I believe in my system and one can see the progress if one analyse the 4 graphics.
About dust...
It know it is a problem but we know that payouts are 10% of investment.
Only the last payout is 10% + dividends.
It is why I advice to take a wallet like XAPO where you do not have fees and so dust do not generate fees like with some wallets.

Like about many start-ups the profit at the start is low and the progress high...
It will be interresting to see how in a month or so the profit and the progress are.
Because like you I do not know.
Anyway,it cannot progress like now for ever.

impossible to revover my password...scam?

black coffee

i'm asking for nothing...
it is said:
if you send less than the minimum,it is considered like a donation.

I give you the possibility to invest in my startup and so i give you the possibility to take a part of my profit.
My profit but not my lost if lost will be.
Because for you it is no risk.
The risk is only on my side.For you what you have invested and the dividend you got is yours all your at the end of 100 days.
But let suppose that i'm not paid from the advertisment company...the lost is for me.
it can happen...just yesterday a welknown company has been hacked and has suspended activity.(adbit or something in this kind)(i have read it on this forum)

For me all is running perfectly...my system works.
so far i have 4 or 5 investors...it's already enough to see my system working.
Now every body is free to invest or not...and the actual investosr will as well do what they want...invest more,reinvest the payouts or just taking the payouts and waiting the last one with dividends accumulated...

but it is NOT a SPONZI

I have got 2 negative trust points for a link in my signature.
What can I do,
nothing...the voters have the last word even if they are wrong.
because this 2 negative trust points i have lost a sponsor.
What can i do?
Nothing.
Remove my link?
So if a link does not please  in a signature it need just to give negative trust points?
Do you think this is a fair system?
What would you say If I and severals of my friends would give you negative trust points for a wrong reason?
Because with my negative trust points you not only hurt me,but as well all winspiral's members who can lose money for a lying.

be carefull with your trust vote...it can fast be  explosive...
yes if you vote negative because you suppose that the member coulf eventually be a scammer...then you play with the fire and you can burn yourself.

No problem even if I have it explained here several times.
it seems it is hard to understand for people...I hope it is understood by the investors.

Your money serves only and strictly only to determine the part of shares you have in the start-up.
is this clear?
if this is not understood...all my system is not understood.

let's suppose in my startup is invested 49mBTS (pending investment)
if you invest 1mBTC we have 50mBTC pending investment.
so each time a dividend is given you earn (dividend/50*1)

if you invest 2mBTC:
so each time a dividend is given you earn (dividend/51*2)

Is so far all clear...because if one does not understand this...i cannot imagine how one can analyse...

i have got 2 negative trust points from people who does not understand this...
The problem is...because of this 2 people i have lost my avatar sponsor.
If each time I would not understand something or someone i give a negative trust point i would only do this...

what does $ pokerstar mean?

from where is your profit if you get not rake?
could you talk about?

i'm not a scammer and i have negative trust...
it does not matter what you are...it does matter what people here think about you...
A good scammer find easily positive trust points...or not?

same for me.

For once it was a little before midnight.

so fat it keep up being among my prefered ones.

Total time logged in: 9 days, 19 hours and 33 minutes.
and since few hours as a scammer and ponzi owner (lol)

bot free and:
Insufficient funds.
i believe you (lol)
bots are clever than me (lol)

yes from here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1181459.0
thanks again.

Sorry,
if i answer by PM
my answer will not be seen and so i have perhaps to answer at the same question for other members of this forum.

But perhaps i have not understood your question?
or what you have not understood...

For me all seems so clear about the "at prorata"
show the first investor and the last investor.
the last has got 1.52 satoshi with the last dividend
The first one has got 34 times more because he has 34 times more pending investment...

I really do not see where it is complicated and where you see a ponzi sheme.
Because all you are searching is a ponzi sheme argument you do not find...
Normal because it is not a ponzi sheme.
Someone who has understood has writen on this forum:
it's a revenue share system...
he is right.

I confirm
i will creat your account...

if you do not understand this...it is no need to tall about other things...
the "at prorata" is the heart of the system.

payouts aredone manually.
I payout if you have more than 10% or so in your "next payout" balance.
Dividends are paid out with the last payout after 95 and 100 days.