We need stable block times every minute or what its supposed to be, I hope this is first in queue order of business  |
|
|
|
Wil there be a PoS fix ? important stuff  |
|
|
|
|
DOnt worry so much, there is time, now taht atsecure can work without you assholes getting his focus expect miracles....
|
|
|
|
|
dem drk boyz sqeelin like a worm on a hook <3
|
|
|
|
|
What was IPO price ? kinda not so worth mining tnx to IPO dumpers....
|
|
|
|
|
Is there plans for an update to adress the block times ?
|
|
|
|
Such a gloating fucking piece of garbage, you and propulsion ... jeez |
|
|
|
I bought THC all the way upto 50 sat because I believe it is a good coin and I felt sorry for it selling @ 6 sat, you lot simply need to buy in order for this coin to succeed, if you guy keep dumping because the price has rose a little, then I will just dump it down to 1 sat and be done with it, it's upto you?
You bumped the price up to 18 as of right now. That pretty good. I am buying up coins and keeping them so they won't get dumped back on the exchange. This is a long term coin. You can be out but keep your coins. This coin will be around in 1 year. I will take my remaining hemp to the grave, and if a coin I have will do well, I will buy a shitload  |
|
|
|
Already onto the next PumpnDump that is brewing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618377.340Is the Dev still here and working on features?
Yes, I have been working on new features. Anon send is the holy grail in crypto right now and no coin has properly implemented yet. We have been working with x11coin team closely as they seem to have the solution that can come soonest.  No he says "working closely", not "helping". ATCSecure has said he is "not working on any other alt coins." https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7059884#msg7059884So Cryptcoin is obviously a scam. This is not FUD, this a public announcement. I didn't say atcsecure was working on this coin. x11coin is worked on by many more people than just atcsecure/Dan. x11coin started as a scam coin and has been turned into something much better, worked by atcsecure and others. I've worked with the NEW x11coin team, as I said. Now please, go back to fighting DRK instead. Cryptcoin is not your enemy. Guess who this developer might be? I will give you 0.7 DRK for the right guess.  It really amazes me to see where DRK has gotten itself to given the hatred from possibly every angle there is. Unreal. So ATCSecure is helping CRY coin to start the next pump n dump.....this is going to make the baby jesus CRY. XC = CRYCOIN (cant even keep up anymore) He is not helping, XC anon is open source, go figure.... |
|
|
|
I dont think DRK people wanna get involved, they just wanna bash compeditors. I just hope they will prove me wrong now |
|
|
|
You can't have a contest / puzzle, without a solution (even if it's closed in an envelope).
The right procedure is this:
1) The one sending the money should know his addresses (not the "label" - this is not what the blockchain has... the blockchain has addresses)
2) The one sending the money should write these addresses from where the money actually originated in an envelope (in our case a .zip protected .txt file) and upload it. This will be the "correct answer" that the puzzle solver will have to find.
3) The transaction is conducted
4) The recipient address is being publicized so that the money flow can be tracked how it reached the recepient.
5) People start tracking the moneyflow backwards
6) Those who crack the anonymity post their findings
7) The "envelope" is opened (in our case the password protected zip file is opened - by distribution of the password)
8] The findings of step6 are measured against the actual addresses of the "envelope" (step2)
9) Finders of step6 collect the bounty.
Problem is that some people here are confusing labels / accounts with address/addresses and hence the above measurement and bounty scheme is impossible. There is nothing to calibrate the right answer to and prove it.
OK, there seems to be some confusion here The sender knows his address, he has only publicised the label. He wants people to find the address for wallet label "1" using the block chain, tracing backwards from the receiving address (it has only had one incoming transaction) The only bit missing is the answer in envelope. password protected zip uploaded to a known location would be perfect, can be checked by time and date stamp that it hasn't been changed. So no problem doing this on darksend and XC at the same time right ? |
|
|
|
Darksend has been live in beta for the past 3 months. XC is a copycoin with no anonymity, paid to be made, by loljosh from atsecure and is less then a month old. Nothing more.
corrected your post Do you know what Beta means? It's the testing phase. You could of still used Darksend. You can now.... Then lets test it against XC and see if both are anon yes ? |
|
|
|
|
Explain to me why XC has to prove itīs anonymous when all we have its the sects word for it that darksend is ?
I propose that we test both these anonymous solutions and then we can close the book ey ??
|
|
|
|
Patience guys, Rome was not built in a day.. We have a great coin... DRK will probably give us a tow now next few days... No need to rush we are doing OK.... We do need to sort a logo out though
Dark won't give a rise to x11 coin. Not now at least. Probably just the opposite. Being accepted on Bitfinex is a monumental deal. Bitfinex only trades BTC, LTC and now DRK. Dont worry we dont need you, you have shit attitude .... Only being realistic. Not everything is rosy all the time. WHo do you think youre fooling ? youre gloating and it shows... |
|
|
|
Patience guys, Rome was not built in a day.. We have a great coin... DRK will probably give us a tow now next few days... No need to rush we are doing OK.... We do need to sort a logo out though
Dark won't give a rise to x11 coin. Not now at least. Probably just the opposite. Being accepted on Bitfinex is a monumental deal. Bitfinex only trades BTC, LTC and now DRK. Dont worry we dont need you, you have shit attitude .... |
|
|
|
So XC is at least semi anonymous. The other day Chaeplin showed he could trace transactions with both addresses, has there been any changes to the XC wallet? or is that where we are at right now..
At the moment this coin isn't anonymous at all. The dev hasn't released any technical documents on how he plans to make it work. The distribution of coins is awful. Source: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich The person who posted the bet is refusing to publish the account "1" address. A forum member has already broken the "anonymity" of the coin once. To see if any developments have been made, that above address needs to be published. Seriously, if you can not afford to lose money, withdrawal your capital from this crypto. So is darksend anonymous ? can you test it somehow ? http://www.scribd.com/doc/227369807/Bitcoin-Coinjoin-Not-Anonymous-v01Evan's reply  Random FUD
The problems addressed in this were handled hundreds of pages ago. Darksend isn't finished yet and was never promised to be 100% anonymous unless you use great care. Plus RC4 will have great improvements to the anonymity offered. Ok but then why you so focused on XCs anonymity when yours isnt 100% and isnt live until 1.5 months from now ? Edit, oh yeah the question kinda answers itself lol.... |
|
|
|
So XC is at least semi anonymous. The other day Chaeplin showed he could trace transactions with both addresses, has there been any changes to the XC wallet? or is that where we are at right now..
At the moment this coin isn't anonymous at all. The dev hasn't released any technical documents on how he plans to make it work. The distribution of coins is awful. Source: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!rich The person who posted the bet is refusing to publish the account "1" address. A forum member has already broken the "anonymity" of the coin once. To see if any developments have been made, that above address needs to be published. Seriously, if you can not afford to lose money, withdrawal your capital from this crypto. So is darksend anonymous ? can you test it somehow ? http://www.scribd.com/doc/227369807/Bitcoin-Coinjoin-Not-Anonymous-v01 |
|
|
|
Just playing devil's advocate...let's say the basic structure of the POS/POW coin WAS made by loljosh, in the end if the product works does it really matter? I could care less if the keebler elves cobbled it together as long as atcsecure built a working anonymous system. I personally see nothing wrong with paying someone to do the grunt work if you can focus on the more advanced functionsof the coin, Even Evan is admitting he needs help and is now looking for qualified devs to join the Dark team but nobody spreads FUD about that.
Then why doesn't atcsecure address the issue directly like you just did. If he said exactly what you just said people would trust him more. Guess its none of your business, just as evan admits faulty diff on day one and doesnīt relaunch, never answer on that, none of my business..... |
|
|
|
Mintpal back online!
Pos Blocks are working as they should and moving fast... if your not staking, upgrade to v1.33
Thanks,
ATCSECURE
can we stake and run an xnode from the same wallet? do we need 2 different wallets? IS running an xnode going to run the risk of being a target for hackers? I am thinking I should probably use it on an isolated network? Any opinions? Seems I might want to look into secure that computer better as well. Yes running an XNODE puts you in a different risk category, I would have a completely separate wallet for an XNODE I have made a wallet on a remote computer and encrypted it, I will transfer 1000XC to that then I will start it, it should stay locked right ? |
|
|
|
you know.. if we all just ignore the dark trolls they will go away. Do not even reply to them. When they realized they are ignored totally it will no longer satisfy them to post shit here. Just ignore them, dont quote them - nothing.
He was right about block times, that is also part of the "crash" , many coin stuck in transfers because no block found = chaos.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
