then they need to market it. If not then they just waste time creating the project because no one will notice it but they say that there are less project that are born during the bear seasons so less bounties are also found in our own bounty section.
It's okay if they run the marketing and it didn't succeed. What important is they tried their best but they only want to make sure that they pay the people who help them (the bounty hunters). If they don't then karma will always follow them. No matter what they do they won't ever succeed anymore.
That is important because the more people hear about the project the more chances there are to get them to be interested and even buy. If you got your project heard by just 1000 people, even if 10% of them invests (which is impossible odds) then you would have only 100 people investing, but if you can get 5 million hear about it somehow, that means even 0.1% of them would make 5000 people investing, and that’s fraction of what could happen, probably more. On top of at, when you reach a certain number of new people is easier, when you have 100 people then reaching to 110 is harder (not just telegram users, I mean real investors) but when you have 5000 then reaching 5500 is not that hard. |
|
|
|
The big release clause will of course be a consideration for ancelotti to try to sign Mbappe, I have no doubt that Madrid are a rich team but of course they also won't want to spend a lot of money on just one player, I think madrid main target now is to find a replacement for Benzema remembers his old age, while for midfielders of course currently Madrid still have alternatives because they still have Valverde, Camavinga, Tchouameni and also Ceballos in the midfield, so replacing Kroos and Modric is of course not too difficult for Madrid because they are still there talented young midfielder in their current squad.
Somewhere close to 300 million would be required to get Mbappe, so it’s not only more than what Jesus would cost, but it would be more like 6 Jesus combined. However, you can't put a price tag on a long term success like that. I keep saying that Real Madrid is just a few players away from being worlds greatest team for at least 10 more years. They already have amazing midfield, and amazing wingers, add Mbappe to that and amazing striker. Only thing left would be the defence and they could get that later on because when you have a team that is filled with such young superstar talents, you don't need to rush into defence, they can go on with whatever they have until they get more money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
