Forgive me, but typical moderation is to delete any disputes, such as this, rather than present them as part of the dialog, and put these in a separate thread for that purpose.

I'm curious why the exchange Coinbene, which began trading shares early this month, has suddenly almost stopped trading Credit$, after trafficking in millions of shares over the past couple of weeks. In the past couple of days, the number of shares has suddenly dropped to almost nothing. Isn't this unusual? - Link: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/credits/#markets

I think it could use a makeover, also, generally.

Oh now that's funny.  "One Million Tokens" per second.

My biggest concern at this point is Hashgraph and EOS.  Although, I find it incredibly greedy the way Dan Larimer has scooped up billions and shown us very little in terms of a product. 

Suppoman can move the price of Credits 0.20 cents, because I've seen him do it.  He's a shill, but if you're invested in a project, he's good for your cause.  So if you're in the coin, why complain about his big mouth?

He's just an entertainer but he takes the time to study the projects he shills, I believe. You can argue if he's wrong, but he does believe in what he touts. I don't see him as a good liar, just a good entertainer.

Today we saw Credits move back down to about half of where he pumped it up from.  Hard to know why, but it was a massive sell off that I suspect may be related to the issue on KuCoin today, where they weren't moving some of their ERC-20 tokens properly.  It wasn't just them, MyEtherWallet went down.  GDAX went down for awhile.  All in all it was the most f*cked up day I've had trying to move things around, then we got the BIG MOVE, and I missed it.  All because I was messing around with Credits and their crappy exchange that they're on.

I'll make a prediction now. If this team gets rejected by Binance, that would be a Disaster for the coin, and it's possible that could happen. KuCoin simply doesn't have the kind of liquidity to move this to the next level.

That worked .... Thank You!

I know that you can perform a "sweep" operation in the Exodus wallet to recover your funds, if this happens to you, so I'm curious if the Electron Cash Wallet has a similar ability.

Does anyone know or have any useful links to an idea that might work in this wallet?

Exodus Example: Steps to recovering your "lost" assets - https://support.exodus.io/article/189-ive-sent-bitcoin-cash-to-my-bitcoin-address

Thanks in advance ...

I think the liberal view is about $30 by year end, and the conservative view is about $3.00.  

My guess is, the alpha could be worth $30, but this depends a lot on the cheaper on-ramps that we hear are coming. We're still seeing great difficulty entering the Crypto space.  Coinbase is expensive, and people feel cheated when they purchase there, not to mention the extra cost of having to pay their banks for a foreign transaction fee, which is because they are actually based in London.

I still see evidence that there are some large buyers, willing to pay a premium price for Credit$  We keep seeing large price spikes, which tells the story of a currency that is not very liquid at the moment. That lack of liquidity will easily become magnified by several times, if and when this coin hits Binance.  

I've been studying other projects who have been listed on Binance, and Credit$ may set a new record in terms of the amount of demand vs liquidity that will be available when this occurs.  I don't think the average performance after a Binance listing can be compared to this.  I'm fairly conservative in my valuation of this project, but I honestly think we could see a 300-400% price spike when this thing hits Binance, because of the combination of lack of a liquidity due to the low supply for a protocol like this. Heck, Suppoman alone can cause a 10-20% price spike, because I've seen him do it several times. So imagine what a Binance listing will do in comparison. The sellers will come, but not until a very nice premium is offered.

Interesting how Credits has held up during the mini flash-crash event this morning, and now is rebounding far ahead of it's Ethereum and Bitcoin pair.  This tells me that something is up, and I think I know what it is.

Binance, with their stop-limit trading function, essential for bigger players to enter the Credits market, is coming very soon, according to the Credits team.

To quote the team .... "We are expecting that Binance will list us in near future. Your activity and support will affect our successful listing."

New Binance Listing Portal - https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/sections/115000106672-New-Listings

The rumor I've heard tonight, and this makes sense, is moving this thread here, which is linked in the "Announcements" tab on CoinMarketCap," was done to help get the final approval on Binance.    

This price action is all about Suppoman shilling it, as he did yesterday, and as he often does. It's one of his top Ten picks.  https://youtu.be/L0wduPpfsE8

I'm not saying Suppoman is wrong, but the price will come back down, I expect.  It's overvalued above $70,000,000 given it's still in the concept stage, and given the strong competition. It's also far outside the top 100 on MarketCap.

If Binance lists Credit$, and we can have stop-loss trading, then it has a chance to really soar, but not until then, I suspect.

I would imagine we'll see 0.50 again in about a week or so, as we did this earlier morning.  I would be selling into this strength, knowing I could buy back in, at a lower price. Last week we saw evidence that a couple of big whales bought up a considerable amount, causing a sudden two short lived price spikes, similar to what we're seeing today.

Unless, someone is certain that we'll get a Binance listing by the end of this month, I would not be a buyer above 0.50 cents.

Right now Credit$ is the #1 traded coin on KuCoin, which is the most available exchange to most people in the West.  I expect that Binance is looking at this with some measure of GREED.  It's astonishing, really, given how many popular projects and coins are traded on KuCoin.

It will be a total shock I expect, when Credits hits Binance, and will dearly cost those who are not on board when it happens.  We can expect a move of possibly 200-300% if previous coins are an example, before it settles back down.

Big Applause for this post.  How do I give you Credit$ for your wisdom? 

Very true and a very good point. It's possible, but the motivation for what I've seen appears to be designed to create buzz, similar to how the U.S. election was hacked.  Here again, my point is also that anything Russian or related to Russia is tainted due to recent world events in the U.S. in the UK and in Syria.  It puts a bad taste in people's mouths and minds for anything Russian.

If Credits wants to redeem itself, they can start by using more polished English speaking people when using the English language to communicate ANYTHING TO THE ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD.  Otherwise they look like total idiots in the PR sense.  No one in the West, wants to hear from a Russia ANYTHING right now.  Russia is openly despised right now on the world's stage, so it's stupid to underline that ethnicity in any way, under the present circumstances.

On the positive side, this is actually a good time to buy Credit$, because of the negative news cycle. This is when you want to buy. Also, my suspicion is that Binance doesn't care about anything but profits, generally, and Credits is one of the best sellers on KuCoin, so they must be chomping at the bit to list it. Binance doesn't want to list a true scam, but with their decentralized platform coming out this year anyway, it won't make much difference what they list on their centralized exchange, as it will be the wild West on their decentralized platform, regardless. So why be too picky now?

Everytime Credits$ dips below 0.50 cents, people rush in to buy it, which is not typical of most of the ICO's that we've seen launched during the bear market.

Fair enough, but the actual evidence is hard to present, and admittedly is about as abstract as the project's 400k transactions per second video.  lol  

Give me a break, I've done nothing but boost the project here, so my credibility as a firm supporter should stand very clear.

Where there's smoke there's usually a fire someplace, and I can smell some smoke with respect to how Credits is handling its marketing and PR. They're not on fire to the point of total destruction and damnation, but when I smell smoke I just say it, I don't need to present the evidence that my nose encounters, generally.

Just a heads up that I have found evidence for manipulation of the social media surrounding Credits, also.  They are quite clever in how they are doing things.

Be wary of individuals who approach you in Telegram, asking you to join a supposedly "independent" group of investors, who first ask you to discuss issues about Credits, when they're really not independent at all, but shills for the project, and I suspect who are being paid to shill it, by creating artificial buzz in Telegram in these subgroups.  While not totally out of line with traditional marketing, it is a bit deceptive in my view, and shouldn't be necessary.

It reminds me a bit of the U.S. election, and how that was manipulated, generally. Here also, we see anything and everything associated with all Russians, as "poisonous," at least for the time being. It's a dreadful coincidence, but it's killing the project's PR. So from that perspective, it might not be a bad time to buy the coin, because the "poisonous" news will die down, or it could get worse, as Donald Trump's problems get worse.

Credits will live and die by how they are viewed in the marketplace, and right now, I'm seeing some evidence of social manipulation beyond what I want or like to see.

I still think the project has merit, but I think it's over valued at a market cap above $70,000,000 at this stage, until new news, or it manages to get listed on Binance, which might not happen if too many artificial shills are discovered overplaying this marketing game.

As so many here have hinted, just imagine this project was brought before the sharks on CNBC's "Shark Tank" show.  How would they evaluate this project's value?

Ok, the big news item tonight is ...... "CREDITS SAVED FROM 4 HOUR CHART DEATH CROSS BY MYSTERIOUS YOUTUBE ENGLISH SPEAKING TECHNICAL ANALYST"

Congrats ..... it's a miracle!

Interesting timing, given the Death Cross on the 4 hour chart was looming.  This YouTuber has no credentials and 7 subscribers.    He sounds like a technical person, but we need some credentials, and perhaps they are great, so I guess we will have to check him out. It also shows that this YouTuber only joined Apr 8, 2018.

Meanwhile, the bull flag on the 8 Hour Bitcoin chart is hard to ignore.

Credits is way oversold today, generally, but we're fast approaching a Death Cross on the 4 Hour Chart, so it's hard to want to join that party.

My guess is we're going to test at least 0.36 cents, which is three times the ICO and about half what I think it's worth right now, on a good day, at around 0.70.

I suspect that only the Binance contract could save an eventual dump to the old low that I believe is at around 0.31. So that's not off the table either in my view, but what do I know, I'm just one of their all time best supporters.  The FUD for anything Russian is huge right now too, thanks to the Syrian chemical weapons attack.  This taints anything Russian, big time, and puts a bad taste in everyone's mouthes for Russian coins, vodka, you name it.  Poison for a poisonous empire, essentially, but this too will pass, eventually.

It's still a protototype, so no big deal if it does test the oldest low. Credits still far outshines most of the other coins in the Hopium class.

Still, it's worrisome that Credits keeps falling precipitously on CoinMarketCap to around 164 in the ranks. That's a bit of a problem for the team, especially if they don't get rid of the the unnecessary FUD that they helped create with that crazy question and answer video on YouTube recently. That video is almost as bad as Justin Sun blowing his nose on live camera and then looking down on his kleenex, which is when Tron died.  

Unprofessional behavior is deadly to these projects guys, and it can become permanent.  All the beautiful pics. in the world, can't overcome a bad video, because it plays over and over in people's minds. That video, along with a few others I can think of, should be axed immediately.

One of the more interesting things I saw last night, was Credits led the bull break in Bitcoin by 1-2 hours, at least, which I find remarkable. i'm not sure what it means, but it was interesting to watch.

So why can't you folks do a Video Presentation of this good material, instead of using some mumbling person on YouTube?  If you folks can't see that it looks like intentional FUD when you do that, then you're not looking at this from an investor's eyes.

You should delete this video from every social platform you're running, because it looks horrible.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X07KsF8xgDc