Yah, throw in the customised yabbings - if you like the Akpororo and Aproko angle. I guess the jabs will some how push it out there to the needless applications submitted. There's always a prize tag.

Oh! You really do think so? Don't be ludicrous. This is going to have a ripple effects if you don't know and tweaking that campaign rule is one of such.

I guess bounty managers too will now need to tweak this rule to accommodate the new flag system rather than the default trust as almost all the negative trusts have disappeared.

This is simply because there are variants to each temperament because of the mix or combination as every temperament has a combination of another. There are 12 blends from the major 4 temperaments. For instance, as a melancholic you could be a:
1. MelChlor - That's a MelancholyCholeric

2. MelSan - MelancholySanguine

3. MelPleg - MelancholyPlegmatic- These are the most reserved and introverted

Of course, not everyone who is at a funeral is there for the food and drinks, especially the bereaved family. But we can't truly say this of gatecrashers and distant attendees. I really don't give a damn about the reasons people attend funerals, whether for food or to pay their last respects. All I am saying is that the time spent at funerals on sermonizing is unnecessarily long and time wasting.

Dude, this is a proven theory and not a mere speculation. All you have to do is check dull cousins/nephews/nieces of yours and then check how their mothers are instead of arguing blindly. Simple.

OP, there is no way Bitcoin will be recognized in every country of the world. This isn't possible even in the next 200 years. To start with, the British Pound Sterling (the highest fiat) isn't even recognized in every country, let alone Bitcoin with all its attendant and confusing technology.

People like you cashnetkwk end up destroying great projects with your unsubstantiated claims of scam. A few minutes ago you screamed BTC2 was a scam, now you turn around to praise it? Why? SMH.

Some of the accounts that got banned for plagiarism were bought accounts and at such you wouldn't be right saying the owners aren't smart enough and could not be discrete to evade a ban by opening another one through Tor to hide their identity.

In the case of this user https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=370611, and according to his confession, he wasn't the one who plagiarized. It was the original owner of the account he bought. No one would say bill gator isn't a smart dude or wasn't helpful to the community until that fateful day of reckoning when his account got trapped in that ban tsunami.

This has always been the way it works in trade and investment - people like to chase price. Apart from Warren Buffet, most investors feel reluctant buying penny stocks. They like the top 5 - 10 companies on the list.

Sadly, in 2017 the same activity number you have now (252) would've made you a Senior ranked member. My point being that 2017 was a better year generally for the crypto industry and those who invested, unlike now.

Anyway, that aside, bounties have become somehow worthless these days because of what shitcoins the rewards later turn out to be. But sometimes one can get lucky and run into worthy rewards if one exercises patience. Yesterday, the market was agog in what looked like a pump of the BTC2 coin doing over 5,000% rise from less than $0.60 to over $36 within a few hours yesterday. It was crazy. Imagine anyone here who participated in the bounty here last year and had like 200coins. That's huge profit, isn't it?

It pumped to over $36 but it's back now to $7. I think something fishy is going on with that coin. Coins don't rise that much in a day without it being a dump.

Sat is Satoshi. It's the tiniest unit of Bitcoin.

Well, you got to be sure what url your friend navigated because there is a bitcointalk.com (phishing site) while this (the real site) is bitcointalk.org. And there is nothing complicating here as navigation on the site is easy.

We may have retracements here and there from time to time but definitely we aren't going to see any of that kind of dip we witnessed in 2018. Fresh money is coming into this industry from panicking investors who seek to secure their wealth as a result of the uncertainties of the US trade wars with China and other countries that will be included in that mêlée. Therefore, I think the bull run isn't exhausted yet.

I sincerely owe you a bottle of beer in addition (or whatever that you drink) for speaking my mind on the identity of Satoshi - Honestly, I don't think the Bitcoin community cares any more as finding him/she out won't influence the price of Bitcoin or its workability.

OP just wrote like one who is new to the ICO stuff. If they actually participated during the 2017 crypto boom I don't think the OP would be sounding this optimistic seeing what investors went through in the hands of developers and their teams. Even till this very moment, most ICOs still maintain that scam modus operandi. We just have to be very careful or completely stay away from ICOs until regulations set into that area.

I can see there isn't any restrictions on where to post. But is posting in the gambling thread compulsory?

You really think those details are mere coincidence? Honestly? Well, I don't think so. The details are too close to be ignored.

OP, what you're asking for is analogous to telling a company to take away the sole distributorship right it gave to its early patronisers just because some new dudes are coming in with bigger cash and wanting the distributorship deal. I am a member of a forum on crypytocurrency, cryptotalksworld, and I know how tedious it has been for us as early member to get traffic to the site. Will you now think it right to flush out all old members who slaved for that forum if traffic increased a few years from now by denying them certain rights and incentives? Life doesn't work that way and I believe that's the principle Theymos is considering most.