All the charts look terrible, with the exception of 1 year and 3 hour 2 year 6 month 30 day 7 day 24 hour 12 hour all down. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGIgiuog.png&t=664&c=UClGHqBNLlBCew)
|
|
|
Dang ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) so much for the bart Simpson headstand pattern ... Yo dawg I heard you liked Barts ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs16-us2.startpage.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fserveimage%3Furl%3Dhttps%3A%252F%252Fimgflip.com%252Fs%252Fmeme%252FYo-Dawg-Heard-You.jpg%26sp%3D32f465d830f9c7decf0874e67e86669f&t=664&c=XkeTnCVwYnONnw) ... so I put a Bart in yo' Bart, inside another Bart ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Ftradingview%2F4%2F4hmtRla8.png&t=664&c=ll2Q2gnVMzW7iw)
|
|
|
I didn't say it was a possible lie, I said it was a lie.
![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Really? Why do I have to beg for proof of anything? Even a mere lie and no proof? Ya'll are making me frustrated.. You don't have to do anything. You could stop posting right now. Nobody owes you anything. From Og: I lost my BTC in Bitcoin Savings & Loan along with everyone else.
I did not keep any "refund" for myself.
From Shavers' SEC testimony: Q And did you return bitcoins to others during that time period?
A Yes.
Q Who? ... A Yes. Ognasty, O-g-n-a-s-ty; ... Q And all the other individuals you named you returned their entire principal amount?
A Their entire balance.
Then you have Exhibit 3 which shows transactions being made to Og, backed by entries on the blockchain. This is plenty of proof. Now please, stop asking the same questions if you don't like the answers. I don’t appreciate the insinuation. Although, I agree whomever it is does seem to echo some of the things I (and a few others) have said, in some sort of trolling way, but I don’t agree with most of it. It’s a little odd for me because… I occassionally joke around with people IRL using a Scooby Doo voice in a joking way, and I’m pretty certain I’ve never stated this anywhere.. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Maybe it is you, as you are finding a way around your limit of 14 posts every 2 weeks! (completely jesting) I remember when your posts, activity and merit were all in parity for a brief while. Nobody needs to give you merits for 150 days now, it would appear.
|
|
|
There is a Reputation thread about this service. OP is encouraged to respond there. I would ask OP for proof that they own any bitcoin at all, but it doesn't really matter. This looks like a straight up scam.
|
|
|
Well, I wouldn't trust it... Domain registered less than a month ago, uses CloudFlare. Completely anonymous. The 3 deposit methods I've heard of are all chargeback-unfriendly, with Advcash being the only one where you can actually perform a chargeback if something goes wrong (for a $35 fee). The fourth one, called Berty (berty.cash), is very new and only accepts deposits from the other 3. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1aRad7u.png&t=664&c=VXErFY_kyGqeIg) I think you did the right thing by tagging them.
|
|
|
Drew Brees breaking the record at home was a no brainer in my opinion and that is why I went with it. I did take it for fun however I did suspect that he would break Mannings record against his former team the Colts and I have noticed that Brees has broken records when playing at home and I believe they have been on prime time so I thought that the over 2.5 TDs was a good prop bet for the night as the Saints were too short for my liking. I'm now starting to think that the Saints make the Superbowl, just not sure which other team they face.
I'm now regretting not taking a 10 point spread or higher on this game (took 9), but you know, woulda/shoulda. Happy to have a win. Won this game, and thanks to Thomas and Lutz putting up solid numbers, won my fantasy league. It was a great day for freedom, and a great day to be an American.
|
|
|
This is most likely just a little December tax loss harvesting for the U.S. and any other countries where its applicable, the Bargain Boyz still aren't buying yet, but they will come out of hiding sometime before the halving (first half of January is my best estimate rn) for the final capitulation. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgflip.com%2F3idhi2.jpg&t=664&c=TlzowlGnATZMgA) The Bargain Boyz got a nibble from $6840 - $6870. Apparently they think even greater discounts are yet to be found, but I certainly hope they are wrong. We have to remember that they last believed $6500s to be true bargain material. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgflip.com%2F3jors2.jpg&t=664&c=yVe5zgkVGRhgZw)
|
|
|
I'll give you a redo on that if you want @nutildah to make it clear 1:1..
What I said about the whole loan thing was just kidding Twitchy trying to get him to sign a real staked address.. I'm starting to think that the concept of signing agreements is not as well spread as I had thought, or something..
Oh, well in that case let's just do 0.01 @ 1:1. I can definitely round that up in a year, regardless of what the price is.
|
|
|
I'm not a hodler -- I actually .... so I can't do BTC.
Well what is one signature payment in BTC? I can wait a week after the close.. But what if it goes to $300k+? You would have to hodl it now.. ... I could hodl some satoshis for you if you want.. OK, you have my word that I would honor this type of deal: (I'm loaning you .01 so you can pay me .02)
With the same conditions as suchmoon. If Trump wins and I don't honor my repayment of 0.02 BTC everybody has permission to run my ass red. But I will repay because that's what I do. Hell, let's up the stakes for me: I will pay you 0.025 if Trump wins the election (on suchmoon-based terms), seeing as how you are basically giving me a loan of 0.01 BTC. Address: 19fZGJAsampH3UEMp5WroX3Y6eUU1tdA7B Message: This is nutildah, signing an old-ass Counterparty address on 12/17 (12/16 for most of you still). Signature: H3B8p56eKe2cysSKIb+Kr016oKRIXhF03F1K2eUORe83ZzjR+96CnKXF5RXaKbZf0tpC+cqfr0hmDvtNQBxW6lQ= First transaction is from 9.29.14 Let me know what you think. I can sign a more specific message if you agree.
|
|
|
This "bounty" has a referral link, I reported it as such. The website immediately wants you to be logged into MetaMask... looks fishy as hell. We'll see what happens to the thread.
|
|
|
CryptoSparks locked his service thread, which is not surprising given that he can't ever admit being wrong. I just wanted to note that somewhere between his next-to-last and last post this change happened: WINS: 109 LOSSES: 1 ROI: +57.27% WINS: 109 LOSSES: 2 ROI: +7.0% Not sure if his bot had another brain fart recently or he fudged the math again. Out of about 7 "investors" who post in the Telegram, only 1 currently has a profit, from what I can gather. Everyone else is sitting on a loss right now. Oh, except for Gabriel (cryptosparks), of course. Even when everyone else loses, he wins.
|
|
|
Well Jerry Jones had to put the Defense over his knee before this game and it really showed, why couldn't the prick wait one week before losing it on them. The Rams tool me down in flames. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Yeah that game was pretty ugly... Goff gonna Goff... not much you can do. I thought the Cowboys were going to do even worse and thats how the Rams would win, but I was wrong. Steelers also lost! I'm 0/2. Still going to put a little BTC on the Saints to cover tomorrow. I need Thomas and Lutz (K) to put up some numbers in order to win my fantasy league... Turns out playing Winston was a great idea, because without him I probably would have lost.
|
|
|
given the fact that Og apparently lied about ever being reimbursed by pirate
When? How? Because Pirate said so? You will exclude OG over some possible lie, but won't even remove that mooseprong moron who advises scammers to evade red trust with alt accounts? I tend to look at net totals when considering including/excluding people from my trust list: are they doing more good than harm?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqLfQkwY.png&t=664&c=LiCxxF4HDGv04w) Eddie... Eddie... What the hell are talking about? Its not just "because Pirate said so." You're not really paying attention here. I didn't say it was a possible lie, I said it was a lie. Considering what was at stake, that's a huge difference. And yet you went and made a meme including shit I never said... That's the great thing about the trust system. I don't need for you to get up to speed on the reality of the situation in order for me to change my trust list.
|
|
|
Recap:
- Twitchy did a good job, presented some previously unconsidered information in a reasonably detailed form. - Og knows its best from a legal standpoint not to respond to any of this, knowing at worst he'll lose a few inclusions in DT, and bowed out - TS and TOAA jumped in with their usual mad dog trollery, impervious to logic surrounding assumptions the rest of us are making
What's next?
For me personally, given the fact that Og apparently lied about ever being reimbursed by pirate, I have excluded him from my trust network. That's the only course of action I deem fitting. Not much else to be done in this case, and I certainly don't wish him punitive harm from something that happened 6-7 years ago.
Not much else to be said at this point. Anybody feel differently? (besides TS and TOAA, thats a given)
|
|
|
Definitely worth a merit, thanks, I'll try it out tomorrow morning.
|
|
|
Sure THIS will stop the Dems! Bestiality is legal in 10 states. Are you going to deny states rights Techole? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%253AANd9GcQswl4zbEv4Cb3aTuPDFCOUtmpw2dv2otBgjXzZdx3ZlrsWaIPd&t=664&c=HVsT4aZVEfBr3w) Regardless, he was making a joke, and it was funny. I laughed.
|
|
|
I am curious this project is a viable project or not. I am confused with what people talk about this thread!
You want the truth? Try to get a hold of one of the main developers. But you won't be able to! They don't want to know about the nasty investors like you. omg... is this shitcoin... still around ? i even forgot about this shitcoin. i sold everything and i moved completly to grin. mine grin it is very profitable. grin is anonymous. makes great return mining it. no troubles no fight. community is really great! nimiq is a scam ico. nobody heard about nimiq. no marketing no exchanges Stop posting from different accounts, its embarrassing. I heard about Nimiq specifically because of your obsession with it. Once the tides for the alt season have turned, I will consider investing in it. I've been following it specifically because you won't stop trashing it. That's what makes it intriguing and makes me feel like there might be something behind it. BTW, a severe privacy vulnerability was recently outlined in Grin: https://www.ccn.com/litecoin-creator-charlie-lee-responds-to-mimblewimble-privacy-vulnerability/Its developers say it was never meant to be truly anonymous. Should probably do better homework.
|
|
|
My pick for the week is for the Rams to beat the +3 spread against the Cowgirls.
I also think the line on the Monday game (Saints vs. Colts) isn't high enough, at -9. I think the Colts are gonna fold like a cheap suit.
Anybody have any tips on how to stream games online without paying for it? My internet seems to have regained its strength.
I signed up for the freemium version of NFL Game Pass so I can watch (some) old games now, lol.
|
|
|
Now that we're in the vortex, you wanna quit?
Fucking LOLing over here. Bravo. Have a great weekend. Thanks Bob, you too. Having just watched a clip of that scene makes me want to rewatch the whole thing. I've probably seen it 5 times but am due for another viewing. For those missing the context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP8_w1J5raYIf it wasn't for this thread I would have never seen this killer movie! Glad you went and watched it... Its one of my faves, probably in my Top 10. So many great quotes. The way they trash their hotel rooms is epic. Just for fun, I read all about adrenochrome last night... Its basically a form of adrenaline and doesn't actually have psychedelic properties. Would you believe that Mark Harmon, Penn Gillette, Cameron Diaz and a young Tobey Macguire were all in that movie? I didn't realize it was them until I looked at the credits on IMDB.
|
|
|
Now that we're in the vortex, you wanna quit?
Fucking LOLing over here. Bravo. Have a great weekend. Thanks Bob, you too. Having just watched a clip of that scene makes me want to rewatch the whole thing. I've probably seen it 5 times but am due for another viewing. For those missing the context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP8_w1J5raY
|
|
|
|