I do not see any strong issue here, once it is money, people will find their way around it. For me, I think the reason is beyond the decrease in the Binance population in that country because, many would have opened their Binance account already and if it is positive for them, they will not abandon it due to the mere language regulations. Also, in another view, this is Binance announcing and not the Turkish government, it might not even have to do with regulation as claimed by Binance, you can't trust them, it might be to reduce the extra money Binance is spending in a way.

If it is entirely English, they will spend the same as other countries but once it is Turkish, they might be spending more for some kind of interpretation, marketing and coding to make it more local. I don't see any reason why the Turkish government would be demarking their local language when their citizens can still find their way around the English language. If that is the case, then it is ill-advised in my opinion.

Investing in the right assets is the best way to go, and if one will not do that, a viable alternative is to invest in the shares or investment packages that will hand you nothing less than 20% p.a. This is now common in my country, so it is doable. Better still, one may vary the investment in the form of diversification, and as a fact, this is the best approach I've known in the investment world.

The purchasing power of the national currency of most countries is always devalued due to many factors, and instead of shifting blame, we should rather plan for our future. If my country is to be used as a case study here, you will cry for the citizens who have been saving their money their entire lives of service (35 years). By now, if I do not exaggerate, the money would have devalued more than 550 times the initial value of when they started the savings.

This is absurd and painful, all your life work will be as if you did nothing, so instead of keeping it in the bank, let it work for you or at least convert it to some properties that will not devalue over time.

Let me start by saying DCAing is very correct if you join it together, it's contemporary English, it doesn't have to follow the old rules. As for the discussion itself, well, you should first know the difference between trading and investment, for this, I do not see you as a bad trader but a bad investor. All your plans can only say of a desperate investor that doesn't have any regard for the investment rules, and this could also mean that you are just an extremist regarding Bitcoin, this is why you can be saying you do not care about the outcome but just invest. What if something unforeseen happened negatively and you lose too much?

This is why I like to always tell us the Bitcoin investors to cool down, we should think before we act and also see Bitcoin as an asset, and not one god-asset, otherwise, it will cloud our judgment and that can't be good. All assets have their good and bad days, which is why investors should be smart and not sentimental, even as we use our economic data and technical charts. The two will now agree for us to have reasonable investment decisions instead of just investing without a basis.

Fine, the DCA approach is a good one, and had it been it's the only one you talked about I wouldn't have given it much thought, but referencing Buy and Buy is not good for a serious investor, we should be ready to act appropriately. Even at this high level of Bitcoin, DCAing is increasingly becoming risky, although the downwards retracement from $71,000+ in a few weeks has limited the risk by a few.

With reference to your first point above, it will even be difficult to catch some users using AIs that way. And since there are no specific forum tools to catch them, many will not be punished and more will even go advanced next time so that they are not caught like the ones that are getting away with it.

Again, I like people who have been clamouring for contexts like this, I think the forum should also well-define AI use and declare war against it in full in its own way. The permanent banning of the guilty ones will be good, and if the accounts are severally tagged as well, it will still serve the same purpose. This is because the reason why most of them are too lazy to post but using AI is that they have many accounts they want to build for campaigns. Tagging these accounts would have made them useless for that purpose and they would be forced to abandon them.

Notwithstanding, how to detect these accounts is still a headache now.

Whether it's a PoW or PoS, it doesn't matter, the two are even far from what I think is an important difference here. Have you seen the PoW or PoS not delivering their functions? So this is irrelevant. What's relevant is that Bitcoin will always be the number one and the most trusted cryptocurrency in terms of payments, trading and investments, it is not going anywhere. But you can be sure that many other altcoins will be delisted over time. This makes them unreliable and the fact that they are more prone to manipulation due to their low liquidity is another issue.

You may think this is not possible (the delisting), but when there are stricter regulations in the future you will understand what I mean. However, the top renowned altcoins will always make it like Bitcoin and I like to say that I do not draw any difference between Bitcoin and altcoins anymore, especially the top-rated ones. Do you know why? Bitcoin is not perfect itself, and as it has some advantages over altcoins, many altcoins have advantages over it too.

Now, the best is for them to coexist so that we can choose the ones we want to use depending on what we want to achieve with them (purpose).

My advice for you is to avoid dwelling in the past but in the present and be hopeful of the future. Bitcoin has done the unexpected in the past and that has gone, it will never happen in that magnitude again, the rest will be some kind of a few multiple returns on your investment. Nothing like the past will repeat itself like many would say here.

Notwithstanding, if you are smart enough, you can be waiting for Bitcoin to fall very well during the bearish season and buy it. This approach alone can enrich you if you have a sizable amount of money invested in it. You can imagine those who bought Bitcoin in late 2022, despite not moving more than 20 times like before will still make at least 4 times their capital since they struck it low. That's the gist.

As for the one to choose between Bitcoin and Gold, if it is for trading, I choose Gold, but if it is an investment, I choose Bitcoin. And since investment is less risky, it is a good call for you to choose Gold. Just follow my earlier advice and you will be fine, however, you need a lot of patience.

You are making a good point but you still did not explain it well. It's true that the traders who are relying on what they know will not achieve anything, but when they are experienced, they have a better chance of success. However, the experience as they call it doesn't automatically translate into success, it is the right application of what you are experienced in that will deliver success into your hands. Practically, let's view it this way, we can't say most of those who are failing in trading are not experienced, can we? That should have spoken volumes already. One may gain the highest trading experience in the world but still lose, while a person with a simple experience, but notwithstanding, knows how to utilize it well and becomes very successful in it.

I know all the rudiments of trading and I conclude that trading is very simple, yet people are losing massively in it. This can only mean they are doing something wrong despite being experienced, and if the issue is not in the experience, then there is a certain missing link, which can only be on how they apply things wrongly despite knowing everything already. This could extend to the psychological aspect as well.

First, write at the back of your mind that airdrops are luck, no one knows it all, and the one you think will deliver the huge money into your hands might disappoint you, while the ones you think will disappoint you could be the one that will deliver the actual results. If you can do some bounty work and various tasks, there is no problem, you are qualified. But you should know that free money will come with some tasks which could be annoying at times as those people are using you for marketing purposes.

However, if you are lucky and can complete all, you may smile but know that many are scams too, so be careful. Such scams will never give you what they promised while some will lure you into involving your money and still disappear with it. Just be careful. That said, the compensation through airdrops may vary, you may earn a ridiculously low amount due to the worthlessness of the token or the amount they give you, or you can be happy with the thousands of dollars depending on the project and how lucky you are. Even if it is $50, it is money if you paid nothing for it.

DYOR diligently!

Sorry, I'm just seeing this and I like to reply to the OP directly.

The AI-generated posts or alleged posts are not new on this forum, but I wonder if there is a good purpose for this if not for cheating. You can't tell me you are posting an AI-generated post for a genuine reason if not for alts sake. Because the required words and characters to be posted by the forum and campaigns are not burdensome to the point that someone can't do the writing by himself. AI posts should be frowned upon if found abused.

However, I am not entirely against the use of AIs but it must be used rightly. How can you ask a question from an AI and copy and paste it directly, or even tell the AI to auto-post for you? That is bad. If at all you use AI, you ask what you do not know, just like you ask Google and others, learn it to educate yourself, and then use what it taught you to construct your post, simple! If you must write what the AI answered, you should only quote some parts and even reference the AI you quoted. Anything aside this is plagiarism and I believe this forum frowns on it and if found should be reported.

You may feel/see it that way but certainly is not entirely true, humans are mostly behind the posts here. If you give it time to check it well, you will discover this but you must not be biased about it to be able to know the truth. Because you seem to have concluded what is happening here in your mind which is supposed not to be so. Fine, there will always be bad actors, but there are also seasoned and genuine intentions.

That said, anyone caught in the practice that doesn't attract quality to the forums is being called out and probably banned. This is what we can continue to do, nothing is perfect. Also, we should not pretend that everybody knows how to write quality English or construct very well without missing their tenses and all that.

What is happening on this forum as a few faults is not isolated as well, it is happening everywhere.

Acquiring properties is good but it must be done sensibly as well. If it has come to the level of agents conspiring to deprive you of your properties, then you do not know what you are doing. All properties should be well-documented and periodically audited for maintenance and accountability with the involvement of your lawyer(s). This is not new to the rich men who earned their money through legal means or at least the means they can defend under any circumstances, unlike those who are buying properties through illegalities and proxies like shell corporation arrangements that are now popular among money launderers.

Once it is being termed an asset, it is never worthless, it is valuable and will always sustain what it's being called. And yes, it is good to have your properties/assets, they will not betray you as a wealthy person (to keep the status) when you need them. This is especially true when all fails, they will not fail you. In reality, this is what many business gurus fall back on when other things fail them even as I watched a documentary of a wealthy Indian billionaire that went from tens of billions of dollars to $0 a few decades ago. He is still living fine today due to the assets he had bought when things were rosy. And of course, this is a very good way to indirectly Insure the future of your children and loved ones.

For this, you can never go wrong with the asset purchase, but just be accountable for them and not just buy and forget them.

You are on point my friend, who cares about what people call me, I live my life the best way I know possible that will be void of any faults or excuses. These people will be the ones that will help you squander the money if care is not taken and will still turn their backs on you and still paint you badly behind your back when the money is no more. They will keep a close distance when it is rosy and you will be almost alone, if not all alone when there is nothing anymore. Many had been affected by this in the past and some people have tested friends in this regard despite just pretending to be poor, but most of the friends failed. So it is better we are wise and smart, it is our money, our lives and our future, and we should plan very well for it, human beings can betray.

This is not about being stingy or not, and not that you will still not dole out money but this must be done sensibly. Like your advice, there should be good portions of the money we make for special purposes. Some could be for retirement savings plans, others could be for investment/business, physical projects that can be called our assets, while the last set may be for what we spend. By this, we do not leave our lives for chance, otherwise, people might feel sorry for the person. I can point to many of them today who are now former rich people due to a lack of smartness and proper planning.

It is very right in my opinion even if there are no restrictions because the OP is not the first person to have done this without any complaints. This is a reputation section and it's open for everybody and cases may be independent, so it mustn't always be how people want it for everybody. Calling out some specific cases like this in a newly opened thread makes it better readable and attracts more readers than lumping it in one thread, so why the section when indirectly creating a subsection?

I only hope the OP can be more explanatory next time, if not for the BSC addresses, I found it difficult to understand what he was even saying. And I wonder why he used a new account to allege someone of alts. He doesn't seem to be a new member here in all sense of reasoning.

I align with you 100% on this and indeed there is no politics here, it's plain, CNN was fair and those who are rating the Biden's performance low are right, it's obvious. The only issue is that, after the debate, many are now politicizing it which the Biden side are trying to downplay though. Well, the record is there, Biden is a huge force in the US political affairs and has worked perfectly in many sensitive capacities without scoring low like what happened in the debate but did excellently well. For this, any right-thinking person will know that age is surely telling, and this is not about comparing it with the issues that are possible also at the young age, such never happened when he was younger, so it can only be the age.

He also complained about a sour throat which I like to believe as well because I can decipher a slight change in his voice, something must have caused that. Regardless, we should not always look at the performance of debates like that, we should rather look at the ingenuity and commitment to do the right thing. Trump is a pathetic liar, he can't be trusted, and CNN, as usual, was able to fact-checked 30 lies from him within that short time, I wonder how many lies he would have told if given 24 hours, he lacks integrity. But on the part of Biden, they rather call his own 9 lies or misleading facts, which may either be true or overexaggerated. I think I see better integrity in one than the other and no matter what happens in debates, it doesn't necessarily means a true performs in the office.

Anything that made Bitcoin hit $80,000 again is a bullish call for it which I do not see coming for now. I stopped having so much expectation on Bitcoin in June, despite having the strong bullish call at the start of the month, it ended woefully. I never expected Bitcoin to hit the $58,000 area in June but that was the reality as it dropped more than $12,000 and it was like a dream. Going forward, I will tread carefully and rather act according to reality using the guidance of my trading chart.

It is possible the coin move higher, however, breaching and holding above the $62,120 1W TrendMagic resistance level is very important which can help it climb higher. It has breached the level already but I hope it sustains the holding above it. Better assurance will also surface if a bullish price action can be seen again on the weekly chart, this will add credence to this view and might be one of the reasons that Bitcoin will rebound higher to reset the resistance at $71,950. A break above that level is expected to retest the ATH of about $73,850 and the final breach of this level must happen before we ever think of the market hitting $80,000 for any reason.

You are one of the most sensible people I've read regarding this context, people are often gullible and do not have the deep thought to conclude on the feasibility of some matters. Let me start by saying that the Hamster Kombat's claim may not even be true, it was over 100 million people before, but as I am writing, they are claiming they have grown exponentially to above 150 million players. If you search anything online too, that's the same message all websites and channels are passing across unverified, but are they really true? I guess not.

I tried to investigate a little and I discovered they are only lying. Do you know why? No Hamster Kombat participants who will not be tasked to join their Telegram channel or follow them on X, but if you check their followers on the two, you will see that they are far below 50 million. The people that cannot tell a common truth about the number of players they have, how can tell the truth about the disbursements of tokens? And you are very right about the liquidity, what value can they possibly give to their players that will cover them? This is unless they give them a token that is worthless, something like $0.01 for 50,000,000 HMSTR worth or worse. I will still not conclude for them but what I see now is that they are using the huge audience to make money for themselves by using them for various marketing purposes.

You are right in a way but this can't be entirely right because Bitcoin can do what fiat currencies can do, so if everything surrounding Bitcoin is a financial game, then everything about fiat currencies is as well. But this is not true in reality, it is only some certain aspect they are using them for that can attest to that. Take the buying and selling of your Bitcoin and the use of it to pay and receive money as an example, these are not jokes, no games here.

Personally, they've helped me better in overcoming the cheating and the barrier in cross-border payment. But still, when it comes to staking, trading, investment etc, yes, one may say they are financial games. Coincidentally, I thought of this a few minutes ago before I read your thread that trading is a financial game and the good player earns so much through it. Not knowing that I would still come across something like that today.

Conclusively, anything about the financial market is an indirect game that we need to play technically and intelligently, so you are right halfway.

If you've been trading the futures market then spot trading will be a workover for you. Spot trading is similar to normal wallet keeping that is solely for an investment purpose which you can hold at any time. In addition, it helps you to manage your holding portfolio better. This is why people use it, otherwise, there will not be any need for it. It also helps the investment in the cross-market matrix, so it is very convenient, to say the least.

On the other hand, futures trading is leverage/margin trading, which invariably means that you are risking higher with it. It is just like the regular financial market trading with traditional brokers, the risk of losing your money is always high. Notwithstanding, you have the chance to make more money with futures trading than the spots trading.

You are mixing things up my friend, for the fact that Bitcoin is decentralised doesn't mean its transactions are untraceable. Decentralisation of Bictoin only means that no central authority can control it, not even the creator, which is a very good one. But all transactions are traceable in a normal mechanism. The issue starts with blenders, mixers, tumblers and others, they are the bad actors here. They will make sure that the Bitcoin you received or sent are not traceable anymore, so they can use it for all sorts of illegal activities afterwards, and that will even be to and fro of the transaction not minding the amount they will pay those who are making the money anonymous for them since it is for illegal purpose. Although some people mix their Bitcoin without any bad intentions, however, their percentage may not be so much.

You can see that Bitcoin itself has never been bad but the desperately wicked minds of people are attracting the bad name to it for their selfish gains. I hope this can stop one day, it will be nice if there are crypto police that are highly equipped to trace such transactions and pull them down. This will also discourage people from patronising them. But before you know it, you will hear people defending such services claiming that some people use those services for their privacy to as well

If meme coins can be relevant in the world of cryptocurrency in billions of dollars today, how much more Notcoin that is not a meme coin? Whether we like it or not, the cryptocurrency market is being hijacked with a different view already, popularity is what will deliver the financial results to many of them just like Notcoin. This is one of the reasons why Bitcoin and other viable projects are not finding sustainable liquidity to continue buying like before, people are only for the recent and are desperately looking for what will hand them millions of dollars regardless of how it comes to be.

Also, frankly, mining Bitcoin or altcoins easily doesn't matter, this is a matter of projects and plans, and once you mine, you mine, this should not even be considered a disadvantage or setback. Bitcoin mining was made difficult due to the fact that it is the first project, but this doesn't stop the fact that 94% of it has been mined now (one way or another the majority was mined). Whether all were mined little by little or totally at once is not the issue, the issue is how the brains behind the project manage things to gain popularity/liquidity, and if the supply is too much they know how to adjust it. This is why some coins/tokens are being burnt so that it will adjust the economics surrounding it (demand and supply).

This is what Bitcoin's founder also intended to do, the situation and the playing of economics all around them will still be the same in the long run. And now, people, do not even regard the good project behind cryptos anymore but the popularity and community supporting it. However, if Notcoin can sustain that (huge community) which I know it will, it will be a good one for it. We should not also forget that it is a gaming coin, and it is not the first gaming coin that will be successful in the crypto world, why can't it?