 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
|
After a long-time period disappearance, now the girlbtc come back to our life, why should we stop him? he is providing some funny things to us on this "boring" forum.
He can be funny and earn some trust without spamming his threads and without creating nonsense threads everyday. Humor should be something funny and not annoying.  He already has a green from Tomatocage, which he does not deserve. I escrowed a deal between girlbtc.com and xFrostee. Both parties were quick to respond to the escrow agreement and the deal was completed quick and clean.
I mean, use a DT guy as escrow and turn green? It just make things so easy for scammers. |
|
|
|
I have information ocminer is the real dev of this coin.
He made a pool for it.
And he made this unofficial thread to distant himself from the scam.
/s
LOL https://z.cash/team.htmlHmm.. I'm Jay there ;-)  ^^This Jay?  |
|
|
|
This spammer+scammer has gone insane. Now accepting new members in signature campaign thread!  A new signature campaign has just been started: girlbtc Signature Campaign https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1651598.0Legendary Members (6 slots): 0.040BTC / week Hero Members (6 slots): 0.035BTC / week Senior Members (6 slots): 0.030BTC / week minimum 35 posts / week you are welcome minimum 35 posts / week and 200 characters
please do not ignore the PM, thx I wonder why Tomatocage left +ve on him just because his escrow service was used. |
|
|
|
Consecutively posting these in his own thread... Hey ,I don't want to spam this ,just post a news for round 18 A little giveaway is set , with 0.005 for valued players. Which means if you bet 0.02btc on girl side in Round 18 , and win ,you get 0.045 total. with the chance 50-50 It is a good deal isn't it? Here is the promotion details https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1643861.0The game is 0 house edge ,trans fee free for bet under 1btc. Wish you good luck I don't understa how your giveaways works. You need to have a bet to be able to be eligible to get the prize and you need to win the bet given that you mentionedthe person need to win if he bet to the girl. I that is the case that isn't a giveaway but more like a bonus prize. uhmmm. giveawy to the real player. ok we may call it bonus prize. Round 19: we judge this round by block #434300 girl : 1LgjCtjkTLaCBUjKxyWoRQYTeoqKJUQjDS 0.0000 BTC boy: 14CJ5jhGHSNA5DtsauyjbKf4wkScZNowy2 0.000 BTC
updated 0:00 14/10/2016History: round 19: block #434300 waiting....round 18: block #4340200 000000000000000002fbc3f01ea7a0957a6c0cfb86bac1da6361f3dbec423411 0.0206 V.S. 0.000 BTC winner:girl round 17: block #4340100 00000000000000000055355040164e0c58c4b5a55861590aa9d579fbb8765d73 0.000 V.S. 0.000 BTC winner:girl round 16: block #434000 000000000000000000f3818b00e3e3f95b0a6d16aa32a1af910dac1fa9ce28b9 0.000 V.S. 0.000 BTC winner:boy round 15: block #433900 00000000000000000291a5c3ef208b29a7dec8f26f54241ad95080dc30203ea9 0.000 V.S. 0.000 BTC winner:boy round 14: block #433800 000000000000000001847bf76f75b9ef708c1622390d4a61f44fb9f383f3d73a 0.002 V.S. 0.005 BTC winner:girl round 13: block #433700 000000000000000001847bf76f75b9ef708c1622390d4a61f44fb9f383f3d73a 0.000 V.S. 0.000 BTC winner:boy round 12: block #433600 00000000000000000406ce0c290cfbaca1add6686eac969d3dfe27856dbbb907 0.800 V.S. 0.002 BTC winner:girl round 11: block #433500 00000000000000000310311b4ac1ffe9d773e013889ab0f4b4c2c60ec25d8419 0.0300 V.S. 0.051 BTC winner:boy round 10: block #433400 0000000000000000033260db770d79af61896728ec71a1cdb63d710b053af019 0.0300 V.S. 0.0231 BTC winner:boy round 9: block #433300 00000000000000000353df34eebb46a0441bdc509c4a0b59b5a246db1a5da44c 0.0410 V.S. 0.0320 BTC winner:boy round 8: block #433200 000000000000000003bf4bc797187451bae456893851338917e1c47f6d4fe844 0.0500 V.S. 0.1000 BTC winner:girl round 7: block #433100 00000000000000000123e44d5450fef0b3f411e522f27b1fc32f9f04dbededd0 0.0000 V.S. 0.0000 BTC winner:girl round 6: block #433000 0000000000000000038f7ccda1055fa241addb2222004f945df64086b958173a 0.0000 V.S. 0.01088 BTC winner:boy round 5: block #432900 00000000000000000382043fea2855031a140865dd7b68624494a04243c07131 0.0000 V.S. 0.01089 BTC winner:girl round 4: block #432800 000000000000000003300e60a078c37ebb8932fb012a4d7a250347f1df5b1db5 0.0109 V.S. 0.000 BTC winner:girl round 3: block #432700 0000000000000000044ddd3818966b7c57247103116e1aa4873e28cc05246918 winner:boy round 2(eighth):da0066c622b29a99a991e3559c8898e273bb0666347634f1d506fb6fc4ea102d 0.051 V.S. 0.04 BTC winner:boy round 1(ninth hash):460b3400b1422bb2f6bea8a57f950966266df2abe963fb187ebfd2489ae89e41 1.2147557 V.S. 0.0284 BTC winner:girlround 0(tenth hash):b00fa46579f788020d1c8068d3450af6fce93c264de92c0a2c4ada1107c5e64a Rules: character 0-7 for girl and 8-f for boy,we judge the last character of the block's hash For example Block #432700 Block #432700 0000000000000000044ddd3818966b7c57247103116e1aa4873e28cc05246918 last character 8 here for boy the winner get his/her btc doubled when the opposite has enough to pay. visit http://girlbtc.com FAQ:Q:so for example, there is 10btc on boy and 1btc on girl, what will happen if the boy wins the round? if girl wins the round you would only pay 1btc and keep 9btc from the boy? A:in this situation ,if the boy wins , the first 1 btc will be doubled , so the boy side will be returned 11 btc. if the girl wins , the boy's 9 btc will be returned and the girl get 2 btc returned. in other word , the site is not betting with you . and additional ,if you bet 1-10btc , the fee will be 1%. thats if the boy wins 10.99 btc return if the girl wins 1.99 to the girlside , 9 to boy side for more info www.girlbtc.com
we are making it running with big players ,like 10btc 100btc 1000btc per bet ,and thx the following first reply with 50+ sensible words and activities more than 240 will get 0.001btc directly TO master : it is not spamming it is just to atrract attention. and get advice.Ok ok I hands up , because I don't want to run round 19 with 0 V.S. 0 Following is the solution: Newest block is 434279And we have 20 blocks left to finish Round 19 ,as it will be ended by 433300 Everyone on this forum can get 0.002btc if you have a 0.005btc or more bet on the girl side in round 19.This is not a free giveaway, so it is not belongs to the Games and Rounds section. We need a push to make the game popular. Almost crazy with this kind of silence .......... Anyone has bet in round 19 with more than will get.... How much we offer, you will play?Make promise here. I will reply ok or not
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
tell me
come on,let's push it . |
|
|
|
Difficulty will decrease after the halving. If diff increases it's due to newer hardware and btc price rising instead.
I don't understand, lots of people are saying that the halving will increase mining difficulty. Now you are saying it will decrease, precisely what determines the mining difficulty? How many of us fools willing to run miners  It depends on how many miners in China are running with near zero electricity cost. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about dooglus, he's already being dealt with. Just wait for Chapter 3, I hear it's going to be good. I could not understand your Chapter 3 reference. What does it mean? Having said that, you claimed that cryptodevil defied a forum rule but you failed to substantiate this claim. Can we now get back on topic and conclude that no forum rule was defied, violated, broken, or otherwise abused here?
Of course cryptodevil defied a forum rule. Account trading is allowed here, while he is claiming the end result is still about deception and using his framed logic to leave -ve feedback on an account. He could at most leave a neutral feedback, saying it is bought. But, if he does not remove his feedback, then he must be removed from DT. Well, only if the "authority" care. |
|
|
|
The OP didn't get the neg for an account sale so your "all or nothing" fallacy doesn't even apply.
It is not a fallacy. It is logic. Selective marking only endorse partiality. Moreover, as per OP, cryptodevil stated the following, where it is clear, he is against the forum rule of account trading and wont remove the negative because of this reason, not the one for which he left it initially... I don't care what your reasons are for buying an account, the end result is still about deception.
That's a whole lot of assumptions from a short quote like that. Why don't you PM cryptodevil and ask for an explanation before jumping to conclusions. Why on earth will I PM cryptodevil? If u trust him, u r free to do that. I prefer public discussion as I do not need any loyalty reward from anyone here. If u ask me about the current members on DefaultTrust, I think, dooglus should be moved to level 2, shorena should be taken to level 1 and Johny Depp should be added to level 2. But, well, I know I am not the "authority". |
|
|
|
The default trust does seem to imply trust of people that could potentially not be on the up and up. But it should also be in every new accounts mind to read how the forum works and understand as many aspects as they can before running into a signature like so many do.
Seeking out accounts to flag seems abit off to me but again this is why people need to read up on trust when joining to realize not everything is what it seems.
Thanks a lot for your insightful comment. How much you earned for this "constructive" statement? 0.00007 BTC? |
|
|
|
But the OP as asking to remove the rating because of the alleged sale. There is no rule about that, in fact the only trust-related rule I can find is the one that states trust is not moderated. So again, which rule is being defied and how exactly?
Trust is definitely not moderated and no one is asking mods to moderate cryptodevil's feedback. What is being asked is to deal with dooglus, who is sitting in DT level 1 and recruiting one after another nonsense. FYI, DefaultTrust has been moderated before. Read about CITM, escrow.ms, Tradefortress, lophie, master-p, friedcat and many others who have glorified the DefaultTrust before. |
|
|
|
The OP didn't get the neg for an account sale so your "all or nothing" fallacy doesn't even apply.
It is not a fallacy. It is logic. Selective marking only endorse partiality. Moreover, as per OP, cryptodevil stated the following, where it is clear, he is against the forum rule of account trading and wont remove the negative because of this reason, not the one for which he left it initially... I don't care what your reasons are for buying an account, the end result is still about deception.
I seriously doubt that you have the authority to speak for "the rest" but there is absolutely nothing preventing you from doing ~cryptodevil, or ~dooglus, or ~DefaultTrust.
Yah. I dont have any authority here. But all I can tell you, once upon a time, I used my resources to bring people to Bitcointalk. Now, I use the same resource to take people to forum.bitcoin.com. Even sirius said there that he regrets his decision to hand over Bitcointalk to current "authorities". Regarding the issue with Bitcointalk, doing ~cryptodevil, or ~dooglus, or ~DefaultTrust, would have solved the problem, if newbies were not forced feed to wear DT. But, as long as the newbies are forced feed to wear DT, "authorities" can not disown their responsibility rectify the mafia like activity by certain DT members. |
|
|
|
Nopes. This is not between SpanishSoldier & cryptodevil. It could be, if cryptodevil was not on DT level 2. But, DT level 1 members are hand picked by "administrators" as loyalty reward. There is no algorithm behind it. And DT level 2 members are hand picked by DT level 1 members. Hence, if a DT level 2 member is defying a forum rule, "administrators" can take step to remove the DT level 1 guy, who has chosen the problematic DT level 2 member.
What is the forum rule that cryptodevil is "defying"? Leaving (actually not removing in this case) negative trust on someone, because he believes buying an account is an act of deception. If that is what he believes, why not he negative trusting everyone involved into account trading in Digital Goods & Auction, including the forum escrows? Can you quote the applicable rule from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0 18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
How exactly is cryptodevil "defying" this rule? It doesn't say anything about an obligation to remove trust ratings after an account sale or anything else that would apply here. Except maybe the "discouraged" part, which is the lesson to learn here. Please read the OP. The account was sold before the rating was placed. Though, this claim of OP is not provable, it is clear that the account not active for at least a week when the trust was placed by cryptodevil. |
|
|
|
18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
The forum doesn't prevent account sales, however, as everyone can leave feedback as they see just, it also does not prevent users leaving negative feedback over account trades/to bought accounts. Hence, Cryptodevil does not 'break' that rule. If your version is to be believed, then why not he negative trusting everyone involved into account trading in Digital Goods & Auction, including the forum escrows? Why not apply the same rule to all and see how dooglus+cryptodevil turn red within days? Why rules are selective applied to those, who does not have any loyal connection to DT? To understand my last statement, each and everyone arguing with me in this thread is somehow blessed by DT. I have no problem if SpanishSoldier remains marked with DT. But, the point is, if this continues, only DT will trust DT and the rest will find something else. |
|
|
|
Nopes. This is not between SpanishSoldier & cryptodevil. It could be, if cryptodevil was not on DT level 2. But, DT level 1 members are hand picked by "administrators" as loyalty reward. There is no algorithm behind it. And DT level 2 members are hand picked by DT level 1 members. Hence, if a DT level 2 member is defying a forum rule, "administrators" can take step to remove the DT level 1 guy, who has chosen the problematic DT level 2 member.
What is the forum rule that cryptodevil is "defying"? Leaving (actually not removing in this case) negative trust on someone, because he believes buying an account is an act of deception. If that is what he believes, why not he negative trusting everyone involved into account trading in Digital Goods & Auction, including the forum escrows? Can you quote the applicable rule from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0 18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
|
|
|
|
Leaving (actually not removing in this case) negative trust on someone, because he believes buying an account is an act of deception. If that is what he believes, why not he negative trusting everyone involved into account trading in Digital Goods & Auction, including the forum escrows?
Did you even read the feedback? It seems you didn't. Did u read the OP? It seems you didn't. |
|
|
|
Nopes. This is not between SpanishSoldier & cryptodevil. It could be, if cryptodevil was not on DT level 2. But, DT level 1 members are hand picked by "administrators" as loyalty reward. There is no algorithm behind it. And DT level 2 members are hand picked by DT level 1 members. Hence, if a DT level 2 member is defying a forum rule, "administrators" can take step to remove the DT level 1 guy, who has chosen the problematic DT level 2 member.
What is the forum rule that cryptodevil is "defying"? Leaving (actually not removing in this case) negative trust on someone, because he believes buying an account is an act of deception. If that is what he believes, why not he negative trusting everyone involved into account trading in Digital Goods & Auction, including the forum escrows? |
|
|
|
But, DT level 1 members are hand picked by "administrators" as loyalty reward.
I wouldn't say a loyalty reward. You wouldn't get put on DT1 simply for being here for a long time, else every member from 2010-2011 would be on there. Seems your IQ level is too low to understand the meaning of loyalty reward. Better stop barking for petty signature payment. |
|
|
|
So, I would like to know from the forum administrators, who, I believe, have chosen a list of trusted members to leave feedback, why allowing account trading on Bitcointalk, if your trusted member thinks account buying is an act of deception?
Nothing to do with "administrators". Scamming is also "allowed" on Bitcointalk (i.e. mods don't ban scammers) but it doesn't mean their behavior is trustworthy. This is between you and cryptodevil. Also it's impossible to prove that the account really changed hands and you should have considered the risk of prior activity when you purchased it. There was ample warning on the trust page. Nopes. This is not between SpanishSoldier & cryptodevil. It could be, if cryptodevil was not on DT level 2. But, DT level 1 members are hand picked by "administrators" as loyalty reward. There is no algorithm behind it. And DT level 2 members are hand picked by DT level 1 members. Hence, if a DT level 2 member is defying a forum rule, "administrators" can take step to remove the DT level 1 guy, who has chosen the problematic DT level 2 member. |
|
|
|
|
Contact dooglus. He is the reason scores of irresponsible people have been added to DefaultTrust.
|
|
|
|
|
I just found that dooglus has included Vod in his trust list, while HostFat has excluded him. So, the net effect on Vod from DT depth 1 is 0. Hence, Vod should not show trusted by default. But, his feedback is still showing under Trusted feedback. Is it malfunctioning of DefaultTrust algorithm?
|
|
|
|
|
