DUDE, there you are WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?!?
Jesus, it has been mayhem out there
|
|
|
if 12900 doesn't hold we're going to 9300
$8,000 will be the low, r-right..........? next under 93 is 68 the way I see it the fuck is rosewater goddammit?
|
|
|
if 12900 doesn't hold we're going to 9300
|
|
|
WTF?
you guys ain't bid this back up yet?
|
|
|
next resistance I see is around 12900, that would be the fore mentioned P3ER line
|
|
|
Should I panic sell all my coins at the bottom?
too late
|
|
|
damn
we're almost down to the parabolic-er-er-er line set by the low on the 22nd
I guess parabolic-er-er-er-er is postponed for now
|
|
|
We are not really in the habit of giving investment advise MBielsa, but if it was me I would certainly be eyeing the exit.
|
|
|
trying hard to break down
|
|
|
Koreans are best off buying Bitcoin right now so their funds will be safe and easily taken with them during any mass evacuations from war. Russia refueling North Korea and getting caught just now is just the start of more instability...
I wouldn’t count on Ripple liquidity and support.
uhhh, minor point, it was China caught refueling NK
|
|
|
...deals with banks...
'nuff said
|
|
|
whelp, this thread is going to hell
see you guys in the morning
|
|
|
this Coinomi is a phone thing?
don't tell me people are keeping real money on phones...
|
|
|
It'd be big, specially for Trezor as a company; but I don't think it would be that big or even profitable in terms of money if you think about it. Being offline devices, the damage would be considerably mitigated by time alone. You'd (hopefully) get an email from Trezor an hour after the first few cases confirm a trend warning you to not plug and power your hw anywhere.
Going through the long con of modifying a chip design, going into production, distributing to retailers/waiting for the chips to be used by a company, and then sold and used; only to then choose a date when enough are in circulation to trigger the 0day, and only get as bounty the first random few wallets that come online that day... There are probably easier less involved ways to be a criminal.
They could try to simply sneak out a couple packets with key data every so often, and just acumulate them for the future; but that would get easily found out by people using them in secure networks.
I agree that it is pretty unlikely, but I would point out that the knock off chip fabs are already technically criminals, and the tainted parts would operate normally in non trezor applications and would be sold at a profit.
|
|
|
I am, seriously, going to bury a laminated copy somewhere on my land. And have smaller amounts also in my hidden home safe. (I have a visible decoy safe bought very cheap from Cina with some crap in it).
and now the internet knows all these things
|
|
|
also, please see the edit to my post above regarding the Ledger
What I am waiting for before I migrate to a hardware solution is something well built, they are both just laughably flimsy, and open source save for the secure enterprise chip, with a larger screen and more than 2 buttons.
Is that too much to ask?
|
|
|
The part in question is the STM32F205RET6 ARM processor which is easy enough to order up at the usual s ources. Unfortunately, counterfeit parts are epidemic in the components industry today, and the incentive to spin up a "special" one of these is...rather large Can't you trust the usual places to source you clean parts? Where do SatoshiLabs order their parts? Now you are starting to think. THAT is a very good question. One would hope that they have a secure delivery arrangement with the manufacturer...one would hope...their website is mute on the subject. You guys had convinced me to get one until I read this post. Is there any evidence to raise the minimum glimpse of suspicion? #doyouknowsomethingwedont? Let me be clear. I am NOT trying to spread FUD, nor dissuade anyone from using a Trezor. This is a purely theoretical threat vector. I am one paranoid motherfucker gentlemen. The sums are...substantial...
|
|
|
|