I am not spamming anything,if you feel that its spam just hit that report to moderator buton.
I call you spammer because you are asking questions which are obviously answered within this topic. I mean your posts are not adding any value to the context in a constructive way but simply annoying as it seems you are too lazy to read but too active to ask questions. If you feel that my posts doesn't add anything to this discussion the don't hesitate to hit "Report to Moderator" button. You are talking about your own benefits from their signature campaign so for that you are even ready to give money from your own pockets,what I said its not the right soultion to resolve this issue. Anyone find me spamming? Report Me  |
|
|
|
If you are part of livecoin exchange then you can help that person to regain his money but if you are just doing that to get them back for the signature campaign and their benefits for yourself then it is not acceptable in my opinion.
Literally you are spamming for the sake of post counts or merits (some people are imagining like writing in meta/reputation/scam accusation will get them easy merits and some statistics are proving them right too). 1. To help anyone for any problem, we can be any entity. 2. Already I have mentioned it is now up to few concerned people. 3. I got negative trust due to some "distant" problem, also I had worked for livecoin for few months. I guess I got enough reasons to state my opinion. It is not a matter for the single person what you will do if many people lost their money in the same way just like OP,you will refund everything?
You mean livecoin will keep on scamming people ? I have answered this on my first post itself. Again I request you to read carefully before raising a stupid question. I like to remind you what your PT reads: Keep it simple,stupid! Being a participant doesn't mean that you are part of the live coin exchange for these kind of issues. You got negative trust for wearing a signature and like many people got but they removed their application and accepted that they did wrong thing so they were removed from their negative trust, if you likely to stand with live coin exchange that you might be have red trust until the accusations solved. I am not spamming anything,if you feel that its spam just hit that report to moderator buton. |
|
|
|
izooomrud not asking for financial help,he just asking to refund his own money which have been seized by the livecoin without appropriate reason.
He may ask or may not ask but a settlement could be achieved in the above said way. Now, it is up to izooomrud and other livecoin sig. camp participants and more importantly few DTs to support this way of settlement. If you are willing to help for gaining the lost or stolen fund you can help them in PMs but this doesn't make them as trustworthy again until they give appropriate reason or refund the money.
Sounds like you did not read all the breadth and width of this topic. Please read where livecoin is standing and I am not here to simply help izooomrud but trying to give another chance for livecoin to clear themselves. If you are part of livecoin exchange then you can help that person to regain his money but if you are just doing that to get them back for the signature campaign and their benefits for yourself then it is not acceptable in my opinion. It is not a matter for the single person what you will do if many people lost their money in the same way just like OP,you will refund everything? |
|
|
|
What settlement would be reasonable in your opinion?
By assuming there is only one scam accusation is open, I like to suggest a community driven settlement after realizing that livecoin is too firm with their TOS. 1. If old and new participants of livecoin campaigns like to support them financially, they may donate some BTC which could be at least half of what was actually claimed by izooomrud. 2. Escrow at least 0.15 BTC (and maximum 0.3BTC) (or current value of his said altcoin) for paying to izooomrud. 3. Convince izooomrud to withdraw all scam accusation by assuming his lost money is about to be recovered. 4. Then, izooomrud may ask for recovery of his funds from livecoin by proving all negative effects were cleaned. 5. If livecoin will be refunding then donors may get back their BTC. But, regardless of livecoin's action against izooomrud in a given (or proposed) time-frame, I guess they still may be allowed to have campaign until another scam accusation will be raised. Please note, I made this proposal based following assumptions and facts: 1. Only one open scam accusation against livecoin. 2. Livecoin is ready to find a resolution if the problem will be discussed in closed manner. 3. There are enough community people will be ready to support livecoin financially due to their own good experience with them. Finally, I was a one of old participant and I am ready to use/donate some 0.03 BTC (10% of max) for enforcing livecoin to find a resolution within their TOS. izooomrud not asking for financial help,he just asking to refund his own money which have been seized by the livecoin without appropriate reason.If you are willing to help for gaining the lost or stolen fund you can help them in PMs but this doesn't make them as trustworthy again until they give appropriate reason or refund the money. |
|
|
|
Nano is faster! Bitcoin is slower.  Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano! Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin. Nano has superior tech! Bitcoin is outdated. Nano is the future! Bitcoin is the past.  Why aren't you holding any nano? So you can live with your Nano no need to to buy any more Bitcoins. If you think you are still need to buy Bitcoin to ensure the security of your funds in future then this can be the answer for your own question no need to convince anyone here anymore. |
|
|
|
I was about to delete my application there but unfortunately, the thread was locked yesterday will have to wait a week before it gets unlocked.
Why would anyone believe you now? Do you believe in your own words? I would because I see this when I try to remove my post with application. I told you already a few times not everybody is lying here.  This message in the screen is not fully true I can't even edit this post to "delete" or something. And service section we can't delete the post in less than 24 hours after that post being posted, but we can edit them. Here The thread is locked so editing the application is not possible but you could wait for 24 hours and can delete yours. |
|
|
|
When someone supporting scam activities with their knowledge then it can also be considered under your definition.You can ask the same question to red trust queen and what answer you will get.  So sportsbet, yobit, and bitcasino participants are supporting scam sites? and how do we treat them? Why aren't they treated like livecoin's participants? When someone says that they won't return any fund to the user if they state anywhere about this issue is good thing? If yobit or other sites were doing the same thing then they also can be considered as trustworthy (IMO).
FYI Hhampuz already tagged the participants for joining on their campaign. |
|
|
|
Isn't tagging them also a way of warning them? I mean those tags can be removed or changed to neutral anytime the issue with that account is resolved. In this case, withdrawing from the signature campaign.
Just too much work for the DT member to tag them and then change them to neutral or removed for hundreds of participants.SO just give warning and let them decide their own fate after that permanently. You don't tag when you warned, red tagging is different by definition " You think that trading with this person is high-risk", don't deviate from the real meaning. Maybe tagging as neutral would be appropriate based on its meaning "Other comments.". If we can use the tagging system properly, there would be no complains, DT's misusing the trust system leads to misleading forum members as that trust is visible. When someone supporting scam activities with their knowledge then it can also be considered under your definition.You can ask the same question to red trust queen and what answer you will get. |
|
|
|
People kept talking about tagging the participants, or shaming them, without acting so I might as well do it.
Start tagging them just from now maybe a bit harsh, atleast let them know and warn them for few hours, if they denied your warning and still wearing their signature then you might start tagging them.(just my opinion) Isn't tagging them also a way of warning them? I mean those tags can be removed or changed to neutral anytime the issue with that account is resolved. In this case, withdrawing from the signature campaign. Just too much work for the DT member to tag them and then change them to neutral or removed for hundreds of participants.SO just give warning and let them decide their own fate after that permanently. |
|
|
|
People kept talking about tagging the participants, or shaming them, without acting so I might as well do it.
Start tagging them just from now maybe a bit harsh, atleast let them know and warn them for few hours, if they denied your warning and still wearing their signature then you might start tagging them.(just my opinion) |
|
|
|
In the recent days I am constantly doing trading on localbitcoin through creating advertisements but from the past few weeks I am getting notification of verification needed to continue trading which is called tier level.I already verified tier 0 and tier1 but still I did passed the limit of tier1 so I need to verify tier 2 which ask for bank statement and much more documents,even I did upload everything its still in the process for more than 48 hours.
Anyone has experience with this?
Even on binance exchange you can find such level of account usage limit for every uses. Inspiring to them I believe localbitcoins also doing the same to make the trading experience with levels of leverage for the every traders on their exchange. I guess this new security and privacy terms because they were shifting their headquarters to new country. Isn't it? But this will affect the localbitcoin customers which was most preferred due to its anonymity. |
|
|
|
Save trees,satoshis should never be printed. But sooner or later we will have something called freedom money which literally called as bitcoin as of now. |
|
|
|
|
I also seen somewhere about the pictorial representation of this article or statistics.
But people still not accepting that bitcoin is legit and profitable.
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know if there is any issue with this?
Can someone here confirm if there is any issue sending btc from a sportsbook to binance? Someone a while back mentioned there is nothing in the TOS against it. I know with coinbase or gemini.. ppl said they would ban accounts if you send btc from gambling site to coinbase and vice versa.
Has anyone done this and if so, anyone ever had an issue with this?
I did withdrawn btc from gambling sites to some exchange but never had an issue.So I guess it depends on your nationality,if your country banned gambling activities then you cannot withdrawn from their. |
|
|
|
Next reply from lbc support; Hi!
Thank you for contacting us.
We are really sorry for the inconvenience. We are working on the address validation process right now so you can complete your Tier 2 Verification. Unfortunately we don’t have an exact time when this will be working properly, however, let us remind you that the suspension for going over your Tier limits won’t start until September the 1st.
We are working really hard on this, we appreciate your patience.
Let us know if you have any more questions.
---
Best regards,
LocalBitcoins So if anyone facing the same issue,we may need to wait for few more days for the problem to get sorted out and then we can continue to use their site without any issues. |
|
|
|
|
Whoever managing the campaign,those participants are at risk now.
People will run back if there is high payment no matter of active scam accusations against them as well.
I think this time there should be negative trust warning after certain time period for the people who is waering those signature until those scam accusation has been resolved.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand the term social trading platform,you are denoting the P2P exchange as social trading platform?
If yes then its good to build some of them will really helps for increase the adoption of cryptos.
|
|
|
|
Blockchain will replace papers and other data storage srvices not the banks which is used for storage place of money. Crypto currencies may replace them. |
|
|
|
Every exchanges are trying to start IEO Launchpad services some successful like Binance, Kucoin and Huobi.
I heard few IEO Launchpads are scams like P2pB2B, ExMarkets and IDAX what do you think guys which are good and scam IEO sites?
if there is an exchange with the shady activities in the previous days then you should not trust any e project introduced by that exchange because the high chance of of those projects into scam. But as far as I know only the new project introduced from the binance got successful and the remaining all went to the loss of the investor. |
|
|
|
|
Just saw that team England won the World Cup in 2019 and I got the to know just while scrolling my social media, congratulation to the team England and also the one who won this prediction tournament.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
