When you guys are talking about the "banked activity" are you referring to a situation in which your account has less posts than activity points but the posts you have are spread out over the 2 week periods such that the account's activity will climb as soon as you post. Or are you talking about the opposite situation where you have more posts than activity and as soon as another 2 weeks passes you get 14 more activity points (as long as you post at least once during that time period)? I could see either situation being called "banked activity" but they're quite opposites.
They are talking about the first scenario but then again the bolded part isnt correct because you cant have less post than your activity ( just a matter of wording imo, it should be potential activity instead of just activity ) . This is what it called as "banked activity" . As for the second scenario, it is not a "banked activity" because nothing is banked for the second one. You get the activity that you supposed to get so there isnt anything that is banked
|
|
|
its nice that you fix all the problems as soon as possible Credits to the moneypot's team especially and as well as the other site owner in moneypot that helps. Thing is that if Moneypot is DDOSed , all the site there will be affected so its kinda like a team work to fix all of it also the statistics are really high The statistics to be honest is kinda low because of the DDOS . The daily BTC wagered could be higher but things happen and the site still pull through this with a significant amount as well . That serves as a proof that the house has been getting quite the attention lately i would be curious to know how much people loose out of those 140 wagered all in all
It would be innapropriate to share the amount of player's loses ( eventhough I keep track most of it ) however one can always do a rough count with the house edge. The house edge of the site is 1 % so the amount of player's loses should be around 1.4 BTC , due note that his is a rough count and it doesnt mean that the player is losing that much as the house could be losing as well
|
|
|
Aha, I know your point, but my point is that people prefer playing funny, famous slots, although they are not provably fair cause in fiat world, casinos and players don't care about provably fair Irony , people dont care about things being fair or not however this is irrelevant because this site isnt solely a fiat casino On the contrary, the slots of big providers have prove their transparency Transparency of what? There isnt any transparency apart from a shiny badges to flash that the game is provided by the XYZ game provider. Having a freespin, bonus rounds and big jackpot isnt a transparency either because in the end it will depends on the bankroll of the site. This isnt a true fairness at all btw are much better than provably fair slots.
The disability of proving if your game is fair or not isnt the true fairness. True fairness is when you can verify the bet of your own not because of being told that this game is fair because there are alot of people that has played it or alot of sites that use it.
|
|
|
Low roll are usually somewhat slow because there are too many of them for the system to handle Not true, it is not about how the number of the roll but every rolls will be recorded in the database thus if a site dont "slow down" the speed for the dust roll then it will cluter up the database which means the house will need to do a database maintenance more often otherwise the site will be slower. With that being said, if OP looks for a fast site without any restriction to dust bet then BetterBets is the fastest while high rolls are fast as lightning, if you are low roller you might never notice this feature.
Does high roller even use autobet? Turns out that uses the autobet mostly is dust bet You can try for dice sites with fewer people playing to reduce lag.
Number of player isnt the factor that slower down your bet solely
|
|
|
-snip-
Actually it looks like BTCJam is not consistent in the way they run there System or the recently changed it. My Reputation Loan Request got deleted and the Supporter wrote me i should link my Facebook and verify my Income (so he obv. did not looked at my account at all) For a Plattform which is out more then 2 Year's it looks not that pro. This happened to few others sometimes. The reason for that could be the lack of activity in your facebook so they thought that it isnt your real facebook ( dont know the reason of them to ask you to verify income again ). Sometimes suspicious reputation loan got flagged by the system, therefore you will see alot of reputational loan request disguised as "short term trading loan" with 1 week or earlier repayment. So either i start "fake Loan" which i actually don't need or i have to live with my credit Rating. It depends on the amount that you wish to loan. If it is a low amount then just bear with your rating for now and slowly build up your rating instead of going with the fast way
|
|
|
Last time I checked, btcJam is strict on the details of the borrowers there, so I think faking details would be hard
Faking details is never an issue there because I have got an arbitration award of someone that is actually a fake identity which I dont care because it is a small amount but the main point is there are currently a lot of potential scammer there. Pretty much the one that got profit there would be btcjam and the scammer. the borrower had A+ rating, he got away pretty easy. Which is the sad truth , even A+ ratings turn into a scammer once he got himself a lot of loan. Kinda a new scam in btcjam, build up yourself with alot of legit loans and ask for a chunk of it in the future just to grab it all away It was a small sum and arbitration didn't affect it as it didn't go back that far in retrospect.
Unless you put on a large amount then pursuing the defaulter is simply a workload assuming he is not in the same country with you. The cost to bring a legal action to the defaulter might cause you a whole lot amount then the amount that you lend , simply not worth it
|
|
|
Does this mean that all cashback and affiliate payments are prorated (such that you don't NEED 5 BTC wagered by affiliates to get anything from them)? Or what is/isn't?
You get 15 % of the house edge for every BTC that is wagered by your referall which means that if your referall wagered 1000 satoshis, you will get 1.5 satoshi back but it will be save on the database until you get a total of 10,000 sats ( because the peer2peer transfer in Moneypot require a minimum of 100 bits . For the cashback it is rewarded based on each tier (references on Bjorn's lovely picture) , The cashback club needs a minimum of 5 BTC wagered weekly to get it otherwise you will not get any back
|
|
|
23rd august 2015 19JdRyJXnWJRUFNERufQn3wavh7hpj38sd
|
|
|
which is odd, BTCjam makes money thru the Reputation System...
They dont but they make money from their platform, from all of the loan there. Basically every loan under 5 BTC will have 4 % fee and over 5 BTC will have 2 % fee. The reputation loan is not a must, you can go through it slowly but if you want to get a faster rating then this is how you do that , it is pretty common there and almost everyone do this to boost their rating to at least B / B- because it is pretty hard to even get 0.5 BTC loan with C rating I see that you also don't have any personal references which I would think would play somewhat of a part in your score.
Yes this as well but unless you got personal references from someone with high rating then it wont affect any difference at all
|
|
|
look at this crazy win streak i observed on crimedice
-snip-
Well you can call me skeptics but judging from the screencap I can say that quite obvious the guy "know" what is the next roll number will be. The chosen multiplier is almost too good to be true which is pretty close to the roll number. Actually this is much expected from a dice site with coindice script ( wonder why someone keep spending their BTC for such script with lot of loopholes while there are Dan's free scripts which is free and bugless)
|
|
|
Obviously dice will never be ev+ that makes no sense, it's impossible
This statement is totally wrong, in fact some dices are +EV . For example jackpot in DaDice , it has been proven that if you are only hunting for the jackpot then this is totally +EV for you. Raffles ticket in Betterbets ( if you know how to get ir properly ). In fact if you know how to play it "smartly" then you can turn the edge over to you which of course involving giveaway / contest winning and investing in the bankroll ( this isnt part of "playing dice" but still a way to get +EV for you )
|
|
|
-snip-
no i had no open Loan. I now opend one just to see if that increase my Reputation, if i pay it back instant. The reputation increase correspondent to the number of loan that you have repaid also with the positive rating that you get from your lender but keep in mind that it doesnt mean that your reputation will increase with just 1 loan ( I dont know the exact math but it will take few loan ). Also there is a 4 % fee applied to your loan, so if you open a loan with 1 % interest for reputational purposes in fact you need to pay 5 % of the amount that you loaned ( 4 % + 1 % ) . That is quite a sacrifice to lose some but it is quite needed if you want a faster higher rating
|
|
|
After all that i had a Score of B- and could lend BTC for roughly 12%.
I seem to miss this but do you have an open loan? If you have got a loan then your rating will goes down. This is to prevent someone from getting alot of loan in one time ( lower rating harder to get loan ). It will be up once you fully repay your loan besides if you want to increase your rating, all you need to do is to "repay your loan" that is the reason why people open a "reputational loan" . Reputational loan is a loan with lower interest and fast repayment (almost instant) thus if you do this multiple times than your rating will be higher
|
|
|
-snip-
There isnt any need to start all over this thing again. The negative trust is some sort of warning and not a sole guidance as people are free to proceed at their own cost. Bringing this matter over and over again wont change any rating of Dadice because if they want their rating to be changed, all they need is to sign a simple BTC address which they refused . Furthermore, if you got a site that you suspect as a scammer than you will just need to PM few guys on default trust, it is not likely every one of them going on a patrol in scam accusation
|
|
|
This is what everyone thought as well but apparently it seems the fee is until the end of each year. With that said, there is no point in paying the fee now since you will only get around 5 months left of weekly payout until the end of 2015 and that is if only this "ponzi" able to sustain itself until the end of the year with so many doubt around
And it isn't on a sliding scale that accounts for how many payouts are left in the "year". Assuming that it will last until the end of the year then it will be 20 times weekly payout for that account but then again since it is a timebomb then there is no guarantee that you will get 20 times of weekly payout ( you could be screwed by this ). Also probably there is never an ROI if you got a lot of gen2 in your account GOT paid . I'm thinking of buying some shares and increase them ....
Even if you got paid by Chris that doesnt mean he is legit . Increasing the shares in your possesion would be taking more timebombs with you. Alas those who paid the fee are the one that keep this ponzi up and running and those who get in first always get profit anyway assuming there will be another person that get in "after" you
|
|
|
-snip-
oldmate has confirmed in the past that he knew the site owner before diggit.io was launched. This strengthen my speculation which means that the owner of the site may be coming back in the future or have some plan for later because it is really pointless to leave 300 + BTC sitting for almost nothing in the site while he can gain more if he put it in a site with higher wagered counter per day. It may not seem to be "abandoned" right now but much like leaving it aside for now as the owner has stated few times that he is busy with some IRL work (?) Hey everyone. Sorry for the lack of replies here. Been very busy!
|
|
|
This is horrible, why run a gambling website without a domain. Do not visit!
The beauty of moneypot let you to visit such site without giving any of your accounts credentials. There is no harm in visiting such site because your account data is protected in moneypot, apart from that there is also no harm to play in a "no-domain" site like this which everyone think might not be provably fair but it is provably fair because it uses moneypot's API I fail to see why someone want to play on this There is no harm in creating one because the developer bear no risk at all. Even if there is no one that play here, he got nothing to lose besides that he can play there by himself and got something back for each wager. some other popular dice sites or some well-made moneypot apps like Dustdice and Coining A Dice.
Funny statement, guess again but DustDice and Coining A Dice isnt the "popular dice sites" in moneypot. Hint : check out the wagered status and you will know which one
|
|
|
I doubt the dev will go thru this much trouble to code something like that I dont see a point on why not if there is a demand to some features as you can see on the previous page that the developer has no intention on leaving this project which means that he is here to stay and add more feature to the existing bot And even if there was a winning stragegy the dice site owners would simply go against us.
Simply think clearer. There isnt any winning strategy but that doesnt mean that you will just need to blindly bet your BTC and hope for the best. Some people just want to use some long term strategy which involves smaller stake which means the faster speed will be more favorable for this strategy and bot comes in handy
|
|
|
arallmuus (the mod on BetterBets) also uses XP and can't test my bot if I want to add WinXP support I would need to rewrite a lot of code, remove .NET Framework 4.5 functions that I'm using and replace them for older functions I have to take a look around that and see if it's worth. Sorry for now Not worth it, there are not so many people that uses XP anymore probably less than 5 % from all windows user and from that 5 % there is probably only around a fraction of it that is aware of a BTC dice sites which means that would be just an extra workload for you ( these number is merely speculations though there isnt really many people that uses XP still P.S : I got another pc btw but that old thing isnt connected to any internet ( thought I might just leave it to serve as cold wallet someday ) windows vista and up only? am i only one who still uses xp? i feel so old right now and outdated can i expect xp support in the future because it looks really great as far as i can see from pictures
Well you can always use VPS for it, get one that is close or in Germany ( frankfurt ) if you want a top notch speed to use it on betterbets
|
|
|
are they already a confirmed scam ? I mean did they scam everyone yet or are they still "legit"
They are never "legit" to begin with. No legit company will need to lie so much ever since the first day they decided to lay foot in bitcointalk. Apart from that, the definitions of scam depends on your personal perspective because for me they are already a scammer since day 1, they didnt pay their signature campaign ( which I dont care but still that is a scam to me ), didnt pay for their social campaign ( again, dont care but still a scam ) also they change their business model from "investment" into selling hardware all at sudden along with heavy advertising throughout the social media which indicates that they need a quick buck ( pretty much a scam to me) Also this guy that claimed he lost/was scammed over 2,500 pounds ....I'm out over 2,500 pounds....
|
|
|
|