Yep. Coding atm. Will do it in a min
if you can call getinfo you can also call getblockhash  That was the info from my pool ui. not from the daemon  |
|
|
|
|
Yep. Coding atm. Will do it in a min
|
|
|
|
|
BattleCoin
Wallet Ver: 60000
Version: v0.2.1.3-g99999-boc
Proto Ver: 60006
Conns: 2
Diff: 5,619,444.29
BlkHeight:378,384
|
|
|
|
|
nope. not at all. What blockheights do you guys see?
|
|
|
|
|
The fee structure i was planning on sticking with what we currently use. I'm not 100% sure when it'll be done. Might be a few weeks.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
Graphs are functioning fine apart from the 2hr avg. Thats a stat only available to the admins atm due it causing issues for a few small people.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
File a ticket and we'll refund you. Going to warn the rig owner
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
It was all rented hash for testing.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
Its mainly since im running a pool now so its in my best interest for profitability reasons to have a faster and better codebase. the 0.8.6 and earlier codebases suck tbqh. 0.9.3 isnt working for mining yet and everything ive tried so far hasnt fixed it. The main reason why the port fron namecoin is due to namecoin being on 0.10
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
its me mining at my own pool. Will release it here tomorrow once ive finished some changes im making
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
It certainly is. It also reflects very badly on you for shitting on other people's hard work. Glad your happy with what your doing cause you'll only be able to keep it up so long.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in agreement there. If there was a dos there would be some proof or a name or anything. We've all been dos'd on IRC. I've had sites of my own DDOS'd. Theres always proof of where it happens and occasionally who it is. Which there obviously isnt.....
So i rate kelsey's post a F-
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.
So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?
~BCX~
Okay, i seem to be the only person who cares about being rational and doesn't think baritus is a scammer (and yes, i lost dgc to cryptoave), SO i think that only adds to the credibility when i say he is NOT involved with DGC development. in fact I pm'd him about a week ago asking him to delete his old github and haven't gotten a reply yet. coming from probably the only person who ever defended him, i'll repeat he hasn't been involved with development whatsoever. DGC v3 is entirely new codebase implemented by Ahmed. so cool your shit bcx. really, i'd rather the original dev of DGC be known as a poor entrepreneur, rather than an outright scammer. the DGC he solicited for his exchange project came from willing investors, not from rigging the DGC network. if you're gonna spread shit, at least spread accurate shit. also, the amount of DGC he solicited was roughly 550k total, about the same amount dumped, so i don't believe there's any more coins left to dump, as if that even matters since his holdings, along with all other DGC ever distributed, were gained legally. people just want a public figure to roast when their investment in an overhyped environment turns sour. that's all conversations about him have ever been about. let's just forget about the guy and move on. the DGC network is clean, that is all that ever mattered and is the only thing worth discussing here. Yea were not going to agree there. Xawksaw, samson, techbytes and kenel helped in the creation of DGC V3. Baritus in my personal opinion is an outright scammer. No one in their right minds would say he isnt. Everyone lost a shit ton of DGC in cryptoave. That money was not gained legally at all. He claimed it was for CryptoAve an exchange that would be launched for DGC which barely stayed online at all. Its a non-existant service. So it is a scam. Also DGC was not overhyped at all. Infact the money that people gave towards the marketing of cryptoave and DGC. Which never happened. DGC was one of the most under marketed coins at a time that was critical for DGC. Ahmed |
|
|
|
Is IXC still gonna lose its mass merge-mining and will soon die?
http://darkgamex.ch:2751/chain/IXCoin shows difficulty is falling whilst bitcoin's is rising. If Ixcoin hash rate continues to fall gradually it'll be a long time before you have a problem. But I understand that because you're relying on one or two big pools that you can't upgrade your software because no-one wants to run the risk, and it's not like they're getting paid much for iXcoin, so who knows... it might just get dropped one day. The difficulty is in constant, slow decline. Just a matter of time before the blockchain will end up to be unsecure. Unless... Unless something is done. Nobody is showing any serious commitment toward ixc. This is not criticism. They are logic predictions based on tangible facts. You know, your comments sometimes are appauling. the fact that some people contribute at all you people should be thankful for. Most coins dont even get that. We try our best but CANNOT move further without a mining pool to help us. Dont forget the fact that we also are very, very busy people and so dont have all the time in the world. We have our education, jobs and real life to deal with. Ahmed |
|
|
|
Do you know tenebrix, fairbrix? Tonal bitcoin? those were the starter alts..lack of everything left them dead and buried.
Not too up to date on the alt history are you? Tenebrix and Fairbrix died because I personally exterminated them along with a few of the other early alts that were pieces of shit. In all fairness TBX and FBX were prototype coins and I was asked by the devs to stress them. They were the forerunners of Litecoin. Back on topic.The title of the thread is "If you were the President of the DGC Foundation, what would be your next step"There seems to be a real concern by people about Baritus still being involved. Count me in as one of those people and as I am sure Ahmed can tell you, having experienced first hand that I can be a significant barrier to any coin I desire to be. What would convince me is that if kenel or the DGC Foundation publicly and clearly stated that Baritus is not involved in any manner, never will be and more than likely stole the $30K of DGC, I would consider the matter closed. The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange. So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story? ~BCX~ Baritus wont ever be involved in DGC and its development EVER. (Atleast not while i'm around). My own personal opinion (not from the foundation or kenel) is that baritus most likely dumped the DGC himself rather than an employee. (No exchange operator is dumb enough to leave their wallet unsecured on a device which other people have access to). now doesn't that just leave yet another with a big stash to dump anytime dgc moves forward? i'm not that heavily invested in DGC. I own maybe 40k and considering ive stuck with DGC since the beginning. I doubt i'd ever dump it even if its worthless (You couldnt count the number of worthless coins i hold) |
|
|
|
Do you know tenebrix, fairbrix? Tonal bitcoin? those were the starter alts..lack of everything left them dead and buried.
Not too up to date on the alt history are you? Tenebrix and Fairbrix died because I personally exterminated them along with a few of the other early alts that were pieces of shit. In all fairness TBX and FBX were prototype coins and I was asked by the devs to stress them. They were the forerunners of Litecoin. Back on topic.The title of the thread is "If you were the President of the DGC Foundation, what would be your next step"There seems to be a real concern by people about Baritus still being involved. Count me in as one of those people and as I am sure Ahmed can tell you, having experienced first hand that I can be a significant barrier to any coin I desire to be. What would convince me is that if kenel or the DGC Foundation publicly and clearly stated that Baritus is not involved in any manner, never will be and more than likely stole the $30K of DGC, I would consider the matter closed. The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange. So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story? ~BCX~ Baritus wont ever be involved in DGC and its development EVER. (Atleast not while i'm around). My own personal opinion (not from the foundation or kenel) is that baritus most likely dumped the DGC himself rather than an employee. (No exchange operator is dumb enough to leave their wallet unsecured on a device which other people have access to). |
|
|
|
|
not at all. he never will be. That is the precise reason why we decided to go the foundation route with the possibility for everyone to contribute equally.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
@Deadsea and @Vlad2vlad
What your proposing is very, very difficult. Only part time devs will be able to work on IXC. Mainly due to the fact that ixcoin is centralised to just a few pools of which almost none are able to help us test new coin code. This means that working on IXC is hard. Me, Cinnamon and GR worked on IXC when we could and tried to debug the mining issue in 9.3 and couldnt do so. Since then i've been mining myself attempting to solve a block with little success.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
We're currently working on the API in preperation for a windows application which we're going to be releasing soon.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
Mainly adoption on a number of services. A massively more secure blockchain. Client source which is friendlier to the end user. Based off the 0.9.3 BTC source with a 0.10 upgrade coming soon. (Once i've got more free time and xawksaw's finished the DGC services he's working on). We also now are not controlled by a single dev and as like whats been done here. Taken input from the wider community, those who are and are not invested in DGC. such as yourself which allows everyone a fair way to contribute towards DGC and its future without being held back like what baritus did.
Ahmed
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
