Свершилось! Международный уголовный суд выдал ордер на арест Путина.

 Так отпустите Чечню, в чем проблема!

  Да, повезло, тем, что не убили, а депортировали народы Прибалтики в Сибирь. Так, что не надо о показухе к границам ближе к Европе.

 Во-первых, рабами в Российской империи были все, включая русский народ, который в иной ипостаси существовать как народ исторически не может. Насчет того, что окраины как сыр в масле катались это вовсе не соответствует реальности. Империя грабила колонии самым нещадным способом. В Средней Азии хлопок вывозился в Россию. Из-за хлопка вся земля пропитана ядохимикатами, Аральское море превратилось в ядовитое болото. Нефть из Азербайджана также вывозилась. Только независимость от Москвы позволила Азербайджану вырваться из нищеты. Кстати, за маслом и сыром я лично летал в Москву, в Баку не было ни того, ни другого в 80-ые годы.
  Россия в колониях проводила политику русификации. Национальный язык коренных народов был на втором плане. Высшее образование велось по русским учебникам. Только обретение независимости позволило изменить ситуацию. Если раньше спортсмены выступали на олимпиадах за Россию, то с независимостью Мир узнал, что есть Грузия, Азербайджан, Казахстан и др.

 

 Алик Бахши

Путин в зеркале Навального
 
       «Я тот, кто пороки твои подсчитал,
         В дурном и благом тебе зеркалом стал.
         Ты в нём отразился таким, каков есть,
         Разбить это зеркало – малая честь.
                       
                                                              Низами 


 
       

    Поражение Трампа на выборах не оставило прeзиденту Путину никаких шансов на продолжение его безнаказанной, можно сказать нагловатой политики в отношении Америки и ЕС. Похоже всё идёт к тому, что Россию ожидают санкции из Ада, из того Ада, в котором по определению Путина надлежит быть Западу. Антироссийские санкции Конгресса, которые Трамп в угоду Путину, за поддержку его на выборах 2016 года, придерживал к исполнению, Байден приведёт в действие и путинский Рай переместится в Ад. Как тут не вспомнить пословицу «не рой яму другому, сам в неё попадёшь».
         Как результат, Путин оказался в яме, из которой ему уже не выбраться. Приближается время расплаты за всё то зло, которое исходило от деятельности Путина как на межгосударственном уровне, так и во внутренней политике. Надо честно сказать, разоблачения Навального в коррупционных преступлениях питерского бандита и ближайшего круга его сподвижников не вызвало в российском обществе какого-то особого возмущения. Врождённое раболепство перед чиновником любого ранга, а тем более перед человеком наделенного высшей властью, есть отличительная черта русского народа, который не считает ничего зазорного в том, что президент и его дружки обкрадывают страну и безнаказанно самым бессовестным образом нарушают её законодательство. Короче, власть в России традиционно всегда была вне закона.

        Eсли русский народ снисходителен и даже безразличен к беззаконному поведению власти, то в цивилизованных демократических странах, куда Путин, нарушая международные правовые нормы, засылает убийц, снабжая их запрещенными боевыми отравляющими веществами, подобные действия несомненно получат достойную правовую оценку.  Ему не сойдёт с рук установленный факт отравления в Великобритании с применением Полония и «Новичком», ему не простит Европейское сообщество за сбитый Боинг над территорией оккупированной Украины, ему не простит Украина за тысячи погибших своих граждан в развязанной Путиным захватнической войне, да и в самой России Путину припомнят о погибших во взорванных им домах в Москве, Волгодонске и Буйнакске, жертвах войны в Чечне и Грузии. У Путина в случае потери власти нет надежды на пощаду. За всё надо платить, так уж устроен Мир, и плата будет высокой. 
        Путин отлично понимает, что только пожизненная власть в его личном исполнении является гарантом безопасности, впрочем как и всякого диктатора. Никакой другой вариант, будь то, передача власти доверенному лицу, или статья в Конституции, не могут гарантировать ему безнаказанность за злодеяния, которые с первых же дней сопровождали его деятельность на посту президента. Страх, это единственное, что одолевает сознание Путина, он же толкает на очередные преступления и приказ отравить своего обличителя Навального тому свидетельство. Сегодня многое зависит от реакции русского народа на сложившуюся ситуацию, созданную Навальным, проявившем настоящий героизм, вернувшись в руки своего убийцы. (1)

       Азербайджанский поэт Низами Гянджеви пророчески описал ситуацию между безнравственным властителем и обличителем его преступлений, ситуацию, которая спустя 800 лет в точности отразилась в отношениях между Навальным и диктатором Путиным.

1.   Навальный – тест для народа. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/62241.html

      29.01.2021





















           

  Вы правы, сохранилось! И это ящер в образе России.

Фильм "Навальный" получил Оскар

Алик Бахши

Навальный - тест для народа
 
     Отравленный президентом России, но воскресший Навальный, что уже само по себе чудо, проявил настоящее мужество, вернувшись в руки своего убийцы. Навальному власти позволили пересечь границу, но только в наручниках. Трусливый диктатор не может допустить контакта с народом человеку, оставшемуся живым вопреки его воле, человеку, единственному на всю страну открыто назвавшему Путина лжецом и главным вором России. Более того, доказавшему фактами, что Путин убийца и руководитель организованной преступной группировки, щупальцами которой опутана вся Россия, а возможно и другие страны. С этой точки зрения удивительна реакция русского народа, он молча переносит все наглые проделки Путина. Трудно представить, чтобы, например, президент Америки смог бы распорядиться в последний момент посадить самолёт частной компании на другой аэродром, только потому, что среди пассажиров не какой-нибудь террорист, а простой человек, рискуя при этом жизнями сотен людей. Подобное распоряжение не только не было бы выполнено, но оно было бы последним для президента. В России же это принято за норму. Если Путин позволяет себе нарушать Конституцию, которую сам же не раз переписывал, то все остальные его преступные нарушения законодательства сущие пустяки. У меня был знакомый, в туалете которого вместо дефицитной в те далёкие времена туалетной бумаги находилась книга «Научный коммунизм». Так сегодня Конституцию России можно использовать по тому же назначению.
    Русскому народу до лампочки всё что происходит в стране, и доказательство тому, те несколько десятков пришедших встречать Навального во «Внуково».  Прошло 200 лет с тех пор как Лермонтов написал:     

         Прощай немытая Россия,
         Страна рабов, страна господ,
         И вы, мундиры голубые,
         И ты, им преданный народ.

    Однако, в России ничего не изменилось. И то, что происходит в России, виноват не Путин, а русский народ. Русскому народу после краха Коммунизма представился шанс на преобразования, но он в силу своего менталитета и имперского великорусского мировоззрения отказался от демократии и выбрал в лице Путина путь назад в империю (1,2). Демократические силы в России, представленные евреями, не популярны в народной среде. Более того, лидеры-демократы не были едины. В конкуренции между собой занимались словоблудием, им было не до народа. Хочу заметить, что Навальный никогда не испытывал какой-либо поддержки с их стороны. В этом плане интересен комментарий бывшего соперника Путина олигарха Ходорковского, который, используя ситуацию в стране, созданную Навальным, предложил себя в качестве будущего президента. Не думаю, что Ходорковский сильно огорчится, если Путин надолго запрячет Навального в тюрьме или вовсе, в конце концов, физически устранит его, как это проделал с Немцовым.
     
    Навальный русский, у него больше шансов стать президентом, чем у Ходорковских с Каспаровыми, что вызывает у Путина и его друзей-бандитов звериный страх, ибо потеря власти для них равносильна смерти. Им некуда будет спрятаться от народного гнева.
   
   Сегодня в лице Навального русскому народу предоставляется второй шанс для цивилизованной смены власти. (Правда я лично сомневаюсь, что народ изменился за 200 лет и согласится на демократические преобразования,  откажется от империи, потому-то империя и демократия вещи несовместимые). В противном случае бунт в России неизбежен. Доведённый до нищеты и отчаяния народ распнёт диктатора и его наперсников вместе с мудозвонами на воротах Кремля.


1.   Народная судьба, или каждому сверчку свой шесток. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html
2.   Назад в империю, или восстановление исторической справедливости поПутину. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22792.html

     21.01.2021

The film "Navalny" won an Oscar

Alik Bakhshi

Navalny is a test for the people


 
      Poisoned by the President of Russia, but resurrected Navalny, which is a miracle in itself, showed real courage by returning to the hands of his killer. Navalny was allowed to cross the border, but only in handcuffs. The cowardly dictator cannot allow contact with the people by a person who remained alive against his will, the only person in the whole country who openly called Putin a liar and the main thief of Russia. Moreover, he proved with the facts that Putin is a murderer and the head of an organized criminal group, whose tentacles have entangled all of Russia, and possibly other countries. From this point of view, the reaction of the Russian people is amazing, they silently endure all the impudent tricks of Putin. It is hard to imagine that, for example, the president of America could order at the last moment to land a private company's aircraft at another airfield, just because among the passengers there is not some terrorist, but an ordinary person, risking the lives of hundreds of people. Such an order would not only not be carried out, but it would be the last for the president. In Russia, this is accepted as the norm. If Putin allows himself to violate the Constitution, which he himself rewrote more than once, then all his other criminal violations of the law are mere trifles. I had a friend in whose toilet, instead of toilet paper, which was in short supply in those distant times, there was a book called Scientific Communism. So today the Constitution of Russia can be used for the same purpose.
     The Russian people don’t care about everything that happens in the country, and the proof of this is those few dozens who came to meet Navalny at Vnukovo. It has been 200 years since Lermontov wrote:

          Farewell unwashed Russia,
          Country of slaves, country of masters,
          And you, blue uniforms,
          And you, their devoted people.

     However, nothing has changed in Russia. And what is happening in Russia is not Putin's fault, but the Russian people's. After the collapse of Communism, the Russian people had a chance for transformation, but due to their mentality and imperial Great Russian worldview, they abandoned democracy and chose the path back to the empire in the person of Putin (1,2). Democratic forces in Russia, represented by Jews, are not popular among the people. Moreover, the Democratic leaders were not united. In competition with each other, they were engaged in verbiage, they were not up to the people. I want to note that Navalny never experienced any support from them. In this regard, the comment of Putin's former rival, oligarch Khodorkovsky, who, using the situation in the country created by Navalny, offered himself as a future president, is interesting. I do not think that Khodorkovsky will be very upset if Putin hides Navalny in prison for a long time or even, in the end, physically eliminates him, as he did with Nemtsov.
    
     Navalny Russian, he has a better chance of becoming president than the Khodorkovskys and Kasparovs, which causes Putin and his bandit friends an animal fear, because the loss of power for them is tantamount to death. They will have nowhere to hide from the people's wrath.
  
    Today, in the person of Navalny, the Russian people are given a second chance for a civilized change of power. (True, I personally doubt that the people have changed in 200 years and will agree to democratic reforms, abandon the empire, because empire and democracy are incompatible things). Otherwise, a revolt in Russia is inevitable. Driven to poverty and despair, the people will crucify the dictator and his confidants, along with the fools at the gates of the Kremlin.


1. People's fate, or each cricket has its own hearth. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/28564.html
2. Back to the empire, or the restoration of historical justice according to Putin. https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/22792.html

      01/21/2021

Yes, Russia has received problems that are to her advantage and that she wanted, as you say. The Russian people are satisfied that these problems have to be solved.

 Да, у меня  есть та информация, какая есть. Другую не имею и не придумываю.

That is, in the end, the United States helps Russia. Very good! I just do not understand why in this case Russia is against sanctions, if they are useful to her. On the contrary, Russia should be grateful to America for the sanctions.

Yes, the West is to blame for fascism in Russia today. The West is to blame for the communists coming to power in Russia. What else is the West to blame for? List at once the list of faults of the West concerning Russia.

Alik Bakhshi

National interests of Russia

     In the speeches of President Putin on the international theme, one can often hear a phrase that, it seems to me, has become sacred - "Russia's national interests". Usually it sounds with reproach to the countries of the West, which, in Putin's opinion, should not only take into account Russia's national interests, but also respect them. True, Putin did not bother to disclose what the national interests of Russia really consist in, but judging by the military-political steps taken by Russia, they clearly go beyond its state borders, which is confirmed by the Russian invasion of Georgia and Ukraine, followed by the withdrawal of their territories. Thus, Russia's national interests inevitably face the national interests of other countries, and are defined only as aggression. Ukraine wanted to enter the European Union, but it turns out that such an desire is an independent country, violates the legitimate interests of another country - Russia. By the way, Putin said that Russia will not allow such actions by the neighboring country. It turns out that if an independent neighboring country, for example Finland, wants to join NATO, then Russia will have to wait for a military invasion, because maybe Finland too is falling under the legitimate interests of Russia.
     I did not make a reservation, Moscow really believes that Russia's national interests are both its legitimate interests. This is confirmed by the words of Foreign Minister Lavrov: "The project of the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline affects the legitimate interests of Russia." http://Http://tass.ru/politika/1582470
    It turns out that if a gas pipeline is laid between the independent countries of Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan by the Caspian Sea, this action is a violation of Russian laws. It is possible that the construction of gas pipelines in general is a violation of international laws. In this case, laying a gas pipeline from Russia to Turkey on the bottom of the Black Sea is also not legal. Or, maybe, Russia asked permission from Georgia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria? Like Russia's request to the Black Sea countries with such a request was not observed. Hence the natural conclusion: all countries that were colonies of the Russian Empire, or as Moscow calls the post-Soviet space, fall under the legitimate interests of Russia. In other words, any independent decision of these countries, whether political or economic, may be in the field of Russian legislation. Exceptions are Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, which have issued themselves as members not only of the EU, but also of NATO. This fact points to the fact that Russia's legitimate interests began to operate with the appearance of Putin in the Kremlin; Under President Yeltsin, the demand for observance of Russia's legitimate interests in the post-Soviet space did not come from Moscow. Here Ukraine did not have time to hurry and was violated the Russian laws, overthrowing its president, Yanukovych. Thus, the removal of the president from power in any independent country, but the former colony of Russia, is a violation of Russia's legitimate interests. I suspect that they did not know about any legitimate interests of Russia in Ukraine when they started the Maidan, for which they received punishment in the form of the loss of part of their country. In short, ignorance of laws does not absolve from responsibility.
   In fact, Putin should present a specific list of Russia's legitimate national interests, so that neighboring independent countries do not violate Russian law and pay for this territory.
   Undoubtedly, each state has its own national interests, however, if the state was once part of the Russian Empire, then its national interests are inferior to Russia's national interests, which are legitimate. Dot!

  The result - if your neighbor is Russia, then you can be either a vassal or an enemy.

   08/18/17.

  Вы правы! Граждане России нуждаются в войне с Украиной. Имперское мировоззрение русского народа требует войны.

What kind of nonsense is it to accuse America of the fact that fascism has arisen in Russia?

You started your post with a fundamental mistake. In democracies, leaders do not direct trade, unlike countries with toralitarian
 regimes.
They also do not manage the production of goods. The free market is the regulator of both production and trade, which was not the case, for example, in the USSR.

  The West imposed sanctions to deprive the Russian fascists of the opportunity to pursue aggressive policies and wars.

 Freedom and trade are different concepts. Of course, in conditions of freedom, trade leads to the development of civilization. But there was also trade between democracies and countries with a totalitarian regime, for example, with the USSR or with Putin's Russia, before the sanctions, which are caused by Russian aggression.

As I see it, you are the paid propagandist here. All your comments here are copying Putin's lies. The West, though late, but understood. that the Empire of Lies and Evil must be stopped. Russian fascism will not pass!

  Yes, Russian fascism threatens the World today, just as German fascism did in the past.

  Nothing happened to the Germans, they were Germans and remained so.

Alik Bahshi

                                                        People's fate or each cricket has its own hearth

         Everyone is different and distinct from each other, not only visually, but also features an individual thinking and behavior. Each man has his own destiny, and attempts to change it is hopeless, because change itself, not as a person. A similar observation can be transferred to people. Inherent to every nation on the common features is not very difficult to recognize the typical representatives of different nations. Just as we can give a description of an individual, and can be characterized by a whole people. Every nation has the genotype, that is, hereditary characteristics, which are likely the people can identify and which determine its historical destiny. Thanks genes we have such a variety of people and as a result states. From this we can conclude that it is the people as a group of people united not only by a common historical past, but also a common future, that is destiny. Thus determine the fate of hereditary characteristics from which no getting around it, which once again points to the validity of the famous wise saying "can not escape the fate", and most importantly in our case, this is true for all the people in general, not just for the individual.

      The question is, why Peter touts Germans in Russia? Because he realized that only the Germans (not French and Italians) can teach Russian law, and the management work that only they can rely on it to his intended reorganization of the state reformatory. In the former Soviet Union can be found German villages, which contrast with the beauty, neatness and order. Even when you are not in their homeland, people do not leave their habits and lifestyles. If they say that, in cases Englishman can usually rely on the word, it goes without conclusion is that, when dealing with someone else, you should not rely solely on words. Gypsies love liberty, but hard work is a burden to them. Russian differ in their .... However, it is better not to detail these differences, because both positive and negative traits can be found in every nation. We note only that, however, such as the Arabs did not want to, they can not be like the Scandinavians, and is not that important external difference as a difference in mentality.

You can spend a mental experiment. If the German, Russian and Hebrew, along with their families to land on a desert island and visit them, that way, in ten years, in what condition we find them? It seems most likely the following simplified picture. The German - solid house with a garden and a strong economy. Russian lives in a mud hut, and rotten to the Germans, and a Jew is mediating between them, say, to buy vodka at the German and Russian markets. Or let's say, what if all the Swiss move to Mexico and Mexicans in Switzerland. How do you think, what would be in this case, well-groomed, and how rich Switzerland transformed Mexico. Probably not hard to imagine what would happen to Germany and Russia, if we make the cross-migration of peoples. No climatic or geographical conditions do not change the character of the people. Why did the Japanese live richer Vietnamese or Russian? Because they are the Japanese and the other explanation is needed. Give Roma land, give them the opportunity to live and handle it, alas, the next day you're gypsies in the land will not find. A similar case is unnatural for Roma, they have a different way of being, however, is not for them alone. Impoverished after the war, do not have any natural resources, Japan and Germany, but by the willingness and ability of their people to work much more than that, what country is Russia. Finland, a former colony of Russia, not a rich mineral resources, with severe climatic conditions far ahead of Russia in terms of life and an explanation of this one, there lived Finns. There is no other explanation. Quite the opposite result, we will have, if hypothetically settle in this territory Russian. I do not for a moment doubt that if the Russian succeeded in 1940 again returned to Finland in the empire, then the standard of living adequate for today's Russia there. So that Finns know why they need the freedom and appreciated this neohodimosti condition for people who can work and wants to decide their own destiny. An empire could not break this will to freedom.

There are no racist or nationalist ideas, I do not pursue, just stating the fact that every nation has its own character and therefore his fate. It would be sheer folly to assert the superiority of one nation over another on the basis that they are at different stages of social development. Yes Englishman richer gypsy, he has his own house, his own country, the Falkland Islands, in the end, there was nothing like a gypsy, but he did not have to, because he belongs to the whole world. Summarizing, we can say that's what people probably unknowingly, and according to their own way, people's mentality is an addiction, and it has. You can realize many of the social phenomena associated with a particular people, and according to its historical destiny.

Unless the person who has musical talent and love music trying to make a talented mathematician, it is unlikely to come out of this venture is something worthwhile. Beginning with Peter the Great Russian people literally pull the ears in Europe, but the distance is not at all close. The latter idea, related to the introduction of Western-style democracy, torn Russia, just kak all previous Russian foreign to the spirit of innovation. Since the days of Rurik Russian used to be ruled and desirable by people because they themselves are useless organizers.
Russia has reached the highest dawn of Catherine the Great, which is two words, then in Russian could not connect. In Russia Oblomovism this phenomenon, not a special case. Who made up the backbone of the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin? Whether there was a lot of Russian? Do not want to be like Russian nationalists, accused of all misfortunes of the Jews. But on the other hand, where you were Russian businessmen, when for example, given the freedom of economic activities after the collapse of the communist ideology. Why were people oligarchs, well, non-Russian nationality? And again, there's no guilt Russian. The fact that the Russian see other value for money than the Jews or Germans. The value of money for the Russian people, is to have fun. From classical Russian literature: Russian aristocrat could dissipate money, drink, and not as I do not spend for useful work. For a Jew money are valuable in themselves, and are a means to enlarge the scheme: money - (mediation, foreign exchange) is money - in other words, the money put into circulation, to make money. The desire to have money in preference to any other property, whether land, factory, farm, make the Jews mobile. They like the Roma, who appreciate the absolute freedom and gold, are not tied to one place and can migrate to any vending their country. A good example is the mass migration of Jews associated with the collapse of Communism and the collapse of the USSR, and preference was given to America and the rich countries of Western Europe, mainly Germany, despite the Holocaust, and not problematic for Israel. But not always for the money can buy everything. For example, there was a famine, no one will sell you bread. And then, the money can be taken away, the one who made the money gun. No wonder the prophet Moses warned his tribe from the worship of the Golden Calf. Unfortunately, either then or later, that charge is left without proper obedience. The people who can not feed himself, will always depend, - gold not grow corn. And in order to grow grain, we need not only his own land, but also their sweat. Germans see the money means for production, that is, they do not appreciate the money as such, but a product that can be made on the money (according to the scheme: product - money - product). Therefore, banks have been the Rothschilds, and the means of production from the croup. The Russian is no such cycle (money - fun - ...). Of course, this is a very rough and simplified scheme to caricature.

In post-communist Russia bankers, traders Tipster emerged mainly from the Jews not to leave the country, but the major manufacturers have not appeared. Though again shills in the country of the Germans. Group of oligarchs that emerged under Yeltsin, the authorities take this free enterprise and using the lack of initiative of the Russian population, achieves a significant impact, both in financial and political spheres. Yeltsin, who regarded himself as the guarantor of the Constitution, which in Russia has always been a dead letter, in fact, is the guarantor of the financial well-being of the oligarchs. It was under Yeltsin symbiosis of power and money reaches its highest peak. The new government, which replaced the communists, provided an opportunity for easy dressing, so instantly corruption permeates all echelons. Money and power gain in the circumstances, Russia unlimited possibilities. For the money, the oligarchs bought parliamentary seats in the State Duma and government posts. Berezovsky is the richest man in Russia with Israeli citizenship, became secretary of the Security Council. Though later, already, as secretary, Berezovsky rejects Israeli citizenship, but this fact only underlines the uniqueness of the situation. Can you imagine a similar post in Israel occupied people, an ethnic Russian, and even with Russian citizenship. In Putin as in traditional executive officer KGB oligarchs saw limp puppet, which will allow them to further enrichment by the sale of the country's natural resources without creating manufacturing enterprises. This trend in the economy could put Russia in a position of countries that are resource fringes of the West and Japan. Russia from the former dictatorship "of the proletariat" could turn into a country of the dictatorship of the oligarchs. (By the way, America is wary of Russian oligarchs close some of them to enter.) This outcome was favorable pathologic complete political bezinitsiativnost Russian people. New new rich did not associate their future with Russia. First of all, they saw it as a country. They are all pre-produced rear in Israel and in other countries, taking out there as much as possible their capital. Russia is for them only a means of enrichment. However, Putin's time they did not see the other side of his nature. As a true security officer, he managed to hide his ambitious future intentions, mixed with strong patriotism. Then the oligarchs did not foresee the danger to their financial empire is Putin. On the other hand violence against the oligarchs prevented spontaneous pogroms, which inevitably would occur, with further economic stratification of society, when one of the causes of such a bundle is readily apparent national factor.
It is worth noting that the fight against oligarchs Putin and his anti-democratic politics, was a lightning rod of an approaching storm in the form of the growth of a large number of various nationalist and clearly pro-fascist parties and organizations in Russia.

The victory of democracy turned around for the Russian people to complete impoverishment and ultimate collapse of the Russian Empire. Can I like the Russian people to pay for their freedom? Do all the freedom, the people who carries a gene Oblomovism? Only a dictatorship for the society, who does not want to engage in any political or economic problems. So the rise of Putin is not accidental, but fatal for the Russian people.

The collapse of the communist ideology has put the Russian people in a dilemma of choosing between freedom and dictatorship, and the people decided not to tempt fate and chose tradition, according to the mentality, the last. The unpopularity of democratic ideas in the Russian environment is reflected in the composition of the national leaders of the Democrats. Moreover, unjustifiably high political ambitions of each individual, Yavlinsky, Nemtsov and Hakamada, ripped, in the end, the balloon of their verbiage.
Russian people prefer the Little Father in the face of Putin, the man did not take place in any party, which is a simple, international, without any ambiguity, vowed to strangle the vermin (ie Chechnya), fighters (ie Chechens), wet in the toilet, and all the other Western guardians of democracy to get circumcised. Do you think it was possible after such a clear and concise policy speech to select a presidential some busybody Democrat willing to distribute empire infidels. Magnificent triumph in the presence of priests and high officials of the state on the occasion of Putin as president more like a coronation to the throne than the taking of the oath.

Putin came not so much a revival of the empire, and how many, continued her agony that is dangerous to the world, even more so when one sixth part again, apparently installed a totalitarian regime.

In the incident, of course, wine mladodemokratov Russian who had to take into account the mentality of the Russian people during the market reforms in the economy and not to go to a situation appears oligarchs. Mladodemokraty naively believed that enough to deprive the communist government, the people gladly take advantage of being given the opportunity for free political and economic activity, by which Russia is sure to reach the standard of living of the world's leading powers. But in reality, trying to taste democracy, the Russian people, in fact, rejected it as not acceptable for domestic use.

 21.04.2005


_____________

I want to say a few words about the "Other Russia", a new party - a new attempt talkers Democrats, led by American paratroopers emerged from Garry Kasparov, Russian fool and seize power. He decided to checkmate the Russian people outside the chess board. True to the role of first violin there like Kasyanov claimed, but "The Other Russia" is not the Russian party. Even if we assume that they will be able to buy the Russian voters, they are still not good for Russia will not do (you can not change people's character and his destiny), and only an even stronger robbery happen, because they, unlike Putin, all currency will place on foreign banks, and the Russian people do not get it. Russian people for himself nothing of democracy will not win, because, I repeat, democracy requires the active participation of people in politics and the economy, that is, what is not traditional in the Russian people. It is this fact, and it is tempting for people like Kasparov (Weinstein), why not use the political passivity of the people and enter into power in pursuit of personal interests. Thought, why Kasparov-Vanshtein not try to Armenia or Israel, but there it is reaching out to Russia, where it is possible to use passive people. The closer the elections in Russia, the more active of the natives of the "Other Russia" for self-promotion. Truly greed for power and money overthrew former players - the new leader of talkers Democrats.

There is no need to repeat Putin's legend that the West wanted to conquer Russia; if this were true, it would have been easy to do at the time of the collapse of the USSR. On the contrary, the West helped the Russians, hoping that democracy had finally won on the territory of the empire. But the West did not understand that the Russian people and democracy are incompatible things. I wrote about this in the article "People's fate or each cricket has its own hearth", explaining it with the mentality of the Russian people. I'm posting this article now.