So we are now in week 13, and we are starting to deploy week 10's 55 Coincraft rigs. A little delay I should say. Meanwhile it's about the time to deploy 250 TH/s custom hardware which should happen in week 13~15. If all these Coincraft rigs and custom hardware deployment happen in these 3 weeks, PETA' hashrate would be explosively growth. Though it only happens in a very optimistic way.

I agree the reinvestment % can be changed. But not now, at least not until they start the reinvestment deployment. Need to see how efficiency CryptX uses these money. If they are able to bring us cheap hash rate, then increase the reinvestment part would be great! Otherwise, I prefer let the money come back to their shareholders. So, let the time tells.

It's very serious regarding their own development hardware, both the total cost and the chip quantities Bitmine can offer.
So far Bitmine has some problem on massive production of their standalone products. However, if Bitmine can offer enough chips to PETA-MINE, then everything will be good. The only problem left will be the cost. How much cost needed in building their own hardware.
Right now I'm just holding shares. I'll increase or decrease shares base on how they deal with these 2 issues.   

The only chance that can save your ass is the difficulty level don't trend up so fast.
Or you're just buying hashing machines for CH.  A year later, CH has machines and your money, yay.
That's a slight difference between CEX.io and Cloudhashing.
CEX.io's situation is you can sell your ghs to others, so you still have a chance to make profit. However the last rat would suffer.
Cloudhashing's situation is that "You are the first and the last rat."

Really want to know if PETA-MINE's project is going to success or not. Let's do some assumption and calculation for future condition.

First of all, the goal of PETA-MINE is to build a 2% of total network hash-rate hosting center.
And the total deployment of PETA-MINE should be done by the end of May, which was announced by CryptX.
And we all know that's no way that the total network hash-rate will be 35 PH/s by the end of May.

So my first assumption is that PETA-MINE will actually deploy 700 TH/s by the end of May. And in the mean time the total network hash-rate is 70 PH/s. Which means PETA-MINE will hold 1% of total network hash-rate.

And we also know there is 35% reinvestment.

To do this quickly, the 14 days revenue of PETA-MINE should be 3600(btc)*1%*14(days)*0.85= 428.4 (btc)
0.85 is about the hosting fee, which is (1-15%)
So the reinvestment should be 428.4*35%= 149.94 (btc)

That is to say, if PETA-MINE holds 1% of total network hash-rate, the 14 days reinvestment should be roughly 150 btc.

Then we go to the second part of the assumption.
I assume that the difficulty increment is 10% by the end of May. You can replace it by any number you want, it's just a fast way to calculate for me, and it seems not a ridiculous number for now the difficulty increment is slowing down.

And that means if PETA-MINE can use 150 btc reinvestment to deploy 70 TH/s hash-rate or more, PETA-MINE will be success. Otherwise, PETA-MINE is not going to keep up with the BTC network increment.

So the most important factor which is still not determined is that at what price PETA-MINE will buy in their reinvestment hash-rate.

150 (btc) / 70,000 (GHs) = 0.00214 (GHs/btc) , Now the AntMiner is about 0.00617 (GHs/btc)

The Key is whether PETA-MINE be able to produce their own rigs under 0.00214 GHs/btc with Coincraft A1 chips, I really don't know. Personally I would like CryptX make a brief statement about the information they've got so far.
Basically there's no way to foretell btc price, we can only assume it. Somehow the error by doing this, you know, is just large enough to put this calculation sheet into trash can.

I personally would like to invest more in this project. But there are too many undetermined factors over there. It would be great if PETA-MINE hits and maintains 2% of total internet hash-rate. But so far it most likely to hit 1% of total network hash-rate, which is great, too. And it would be great if CryptX give us some information about the reinvestment progress and cost per GH/s.

Does anyone has a clue that by when cointerra is going to fix this PCB issue? Do old customers get benefits when they fix up this issue? Or it just benefits those new Terraminers using new designed PCB board.