I don't get your point, so every donator can get 1% of your winnings? So if only 10 donators, so they only take 10% of your winning, and you took the remaining 90%? It is not fair for them cos if they don't donate u, you won't earn any money.
IMO the donators take 80-90% of the winnings and you take 10-20%, that's better.
IMO the donators take 80-90% of the winnings and you take 10-20%, that's better.
Fox, you are entitled to your opinion about the percentage splits but you are simply not understanding the math of this whole deal. The percentage of the winnings is determined by how much BTC you put in. Maybe someone else can explain this to you better.
Fox did state it incorrectly, but I fully understand your math. When a player's entry is covered by an investor they generally take 85%, after the entry fee is recouped. You are only giving the investors 45% which is close to 50% of what they should be getting.
As for you calling it an sponsorship you know that is BS, because a sponsorship would get ZERO back therefore it is an investment.
Still believe that a team would have been a better idea for investors as long as you could prove their advance poker players.
Hope to see you here at the WSOP, I'll keep an eye out.