|
I contacted bittrex today.. lets keep asking them to add CYG!
|
|
|
|
pepe did not had an airdrop though, here there are airdrop plus 400k coins donated for stupid things because dev is incompetent
People are only buying pepe because there is a prominent pumper behind it and they hope he will pump it and not dump all over them. Good luck with that!  |
|
|
|
We have our road map  What kind of voting do you plan dev? Would voting allow for users to do polls, like an on blockchain election? |
|
|
|
hey developer, if you can see this, bittrex said that you should keep coming to the slack and they will add it
Other people can ask about CYG in the bittrex slack too  Let's let Bittrex know about the vibrant CYG community! |
|
|
|
Who is it?  Look at the number of transactions.. it's clear that the first two wallets are either a pool or exchange. One is likely pool.mn and the other yobit. |
|
|
|
I heard a big whale is here for a big pump. Strap in.  |
|
|
|
As we followed the community's request, we've contacted Bittrex a few days ago. A few hours ago we got a response from them : Thanks for the request. Our policy is to not comment on whether we will launch coins but we only add coins under active development with high community demand.
We gauge demand based off of tweets, hash power, length of bitcointalk thread, volume on other exchanges, etc. Follow us on twitter @bittrexexchange and tweet about how much you like this coin and Bittrex. We respond to creative and insightful posts to help market your favorite coins and Bittrex. I'd also consider coming to our irc channel #bittrex on irc.freenode.net and do some guerrilla marketing. The traders there can help you gain exposure for your coin. So, following their "requirements" we would like to ask you, our community, to express your interest in being added to Bittrex. Regarding the first consensus poll, we are getting many responses from you by the form, and the most "requested" developements are starting to clear out. Keep up the voting, remember you can submit your proposals until 23th of March Also go ask them in their slack to add CYG! ---> http://slack.bittrex.com |
|
|
|
everyone knows who's behind this project... that's why hash was so high on launch!
Satoshi Nakamoto? Who else?  |
|
|
|
No dev, no countdown, no relaunch! Too many times to lie.
So then I do my own countdown if devs does not show, in 24hrs I can say who is behind this project!
everyone knows who's behind this project... that's why hash was so high on launch! |
|
|
|
Well, we launched and began mining on our cards, the pools joined in and then there was a MASSIVE hash spike to over 30ghs. Not sure which pool it was on if any, but essentially the chain we were on was different from that of the pools and many other miners. When we referenced what we were seeing on our side with that of the pools we were way off. This can happen if a pool or user has their time set ahead and mines a lot of blocks with an extremely high rate of hash. The dev team got forked off :/ so we had to start over.
I know that many of you will likely disagree with us and accuse us of an instamine scam. We waited until we saw other miners come online before we started, and many people here mined at block 1 as well. We kept things as fair as we thought was possible. This is backed up by our very rewarding POS system that will be beneficial to many with varying holdings.
We're not out to scam but all dev teams need funds to work with on their projects.
Essentially, it was a "supermine" some of you may remember these from the multi-pool days. It's similar to a 51% attack. 30ghs within 2 minutes is massive, and it created a situation for us that would not be sustainable for the long list of updates, features and community events were going to be hosting. We'd love to have continued with that chain, but we can't when we have 0 coins to work with.
Pepeteam
So your previous excuse of the gitlab repo being set to private was just bullshit, then? |
|
|
|
LOL got to shakeout all the miners who were in on this so that dev team gets more coins on relaunch |
|
|
|
Signature added. Glad to be onboard! Will add sig soon. Also as you have a history with NXT please consider to adding a NXT swap to your ICO as i think you will get a strong interest. Cheers... Thank you, cheers! |
|
|
|
Signature added. Glad to be onboard! |
|
|
|
Seems like Condomcoin would be perfect for your exchange |
|
|
|
This coin is rather 'meh' so far. Only 39% sold.
How much it raised is meh so far. Cant argue with you there. But the coin itself if it has what the devs say it has will be really interesting to say the least and I'm sure many other coins after it will try to copy it. Then the lack of sales aka meh will actually be a good thing because a lot of coins will be burnt and will only increase the value of those who bought in on the ico. Well we shall soon see. Unless it reaches 70+% then its distribution is too small to make it anything worthwhile. Other than an initial pump and dump it will fade into oblivion at current levels. Not advocating for CIRC, but I just wanted to say that this argument doesn't hold water. Check out the NXT IPO - entire supply sold for under 25 BTC to 70 people. That turned out ok. |
|
|
|
Nice roadmap. I bet we'll see a nice rise in the next weeks leading up to the coin swap and masternodes. |
|
|
|
It appears that the distribution (of balances) that you see on BitTrex is *not* the rich list, it is *not* looking at the block chain,
it is only showing that for the balance in the Bittrex wallet (the top entry in the rich list), how that balance is divided over Bittrex accounts.
I have balance outside Bittrex that does not show on their distribution list, only my balance on Bittrex does.
This is correct! |
|
|
|
Top 25 largest balances:
0. 509773.27 [Premine tokens that will be permanently burned by Bittrex]
1. 109725.63
2. 100000
3. 100000
4. 99750
5. 76209.47
6. 69515.8
7. 62102.53
8. 59850.35
9. 53768.89
10. 52667.87
11. 52238.81
12. 50000
13. 46154.97
14. 43990
15. 41338.52
16. 35910
17. 35064.91
18. 31388.01
19. 31241.14
20. 29844.86
21. 27929.62
22. 27431.25
23. 25522.26
24. 21371.66
25. 20149.5
VS richlist: http://explorer.gambitcrypto.com/richlist1 1508848.45144854 60.35%   2 509773.26429452 20.39 BURNED TOKENS 3 83011.14800196 3.32 4 62122.62471755 2.48 5 59858.75197451 2.39 6 50002.91516385 2.00 7 38387.92526551 1.54 8 25006.56384620 1.00 9 20154.91912703 0.81 10 17470.42223050 0.70 11 16123.67797418 0.64 12 15916.32012325 0.64 13 14936.00000000 0.60 14 12586.72081788 0.50 15 11003.56319943 0.44 16 10003.23111130 0.40 17 8005.31589004 0.32 18 7999.98000000 0.32 19 6507.02344070 0.26 20 3691.24660255 0.15 21 3098.21935963 0.12 22 2508.23277599 0.10 23 1808.44148170 0.07 24 1679.03647575 0.07 25 1511.31552502 0.06 Care to elaborate about this? Congratulations! Seems like you discovered Bittrex' wallet |
|
|
|
So how much coins does M1 have after all? 100k or 27k?
After PoW it will be 32k coins. There are currently ~24k coins. What's amazing is that some miner dumped some coins at 18k satoshi on Yobit, while the coin was being bought at 70k sats . I regret not catching that dump. FUD is good for cheap coins though, keep fudding! |
|
|
|
I need some feedback from the community.
Would you all prefer to see work-in-progress betas sooner, or wait longer to be presented the finished and 100% polished product?
I'd prefer to show more work in progress, thats why I ask. It helps me when users test and abuse things. Anon test will be released later today, and I'd like to start testing the social network sooner than the time announced on the website, and some of our trading tools.
Thanks!
Faster testing/updates are better IMO, even if its in unfinished beta. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
