Such small market movements in a positive direction can be a trap for you. Not the fact that the market will continue to grow. But you'll be in on it. Be careful.
They have been a trap several time in the past when we thought a breakout is coming but in fact it was not. |
|
|
|
i am feel , this stable point keep for some time, after 2-5 years we can expect huge bull run. near future i am not expecting and i dont think bull run comes. now no new investment coming. my portfolio now below 50$ , i am anyway ok. i know this will be rise ... how about your thought https://www.bitcoin-socialclub.com/What you think, and what you expect. If you are sure to hold the coins that you have at the moment I think that is something extraordinary. But I advise you to trade rather than holding. Because holding now will not bring results. And trading brings results? Which was the last very good trade you did? Are you saying you are trading tiny swings? |
|
|
|
Therefore we are required to be more careful about the projects we will follow, because here we work there are no legal contracts, so when we do not receive anything from our work because we are not careful before. Therefore nothing can be wrong, and only our luck can answer the results of the work we have done.
The projects that decide to deceive bounty hunters only harm themselves. If the hunters raise their voices they can damage the reputation. That should not be in the interest of any project. Do not be so sure about bounty. Because there were hundreds of projects that did not pay the bounty hunter's money, and it still is. Any complaints or other notices made here are not always solved. But it is mostly not the very strong projects which decide to not pay. Which one would you say was the one that most surprised you with not paying the bounties? |
|
|
|
People are now in favor of regulation but what will be the rules to regulate these ICO, and how can we investors sure that they are going to implement this, just look at this rating sites, they should be the one to catch scam Ico but they are still letting them to continue and even gave them high rating because of the premium listing.
There is a lot happening now that makes us not have to believe in the ICO ranking anymore. It is true that ICO ranking seems to be manipulated if the project has money. This is really a pity. We can no longer trust ICO rankings. Because it can be set because they list premium. Thinking about it that was to be expected though. If you pay for a ranking you will most likely try to influence the ranking. |
|
|
|
You say so as if for the first time you hit the Internet forum ...))) This is the eternal misfortune of all forums at all times. Newbies are lazy to reread dozens or hundreds of pages of correspondence and constantly ask the same thing.
And I want to say a few words in the protection of newbies - very often the information that is listed on the first pages is irrelevant and therefore it is better sometimes to ask the knowledgeable people for advice once more than to make a mistake by following the old instructions or using irrelevant advice. Some of “Newbies” here on the forum are experienced Full members, but their accounts were banned  ) so rang does not seems everything Maybe you should leave out the word experienced then, because if they were experienced why would they get banned? That's even more stupid if you are familiar with the rules and still get banned. But there are some cases when you are getting banned, but there are no real reasons for this. Sometimes they don’t even answer Can you name such a case? If you did not violate any rules I don't think you get banned. There must be a reason for it usually. Why should somebody get banned for nothing? |
|
|
|
It depends on a project itself. If it is a really good one and people are investing a lot of money into it, plus this project collects its hardcap, the possibility of a dump is pretty low. But unfortunately in the most cases bounty hunters have a huge affect on a starting price.
It is not the problem of the bounty hunters if a project doesn't even create enough demand to absorb the bounties that are being sold in the market. the problem is with the project itself because sometimes the project is fake or the team doesn't seriously develop it or can't develop the project so that a dump occurs. then the fact is that investors are currently less interested in crypto especially ICO and that makes projects difficult to develop. so the bounty hunter can't be blamed on this case. Okay but if a team is fake or stops developing it isn't surprising that a dump occurs. |
|
|
|
Indeed, those people who are not the first year in cryptocurrency are well aware that this situation is temporary and there is no point in going back, as if you leave the market now, you can lose a lot, and then when the market recovers, they regret it.
If you leave the market now you can lose a lot, and if you left the market late 2017 you didn't lose a lot but won a lot. But many people has lose in the last year and some of them leave the market with a big disappointed and they hope that they can turn back time to 2017 so they can sell all the coins they have. I think right now, and they have a chance to come back to the market since many coins have to get started to increase and I believe that it will not takes too long to see all coin can increase higher. Some of then has already increased up to 20% from the lower price, but unfortunately, it's only for temporary. But it's a good sign for us because all coins can survive until this day, so we can hope that it will increase higher in the next months. Many of those who left the market at a loss could be broke and not even have the funds to buy back in. |
|
|
|
You're right. The idea of creating a hybrid crypto exchange is really new and unique. To date, such developments as far as I know are not in other projects. Exchange IEX can really be unique.
I also met with either decentralized exchanges or centralized (ordinary) exchanges. I hear about the hybrid for the first time. It will be very interesting to try! To be honest it is the first time when I see hybrid exchanges. I think that it should be better then centralised. But we will see I really like this new approach to the situation. it does not look like something else. it has many advantages Hybrid exchanges are necessary for the transition from centralized to decentralized exchanges. They come with a learning curve and you can also see how users react and what they like and need. Having exchanges that don't hold your keys is very good and should be an available option especially for large transactions. I think that the technology of hybrid exchanges is a very promising technology. It is possible that in the near future, most exchanges will use such a hybrid platform. They will play an important role, but centralized exchanges as well as decentralized exchanges will exist as they are both in need for different purposes. |
|
|
|
To be honest, I don’t see any reason at all to talk about having all the same talk about really arguing about when the ICO market will change. This process is beneficial to all but banks. And now they are very angry because of this.
But banks have so much capital that they will stay around with all the power and influence they have. They can influence the media and politicians and they can also pay good salaries and hire a whole army of software engineers. |
|
|
|
Thanks for reminding me of what I already know. I will be exposing the projects you bump as a scam. To be fair to each project, they have nothing to fear if they aren't a scam, but I'm pretty certain more than half of them are.
How do you define a scam project or not? What are the criteria? For example, the famous and popular worldwide project Dash. For several years they have been making their payment network. Made? No, they did not ... Masternode Dash cost over $ 1.5 million in December 2017 - today it costs $ 90 thousand ... Dash scam? No, no and no! Then why other projects with masternodes and unfulfilled plans and promises you refer to the scam? I think that this is not the right judgment. Only time will judge what teams are scam and that are not. And sometimes it can not be decided whether a project is a scam or not, since some might just fail because the team is bad, but that doesn't make them a scam. |
|
|
|
Do you have your own recruiters?
Do you mean scouts? Yes, we will have our own team and AI help to assess kids better. Thank you. Yes, that's what I meant. Which African countries do you target in particular to find new talents? East Africa for now - Zambia as first one. And how do you recruit people from countries like East Africa or Zambia? Do you have staff over there? Yes, mixed team with local and European coaches working onsite together. That will allow to share knowledge with local coaches and more option to train more people in destination country. But you can't fully decentralize sports. Is your main goal to foster cooperation between different nations and to share the knowledge? |
|
|
|
I have seen many hunters talk about the kyc with utmost hatred. Many wants kyc removed, many thinks it's not fair for hunters, while some say it shouldn't be for hunters, because hunters are not investors.
But the point is, if the company or start-up project asks for kyc from hunters, they are not wrong in any way.
Kyc are not for investors only, as long as you will hold or holds a company's or start-up project equity share and have voting rights, you are a customer. What this simply means is that whether you bought the token or through bounty hunting but holds this token with the so called investors, there is no different between you hunter and an investor with cash.
Both of you holds the same token from this company and share equal right with them, which means that what an investor can do an this particular company, you as hunter holding the same token can do also.
The only difference is that the investors invested their cash and you invested your time and both of you holds the same token and shares equal rights. So if you say that you can't pass through kyc because you are a hunter, then you are the cheater
But who needs KYC for crypto projects? Most successful crypto "bitcoin" didn't even asked for anything? So why these team have KYC as a part in it. The fact is that in the course of my entire practice of participating in Bounty companies, not a single successful project set conditions to provide personal data to Bounty participants. For the whole 2018, not a single project was successful, The biggest problem is not KYC generally, but the fact that some companies say no KYC is required and afterwards they change it. It is just a tactic to steal investors money by saing that you didn't complete your verification.So if they need it really they have to ask for KYC initially then allow the investors to join on their projects. I agree, they should do their verification in the beginning and either allow or disallow a participant. However, the problem with this is that you give away data and if the project doesn't raise enough and gets cancelled you gave your data for nothing. |
|
|
|
Such price spikes have happened several times and this time undoubtedly will be an exception. I prefer to HODL and take profits as soon as possible in the bull market. Improved market conditions will give more chance to busted accounts for recovery.
Keep in mind that you are not the only one who is willing to take profits if possible. A lot of HODLers are going to sell. |
|
|
|
i feel about this month crypto going stable, sometime go pump then dump again,like real supply and demand.
but we dont know what will happen next, after ENJ make great pump, wish good news again.
It so much looked like we stabilize but nah that's far from us. I feel bad each time I see the market falling. Same for everyone unless you have a lot of short positions. That is when you like to see the market in bad shape. |
|
|
|
Therefore we are required to be more careful about the projects we will follow, because here we work there are no legal contracts, so when we do not receive anything from our work because we are not careful before. Therefore nothing can be wrong, and only our luck can answer the results of the work we have done.
The projects that decide to deceive bounty hunters only harm themselves. If the hunters raise their voices they can damage the reputation. That should not be in the interest of any project. |
|
|
|
Absolutely right. We all need to work hard to achieve our goals and not only in the crypto industry. All your efforts will be rewarded but you need to be patient and give the market time to recover its past position.
Or in a best case scenario the market would even go beyond the past position and bring huge profits for everyone who was patient. |
|
|
|
At the moment, everyone is waiting for the rise, it is logical. We came to the investment market. But there was a situation when too large forces began to hinder the development of the crypto currency. We must wait.
You must feel terrible if you are one of those investors who bought into the market during early 2018. That have been painful times. |
|
|
|
We need DEM in bigger Crypto Exchange.
Next months should be great, be prepare.
i don`t know if big exchanges are the right way ! there you can lose or Win, but long term lose.... think that we Have PoS... and if you have big amount on exchanges they can stake DEM and sell it when they want ! i think that one and Only point that Crypto can survive on long term is to habe some good exclusive product behind Crypto ! Let eDEM be the first to have that !! If exchanges stake large amounts even then it should not be a risk. It is not so much more supply due to staking. |
|
|
|
On the charts of coinmarketcap, we can see the price of cryptocurrencies have risen slowly for last months and we are getting back from the drops with a very carefully speed because we still see many fast dumps include with many pumps, so trading will be more profit at this time rather than holding.
Some cryptocurrencies were going up, but it is not a trend reversal. I think we will see some pumps. It is needed to keep us excited.  |
|
|
|
I have seen many hunters talk about the kyc with utmost hatred. Many wants kyc removed, many thinks it's not fair for hunters, while some say it shouldn't be for hunters, because hunters are not investors.
But the point is, if the company or start-up project asks for kyc from hunters, they are not wrong in any way.
Kyc are not for investors only, as long as you will hold or holds a company's or start-up project equity share and have voting rights, you are a customer. What this simply means is that whether you bought the token or through bounty hunting but holds this token with the so called investors, there is no different between you hunter and an investor with cash.
Both of you holds the same token from this company and share equal right with them, which means that what an investor can do an this particular company, you as hunter holding the same token can do also.
The only difference is that the investors invested their cash and you invested your time and both of you holds the same token and shares equal rights. So if you say that you can't pass through kyc because you are a hunter, then you are the cheater
But who needs KYC for crypto projects? Most successful crypto "bitcoin" didn't even asked for anything? So why these team have KYC as a part in it. The fact is that in the course of my entire practice of participating in Bounty companies, not a single successful project set conditions to provide personal data to Bounty participants. For the whole 2018, not a single project was successful, The biggest problem is not KYC generally, but the fact that some companies say no KYC is required and afterwards they change it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
