Guys...  Nonsense. We came here to find the American Dream. Now that we're in the vortex, you wanna quit? |
|
|
|
Yep, I think you guys are right in that Winston is the better pick. Interestingly, he's playing with a broken thumb, but he played through it last week and got his highest fantasy score ever, so, didn't seem to slow him down much. Here is my matchup. Should manage to pull off the V without too many problems, but anything can happen.  For some reason my opponent is keeping Thielen on the bench. Not sure what his reasoning is. Maybe he'll update his lineup before Sunday. I'll definitely be rooting for the Steelers! |
|
|
|
Boyz are revving up the trucks, shining their hood ornaments, getting ready for true bargain hunting.  Where has Lambie been anyway? |
|
|
|
Ouch... Though I don't prefer to be the bringer of negativity, bitcoin is among the highest of the high-risk investment category. If there's a market sell-off, BTC, now inexorably tied with Wall Street, will be one of the first assets to suffer a major sell-off, as big-time investors (however ironically) plow their money into cash. - stocks go down - dollar becomes stronger - Fed prints dollars - stocks go up - a bubble pops - stocks go down - dollar becomes strong - Fed prints dollars - stocks go up - etc. Apparently they can just keep doing this forever, and the cycle will continue forever... I'm not wrong until proven otherwise. The dollar is the worst form of currency except for all of the others, BTC included. The case for BTC being some sort of alternative store of value to the dollar just isn't there yet, IMHO. Speculators have to get out first, which as we all know, isn't happening any time soon. |
|
|
|
WINS: 109 LOSSES: 1 ROI: +57.27%
Another loss will make that negative. What's the actual ROI for your clients after you took your 30% fee? What's the actual ROI for you? And you can't claim that you have a no-risk strategy anymore. The risk has been shown to be huge, 30%+ on one trade. I also love how you count all those martingales as separate trades when you win but obviously only as one trade when it gets liquidated at a loss. So how many actual new trades did you initiate over the 3 months, not counting the "dollar cost averaging"? And one of them went horribly bad. Your bot sucks, in case no one has told you that yet. MAKE INcoME pASSively Everything he's said is bullshit and has been laden with lies from the beginning. Now most (if not all) of his actual investors are sitting on losses, and what does he do? Re-arrange his charts to show no loss at all! I would say he should be tagged and flagged but we did that already, and if people are really stupid enough to continue plowing their money into this, well, they can't say we didn't warn them. |
|
|
|
Notice how they attack us, the person(s), and not our arguments. For we speak the truth.
No, you don't, you've been caught lying several times already. There's no reason to take you seriously. |
|
|
|
Since its not certain that cryptodevil will respond to this thread, I recommend linking this thread in the one referenced by cryptodevil in his trust rating for Balthazar: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822217It sounds like the OP of that thread indeed got their BTC back, so I would appeal to cryptodevil by mentioning that fact there, as well as that Balthazar has been nothing but a positive for the community since then. Perhaps enough time has passed where cryptodevil will change his mind on the issue. |
|
|
|
And again Nimi- and -Numby are tossing post after post to each other. I wonder what the hidden agenda is that this single poster keeps on spending time to share his opinion that nobody is waiting for.
Its truly bizarre. They are definitely the same person who is obsessed with shitting on this project, for whatever reason I can't discern. One thing that I do know is that they are absolutely full of shit and I don't believe they were invested in this project for one second. |
|
|
|
LOL. Sam Kinison had a joke that touched on that subject, but it was about literal necrophilia rather than metaphorical.  "Oh, you mean life keeps on fucking you even after you're dead? It never ends!!" Weird. We heard his body was cremated. " Cotten, according to his widow, died in India from Crohn’s disease complications. He was 30 years old, and in the process of philanthropy involving an Indian orphanage. Rumors through various chat groups claimed the body was not repatriated intact, and was instead cremated in Jaipur, India. EDIT: CoinSpice has been unable to independently confirm that claim." source - https://coinspice.io/news/canada-exchange-update-190m-gone-mysterious-death-exit-scam-fears-grow/There was a bunch of weird discrepancies in this case. Including that they managed to get his name wrong on the death certificate. Also, this CoinDesk version of the story says his body was brought back to Canada: Following his death, Cotten was embalmed in a medical school and transported back to Canada, where he was reportedly buried in mid-December. |
|
|
|
I am sure you two are having loads of fun obsessing over me, but back to the part where you prove your accusations against OGNasty...
I don't recall anybody saying "Hey, let's get TECSHARE's opinion on this." You could have chosen to not say peep, but instead you chose to start attacking literally everybody who pointed out the discrepancy between Og's words and Shavers' testimony (and documentary evidence supported by the blockchain). |
|
|
|
What we have so far: - cryptohunter, aka The-One-Above-All, has provided zero evidence that Bob has been "supporting scammers" - cryptohunter likely sold his account: The person posting from the cryptohunter account HAS NEVER posted from this account. We will not address this again.
I don't know what else there is to be taken away from that particular wording. There are many easier ways to have conveyed this information, yet they chose to convey it in a fashion which insinuates they sold their account. Meanwhile, any time somebody presents evidence or rationale that runs contrary to cryptohunter's talking points, they delete the post, under the pretense that it violates their local rules (even if it does not). This summation of observable instances paints a picture of clearly untrustworthy, and I daresay scam facilitating, behavior by this user. I am doubling down on my initial recommendation left on their trust wall some 8 months ago that this user be avoided at all costs. |
|
|
|
Seems reading isn't your strong suit. Read the part in bold. You have to request people "leave" your thread, which you never actually did. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. If you are too dumb to see that I just provided evidence that is your problem mr scam facilitator. If the concept we presented was to complicated for you to understand get some help.
No, you presented no evidence. You said, "here are the scammers" and presented a list of DT members which you claim to be scammers, yet you've provided no OBSERVABLE PROOF of this. Its just you doing what you do best: calling people names. Its the only thing you do. How hard can it be for you to understand THEYMOS CAN NOT KNOW. He was not lying he was speculating based on the server side information we want him to have?? got it now retard.
Theymos wasn't speculating, he said "you are cryptohunter." He didn't say "you might be cryptohunter." It is not speculation. It is a statement of fact which he is in a unique position to verify. So you've just lied once again. There are other ways to verify you are cryptohunter besides IP information. Common sense is a big one, something that you are severely lacking. The only thing I "got" is that, for the life of you, you cannot be honest. You are simply incapable of it. I don't know whether its a psychological problem, if it comes with being a troll, or if its a genuine neurobiological deficiency. Whatever it is, its rendered you incapable of telling the truth. Ergo, you are not to be trusted or taken seriously. Despite my efforts to find a rational, decent side to you, you have once again failed to debate in good faith and as such I am now putting you on ignore permanently. Even if he comes back denying that he sold it, there are many other weaselly possibilities. Are you forgetting that you're dealing with an award-winning megatroll?  LOL, I suppose I did. Doesn't seem irrelevant or off-topic to me. Seems quite the opposite. You're untrustworthy and incapable of debating in good faith. Since you deleted the message, I didn't actually get to tell you that I am putting you on ignore, so consider this post that message. I won't be interrupting your threads any more. Have at it. |
|
|
|
Cryptohunter is incapable of engaging in honest debate, thus I am putting him on ignore permanently (and all his alts, as well). A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. If you are too dumb to see that I just provided evidence that is your problem mr scam facilitator. If the concept we presented was to complicated for you to understand get some help.
No, you presented no evidence. You said, "here are the scammers" and presented a list of DT members which you claim to be scammers, yet you've provided no OBSERVABLE PROOF of this. Its just you doing what you do best: calling people names. Its the only thing you do. How hard can it be for you to understand THEYMOS CAN NOT KNOW. He was not lying he was speculating based on the server side information we want him to have?? got it now retard.
Theymos wasn't speculating, he said "you are cryptohunter." He didn't say "you might be cryptohunter." It is not speculation. It is a statement of fact which he is in a unique position to verify. So you've just lied once again. There are other ways to verify you are cryptohunter besides IP information. Common sense is a big one, something that you are severely lacking. The only thing I "got" is that, for the life of you, you cannot be honest. You are simply incapable of it. I don't know whether its a psychological problem, if it comes with being a troll, or if its a genuine neurobiological deficiency. Whatever it is, its rendered you incapable of telling the truth. Ergo, you are not to be trusted or taken seriously. Despite my efforts to find a rational, decent side to you, you have once again failed to debate in good faith and as such I am now putting you on ignore permanently. Even if he comes back denying that he sold it, there are many other weaselly possibilities. Are you forgetting that you're dealing with an award-winning megatroll? LOL, I suppose I did. |
|
|
|
Back on topic to boblawblaws scammer supporting , trust abusing behaviors I think. Can't let that wussy weasel get away with it entirely can we even if he fav feltchers like you and jayjuangay would have it that way.
Who does Bob support that is a scammer? How have they scammed anyone? Its not like they lied about being an alt of a disreputable member in order to protect their main account from being tarnished any further, which pretty much entirely backfired apparently. Can you stop being dishonest long enough to admit you are cryptohunter for once? Okay now you are at least engaging in some form of debate. Let's pull you apart. No off topic thanks. Stick to the OP. The person posting from the cryptohunter account HAS NEVER posted from this account. We will not address this again. This is a lie. How do you have the nerve to claim anyone else is dishonest when you yourself are incredibly so? You are cryptohunter. Not only did theymos tell us, you write with the exact same style in both accounts. You use the same phrases in both accounts, the same ridiculous ALL CAPS AND LOTS OF PUNCTUATION!!!! to make your non-points. You're a liar and not to be taken seriously. As for my question about Bob supporting scammers: you sidestepped it entirely to go on one of your long-winded personal attack-laden rants about nothing! Your whole crusade is a sham. Nobody has ever or will ever take you seriously, not only because you are an unrelenting asshole but because you constantly lie about everything. Stop side-stepping. Provide OBSERVABLE INSTANCES of how Bob is supporting scammers, or else kindly shut the fuck up. |
|
|
|
|
For the record I went with the Steelers in the poll... Bills have indeed been improving but I think Steelers are the better late season team and know how to win in crunch time. Bills had a playoff drought from 1999 - 2017 when they lost to the Jags. Meanwhile, Steelers have been to the playoffs 11 times during that period.
I do need your guys' opinion on who to start for my QB:
Carson Wentz
or
Jameis Winston
This is for the victory in my fantasy league. Winston is projected to score about 30% higher than Wentz, which is quite significant, and it could make or break my team this week. On one hand, Winston is great for fantasy teams, on the other than, Wentz's team needs a W for the playoffs. Who would you go with?
|
|
|
|
Back on topic to boblawblaws scammer supporting , trust abusing behaviors I think. Can't let that wussy weasel get away with it entirely can we even if he fav feltchers like you and jayjuangay would have it that way.
Who does Bob support that is a scammer? How have they scammed anyone? Its not like they lied about being an alt of a disreputable member in order to protect their main account from being tarnished any further, which pretty much entirely backfired apparently. Can you stop being dishonest long enough to admit you are cryptohunter for once? |
|
|
|
I never officially crowned anybody as the victor, but now is as good a time as any to put the troll tiara on The-One-Above-All... How's that for a troll user name, eh? "The One Above All"... The epitome of humility right there... Enjoy your crown, cryptohunter:  I apologize for not announcing the victor earlier, but we just found a couple of boxes of ballots that went missing for a few months, plus there were irregularities in our electronic voting machine... people would press "The-One-Above-All" and end up somehow voting for "Halliburton", it was a real mess. Anyway, thanks to all who participated, and thanks to the nominees for... well actually thanks for nothing, you should all go re-evaluate your "contributions" to the forum. I hope you enjoyed this thread (that effectively ended 4 months ago). Happy 10th Anniversary and Merry Christmas! |
|
|
|
He attempted to debate you but you deleted his post, making it appear as if there was no debate. That's just another way (among many) in which you are dishonest and untrustworthy. You obviously are unable to engage in honest debate which is why you resort to deleting posts that observably disprove your observably nonsensical nonsense. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Hahahahaha..,
You know that usually I do not post in this fucktwat's self moderated thread, but it is quite hilarious (maybe even ironic) that you, mic, are asking about the purported "team" of this diptwat... hahahahahaha Not that it is an irrelevant question, because diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All's, does constantly use such stupid ass troll/shill reference to his interweb's persona.
Of course, I already mentioned diptwat's use of the royal "we" in an earlier post in this thread (which probably can be easily found), but of course, diptwat refuses to admit why he is actually continuously using such royal we term,
He just seems to be a fucking silly ass loser shill/troll who may or may not have a team, and to the extent that he has a team(handler) that is helping him out with his content, themes, etc, then hopefully (on a personally fulfilling level, not that anyone should give too many shits about a person who seems to be employed to engage in such non-constructive posts) he is actually getting paid in bitcoin and able to stack a few sats rather than spinning his wheels with ongoing largely irrelevant nonsense spreading.
These are great points JJG and its nice to see you here. You have successfully pointed out observable instances of t-o-a-a inventing friends for his lost cause that nobody else will touch with a 10 foot pole, it would be clear abuse of a self-moderated thread (and definitely untrustworthy behavior) if he were to delete your comments. I suggest you engage in use of your DT powers and leave a negative trust rating for both the-one-below-all as well as cryptohunter, since this is his alt account, and they are one in the same. In summation, there's no reason why anybody should ever take you seriously about anything, ever. I think most people already know this. I think you secretly know it as well but are incapable of admitting it, because you are dishonest. |
|
|
|
I am more focused on everyone else observing getting the full backround of the motivations behind this targeting, and the long term consequences for this community if this kind of Stalinist behavior is tolerated.
To everyone else observing it looks like you are barking at anyone who questions why OgNasty said he lost funds in the BST ponzi when Trendon Shavers testified to the SEC that he had refunded him in full. |
|
|
|
@nutildah. Can you change the poll? I suggest polling the wild cards Steelers versus the Buffalo Bills game hehe.
Hah. Funny you should mention that. I chose Steelers/Bills and updated it before reading this comment. New Poll 321 - Buffalo Bills 322 - Pittsburgh Steelers The spread is currently -1.5 Steelers. Both teams need this game to get in the playoffs, should be an exciting matchup. My internet has been fucked for the past 3 days so that's why I was a bit late.. Checked in to a hotel just to use their Wifi for work... ended up spending most of the day looking at Facebook and YouTube.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
