It's calls a multiply contract and it's available. It seems a bit like the same contract at Ethereum but has a little differences. Mostly it means that the smart contracts logically tied to each other may be created in a different periods during the work (and relied to the same project, not a different projects)

During the work on the project the situation may change and the demands may also change. More than that the project goals may be putted incorrect and the project would be awaiting for a freelancers for too long (due to high demands/low reward, etc.) In that case the change of the project goals and requests will be available for editing.

Nevertheless the client can't change the project if it's been already accepted by freelancer and during the work of the hired professional.

Just imagine if you need a programmer to create a small working program. If you won't choose a freelancer you have to hire a programmer with a salary, pay him and use him some way after that program is made ... freelance saves tons of money and nervs

It depends what information do you mean. The whole system information required for work (keys, sertificates, ratings, reputation, etc.) is storing in the main blockchain of the upper-level and available to every user. The information of the projects is available to client, freelancer and verification agent only.

They'll be just like the Ethereum one. A sender is forming a transaction and the miners will add it into the block to change the system

Really it doesn't matter. The whole data is stored at the verified users memory, that users have an access keys, if they want to uncover the data they'll do it anyway. Of course the chats are encrypted.

Yes, it might be too subjectively sometimes that's why we need a dispute.
Dispute procedure available to both users (customer and freelancer) in some time after the project been done and inspected by the agent. It has rounds:
1) The dissent side is choosing another verification agent and that agent is inspecting the project again;
2) If the both side (or one of them) still thinks the agents were wrong, a several number of randomly chosen agents are checking the project again;
3) If one of the sides still disagree with the results a well-known reliable agent is inspecting the project (for the first time it would be Effective Energy Ltd.);
4) If the problem isn't solved, the whole project information will be opened and the mass voting will be started;

Yes, it would be a dispute procedure, all users can start it if he/she doubts in any agent.
The point is — that agents would be a pretty well-known people with known accounts so they would be interested in being honest.

We doesn't have a classical bounty program, however you can participate in out airdrop.
Just join our Telegram channel @alehub and ask the question there, our admins will guide you with all the information.

Users are free to choose but the both the freelancer and the client should approve that part of information (or allow using full information) due to avoiding the situations when a verification agent can check not the most important part of the project and has no access to the key goals of the project.

Hello, Paul Mattis,

Thank you for the support!
What exactly do you mean about a "token details"?

They're developing fast but still can't be a trustworthy method of recognizing a good or a bad design.

Well it's always a human factor in some way. But most of the projects just can't be verified any other way. For example a project relied to administrating can be working properly "on paper" but it won't work in real life conditions.
Also want to mention that in most of the situations verification agents are receiving only a part of the whole information and that reduces the chance of a leak.

For a regular project the number of the embedded blockchains is determined by the security policy. However giving access to a limited number of necessary blockchains to every user is possible, it's hard to put it into the common form. So the easiest way is to give users a full access with unlimited blockchains.

That's right. They are also solving the problem with the volume of the main blockchain. The main blockchain is a registry for registering commitments, conducting a transactions and keeping the important legal information. In reality all extends on keeping the project information relate to customer and freelancer, also some other people whom they're contacting during the work on the project.

Inside ALEhub has a virtual machine that runs the smart-contracts. Equal to Ethereum every smart-contract or byte-code has a insufficient price. That price will become perceptible only with a huge amount of data involved into the processes.
Generally ALEhub has a limited minimum price and the transaction price won't go higher untill that minimum reached. After the minimum level is reached the price will increase only for code execution.

The agents will pass a serious KYC procedure and they'll have to provide us with the information of their working experience and education.
Also every customer will have an ability to put an requirement of some special skills or education for an agent. For example if the contract is close to a law field the customer and freelancer may request their verification agent to have a legal education or an experience of work in that sphere.

Thank you for your support, it's really important for the team to get a postive feedback, that makes us go on and do all our best.

About the unsold tokens: yes, if it would be such a situation we'll burn them.

Nothing can stop us, we're on media already

For example you can check this articles:

1) Bitcoinmagazine
2) Qukuaiwang (Chinese language)
3) CCN
4) Medium
5) ICObench

...

And many others. If you want to be fully tuned into our news and publications you can subscribe to our Twitter and Telegram group (@alehubnews and @alehub).

And thank you for your interest and support of our project!

Yes, most of that things are mentioned in our WP but sometimes it's better to ask somebody about a thing you can't understand or doubt at something.


For the first time our company would be that kind of agent but we'll invite reliable people to that position who would pass the KYC and has a reputation of trustworthy professional.