https://yobit.net/en/wallets/Withdrawal FIRE Wallet status: Delayed (186078 blocks) // wallet offline Withdrawal FIRE Wallet status: Online (186081 blocks) // wallet online Every time I take my node off-line the market shows Delayed, tested it a few times over the last few days && am not able to keep a node up 24/7/365. I reinstall my systems almost every week (PCs && Routers/Modems), also have major network down times over the years & wish we still had cecilbdemented VPS on-line for DNS link (almost bought one with a block explorer last week) I have had to change my IP a few times over the years, so the DNS node that was coded by cecilbdemented is now wrong && pushed a few updates to Github. Although not being a wallet coder, most updates or fixes are simple copy / paste edits (with the right review) && from the looks of it the only community still running the application or reading this forum thread? Will just have to sit back && wait, not like it's the only alternative. The one && only FIRE though, but not much without Development or Community.
|
|
|
Hello DEV's. I wish your business runs happily! Discerning project, impeccable website.
Ha ha thx, from the building a farm account poster (very constructive post) && see the support of many alts Well something is better than nothing, but that's the problem"s" with 5000+ pages of just chat (that's why they have IRC, Slack, Discord, etc..) && no talk about actual development P.S. updated the impeccable website, as it has a purpose of nothing right now && all in the plans to get a real website linked to DNS // "no point in building a roof && leaving no room for upgrades, when you don't even have the ground floor layed out"
|
|
|
My Staking Weight = 96 && 19 on 2 wallet.dat files (+ a few other .dat files with small inputs to move the chain if it stalls) Network Staking Weight = 475  getblockhash 186011 07fe7cfc57a003825354ac3d2e3defba0bb5cc51244093915b88f41c3b853fbd  getblockhash 186010 11f37ec713d5a9ea82c940c68aced19799badc50114f3ab4b55dc0ddfb79bade received block 11f37ec713d5a9ea82c9 SetBestChain: new best=11f37ec713d5a9ea82c9 height=186010 trust=695630213476994 blocktrust=1056867 date=06/17/18 18:38:20 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED received block 07fe7cfc57a003825354 SetBestChain: new best=07fe7cfc57a003825354 height=186011 trust=695630214525571 blocktrust=1048577 date=06/17/18 18:42:53 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED addnode=50.83.11.14:49697
Can't connect to any nodes, will give it a few days && then shut it down // was going to try to update github, but would need a more qualified dev to oversee any optional updates from 100's of other altcoin code fixes online?
|
|
|
--faild tx // got a fresh 4.0.0 node up & going to keep troubleshooting the problem, not one 2 give up or abandon 2018.06.12 08:08:15 FIRE 1.17519787 5/20 Sending
-- testing a resync again, wish me luck && also used 2 new addresses for future staking to keep the network moving 2018.06.12 11:16:49 FIRE 1.00000000 1/20 Sending 2018.06.12 09:48:03 FIRE 1.00000000 8/20 Sending
// if I happen to lose a few FIRE, not like it has not happen 10,000 times over the years of testing && just trying to keep the network from going defuncted for months again
--tx confirmed, still unable to keep a good node connection count & keep a stable synced FireCoin chain // need a few more nodes online, the network is not very balanced right now & should have more even staking nodes to balance it out #1 address My Staking Weight = 25 Network Staking Weight = 1310 #2-5 addresses updating..
|
|
|
TechCoin seems very impressive coin.I wish TechCoin will get succes.
The only thing TECH hodl right now is the name, really low supply + inflation && that's why most are updating the names to something more marketable (names are key in coding services, do think they have gone really random these days && are creating slang words just to market brands?) There are a giant name source of links for the word TECH though, which could hodl a lot of store value if you think about it (very few understand data, many are learning && coding has evolved much over the last decades) && just going to take many years to develop the world of applications first
|
|
|
--faild tx // got a fresh 4.0.0 node up & going to keep troubleshooting the problem, not one 2 give up or abandon 2018.06.12 08:08:15 FIRE 1.17519787 5/20 Sending
-- testing a resync again, wish me luck && also used 2 new addresses for future staking to keep the network moving 2018.06.12 11:16:49 FIRE 1.00000000 1/20 Sending 2018.06.12 09:48:03 FIRE 1.00000000 8/20 Sending
// if I happen to lose a few FIRE, not like it has not happen 10,000 times over the years of testing && just trying to keep the network from going defuncted for months again
|
|
|
Wallet status: Online (185508 blocks) // 3 peers addnode=50.83.11.14 addnode=213.230.76.68 addnode=78.46.92.72
Forging. Your weight 7 Network weight 3409 {inputs of around 1 FIRE to balance the network out, also set reserve balance to throttle the staking weight} //if you open your wallet, make sure to only stake half the network weight or lower (anything over the net weight will not stake or fork your wallet) && the chain will stabilize
--seeing a bit of orphan blocks in the db log //rebuilding the database, one node is 200 blocks ahead & might have forked or it has a top block of 185779 Wallet status: Online (185532 blocks) Yeah it has forkd, only received a few tx's from the chain test && showing 185935 Current number of blocks (YoBit on 185579) // should have tested with even smaller inputs (1 FIRE x6 && 5 FIRE x1), lost 3 tx's && received 3 tx's 2018-06-12 08:08:15 FIRE 1.17519787 In process checking again 2018-06-11 21:49:28 FIRE 5.00000000 Completed2018-06-11 17:38:44 FIRE 1.00000000 Completed2018-06-11 15:31:52 FIRE 1.00000000 Completed2018-06-11 10:28:27 FIRE 1.00000000 Completed 2018-06-08 08:39:31 FIRE 0.86886773 Completed 2018-06-06 09:21:59 FIRE 1.13777331 Completed Edit: Estimated total blocks changed to 185765 & seeing a lot of orphans in the debug log, will keep watching // seeing three connections from the same node now (all inbound 4.0.0), Your weight 9 & Network weight 2576 (one node staking with it self) --faild tx // got a fresh 4.0.0 node up & going to keep troubleshooting the problem, not one 2 give up or abandon 2018.06.12 08:08:15 FIRE 1.17519787 5/20 Sending
|
|
|
Wallet status: Online (185508 blocks) // 3 peers addnode=50.83.11.14 addnode=213.230.76.68 addnode=78.46.92.72
Forging. Your weight 7 Network weight 3409 {inputs of around 1 FIRE to balance the network out, also set reserve balance to throttle the staking weight} //if you open your wallet, make sure to only stake half the network weight or lower (anything over the net weight will not stake or fork your wallet) && the chain will stabilize
|
|
|
Trying to build a self hosted block explorer again today (insight + iquidus), could not get a working build on this system for some reason && kept having MongoDB + Node.js errors Having tried to get a working build on one for a few hours, if I can ever get a PCIe SSD upgrade & eventually get one hosted with the right directions. I have tried a few times over the years to get a working one up, not able to because my systems are always on breakable source or the non-stable builds. // to bad one couldn't just order a USB or SD with all the right installations to host a block explorer, maybe someone could help me setup one & or remote via TeamViewer the installation? Edit: testing a few other API monitoring sites, might find other routes @ building a block explorer
|
|
|
[Request For Comment]
Hello 2GIVE Friends!
We have been contacted by satowallet.com with an offer to add 2GIVE to their mobile wallet for IOS and Android.
Does anyone here have any experience or comments you can share ??
Is it a good reputable wallet company??
-dvd
Haven't tested that one yet, already GIT a AVM (android VM) up to test it though && then low on system RAM (need to upgrade to finish testing)
|
|
|
Just now picking up all the small faucet {give a ways}, a bit of 0.001 inputs && few bytes bigger than tx dust @ 48.3 kB / 331 + 1 { "hash": "49266a7559fd6cbc08a4dac0faee0d2fe08fd26ac2075077b4892d38c2af9d11", "confirmations": 5, "size": 49468, "height": 236941, "version": 6, "merkleroot": "064a97587dd704377ecf673629ac950cba84230bc605926e1dc49ad7eb24234b", "mint": 0.65684562, "time": 1527692188, "nonce": 0, "bits": "1e0491df", "difficulty": 0.00085478, "blocktrust": "380514", "chaintrust": "148c2c9120b6c4", "previousblockhash": "10a59096f36af9bf07e7cc30c7b39f9994da2a537707becb38cc8dd73451a2c1", "nextblockhash": "458ffc87c3361f8492f1833b7d702ba353e5b73c2ba26d7324c47e234f187f71", "flags": "proof-of-stake", "proofhash": "0192f7c7223737f464d3857e72a6f64066645766540cf5d4b9f16b6bd701b7af", "entropybit": 1, "modifier": "000000000d7f0bc6", "modifierchecksum": "0708f5c7", "tx": [ "11858c9e2f744149e3482b1445607f72d5511e2213c436d774ea056bf14fd99f", "3bde23ad063e859b9ee957ed427e72044a86649708afa1f74e90814a95e4190a", "9d167b870c7fa9022b77abde83234c8a914ddcf1effbd1a1198b7d745228dd31" ], "signature": "3045022100bf60a98aacb0e5a149037c264cd854d7ea91104c042ebdfb7b66773d2068fa6f02201 02fbbb8c0ca01a78c082ee5239d80c7e335bf001c405688916a17d162d08b49" } // cold storage didn't go through right away, had to resend after cold storage from YoBit && am testing with a second tx as well (quotability purposes)
2018.05.30 10:24:58 TECH 3.95738522 0 Transfer from cold storage 2018.05.30 09:55:31 TECH 11.17940192 8/20 Sending
|
|
|
//only having one node online, will try to git another one up & see if I can git a few coins to keep the network stable accepted connection 78.46.92.72:56344 send version message: version 70013, blocks=0, us=50.83.11.14:49697, them=78.46.92.72:56344, peer=78.46.92.72:56344 Added time data, samples 2, offset -1 (+0 minutes) Added 78.46.92.72:49697 from 78.46.92.72: 0 tried, 2 new Moving 78.46.92.72:49697 to tried receive version message: version 70013, blocks=183716, us=50.83.11.14:49697, them=78.46.92.72:49697, peer=78.46.92.72:56344 received block 00000ed478b28a511d4a
Wallet status: Maintenance
Edit: PM me if you are able to donate a few coins to git the wallet out of maintenance, one node staking will defunct the network eventually // // // hmm, searching firecoin from all engines (web searching sites) && found a few goodies (DYOR)
|
|
|
Hosting for this blockchain has expired since... 2018-05-21 (7 days ago) This blockchain explorer is now in the grace period, and will eventually be taken offline. Contribute Now!
//picked up a few TECH {Transfer from cold storage} @ YoBit just IN case the block explorer goes offline, would love to fund another few bits for Crypto ID explorer && am just unable to right now (may BTC some 1 can start an open sourced 1 of these days)
tech (TechCoin) on 2018-05-28 01:16 Expires 2018-05-21 14:25 (in -7.1 days) On 2018-04-12 22:57, credit "Paymium 4fd4cc" (31.00 days), new expiry 2018-05-21 14:25 On 2018-03-07 22:35, credit "Paymium 186d02" (31.00 days), new expiry 2018-04-20 14:25 On 2018-02-09 18:05, credit "February 14 bonus" (14.00 days), new expiry 2018-03-20 14:25 On 2018-02-06 07:09, credit "Paypal" (31.00 days), new expiry 2018-03-06 14:25 On 2018-01-09 07:07, credit "Paypal" (31.00 days), new expiry 2018-02-03 14:25 On 2017-12-20 15:56, credit "Paypal" (31.00 days), new expiry 2018-01-03 14:25 On 2017-10-30 17:32, credit "Bitcoin at $6000 !" (30.00 days), new expiry 2017-12-03 14:25 On 2017-08-14 21:24, credit "Bitcoin at $4000 !" (30.00 days), new expiry 2017-11-03 14:25 On 2017-07-09 02:36, credit 0.0050 BTC (39.60 days), new expiry 2017-10-04 14:25
|
|
|
it will double the h/s, configurations are key && only improving over the years of machine code // never settle for basic stock settings, everything can be fine tuned && or improved (just because it is not broken does not mean it cant improve) // even when you do something 100 times, the process will only git what path of steps taken (shortest path to transform one word into another = algorithms) && elevate like the present future of change
|
|
|
a warm thank, bro afaik, it's the only cpu miner in assembly (and one of the only which is not a rip of Wolf0) so it's to be the fastest. i however got reported being slower on some Intel i7 or Xeon. i don't own one so i cannot optimize well yet.
That would BTC the key to many systems or applications, optimizations are quite heavy when tuned right && having spent 10,000 hours over the years on just playing around with the basic hardware on all algorithms (configurations files). Still love to setup & test hardware, even if it's not going to earn many coins Kinda of a refresher course every week, so funny that people still think only sha256 or Scrypt are the only ones
|
|
|
Tested good on Windows Vista, 7 & 10 + Linux Mint 18.3 Sylvia for the untested.028 build (still need to test Ubuntu 18.04, basically the same system though ) //having tested many miners (100's) over the years, great work && the best h/s per CPU than all others
|
|
|
Startx 2 piece the puzzle together after almost 5000+ alternative testings Yes. The system only wakes up to mine when there is something to work on. 2GIVE does not waste resources mindlessly trying to mine empty blocks in order to move the chain forward. When it stakes eligible coins it will run a light-weight mining algorithm as well as when someone sends coins from one address to another address there will be a 1% transaction fee available to compete for. -dvd Is it normal for the 2give-qt miner to show 0 when i type gethashespersec?
You gotta check out this block #76998 https://chainz.cryptoid.info/2give/block.dws?76998.htmIt's REALLY rare -- first off it contains 3 transactions (most of our blocks to date have only 2) Secondly, it really demonstrates the power of our "coin-folding" system that de-fragments the chain over time. Thirdly? It includes a transaction from an alpha v7 wallet (running 70001 protocol) going to an alpha of our IOS mobile wallet! Stay Tuned! -dvd Can't wait to see the full use of the chain, watching the two transaction blocks way two many years in the 5000+ alternative proof of stake coins && am quite impressed on future users being able to sync in under an hour after years into the chain. Not weeks/months/years after a block chain has so many empty blocks, like looking @ the coding changes over the years of wasted space in the source lines of code (SLOC). Even the forum coding was a great learning experience, many styles of coding && many fixes over the years in human readable formations. {large blocks comparison) // BTC = 2000+ transactions per block // LTC = 300+ transactions per block // Others = 50+ transactions per block [the whole 1MB block size debate years ago] Blockchain Size2Give = 108MB @ First block 2016-04-18 //BTC = 197.77 GB @ First block 2009-1-9 //LTC = 16.76 GB @ First Block 2011-10-08 //DASH = 6.15 GB @ First Block 2014-01-19 //XMR = 50 GB @ First Block 2014-04-18 //ETH = 564.78 GB @ First Block 2015-07-30
The first tx with 3 + the PoW transaction in one block https://chainz.cryptoid.info/2give/block.dws?92099.htm21:35:36 1 92099 - 3 3,970,604.265596 2GIVE 0.0002 193.645977 2GIVE
|
|
|
FYI, we were just notified that 2GIVE has been listed on: https://xchange.me/Anyone here has any experience with this exchange? -dvd FYI, its also listed on the following exchanges. Maybe you should tweet about it. Some of them actually have decent (100K+/day) volume. - Litebit.eu - HitBTC - Etherdelta Not listed @ HitBTC FYI (listed @ https://www.litebit.eu/en/buy/2give would be correct), posting spam now with the PDA newbie accounts && almost had to checkING IT once or twice to confirm the TIMES //^that eXchange would bit around longer than trex, even cryptsy b4 the byte {80+ PoW nodes claiming blocks, 50+ PoS block nodes && watching the network balances with both stamps} // 2 accounts from the trolls with peering onions, real world of unknowns && actual "getinfo" ## trust only real accounts via forums, you're learning minds of entrusting users around programs with real world lessons ++ Date / Time Blocks Height Interval Transactions Value Out {* 1% = PoW} Difficulty {PoS i ( m ) =} Generated+Fees 2018-05-11 Fri 129 90191 669.8 18 2,975,706.407 2GIVE 0.0003 ± 3% 693.71227425 2018-05-12 Sat 123 90314 702.4 1 1,667,454.965 2GIVE 0.0003 ± 3% 834.12554771 2018-05-13 Sun 591 90905 146.2 689 227,859,691.232 2GIVE 0.0005 ± 55% 3,341.80897945 2018-05-14 Mon 597 91502 144.7 529 247,373,416.433 2GIVE 0.0005 ± 50% 1,953.1048699 2018-05-15 Tue 305 91807 283.3 210 113,481,587.439 2GIVE 0.0003 ± 25% 467.82227796
|
|
|
// blocks are actually being tested, will be watching closely && study https://chainz.cryptoid.info/2give/#!extraction // miners sound like hybrid machines, no wasted power via water block heaters && renewable resources // that cut out {of} wasted power in the PoW/PoS code be a bit of pure genius, now simple instant tx un--like the old alts coding with wasted mining watts + heat && actual improvement in the world of applications Idea reminds of taking all components of a solutions & making one simple engineered machine {1 or 5 components needed to create renewable energy?}, solve actual problems needed! Water Wheel Electricity: ^link^ //diff @ 0.0007 for the first time with over 500 tx's && almost 500 blocks
|
|
|
|