I would not recommend going through this procedure for the sake of the airdrop or even the dubious bounty of the campaign. All the same, the collection of personal data is necessary, but it can be justified and the project must have the unconditional confidence of the community.

In some ways, this is violated by the very idea of a bounty campaign. The message is that by spending your time and resources you support the currency at the beginning stage and it is logical that your remuneration will be measured in this currency. payment in the etherium would be too much like hired labor.

The question is only in comparison with what it falls? If prices are in December, then yes. If we consider the price for March 2017, then the price has increased many times. To be honest, the forum is full of panic-strikers, who begin to panic at the slightest hint of a red color. These people, as a rule, like to talk about long-term investments.

There is no guaranteed way to manage risks. Even in the stock market, which is considered more "civilized" than the crypto market, no one can predict anything. It remains only not to make rash decisions based on emotions.

Does anyone have any impressions of using such bounty services? I was very interested in whether anyone received any real payments from them.

I do not think that someone can teach you trading. It can only help experience and the constant receipt of new relevant information. Over time, the skill will come

I do not think that there is any sense in selling the entire portfolio. The market is certainly unpredictable, especially now, but there is no reason for panic sales. Practice shows that the patient wins.

The technology of blocking gives a huge number of opportunities for improving the world economy. Crypto makes the entire secondary market of securities unnecessary, which means that the amount of speculation will be significantly reduced.

It depends on your goals. Perhaps for trading now is not the most successful time, but in order to make long-term investments it is quite suitable. There are no objective reasons for the collapse of the crypto market, and therefore only development is possible.

To present such a scenario is how to present humanity on Mars or victory over cancer. Such a scenario is inevitably realized, it just takes time. the generation of Buffett and his ilk will never be allowed to dominate bitcoin.

I do not think that such a habit can work out for most bounty hunters. All the same, this is a way to earn money for a lot of people, and people want to receive money for their work. Over time, people will learn and understand what to hold is more profitable than selling immediately.

My policy with regard to the bounty is to sell such half immediately, after the coin is released to the stock exchange, and leave half for long-term storage. Most of the tokens most likely will not return to their original price, but some can make a significant profit over time.

I do not think that the fall of the market is due to objective reasons. Most likely the matter is in speculative processes. Now in the crypto begins the era of digital whales and the market will be stagnating Telegrams will not implement its project.

A great plan and a great idea, only absolutely technically impossible. Firstly, this will increase the burden on the administration many times, in the second the criteria for assessing posts are not completely clear. Well, in the third it will greatly reduce the number of active users.

I also do not think that bitcoin is a complete economic system. Rather, it is a tool by which this system can be created. while the market is still very young and it is difficult to predict whether all of its potential is being realized.

Maybe this is not the best verification system, but it works. I do not think that the forum now needs new changes, the merits sytem for this is enough. Although sometimes it greatly lengthens the login process

Higher education finally decided to keep up with the times . Now a lot of information, but it is scattered and sometimes unreliable. Perhaps universities of this level will be able to outsmart and theorize the blockchain

The very idea of the banking system assumes that only bankers remain in the winnings. The system is about the same as in a casino. Only the banking system is less humane and the chance to win even lower.

such a scenario is possible, but it will take a very long time. People still do not give up cash simply because they are used to them. It is not so easy to overstate the practice that was formed by generations

Each coin has it's own ideology and some purpose. Nowadays in conditions of hype and influx of new users, ideology of the coin has been reduced to the conduct of ISO and fundraising. A huge number of projects do not even have a clear documentation, not to mention long-term goals.