On my btc-e funds page I can see about BTC 18.2 marked as 'Special Offer Volume' beside my BTC Balance. Anyone in here knows what that's about?
https://btc-e.com/news/101 |
|
|
|
Think of it more like a Sams club that pays its members residual income to bring others on board.
Is this one of those pyramid thingys?
No but the structure at the job you are working at probably resembles a pyramid.
Of course a job resembles one you have boss at the top workers below unlike this which is one. |
|
|
|
I noticed people talking today about bASIC and someone brought up an interesting point, that bASIC may have been a diversion to get people from buying from other producers of ASIC mining equipment so said persons could get higher in the que for machines without actually having any intention to deliver any mining equipment. I have to think that it would be possible to claim you were going to produce ASIC mining rigs, get said funds and then spend them on rigs for yourself. You could get an edge on mining and then take your time refunding your clients. Meanwhile you would get enough of an edge to pay back all your "customers" while making a worthy profit for yourself. It might be time for some of those customers to possibly get the authorities involved for a case of fraud. Any thoughts?
So you mean like June of last year when BFL announced their ASICs to pull the rug out from under the FPGA companies. |
|
|
|
There's nothing illegal (in the UK) about what is being requested - and were disclosure of the requirement for such documentation made in advance of accepting funds it would be perfectly reasonable.
You mean nothing besides the perjured document (the claim form) you file. |
|
|
|
Just now, I tried setting cgminer's thread-concurrency to 6144. It tried to start, but crashed before it could get going. Bumping it back down to 2048 got it running at the reduced rate. I've switched it back to reaper.
(As for versions, cgminer is v2.10.4 and reaper is v13b4. Both are 64-bit builds on AMD64 Gentoo.)
Are you using in the shell before starting cgminer.
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export DISPLAY=:0
|
|
|
|
From the contract 2.3 The Commencement Date for the initiation of data processing services contemplated hereunder shall be ten (10) business days following the receipt of specialized processing equipment from an outside vendor.
Yes. 10 business days is to give me time to make sure I don't loose my ass and don't start trying to deliver on something that is yet to be working. There are still a lot of variables yet to be nailed down including mining software. That said, if it takes 6 hours to get things up and running, the 10 days will not be needed. There are no worries if it does not benefit you the contract will change again. |
|
|
|
So the probability that the Investor will not get his initial investment back is extreme high.
In the end, Investors are paying for your hardware.
In the end your joking it was from the start these people were just to stupid to do the math. But each individual must do their own own due diligence and decide what is best for them. I have given this a lot of thought and would not be proposing it unless I thought it would benefit the purchaser.
BS you have never thought of the purchaser in any of this it was all designed to line your pockets and where was this due diligence when you listed on the GBLSE. But you will be mining with that hardware forever while the 1st batch of Investors only mines for 6 months and fully paid your "New" equipment.
Yes just plain theft of your "investment" going on now |
|
|
|
Tom took credit cards for payment if those do not get refunded under US law that is wire fraud a federal crime that is frowned upon, BTC they don't give a tinkers damn about it...
+1. He committed fraud. So the time he was planning on spending with his family, he will now be spending it with big bubba in a jail cell. Yeah, that totally happened to Sonny when he committed fraud on a much larger scale. Your talking white collar commercial fraud them types usually get negotiated settlement pleas whereas the regular joe who rips off the credit card company goes to jail. I don't think we would find Tom among the great thinkers who had actual depth in the plan that would create some doubt in the mind as to what exactly happened like them commercial types come up with. You know the type where the prosecutor gets to think well we can spend years and how many millions of dollars doing this or we can get plea agreement and be done with it. |
|
|
|
I found this on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Payment_methodsA funds transfer service between personal and business accounts at participating
Canadian financial institutions. In cases of identity theft the transfer may be reversed, especially if both parties are with the same financial institution[4]. Anyway, I will contact my bank this week for more information. Or you could go to the cavertix website and read their reason for not taking them anymore. That being the high rate of charge back scams with them. |
|
|
|
You can think whatever you want. Thanks, I will. I really dont have to explain myself. That's true, you don't. Good luck with your scammer buddy Tom.
Thanks, good luck with your super duper 100% guaranteed fund. Looks like you will be able to pay your buddy Tom a visit in Jail now. 1. The chances of Tom ending up in jail over a failed BTC venture when outright scammers like Pirate, Hashking, Andrew Nolan, BTC Guy, etc etc haven't been prosecuted. 2. Tom is not my buddy, I'm a former customer of his. I just disprove of morons and scammers, of which I believe you are one. Tom took credit cards for payment if those do not get refunded under US law that is wire fraud a federal crime that is frowned upon, BTC they don't give a tinkers damn about it... |
|
|
|
Does anyone have any advice?
Yeah give up on the idea of stealing your universities resources. |
|
|
|
about their orders and their information being in the hands of a company which isn't based in the US.
Welcome to the club the rest of the world is not to thrilled with their data being co-opted into US hands. |
|
|
|
Here's my bASIC conspiracy theory for you all to chew on:
Hungry Hippo miners have started a campaign to claim bASIC is a scam so they can scoop up all the cancelled pre-orders from the 1st run. How do you like those apples? Now...... fight!
Seems to mostly be BFL bitches in here causing the BS so one more for you they are trying to drive bASIC out of business so their supposed boxes will have less competition. Those boxes which were announced months before everyone else but are still nowhere to be seen BTW. |
|
|
|
 SAC you are a star! Many thanks for your help. Seems obvious now. Changed bitcoind to devcoind as per the makefile. Busy compiling now. Your welcome. |
|
|
|
I've been trying to compile devoind to mine solo on ubuntu 11.04. I have followed install instructions but keep getting the same error
user@mining-server:~/old-devcoind-master/src$ make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=1 bitcoind
make: *** No rule to make target `bitcoind'. Stop.
I have tried the other linux makefiles but the error is the same.
Please help.
Look at the contents of the makefile near the bottom you will see what the targets are named like this. bitcoind: $(OBJS:obj/%=obj/%)
$(LINK) $(xCXXFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(xLDFLAGS) $(LIBS)
clean:
-rm -f bitcoind test_bitcoin
-rm -f obj/*.o
-rm -f obj-test/*.o
-rm -f obj/*.P
-rm -f obj-test/*.P
-rm -f obj/build.h
With a makefile containing these you have a clean and bitcoind target to use, see what they have named it in your copy. Oh and unless you have installed the miniupnp from source it will fail with the command you list above use USE_UPNP= to skip the check for it. |
|
|
|
So, with the latest news from bASIC, why aren't there 2,000 threads calling them all liars and scammers? They've now pushed the date back again, lied about when Chinese New Year is, posted 6 consecutive news updates that simply say "the next update will have real news!", and most of all, they clearly lied about their chips being ready.
What? Only BFL takes shit for mistakes? Got it.
BFL have lied at every opportunity Tom delivered on the FPGAs as he said perhaps that has bought him some good will or the useless drama queens that inhabit this board have more pressing threads to troll. |
|
|
|
with some slight alterations, ive underclocked the core and memory speeds by about 5%, and returned the worksize to 64. As a result i moved from 3.7khash/s to 5khash/s and reduced hardware error rate by 80%.
still feels low, even for a laptop GPU, plus i feel like im missing out by not having it utilize my CPU (i7 620 mobile quad-core) at the same time. any advice would be great, as the first-time setup is always the toughest
Cgminer does not do cpu mining by default you need to build the program yourself with it enabled and I do not think scrypt is an option you want poolers cpuminer for litecoin also you are using one of the least useful cards when trying to mine, Nvidia sucks at this stuff. |
|
|
|
I also need that info to justify the fact that you have to send you own personal data to his Lawyer (EU Law forbit me to send data outside EU without having the data of the counterparty),
and in case of Identity Theft that I can sue James Gibson (in case of Identity Theft etc)
Riddle me this: if both countries require you to obtain data from the other person prior to sending data to the other person, then who sends data first? Does this need to be an in person same time exchange? Surely, someone has gone through this before... Or are the rules written in a way to outlaw something without "outlawing the something?  " haha, head explodes There it is in bold in case you still cannot read the person requesting the information sends their data first according to those words. Where would you every get that idea a lawyer is a representative of one of the parties involved not the main actor of the process. That would be the person/company they represent whose information would be needed as they pass received information on to their client and in case you have not noticed the lawyer in question here is listed nowhere on that law offices website anyways, so how the hell you supposed to get his information from it? And your certainly not going to get any information from Google on the supposed lawyer either. https://www.google.ca/search?q=Lawyer++Quentin+Page&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&gbv=1&sei=4SDnULT1GsmSqgG-qYDAAgI went ten pages deep on that puppy and there are two lawyers in florida with that first name a Quentin Fairchild in Fort Myers and a Quentin Till in Jacksonville. |
|
|
|
This is an insane debacle for Gigamining. I have gotten confirmations from all other asset owners without any weird verification, and only Gigamining is creating such a mess. I speculate that they do not have the funds to pay back and hence make it so difficult to claim the shares.[/color]
-1 I would not have gotten myself into the legally thorny mess Gigamining did in the first place but if I had gotten into the mess then I would probably get out of it in a similar manner. I do not think the issue is so much insolvency as being in a delicate situation and attempting to work it out in a logical and fair manner. Logic and fairness were never the point of this operation, filling gigavps pockets with your btc was the goal and still is at every opportunity he can find to do so. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
