Possible that its trying to counter the low diff we had earlier. (many blocks insterted)
I wonder what `gethashespersec` is wallet returning now.
Now that you mention it, that would also explain the incredible report of 12Mh/s network speed. The bug in diff adjustment would keep the diff low but the hashrate estimation would still think that the diff was high, reporting the hashrate that would have been needed to have the 3 blk/s rate with the difficulty that should have been set instead of the one actually set. Now the hashrate is slowly decreasing, but the amount of found blocks in 3 days still pushes the diff up. Now, this is the hard part: for 2-3 days, the block rate was around 40x or more the normal rate. That means that it would take around at least 2x40 days to balance the amount of blocks found, and so the diff to normalize... That's not nice at all :/ |
|
|
|
Dont agree with you Hilux74 on NF 15 was also botnet virus. Was not so effective as on nf 16 compare GPUs mining, bit it was. Maybe you right about multipools, but i dont think so. There is 100 more profitable coins to mine and i dont know any multipool who mine scrypt-jane coins? Nice hash add scrypt-jane but for nf 16. Othervise you can maybe rent couple rigs on interent. So my question is if is not bot virus from where then you can get 12MHS nethashrate? if one GPU give you 5khs that should be then 2400 GPUs/6=400 Rigs. dont know.  Yes, the hashrate is insanely high, would they put that hashrate spread on different nets that would give lot's of btc's worth altcoins, however the rest of the altcoins have not decreased rate, so where's that hashrate coming from? and why it doesn't decrease when the utc price does not rise up? Hell, 12Mh/s would be really nice even on normal scrypt... |
|
|
|
Even if diff drop a lot Botnet virus will connect again and will raise diff.
So .... changing nf was not solution. Should block CPU mining to get rid of botnet virus.
 AT N14 there is no CPU botnet doing anything of consequence. CPUs cannot compete against GPUs at N14 (or N15). At N14 it is EZmode mining for dummies again and UTC has likely made its way back onto the menu of profit-hopping multipools. I wish the devs had gone with N15...no botnets no multipools...and low end GPUs matched effectiveness of higher end GPUs and power usage was lower. Mining setup took some more skill but it was worth it imo. It's sustaining a ~10Mh/s, i don't thing that's a profit switching multipool. I smell fpgas |
|
|
|
With 100khs you mine 80 coins per day by current diff. Electricity cost you(monthly) 100€ what is 0.28BTC. By current price you need to mine 933 days to get 0.28BTC. PUMP that we need just to cover electricity should raise coin price to 0,00011666 Sat.  We only need 0,00011306 Sat bigger price. Not bad at all. Apart from the price issue, what do you use to get 100kh/s??? I'd need at least 12 gtx 970! is there other cheaper way? |
|
|
|
With 100khs you mine 80 coins per day by current diff. Electricity cost you(monthly) 100€ what is 0.28BTC. By current price you need to mine 933 days to get 0.28BTC. PUMP that we need just to cover electricity should raise coin price to 0,00011666 Sat. We only need 0,00011306 Sat bigger price. Not bad at all. That or diff lowering enough, what happens first... |
|
|
|
It's happened! After block #1,600,240 the difficulty starts to adjust!
Only thing missing is the pump  Best regards! |
|
|
|
1500-2500 kh/s network rate, where's that coming from? i have 4 gtx 970 and i have 33kh/s! i want to learn to program fpga's, shouldn't be too different than coding my old Commodore 128 ASM Wow, that's over 8kh/s per card! Yeah, 970's are really efficient for scrypt-jane due to their 4gb mem size, i got around 1100 h/s on NF16. I can't make them use all of it on NF14, if i try to raise the amount of threads to make use of the rest of the mem it starts dropping performance. May be there's someone who has a better config. Best regards! |
|
|
|
|
These are hard news, i don't know what others think, but with this extremely high block rate, the dump after the exchanges enable the wallets again will also be astronomical...
I see dead people...
Let's hope it's not so much as to drop utc even further down...
Best regards
|
|
|
|
What are your best settings for 750ti and 950gtx ? THK U  Give it a shot with the autotune and then move from that values a bit. That's what i do |
|
|
|
Craptsy finally have their wallet in "maintenance"  |
|
|
|
Better buy some UTC while its still cheap..easy double in my opinion
The double has already happened, BTC has nearly doubled and UTC kept it's BTC price Now, something more must happen to make UTC rise it's BTC price, it's absolutely quiet right now, few sells, no buys... |
|
|
|
1500-2500 kh/s network rate, where's that coming from? i have 4 gtx 970 and i have 33kh/s! i want to learn to program fpga's, shouldn't be too different than coding my old Commodore 128 ASM |
|
|
|
|
Bittrex successfully working from newest wallet, sent 20 utc to my bittrex account from the new wallet and it worked ok.
|
|
|
|
|
well it's past gmt 1:00 am and utc14.yacoin.club still working on nf 16
|
|
|
|
The retarget block is set at block 1500000 and the reward at 10 utc from that block on. It's not changed for the following retargets after that one, but the next one is already in place See line 980 in src/main.cpp int64 nRetargetUpdateStartV4 = 1500000; // fix #3 Nov 01 2015 @ 12am +/- 3 days UT target and later on same file line 1042 else if (nHeight < nRetargetUpdateStartV4) { nSubsidy = 30 * COIN; } else if (nHeight < 6000000) { nSubsidy = 10 * COIN; } Before block 1500000 the subsidy is 30 coins, from block 1500000 on and before block 6000000 the subsidy is currently 10 coins. That should be ok for now i think. I mean, block 4000000 is several years from now, there's plenty of time to make adjustments until that time. I just took a look at the source code and I found out that: should go into effect sometime around November 1st When does the NF change takes effect?
NF changes exactly Sun, 01 Nov 2015 00:00:00 GMT (UNIX TimeStamp 1446336000) The PoW reward for block will be reduced to 10 coins sometime around November 1st (or more precisely from block height 1500000). So NF14 and reward=10 will be as two independent events (but close in time to each other) --- Block reward reducing really differs from what has been declared: Change notes: Change to 10 UTC per block pending new update 10 UTC per block - 4,000,000 5 UTC per block - 6,000,000 2.5 UTC per block - 8,000,000 1.25 UTC per block - 20,000,000 1 UTC per block - 25,000,000 .5 UTC per block - 30,000,000 .25 UTC per block - 40,000,000 .125 UTC per block - 50,000,000 .01 UTC per block - 208,145,600 Change to 2% pending new update 1.5% per year at block 4,000,000 1% per year at block 8,000,000 GitHub Diff: https://github.com/Kracko/ultracoin-2/compare/6135192516147ae7d478fd850b085165289558a1...Kracko:masterSteven, do you know about this!? |
|
|
|
I'm still holding a big bag After the change utc should easily go up to 5k-10k, as reducing the botnets coin abusing and the block reward should have an interesting impact on dumping. just don't sell em for a while or you will lose out Awesome! Right in time for me to add another gpu to my rig NF14 rocks. the best balance between mem usage and gpu stress should go into effect sometime around November 1st Any quote on this? Thanx! When does the NF change takes effect?
|
|
|
|
Awesome! Right in time for me to add another gpu to my rig NF14 rocks. the best balance between mem usage and gpu stress should go into effect sometime around November 1st Any quote on this? Thanx! When does the NF change takes effect?
|
|
|
|
Any quote on this? Thanx! When does the NF change takes effect?
|
|
|
|
|
When does the NF change takes effect?
|
|
|
|
The pool is down, and nobody ever figured out how to solomine i don't see any problem with official pool right now, solo is impossible by design, which is probably fixed in Lyra2REv2 for VTC. but block explorer is stuck at 110893 (network is at 111268) Well something is wrong with the official pool because it never shows pending blocks or rises the Total or Confirmed blocks |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
