 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »
|
Something is wrong. I had about 2.1 XVG pending payment and now find nothing, including my history is gone. |
|
|
|
|
What's the syntax for setting up a worker name with XVG?
I thought I remembered seeing something like ID=concatenated onto the p= param but looking back a few pages I can't find it.
By the way, mining Verge IS a topic for discussion here. Claymore added blake2s and keccak to the latest v 11 edition, and there is precious little information on the details beyond the very basic requirements.
|
|
|
|
Why the hell someone would copy the whole first post???
Lack of sense and obviously can't read, either. I am fairly certain that we have all seen it - at least three or four times, now - if we never looked ourselves.  |
|
|
|
Let me tell you that the amount of work to make a stable pool is beyond imagination. In the last few days we invested a huge amount of money to get enough hardware and also a huge amount of effort to get the pool stable. I think this goes for most of the pools at the moment.
It is not that you just push a button and it works magically, but it takes hours of debugging, looking in logs and sleepless nights with crashes etc.
So, i will tell you guys just as it is. For now NLpool is stable since about 16.00 Amsterdam time. If you want, you can use it ... and we don't steal.
I for one appreciate the time, effort and expense you guys have gone to in order to create and maintain a stable pool. You didn't mention all of the other sites sending you 'gift packages' in the form of DOS or DDOS. It's bound to be fun. |
|
|
|
12 days and 50+ pages latter: no luck yet finding any decent blake2s pool.
Unimining was good only day one after v11 release. Antmine also, maybe 2 days.
All others not even worth mentioning.
Pools to avoid:
zpool.ca
unimining.net
antminepool.com
yiimp.eu
xvg.ehu.bg
pool.gigarho.com
nlpool.nl
oxo.rs
coinfoundry.org
zergpool.com
Stop wasting your power and GPUs. Stop feeding amateurs and thieves.
Unfortunately "-mode 1" is only smart option for now.
Agree, i'll also stop the xvg too, it seems to be a mafia. The only pool i've tested and didn't stealed me was NLpool but 1 day later it was unusable. It does gpus stressing a lot for a few bucks. My GPUs don't seem any different as long as I tune "-dcri xx" properly. I have the same temps, same fan %s, etc I think nlpool.nl is not one of the crooks, but it's easy to group them into the stack of people using "YIIMP"/"YAAMP". TBH, I haven't tried any others beyond antminepool and it seems to be missing about 20% of what I should be getting. Now nlpool.nl has problems with stability, no question there, but they are working on it. My suggestion would be to add a second server dedicated to XVG with blake2s algo and perhaps or at least add an alternate port for balancing the load. The problem is that unless they have two distinct IPs it's probably already at capacity. |
|
|
|
...
The whole Claymore's log from when the issue seems to start:
18:41:37:870 cc4 ETH - Total Speed: 99.571 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1173, Rejected: 0, Time: 34:22
18:41:37:870 cc4 ETH: GPU0 13.016 Mh/s, GPU1 12.974 Mh/s, GPU2 13.037 Mh/s, GPU3 13.019 Mh/s, GPU4 23.765 Mh/s, GPU5 23.760 Mh/s
18:41:38:355 1738 srv_thr cnt: 1, IP: 192.168.XX.XX
WTF?  I know, right? How could people copy that huge wall of text? A) Devil is in the details. I'm running over 25 miners with 6-8 GPUs each almost all alone by myself. Build from scratch. many different models. RX. R9. GTX, ... And I had no exp in these stuff 9 months ago. I managed to do all of this, get a perfectly stable system with little to none problems, only by paying a great deal of attention to details. So I do the courtesy to others who may want to help me, by giving them "the option" to see and read the details. B) If you get off your high horse, you'll see that I put the important parts short and sweet in the beginning. Giving the line of error which I think is the main thing. System spec. And few lines on what's up. THEN. Only then, I wrote "the whole log file from which the problem starts". So the post is not in anyway or from defined by the log file. You can simply ignore it. You don't need to quote it. And it will take 2 sec to scroll past it. So if you don't have anything to say, stop talking. It's not Facebook or twitter, or text messages with your bff. It's a forum. You can expect time to time a lengthy post. And as long as it's not messy, it's perfectly fine. Ah, but I don't own a horse. The issue is not with lengthy USEFUL posts, it's people quoting the " README!!.TXT" file entirely or such. Never-the-less, it tends to be "drinking from a firehose" analogy: it's not useful and people just aren't thinking about what they are posting when they decide they - for whatever reason - include the entire "ReadMe" file in a post. Sure, you can scroll right by it, hardly the point: somebody is paying for the storage here, and I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone needs multiple copies of that file, and it's not just the OP, it has been quoted. WTF?  |
|
|
|
I was getting ready to ask if there was some magic sauce.
Am I screwed if I used the Android Verge / TOR wallet and address? I figured that I wanted to disable the feature to gen a new address for each transaction.
I mean it's not the end of the world, I am looking for about ten cents worth and it says "no connection" even five hours after the transaction was confirmed.
You also need to download Orbot - then your "no connection " problem will be sorted. **You need to exit verge, go into your orbot app, apps, check Verge, make sure orbot is running and confirm that you want to start a VPN. Then start verge! There ! you got your 10 cents back  Ah, I remember that it automatically loaded Orbot, but I didn't get the word that I needed to kick the hamster. I owe you approximately .008% of a beer! Damn I love modern times! Groeten |
|
|
|
I was getting ready to ask if there was some magic sauce. Am I screwed if I used the Android Verge / TOR wallet and address? I figured that I wanted to disable the feature to gen a new address for each transaction. I mean it's not the end of the world, I am looking for about ten cents worth and it says "no connection" even five hours after the transaction was confirmed. |
|
|
|
Many connection issues on nlpool today...
I noticed. We got some extra attention from new fans who sent us a few billion welcome packages over the network. Working on it, it should soon be stable again. Edit* in 10 minutes from now it should be up and running again. Sorry for the inconvenience. Right now I'm still getting those rejection messages on connection attempt. Web interface is answering and diplaying progress, so oversubscribed, maybe? No big deal, but you have a new ETA? Without knowing about the internals of YAAMP / YIIMP can you allocate a second port to a coin / algo? |
|
|
|
I've been mining on NLPool for about 24hours now and it's real good but those orphan blocks really hurt.
The thing is that we're used to orphaned blocks being useful, but only with Ethereum. They could be "Uncle" blocks that are redeemed later. With other crypto currencies, anything that doesn't become part of canonical truth is permanently orphaned. |
|
|
|
I have a 6 rig setup consisting of all rx 470/40's. I can dual mine with blockchain beta and get 29mhs on each card. I recently bought a 4k tv and would like to game some. However, i tried several combinations of claymore and newer amd drivers. I setx and change the drive to computate. Only my display gpu gets 29 mhs. The rest are stuck around 20. They are all modded. Is there a fix for this? Thank you for your time.
About two hours ago (roughly when you wrote this) I was wondering the same thing, because I hadn't "hit" on a solution in about two hours, but at this point - starting about 90 minutes ago, things are back to the same rate of discovery I had during my first four or five hours. Mining rates are never truly uniform, so I'm going to just state that I think it's normal, part of getting started with a small, but growing group. I had two finds in the past 90 minutes and a third one appeared while I was writing this message (and right now I only have one GTX1060 pointed there). The actual hash rate is about 500MH/sec - roughly 1/2GH/sec. If you have noticed, Verge mining shows up at about 34GH difficulty, as opposed to the stated ETH difficulty at 4000MH (roughly 4GH), so it's about 8.5 times more difficult to find a solution or "share" than it is for Ethereum. |
|
|
|
But nlpool seem to have an issue with the web displayed wallet balance, that sometimes goes down without payment, as if the coins were "hidden" for some time, and later "reappear" in the balance...
It comes and goes, but always corrects itself. I don't know enough to analyze the problem or suggest fixes, but if you'll notice - when the amounts are wrong, the graphs are usually missing any data, also. Strange, nothing bad going on, just something isn't exactly right in the configuration for the miner pool display results. |
|
|
|
18.6 maximum onb my KFA2 1060 GTX 3gb  Getting solid 295 sols/s on equihash I don't know what to think about my GTX 1060's: I had a generic / HP with 3GB that regularly got 23MH/s ETH, but my new 6GB Gigabyte card won't go over 21M. Now, I am getting around 500MH/sec on my second coin XVG, which I was not doing on the 3GB card, but my ETH rate didn't change more than 1% lower. Strange. I suppose it's another "silicon lottery" phenom: this has Hynix VRAM, I had Samsung memory on the 3GB card that kept crapping out on me. |
|
|
|
Seems there's a consensus that for an RX 580, BLAKE2S for Verge at dcri 50+ is the way to go?
That seems to be a winning combination regardless of the GPU engine you're using. I have my two RX 580's single mining, for now, but I'll add them to the NLpool here within the next day or two when I have a little spare time. Maybe closer to -dcri 70 for some cards, but I am seeing a little decrease in ETH speed, so I went back to 60 to see how it rides. Right now I am monitoring a new Kickstarter that we launched at noon here (NYC time) for playing cards ("DeNovo" / UC2018 decks). I have to redo my OC but I found that going over 50 has quite an impact on the ETH hashrate (from 184 to 174). It's going to vary a good bit depending on your specific luck in the "silicon lottery", really. Just card vs card is not the only difference. I have settled around "-dcri 65" for my 1060/6GB rig right now, and it doesn't have much - if any - impact on my ETH mining. Is there a topic benchmarking blake2s and keccak for the RX 580?
I have Spec edition 580 at dcri 50 30.5 Eth + 1.500 xvg with same power DCR mining. I write here my bat file. Edit your wallet, mail etc. EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "ETH WALLET" -cvddc 900 -mvddc 900 -cclock 1133,,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2100,2200,2200,2200,2200 -tt 65 -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -dwal "XVG WALLET" -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XVGB -dcri 40,50,50,50,50 My 'sweet spot' appears to be about -dcri 50, also. I haven't really screwed around with it too much yet, but I started at 25 and adjusted it over the first few hours when I moved my 2nd coin over to NLpool.nl after leaving it in single mining mode a few days after 11.0 was posted. My cards are GTX1060/1080 and RX 580's, all with 8GB except the 1060 = 6. Not advertising here, but I am getting VERY good results using NLpool.nl's BLAKE2S pool, and haven't tried anything beyond that with 11.0 version. I had been single mininng for a while after I realized that all of the previous coins had been eat up by ASICs coming out (sounds right - "A-sicks"). Setup was truly easy, quick and couldn't be simpler. Yep nlpool is the best pool for xvg now. I tried a few pools but they stole about %50. Dcri 50 is the best config for sapphire spec rx 580. I use "40" for rx 570,Wth 50 I got black screen. Very nice for me, so far. I seem to usually have pretty good luck, but I am doing more than 50% better on NLpool.nl than I was on my previous 2nd coin attempts, although that was prior to the ASIC deaths of the Pascal and SiaCoin mining. As noted above, my "-dcri 65" seems to have virtually no impact on the ETH side, given that a 1% varience isn't really worth mention. I was running at almost exactly 21MH/sec on that specific card, and now it's at least 20,9 - so no issues here. "Your mileage WILL vary", almost inevitable. You have to tune that parameter using the "+" and "-" keys on the keyboard - for every rig. No two rigs, no two cards, even if they are the same model & manufacturer are going to be precisely the same. |
|
|
|
If you look from the green it's 1080ti
And from the reds then 580 ..
Honestly it's a crap shoot, but AMD cards are so much easier to MOD, since the BIOS are locked for all GTX 10 series cards. If you have the time and wisdom to play with nVidia GPUs, I tend to get better results on my 1060 6GB than on either my RX 580 4GB or 8GB cards. They all ride about the same, but since I have more control over the machine with the 1080 & RX 580's, it produces about 10-15% more hashes average. I am not even trying to distinguish between brands, much less models here. Just speaking in generalizations. If we all could get Titan V cards for the price we USED to pay for RX 480's, we would be golden! |
|
|
|
Seems there's a consensus that for an RX 580, BLAKE2S for Verge at dcri 50+ is the way to go?
That seems to be a winning combination regardless of the GPU engine you're using. I have my two RX 580's single mining, for now, but I'll add them to the NLpool here within the next day or two when I have a little spare time. Maybe closer to -dcri 70 for some cards, but I am seeing a little decrease in ETH speed, so I went back to 60 to see how it rides. Right now I am monitoring a new Kickstarter that we launched at noon here (NYC time) for playing cards ("DeNovo" / UC2018 decks). |
|
|
|
|
I am using a Gigabyte 6GB card with +205 clock offset and +1000 memory. My card seems to be able to take anything for memory (Hynix), but 1000 is the limit for the nVidiaInspector tool I use to adjust frequencies.
My card is mostly stable with +230, but I get enough errors to throttle back and it's rock solid at +200 to +210, but for some reason I get best share results at +205.
I didn't say, but I have power limited to 70% instead of wide open, and I get better results using 80 watts instead of the 105-108 watts without tweaking it. These numbers are from Orbmu2k's NVI tool, but I'll plug my Kill-a-Watt EZ at it soon enough.
|
|
|
|
My 'sweet spot' appears to be about -dcri 50, also. I haven't really screwed around with it too much yet, but I started at 25 and adjusted it over the first few hours when I moved my 2nd coin over to NLpool.nl after leaving it in single mining mode a few days after 11.0 was posted.
Not advertising here, but I am getting VERY good results using NLpool.nl's BLAKE2S pool, and haven't tried anything beyond that with 11.0 version. I had been single mininng for a while after I realized that all of the previous coins had been eat up by ASICs coming out (sounds right - "A-sicks").
Setup was truly easy, quick and couldn't be simpler.
Increasing dcri from 50 to somewhere in between 60 and 70 increase XVG without decreasing ETH for me (rx 580 1300 core, 2250 mem, 0.95 v core) Yep, probably universal. I am just playing with my single 1060/6GB card ATM, but using -dcri 70 and I don't see any difference to speak of. I'll keep my eyes on the number of shares and compare it to the previous week or two single mining to be certain, but I am getting around 25x the hash rate for BLAKE2S compared to ETH - without really changing my overall MH/sec rate for Ethereum. |
|
|
|
Is there a topic benchmarking blake2s and keccak for the RX 580?
I have Spec edition 580 at dcri 50 30.5 Eth + 1.500 xvg with same power DCR mining. I write here my bat file. Edit your wallet, mail etc. EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999 -ewal "ETH WALLET" -cvddc 900 -mvddc 900 -cclock 1133,,1200,1200,1200,1200 -mclock 2100,2200,2200,2200,2200 -tt 65 -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://mine.nlpool.nl:5766 -dwal "XVG WALLET" -dcoin blake2s -dpsw c=XVGB -dcri 40,50,50,50,50 My 'sweet spot' appears to be about -dcri 50, also. I haven't really screwed around with it too much yet, but I started at 25 and adjusted it over the first few hours when I moved my 2nd coin over to NLpool.nl after leaving it in single mining mode a few days after 11.0 was posted. My cards are GTX1060/1080 and RX 580's, all with 8GB except the 1060 = 6. Not advertising here, but I am getting VERY good results using NLpool.nl's BLAKE2S pool, and haven't tried anything beyond that with 11.0 version. I had been single mininng for a while after I realized that all of the previous coins had been eat up by ASICs coming out (sounds right - "A-sicks"). Setup was truly easy, quick and couldn't be simpler. |
|
|
|
|
Guys! Please think about what you are posting: we don't need to see the entire "README!!.txt" file or half of your logfile posted here - and if we do need your logfile to figure something out for you - we'll ask. Jeezus, people!
I run a web-based forums site myself, so I know that it's tempting and easy to just not consider everybody else, but it's truly a waste of time for people like Claymore who read (or at least try) through this whole thing three of four times a day!
Sorry, I'll get off my soapbox, now...
|
|
|
|
|
