Sorry to tell you... I think you won't have any luck for the obvious reasons.
|
|
|
question about this line before i proceed...
# ./Configure --prefix=~/Bitcoin/Deps --openssldir=~/Bitcoin/Deps/openssl linux-generic32
should this be:
# ./Configure --prefix=~/Bitcoin/Deps --openssldir=~/Bitcoin/Deps/openssl-1.0.0d linux-generic32
?
or does it just create the dir called 'openssl' if it doesn't exist yet?
The right way should be # ./Configure --prefix=/home/user/Bitcoin/Deps --openssldir=/home/user/Bitcoin/Deps/ openssl-1.0.0d linux-generic32 It will create the dir if I'm not mistaken and copy the right openssl version for your arch. to it I think I'll give it a try again and see if this time I can compile it in CentOS Was almost thinking it was a lost battle for me. And it can still be. Thanks for the tips on the thread, guys.
|
|
|
even if you stop all this nonsense now!
What 'nonsense'? Even when people produce code from the source allowing the premine to be spent, you say it's 'nonsense'? That sounds like critical information people should be aware of, and in direct contrast to what RS says. The reality that everybody refuses to see is that he is 2 steps from creating the almost perfect way for a private company to transfer value, hell, even proceed to payments a la paypal way...
Well gee psy, you just broke your 'I've never supported SC, I only rag on BCX' stance. Chalk another one up as a confirmed kool-aid drinker Nope, not supporting him. I don't need to support him to recognize that he worked the way he wanted and created a new "thing"(not going to call it cryptocurrency) that may even succedd, even if just for a while. That's what enraged persons do, refuse to see opposite points of view just because you don't agree with them, or maybe because you're jealous, still couldn't figure it out. Keep chasing those windmills, fellas... that's all I'm saying ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toonpool.com%2Fuser%2F856%2Ffiles%2Fdon_quixote_425585.jpg&t=663&c=_OQMN-5yInOirA)
|
|
|
The reality that everybody refuses to see is that he is 2 steps from creating the almost perfect way for a private company to transfer value, hell, even proceed to payments a la paypal way... If it ever gains as much traction as Bitcoin it will be an asset more valuable for any company to hold than bitcoin itself. Even if he creates the NPO, the NPO has funding, with his royal tax, and if it really turns a profit maybe they will be the company that will hold such asset, if somebody else with more money doesn't show up and buy the whole thing. Doesn't matter what you all say, that's it's unfair, blah blah blah If he does it with you all against him, just because you don't agree with his decisions, then you can all be sure that his arrogance will be 100x worst than it is today. If he fails, he can just blame you all for is failure and will continue being the same prick he is today. <-- Do you really want to give him such weapon? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Or maybe you already did gave him that weapon, even if you stop all this nonsense now! The only thing I'm certain is that you will never stop hearing/reading about him, he doesn't looks like the kind to stay put and eat the frog.
|
|
|
What exactly am I lying about Psy? I know you like to play word games, same as your other puppets of CH, so let me clarify for you.
I haven't really mined in the past few months with the intention of making any profit. I have mined a bit for the purpose of wrecjking alt chains, experimenting on them, performing various attacks and raping new alt coins.
Is that clear enough?
So clear I'm quoting it... And leaving to others to compare what you said in your last post, about pum'n'dump of alt chains and profiting with it, to the statements in this post.
|
|
|
Yes, kinda like that. BCX is only fighting against himself. He pretends to be the righteous guy, but he's no better than the persons he fight against, so he should probably just STFU.
I'm either convinced you are truly retarded, or you have no idea what arguments you are making or lack the foresight to play more than 1 move ahead in chess. SC2 is not decentralized. I fail to see how BCX is fighting against himself. Please elaborate. And who gives a fuck about SC not being decentralized? I don't, BCX doesn't, also... But you do. Stop being a puppet, you fool! It seems the one who can't see 1 move ahead is you and not me... or maybe you are just truly retarded!
|
|
|
@Psy and Viper Lemon Bitch,
1) I mostly traded in 2009, very little cpu mining on a couple of machines. Anyone with any sense could see BTC was cutting edge even its early days and it was going to increase. I bought regularly in mid to late 2009. Started mining in January 2010. Heavy GPU mining in August 2010.
2) I haven't really mined at all in the past few months. No need to.
3) Have acquired 35,000 NMC and nearly 5000 BTC with various methods over the past Several months.
4) Mined the hell out of IXC/I0C with my paid for 68GH /s raked in over 850 BTC with pump and dump in the first few days of launch. Sold a lot of both to stupid people.
I have NEVER been in a loss situation with BTC or any coin for that matter, BTC could fall to a $0.00 value and I would simply sit on it with already realized huge gains. I think what burns your ass more than anything is that I sit in a rock solid place of security with BTC, which reflects my financial stance in the real world.
Thank you. Finally you admitted the real you it so everybody can see with their own eyes. All in the same post...
|
|
|
So, should we conclude that BCX also ignores people because he knows that we, the ones who speak against him, are right and he can't possibly say anything to defend himself? <--- Just another contradiction...
... kinda like CH/RS ignores people / bans from his forums / BK's from IRC channel when people bring up that he's a charlatan for insisting his is a decentralized currency ? Yes, kinda like that. BCX is only fighting against himself. He pretends to be the righteous guy, but he's no better than the persons he fight against, so he should probably just STFU. The pot can call the kettle black and still be correct. The fact that the pot is black as well doesn't change the kettles color.
That's correct. And the opposite is also correct, the fact that the kettle talks back despite being black, doesn't change the pot color... so, draw your own conclusions.
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong about people having profit as a motive. You would probably agree however, in the majority of cases, that this leads them into malign attitudes. Everybody always starts with the best intentions. This same benign initial motivation, having turned malign and metastasized, is right now destroying whole countries and nations of old. Just look around you. But to keep things fair, the greed of BTCEX is the least of the world's problems right now ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Psy would have to verify... but I think what he meant to convey is how BCX has been shown to mine BTC when it is unprofitable but is now complaining as that being a flaw to SC to further spread deceit and her agenda. So it's not necessarily bad to be profit motivated, but it is bad to do one thing and say another for sake of ridiculous propaganda. i.e. Warren Buffet making claims the rich should pay more in taxes when he is involved in near permanent state of litigation to get out of paying taxes (which would be unnecessary if he just paid what he is supposed to) and his business thrives on the death of other businesses. +1. And I didn't catch it, if that was what Psy meant. Exactly what I meant... Both of you are right, you just described it more eloquently than me. How was BCX coping with his losses when mining BTC was not profitable? Is it consistent with his current views? You know what they say about the noveau-riches... PS: I have this way of saying things that leaves a lot to understand between the lines to the ones that really care. If they don't understand, well, that probably says more about them than it says about myself. And using BCX arguments: Coinhunter started ignoring peoples' questions when he was caught lying. So, should we conclude that BCX also ignores people because he knows that we, the ones who speak against him, are right and he can't possibly say anything to defend himself? <--- Just another contradiction... Look at the ignore list that he so proudly shows in his signature!
|
|
|
Thanks dude! This will look nice in my Sony Ericsson Satio! EDIT: Installation failed ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) It was too good to be true ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) I always have trouble getting apps for this phone. Oh well, I bought it because of the camera and not to install apps anyway.
|
|
|
Solidcoin generation rate time in seconds = Difficulty * 2^17 / hashrate
Currently SC Difficulty is 25010
A machine with 50 kh /s will take approximately 18.6 hours to mine a block of 5 coins valued at $0.12 USD LOL
Is this not some some insane crap or what!
Well, you said you were mining by the end of 2009... How much was it worth 50Bitcoins then? $0.001? And how many blocks would you mine in 18hrs with 50KH/s back then? 10000BTC pizza, anyone? That statement of yours shows what you really are: A GREEDY MOTHERFUCKER! You already told us that you only mine Bitcoin for the money, so it must've been hard for you when your mining operation was runnning at a loss back then, hein?
|
|
|
I'm just here because I sometimes like to talk to the newbs.
BTW, what's a sock pocket? FFS...
I must have been still pissed when I wrote that. I meant sock puppet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet) Now I find out it should have been one word. Now I'll probably get this account locked up in BT jail for three days for posting off-topic. I'm one of the nicest gals on this forum and been here almost a year, then get banned for posting off-topic. I don't troll or say a single bad thing about Bitcoin on this forum. In fact, in real life I also promote Bitcoin. I know it's not the end of the world for not being able to post, but it's the principle of the thing that has me so pissed off. When I get out of here (newbie world), I will be a voice to recon with. Any body posting off-topic WILL be reported to the mods--no ifs ands or buts about it. They want a civil board, then they will get it. As far as the trolls are concerned, I will also be drilling them a new asshole. I don't need those motherfuckers here, either. The last time I got this riled up, my pussy got wet. This time I'm sitting in a puddle of juice. Fuckin' with this girl may have been the best thing that ever happened to Bitcoin. As far as my other account goes, it will play fair and square. But this one I will be known as: Nikki the Bitch I know that you meant to say sockpuppet, just found the sock pocket funny as hell that I couldn't help it lol Be careful Nikki, having your pussy wet is a no no around here ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You were banned for posting off-topic? Jeezz, I have no idea why I haven't been banned yet, goofing around as much as I do ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Also, I love your new nickname, Bricolage. Is it because you like to do things with your hands? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
I can rent a bot for that. 4BTC to post 5 replies and randomly clicking threads for 5 hrs. You'll need to give me your login. You can put a generic password while my bot works and after you change it.
I'm just joking but that could be a good business :p LOL
4BTC? Wow, that is steep. If I were in that business I'd be willing to do it for 1BTC. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) My bots are expensive and make good money by the hour... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Sounds like a solid business venture, but i decline your offer. I prefer manual labor. Because its free... That depends on how much you value your time!
|
|
|
I can't find things like: X- Shutdown Solidcoin for ever. Y- Improve Bitcoin and Litecoin. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Cheers! Your reply would actually make sense if you didn't used Litecoin on the Y...
|
|
|
So on one thread this guy is selling stuff from a dutch website with 30%-50% discount by scamming the site, on this thread he's selling access to a database that's not his to sell because some of his skiddie friends gave him acces to it.
This forum is walking into a liability nightmare if it continues to accept this type of sales on the marketplace after being warned by the users about them.
|
|
|
I thought I would have a look, although it's not a language I use, and I am not a professional coder. I learnt that 30 years ago and haven't done real coding since my 20's. I did see there are copyright signs in the headers and went to the licence.txt. I am not sure if you can copyright to a made-up name, and I wonder where the trademark application was done?
The SolidCoin name is trademarked by RealSolid. All source applicable is also copyrighted by RealSolid. The copyrights and trademarks will be handed over to the SolidCoin NPO which will be created at some point in the future.
He should restrict himself to only modify the code and leave the licensing to someone who knows what they are doing...
|
|
|
Put a entry page asking if the visitor is over 18, if he answers yes and is lying he's the liable one. Like the above poster said that covers all the adult sites and it works for them. BTW, the credit card to prove that you are over 18 is an e-whore scheme to take clueless horny dudes to signup in to sites using their affiliate links ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) and adult websites use the same scheme, ofcourse, saying it's only for age verification and it's an unpaid trial, altho they will charge them the same way most of the time.
|
|
|
Where the hell is BTCX?
Coordinating his gorillas who can read source code to find flaws and exploit them. Ofcourse you can't expect he will disclose any of the flaws... That's not his style. Well, at least not until he actually made a profit from them.
|
|
|
so they should be able to easily compile it, even without a makefile.
This statement is demonstrably false and shows a tremendous amount of ignorance. Yes, sometimes I can't even compile shit that comes with a makefile... Bitcoin being one of those. Maybe I should start making life of Bitcoin developers hell because I'm ignorant. Before someone asks, no I won't use debian. I'm a CentOS guy.
|
|
|
Also, new solidcoin attack vector is: Release the makefile! Nobody cares about trusted nodes anymore, just makefiles.
In all fairness, it's pointless to release source code if the people you are releasing it to are not able to easily compile it. You do have a point. But it's also worth remembering that 99% of the source code beggars wanted it to read the source, so they should be able to easily compile it, even without a makefile. One thing is for sure, most people won't ever download the source and compile it for themselves, be it from solidcoin, litecoin or bitcoin... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37710.0
|
|
|
|