Staking is going well no issues here.
|
|
|
I think this just hit an all time high at 8k
|
|
|
Grafix are so pretty are there dates for the roadmap?
|
|
|
This coin is exploding right now.
|
|
|
Is the pre-sale funds released right after the wallet release or after the pool is set?
People needs to see actual development if you have nothing to show why would you require funding?
ICO funds will be released after wallets launch. Our development proofs will come as scheduled on our timeline roadmap. You and any other user are free to get in or skip the ICO participation. XSP will go live and further more developed althought if we raise a low amount of ICO funds. Is there a maximum you need to finish or is the site already done?
|
|
|
Bitcoin is digital gold take that as you will.
|
|
|
Aren't nootropics banned in certain countries? If I'm wrong let me know.
|
|
|
Nicely designed site it seems you have put some amount of work into it.
|
|
|
The ICO is used for building the the cloud mining exchange and pool or it will be available on launch?
ICO will be used to sustain development about the funding side of it. Please give a read and keep watching closely this active timeline: PoolStamp Alpha Roadmap http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/385684/PoolStamp-Project-Development/As you can see from our roadmap Cloud Mining Multipool will be accessible at early stage only from ICO investors, then will be released to public. Software is already done and under testing, so you could consider it active since launch. thanks for the link do you have a time when the ico and mining will be? Mining period is going to be set to 5 / 7 days maximum. Initial Crowdfunds Offering will start tomorrow 15th December 2014 and will end on 21st December 2014. Launch and wallet release date is 21st December, exact hour TBA. please give a time so that I can stay up for it.
|
|
|
The ICO is used for building the the cloud mining exchange and pool or it will be available on launch?
ICO will be used to sustain development about the funding side of it. Please give a read and keep watching closely this active timeline: PoolStamp Alpha Roadmap http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/385684/PoolStamp-Project-Development/As you can see from our roadmap Cloud Mining Multipool will be accessible at early stage only from ICO investors, then will be released to public. Software is already done and under testing, so you could consider it active since launch. thanks for the link do you have a time when the ico and mining will be?
|
|
|
The ICO is used for building the the cloud mining exchange and pool or it will be available on launch?
|
|
|
Good luck with your project
|
|
|
People are resilient to new things or scared because they dont understand Bitcoin.
|
|
|
This will be very profitable for Valve and they seem they like new ideas.
|
|
|
How will you prevent piracy though?
|
|
|
I'd like to see a "How I used Bitcoin to Eat the Rich" thread. We need more charity in BTC, all crypto charity is done by doge community.
We absolutely do not need more charity. Charity is unethical. What the world needs now more than ever is solidarity among the working-poor, underemployed, and unemployed castes. I am not 100% sure on this. I think it is wrong to allow someone to collect charity on an long term basis because it gives them a disincentive to go out and improve their lives. However there is no issue to help people over the short term as sometimes people just have a short period of "bad luck"
|
|
|
At this point, if Charlie has sold the coins he owes bracek the coin. If Charlie has not sold the coins, he should just return the unsold merchandise and be done with it.
From what it looks like (although this is not 100% clear) Charlie has not sold either of the 25 BTC coins, however he has paid bracek a little more then 20 BTC as a sign of "good faith" so this would not be 100% possible. He could send one of the coins back but would first need to receive a refund in the amount that he has advanced bracek prior to sending the other back
|
|
|
This thread is nothing but PoW miner shills trying to hold on to their waning power, as the crypto world is increasingly moving toward the superior PoS system.
i totally agree, but in all honesty i think something further superior to PoS will surpass PoS as the alternative algo that will challenge PoW. its simple evolution. I don't think it's likely, since PoS has reached nearly perfect efficiency in terms of resources. The further variations are subsets of PoS, such as DPoS, TaPoS, they can improve upon PoS, but the core ideas of PoS is unlikely to change. you should take a look at proof of importance. Its founded on the concept of pos and is as efficeint but the method by which people are chosen to forge blocks is vastly different. Those who are most important to the network are the most likely to forge apposed to who has the most coins. So a merchant that does thousands of transactions but little balance could end up with higher weighting than a hoarder with loads of coins. Its not just how many transactions that are factored in to decide importance but who the transactions are with and their importance, much like a web of trust. this also plays into things like the asset exchange. with pos, scammers would be listed exactly the same as genuine vendors and therefore have a high chance of scamming, thus assets could not be listed and require users to know the asset ID. with proof of importance, assets can be listed by importance score, as well as volume, importance gained from or history of past assets among other methods, merchants that do not meet the minimum requirement would not be listed until they meet the minimum requirement which vastly reduces the chances of scammers being listed. PoI will open many doors when it comes to online marketplaces/asset exchange that would not be possible with PoS. It sounds like PoI will essentially centralize the mining of the coin in a way so that certain people will control the network. Granted these people would generally not want to attack the network however the same disincentives of attempting to launch an attack are not there that are there in PoW
|
|
|
|