I think anybody monitors only transactions which have only 0-confirmed parent transactions, and then they change its and rebroadcast. After many wallets affected to this when user try to send new transaction based on 0-confirmed old transactions - a wallet software make new transaction from itself TxIDs, but network knows about other TxIDs...  |
|
|
|
|
Now i did a payment to myself by Mycelium 2.5.2
After transaction was made, after 1 minute i tried to send new transaction (parent transaction had 0-confirmation). Mycelium allows to send transaction based on 0-confirmed.
But Mycelium could not send a new transaction - "transaction was declined by network"
I think for 1 minute (because blockchain.info & tradeblock.com shows to me different cashes of my first (parent) transaction) while i did new payment in this time anybody changed my transaction and some miners got other and inputs of second transaction after this referered to invalid TxID.
I think this type of attack affects user wallets too - if wallet software can spend unconfirmed outputs (Mycelium, Breadwallet, Electrum and etc.). And user can think that payment was not sent but some peers got normal valid transsacion, other got invalid... It's not good news for bitcoin users.
|
|
|
|
UP https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/Now again 92K transactions but now 99% from theirs now have a fewest fee/Kb Is it bad mixer? Or new stress test?  Now it's not big problem because there 99% of all transactions have < 1 satoshi/byte fee. But it's not good for some centralized software of blockchain - blockchain.info site (max request errors), biteasy.com + blocktrail.com (lagging of indexed blockchain), Mycelium wallet (long time syncing and lagging of wallet balances)... |
|
|
|
Хотелось бы, чтобы на сайте были другие контакты, кроме email Столкнулся с тем, что из-за задержки посылки смс (видимо, с вашей стороны), я указывал старые смс коды и после нескольких попыток мой аккаунт заблокирован. Теперь у меня нет возможности писать через внутреннюю форму. А для незалогинившихся пользователей - только емейл. Написал - час примерно не отвечаете. У меня зависла приличная сумма, которую послать теперь не могу, и оперативно как решить - тоже не знаю. Или форму хоть для онлайн чата со службой поддержки сделали хотя бы... |
|
|
|
|
Поработал с ними! Продавал им Биткойны, получал Сбербанк
Всё отлично!
Просто они по функциональности отличаются от остальных обменников. Плюсы - выгодный курс обмена (на практике 3% против других где до 9% доходит от текущего курса Биткойн). Нюансы - они, видимо сводят физлиц друг с другом, p2p через заявки. И если вы получили все средства, надо отмечать, что заявка выполнена, в противном случае контрагент (или физлицо) не может получить биткойны. Вообщем, это отличие от многих других обменников. Из-за этого исполнение затягивается до нескольких часов для обоих сторон, а то и до суток. Из-за этого, видимо, не поняв сути, некоторые жалуются, что "отправили, но не получили"
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Trezor team,
Thanks for last update!
I am very glad to get the feature of showing a receive address & a qrcode in the screen of device.
Now your device 100% secure as for a sending and for a getting of bitcoins!
|
|
|
|
Thank you for info! I bookmarked this site. |
|
|
|
Hi, Mister Perlover, let's refer to him as the Customer, definitely has ordered 2x Poseidon from us, that is an undisputable fact. The total hashrate of that order was 4.2 TH/s. Taking into account that the order was not completed in the stated timeframe (for reasons everyone is aware of), and, the Poseidon model was discontinued, the Customer was offered a substituion of his order for cloud mining services with increaced hashrate as compensation. This option did not satisfy the Customer. Moreover, the Customer even declined to listen what compensation we are offering and discuss this matter, despite the fact that the total offered hashrate was calculated so that he would be able to return his investment in the shortest time frame and receive profit on top of that. I order at you two 2.1TH/s machines. I don't like cloud mining, and didn't it. By this reason i choosed your company. I will not write here, why I don't like a cloud mining. This topic for another conversation. Briefly, just want to say that this is more hype - you own the power that you do not actually own. And you take care of all the risks payback. While having the hardware, you can always turn it off and turn it on again when you need it. So, I paid about $10,000 for the equipment in the summer. I promised to get these hardware it in September. But in September, on contact with me no one came until I sent several emails. Omitting many descriptions of why I suspect that HashCoins can cheat, just say what reasons have caused this suspicion. They are professionally playing for time. On the part of the letters they don't respond, promises are constantly not performed and i should constantly to remind to them. For example, 30 Oct 2012 they confirmed that order will be remaked, and (!) additional agreement will be send in next week. I don't have an agreement even now! 10 November in email they wrote to me that additional agreement will be ready during 2 days. 20 November they wrote to me that they have problems with Adobe Echosign and agreement will be ready soon. And so on. After a long emailings (i have 60 emails in my email box) i got (24 November) first device - Apollo 1TH/s. But they promised to send three devices before end of this year. But now is 1 December and soon in Europe will be the Christmas and post service will not work after 20th days of December. Of course, after this whole saga, I began to worry. I wrote to them in Friday - no answer. I wrote in Monday - no answer. I wrote here in forum. After my post (!) during some minutes they began to call me. I knew in advance that they will ask - what is asked always in such cases - TO DELETE POST from this forum. Then they wrote to the email where they asked me to remove my post. It was the second alarm that something is wrong with the HashCoins. They do not have the time to answer my emails, but have time to monitor the forum and call to me as it was the first time ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=417623.msg9316133#msg9316133). And that's what I still do not like it - they write about regular promotions, reduced prices, fast delivery here, but can not meet its obligations to 5 months in front of me. For example, why they did not immediately send 4 devices, they assured me, why send one at a time? It seemed to me that they are just playing for time - because as long as I keep quiet, they can write about super promotions here and how everything is well with them! Also the question - why all they offer a cloud service as compensation, but can not send the equipment? Equipment for cloud service they have, but paid by customers equipment they don't have. This is very strange! The thought creeps in that the money paid for the equipment they use to buy equipment, but ... for the purchase of their equipment. The Customer has insisted receiving the hardware and we, as a manufacturer of said equipment, decided to accept his terms, and, as an exception recalculated the order along with the compensation. There was an agreed schedule for hardware shipments and we have indeed started shipping according to that schedule, thus fulfilling our obligations in front of the Customer. Our only request to the Customer at the time of the first shipment was not to disclose the personal data. This request was ignored, as you can see here. Futhermore the Customer started publicly accuse us in dishonesty, technically, a scam accusation. Due to this fact, compensation for the Customer in the form of hardware was denied. Instead, the compensation was offered as cloud hashrates, and that offer was also denied by the Customer. The remaining 3.1 TH/s out of 4.2 TH/s of the initial order will be shipped to the Customer until the end of December 2014.
What I divulged by my message ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=417623.msg9706705#msg9706705 )? > The Customer has insisted receiving the hardware and we You forgot to tell here that i asked to you to return money to me (make refund). You answered to me that it's not possible! Because i didn't want your cloud mining i had insisted receiving the hardware. Because otherwise I would have left without money and equipment... > The remaining 3.1 TH/s out of 4.2 TH/s of the initial order will be shipped to the Customer until the end of December 2014. So that is, you agree to sent to me the equipment? Your last email tells me that you do not send me anything. I suppose I should be glad that you will send me the equipment, less powerful than I ordered and 4 times cheaper from price in July 2014? Good move. 5 months of using my money and to ship the equipment, which is already 4 times cheaper and less competitive. Well, I agree to your terms. Otherwise, I guess I'll never know, are you cheats or not. But please note, as I wrote, I'll leave from 14 Dec. To fulfill its commitment, you need to send more than one unit per week, and at least two. Do not send the equipment that I can not get until 14 December. But please notice that you can return to me the rest from my payment. But i don't hope that you will return a money... Regarding scam accusations, we would like to stress this again: we are a registered company. You can visit our office to discuss ordering matters or from plain curiosity - we will always happy to welcome our guests. We have gone the extra mile to keep the mining hardware business as transparent as possible, giving out our addresses, phones and identitites. We also have a registered trademark: HashCoins. The best thing you can do - to fulfill their obligations. And to openly discuss the problem. And not to scare customers sanctions for the publication of unpleasant facts about you. I don't understand why I have to go from Czech Republic to Estonia for sedation? A bit of eloquance from my side.
If in a store, a customer or a prospective buyer is behaving inadequately and distrubs the store's business, he is politely asked to leave. And it is deemed normal. So our request to users with this attitude to leave the thread or at the very least stop spreading this online-buffoonery. If you are making scam accusations, please, specify your information, such as name, phone, address, email address, and proof of your claims.
> If you are making scam accusations, please, specify your information, such as name, phone, address, email address, and proof of your claims. Now you ask to leave personal data here in forum? :-O Above you wrote the opposite - a violation of your rights and entails the cancellation of your obligations to the client. Despite all accusations and difficulties we have been through, we continue working in this business, supply hardware, support and develop the world of cryptotechnologies. We care about each of our customers as much as we care about our business.
Yes, I really hope that I'll get at least a less powerful and cheap equipment. Very nice doing business with you! P.S. Now all i have for $10,000 paid at summer time (5 months ago!) - one device https://www.hashcoins.com/product/hashcoins-apollo-v3-black/ (price, $1,249.00 black friday price is $599.00) And who of us injured party? Perlover |
|
|
|
Hi, HashCoins informed me that i broked their terms! And they will not ship to me other hardware. And what we have? I ordered 2 machines - 2.2TH Poseidons for ~ $10000 in July 2014. I waited 2 months. No shippment. I contacted many times with them till i had posted here my first post about HashCoins. After my first post here the HashCoins called to me during some minutes. They asked to me delete post and promise to me resolve problem. They told to me that they cannot bring to me hardware. I asked to make refund, but they told to me that they cannot make refund! They strongly suggested to me cloud mining. I didn't want. Some weeks of negotiations and they agreed to reform my order to other hardware. But after many weeks and my reminders they sent to me first miner (1.1TH/Apollo). They promised to send to me other three Apollo in this year. But small time left before Christmas. I suspected that they will not send me anything. I wrote to them in Friday and no answer... until I wrote a new message here. They recalled to me but i didn't answer. They asked by email to delete my post. I didn't want. Today, after my second post here they claim i broke their conditions! And they will not ship to me other hardware! And they can suggest to me now only cloud mining... HashCoin Guys, what i broke? Please write here. I am sure that the HashCoins is scam. They use hardware of customers yourself in their cloud mining and suggest to customers to remake orders from hardware to cloud mining. It's their strategy. Or their financial scheme is Pyramid. They live at the expense of new customers. They don't plan to send a hardware. They sent to me only one Apollo only i calmed down and did not write about them. |
|
|
|
I can't really comprehend even what the hell is going on here.
Hell? :-O Where is hell? What are the claims that you have? They are open for communication on the phone and email, you can visit their office even. So from my point of view they do what they promise to do.
Your post is addressed to me or anybody here other? |
|
|
|
HashCoins, when i will get 3 miners from 4 Apollo?
You have fulfilled my order only 14% (from price amount).
HashCoins contacted with me and assured me that i will get 3 miners near two weeks. Ok, i will monitor this execution ;-) |
|
|
|
And after 2-3 minute new core file: pi@raspberrypi ~ $ gdb -c core.2323 /usr/local/bin/cgminer
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "arm-linux-gnueabihf".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/cgminer...done.
[New LWP 2351]
[New LWP 2323]
[New LWP 2325]
[New LWP 2333]
[New LWP 2334]
[New LWP 2335]
[New LWP 2336]
[New LWP 2337]
[New LWP 2338]
[New LWP 2339]
[New LWP 2342]
[New LWP 2343]
[New LWP 2344]
[New LWP 2345]
[New LWP 2350]
[New LWP 2328]
[New LWP 2324]
[New LWP 2348]
[New LWP 2340]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `cgminer -c cgminer.conf --hfa-hash-clock 700'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
bt
#0 __list_del (next=0x0, prev=0xb2f19398) at elist.h:78
78 next->prev = prev;
(gdb) bt
#0 __list_del (next=0x0, prev=0xb2f19398) at elist.h:78
#1 list_del (entry=0xad6f9398) at elist.h:89
#2 complete_usb_transfer (ut=0xad6f9380) at usbutils.c:2864
#3 0x0004168c in usb_perform_transfer (cgpu=0xc82e70, usbdev=<optimized out>, intinfo=<optimized out>, epinfo=<optimized out>, data=0x0, length=0, transferred=0x0, timeout=0,
cmd=C_REJECTED, cancellable=false, tt=false, mode=<optimized out>, seq=<optimized out>) at usbutils.c:3028
#4 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
But in /var/log/kern.log now no there are new logs :-/ |
|
|
|
Try this one line change in usbutils.c line 893: Change: to: Now i got new core file after this changes pi@raspberrypi ~ $ gdb -c core.2206 /usr/local/bin/cgminer
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "arm-linux-gnueabihf".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/cgminer...done.
[New LWP 2228]
[New LWP 2206]
[New LWP 2208]
[New LWP 2215]
[New LWP 2217]
[New LWP 2218]
[New LWP 2219]
[New LWP 2220]
[New LWP 2221]
[New LWP 2222]
[New LWP 2223]
[New LWP 2226]
[New LWP 2227]
[New LWP 2229]
[New LWP 2209]
[New LWP 2216]
[New LWP 2224]
[New LWP 2207]
[New LWP 2210]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `cgminer -c cgminer.conf --hfa-hash-clock 700'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00041610 in usb_perform_transfer (cgpu=0x1500f88, usbdev=<optimized out>, intinfo=<optimized out>, epinfo=<optimized out>, data=0x184cf18f <Address 0x184cf18f out of bounds>,
length=422109583, transferred=0x191a018f, timeout=0, cmd=C_REJECTED, cancellable=false, tt=false, mode=<optimized out>, seq=<optimized out>) at usbutils.c:3061
3061 else if ((endpoint & LIBUSB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) == LIBUSB_ENDPOINT_IN && *transferred)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00041610 in usb_perform_transfer (cgpu=0x1500f88, usbdev=<optimized out>, intinfo=<optimized out>, epinfo=<optimized out>, data=0x184cf18f <Address 0x184cf18f out of bounds>,
length=422109583, transferred=0x191a018f, timeout=0, cmd=C_REJECTED, cancellable=false, tt=false, mode=<optimized out>, seq=<optimized out>) at usbutils.c:3061
#1 0x1850818e in ?? ()
#2 0x1850818e in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb)
And in this time in /var/log/kern.log Dec 1 13:32:22 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.077616] usb 1-1.3.1: USB disconnect, device number 7
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.569565] usb 1-1.3.1: new full-speed USB device number 8 using dwc_otg
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.682342] usb 1-1.3.1: New USB device found, idVendor=297c, idProduct=0001
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.682380] usb 1-1.3.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.682395] usb 1-1.3.1: Product: M1 Module
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.682409] usb 1-1.3.1: Manufacturer: HashFast LLC
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.682423] usb 1-1.3.1: SerialNumber: 6fd744af545f5ee1aa2b717c30f27551
Dec 1 13:32:23 raspberrypi kernel: [ 4186.691731] cdc_acm 1-1.3.1:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device
It's not big problem for me - i have bash script "while : ; do cgminer...; done" But i would want to understand - where is bug - in your side on in my one. |
|
|
|
Black Friday Sale 2014We are happy to announce that for a limited time only HashCoins will be offering its customers exclusive discounts of up to 50% on our Ares, Zeus and Apollo miners ! Visit https://www.hashcoins.com/black-friday/ to take advantage of these sweet deals ! Additionally, HashCoins are offering 20% off HashCoins hosted mining to all customers who make a Hosted Mining Contract purchase quoting the promo-code “BFHOST2014” HashCoins, when i will get 3 miners from 4 Apollo? You have fulfilled my order only 14% (from price amount). Soon Christmas holidays and you promised me to send in this year 4 units of Apollo. One unit i got, thanks. But no more body movements on your part It is very very difficult to achieve from you fulfill your obligations. 5 months before i sent my money to you :-E |
|
|
|
Try this one line change in usbutils.c line 893:
Thanks, i done Now it is working. I will report about results. And please i want to notice that before core files i see in this time in /var/log/kern.log Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.017696] usb 1-1.3.1: USB disconnect, device number 13
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.762521] usb 1-1.3.1: new full-speed USB device number 15 using dwc_otg
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.876079] usb 1-1.3.1: New USB device found, idVendor=297c, idProduct=0001
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.876115] usb 1-1.3.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.876131] usb 1-1.3.1: Product: M1 Module
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.876144] usb 1-1.3.1: Manufacturer: HashFast LLC
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.876158] usb 1-1.3.1: SerialNumber: 6fd744af545f5ee1aa2b717c30f27551
Nov 29 07:30:44 raspberrypi kernel: [58770.881156] cdc_acm 1-1.3.1:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device
And Nov 29 09:33:14 raspberrypi kernel: [66120.264296] usb 1-1.3.2: USB disconnect, device number 14
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.009407] usb 1-1.3.2: new full-speed USB device number 16 using dwc_otg
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.122171] usb 1-1.3.2: New USB device found, idVendor=297c, idProduct=0001
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.122241] usb 1-1.3.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.122260] usb 1-1.3.2: Product: M1 Module
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.122274] usb 1-1.3.2: Manufacturer: HashFast LLC
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.122289] usb 1-1.3.2: SerialNumber: cad2530b65ee406439d3a7cb8190d609
Nov 29 09:33:15 raspberrypi kernel: [66121.127335] cdc_acm 1-1.3.2:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device
And my core files: -rw------- 1 pi pi 162668544 Ноя 29 07:30 core.3641
-rw------- 1 pi pi 171257856 Ноя 29 09:33 core.3789
Exactly in like these moments cgminer gets segmentation fault |
|
|
|
My console is also displaying a lot of the LIBUSB_ERROR_IO. Any ideas?
I got same errors in RasPi After i recompiled with --with-libusb but before i done: cd cgminer-distrib sudo make unistall # should be done for uninstalling *.h files of libusb support which were installed by cgminer. Without this you will get binary linked with non-system lib sudo make clean ./configure --with-libusb ... make && sudo make install |
|
|
|
Hi, Other device Raspberry Pi B+ (i bought other device and other micro sd card) I installed new OS for new RasPi The miner is same And again segmentation fault in usb_perform_transfer May be some compile options are not fine for gcc? I think a hardware is not problem now... pi@raspberrypi ~ $ gdb -c core.3179 /usr/local/bin/cgminer
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "arm-linux-gnueabihf".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/cgminer...done.
[New LWP 3203]
[New LWP 3179]
[New LWP 3181]
[New LWP 3188]
[New LWP 3189]
[New LWP 3190]
[New LWP 3191]
[New LWP 3192]
[New LWP 3193]
[New LWP 3194]
[New LWP 3195]
[New LWP 3196]
[New LWP 3199]
[New LWP 3200]
[New LWP 3180]
[New LWP 3206]
[New LWP 3182]
[New LWP 3205]
[New LWP 3197]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `cgminer -c cgminer.conf --hfa-hash-clock 700'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 __list_del (next=0x86aa, prev=0xad5fc380) at elist.h:78
78 next->prev = prev;
(gdb) bt
#0 __list_del (next=0x86aa, prev=0xad5fc380) at elist.h:78
#1 list_del (entry=0xaf5fc380) at elist.h:89
#2 complete_usb_transfer (ut=0xaf5fc368) at usbutils.c:2864
#3 0x00041af8 in usb_perform_transfer (cgpu=0x1e8970, usbdev=<optimized out>, intinfo=<optimized out>, epinfo=<optimized out>, data=0x0, length=0,
transferred=0x0, timeout=0, mode=0, cmd=C_REJECTED, seq=0, cancellable=false, tt=false) at usbutils.c:3028
#4 0x00000000 in ?? ()
|
|
|
|
Miner: HashCoins Apollo I regulary get a segmentation fault I tryied with included into cgminer 'libusb' and with system libusb - same result This binary was compiled as ' ./configure --enable-hashfast --with-system-libusb' I turned on a core dumping and i got: pi@raspberrypi ~ $ gdb -c ./core.26546 /usr/local/bin/cgminer
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "arm-linux-gnueabihf".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /usr/local/bin/cgminer...done.
[New LWP 26599]
[New LWP 26548]
[New LWP 26559]
[New LWP 26560]
[New LWP 26561]
[New LWP 26562]
[New LWP 26558]
[New LWP 26557]
[New LWP 26555]
[New LWP 26567]
[New LWP 26556]
[New LWP 26563]
[New LWP 26564]
[New LWP 26546]
[New LWP 26597]
[New LWP 26598]
[New LWP 26566]
[New LWP 26547]
[New LWP 26600]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `cgminer -c cgminer.conf --hfa-hash-clock 700'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x00041b58 in usb_perform_transfer (cgpu=0x20193d8, usbdev=<optimized out>, intinfo=<optimized out>, epinfo=<optimized out>, data=0x0, length=0, transferred=0x0, timeout=0, mode=0,
cmd=C_REJECTED, seq=0, cancellable=false, tt=false) at usbutils.c:3061
3061 else if ((endpoint & LIBUSB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) == LIBUSB_ENDPOINT_IN && *transferred)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00041b58 in usb_perform_transfer (cgpu=0x20193d8, usbdev=<optimized out>, intinfo=<optimized out>, epinfo=<optimized out>, data=0x0, length=0, transferred=0x0, timeout=0, mode=0,
cmd=C_REJECTED, seq=0, cancellable=false, tt=false) at usbutils.c:3061
#1 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
P.S. I looked sources and i think that problem may be in my hardware (memory for example)... The static function 'usb_perform_transfer' cannot be called with zero-valued parameters :-/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
