 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 »
|
Misread the OP. Settle down rubberneck.
Remove my negative trust due to your personal incompetence then. And how many others have you judged based on quick judgement without reading? Are any of your trust feedbacks legitimate? You'll have to forgive me, but there's been a lot of "account farmers" here in bitcointalk who create accounts to spam and scam and sell them to others who spam and scam. I thought you meant you had 8 BCT accounts. Trust has been settled. I appreciate your hard work in ensuring that scammers are called out, just give people the benefit of the doubt, there is a lot of passionate people on here and sometimes they might appear to be something they're not, something that gets lost in translation through online / inpersonal communication. I apologize for not being clearer in my original post. |
|
|
|
Why did you actually create this thread, did you not have enough drama from the block size debate going on already?
Because I felt like it. Why did you visit it?  |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=261027 Suggests I am an account farmer. #1, no idea what that is. #2, probably not an account farmer as I have 1 account on here. #3, he read my old post and suggested that I was farming accounts because he MISREAD that I stated I have a few reddit accounts. #4, this place is just as shitty as r/bitcoin clearly he is a. theymos or b. riding theymos c. I won't be back to this shit ass forum. It's ironic to wreck peoples trust for literally 0 reasoning behind it. e. - Try to give that account negative feedback, it is somehow weirdly impossible because it is an invalid url. The trust system of bitcointalk is bullshit, any random asshole can make you look bad for no reason at all. But the way you lay out this message, you make it sound like you're guilty of something... Not so much, and the user has removed the feedback, as I will remove his right now. |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=261027 Suggests I am an account farmer. #1, no idea what that is. #2, probably not an account farmer as I have 1 account on here. #3, he read my old post and suggested that I was farming accounts because he MISREAD that I stated I have a few reddit accounts. #4, this place is just as shitty as r/bitcoin clearly he is a. theymos or b. riding theymos c. I won't be back to this shit ass forum. It's ironic to wreck peoples trust for literally 0 reasoning behind it. e. - Try to give that account negative feedback, it is somehow weirdly impossible because it is an invalid url. The trust system of bitcointalk is bullshit, any random asshole can make you look bad for no reason at all. But the way you lay out this message, you make it sound like you're guilty of something... itsamemario is a socket puppet. Throw down some evidence on that or at least seek me out on other platforms. Surely your hunch is a little misguided. Actually better yet, lemme know what my other account is! Should be fun to see your acquisitions, you must know more than I do! |
|
|
|
The only thing I don't support is the ease at which you can destroy someone's trust. I received negative trust from a scammer, simply for calling home out on his bullshit
Yeah it's pretty easy in this neck of the woods. Tis a shame, yet there seems to be a number of great forums and such surfacing. I think it's just a matter of time before a few developments are ready for launch into the world of decentralized discussion platforms. There's been talk about a few, but they must require a bit of time. Anxiously awaiting.  |
|
|
|
Misread the OP. Settle down rubberneck.
Remove my negative trust due to your personal incompetence then. And how many others have you judged based on quick judgement without reading? Are any of your trust feedbacks legitimate? The negative trust was removed. Check again, and stop being off topic. Talk about what you want in your own thread, I'll talk about what I want in mine.
Capiche? I do love how you contributed to the offtopic'ness. Thanks bud. |
|
|
|
Misread the OP. Settle down rubberneck.
Remove my negative trust due to your personal incompetence then. And how many others have you judged based on quick judgement without reading? Are any of your trust feedbacks legitimate? |
|
|
|
Because all other places are dead compared to it, and because you get the developers posting stuff on here. I have asked some stuff in the technical section and gmaxwell was cool enough to drop a reply. They seem overall like good fellas. Of course I see the drama with Theymos on reddit etc and i understand a lot don't like it. I personally don't use reddit, it's annoying as hell when I click on a thread title and a link opens instead of the actual thread.
This forum is quite good for personal chat and conversing in detail, I do agree with you on that! Reddit seems to be good for news circulation, but I have since been focusing on Google - Bitcoin - filter news |
|
|
|
Hopefully the next forum won't hurt your feeling so bad, lol.  hopefully you have a wonderful day. Glad to see you were able to use the feedback system yourself. Less glad to see you leave. jonald_fyookball seems like a sensible person. Like I suggested in the other thread, I would like you to communicate directly with him to solve this. I appreciate your sensible means of looking at things. I have since received a message from the user, he has refrained from removing the trust. It's unfortunate that a trust system is this easily abused, as well that users would jump the gun on leaving negative feedback due to their personal incompetence or misunderstanding. I do believe he/she is most likely a positive contributor to this website, but I also believe that if this user is so willing to abuse the system without fully understanding why they are leaving feedback, than it's more than likely they have also left negative feedback on other users that fail to deserve it. In any regards thanks for your level headed approach. It's quite unfortunate. Shit happens, I guess everyone can play the same game and we can all keep misreading posts and leave negative feedback on eachother. |
|
|
|
Hopefully the next forum won't hurt your feeling so bad, lol. hopefully you have a wonderful day. |
|
|
|
I remember reading about Voat. What is it exactly, like a reddit ripoff? whats so different about it?
I remember reading it would run under the Bitcoin blockchain or something, but never found the details about how would this actually be done.
Haven't heard about the blockchain although that would be pretty cool. It's basically a reddit clone with a few differences. For example in the v/bitcoin thread, the moderator privileges are transparent and you can view what they are deleting and actions they are taking. Just an added layer of transparency, but quite similar to reddit with a few small changes. |
|
|
|
And what do you expect to achieve by posting retaliatory accusations before you've even tried to get him to reconsider feedback he may have left mistakenly? Or was it just easier to go off into that red ink rant? You shouldn't believe everything that others tell you on the internet yeah they could be a 17 year old girl who doesn't know the first thing about professional escrow.  Easier to go off on a rant seeing as I cannot return the favor of negative trust. |
|
|
|
Nope I will be out of here soon. This place deserves no participation.
I love people who participate to say they don't want to participate. If you don't like the forum, shut the fuck up about it and leave. No one cares and no one will miss you. If you want to continue grabbing at attention like this then post in off-topic, not the bitcoin discussion forum. Don't worry I am still packing up! Nothing wrong with voicing an opinion in a forum, if you don't like it, feel free to pass on to the next thread! Thanks, now get the fuck up and leave. |
|
|
|
Don't leave man. bitcointalk needs you, and you need bitcointalk.
But if you do leave, go to uCrypto.co instead.
Thanks for the kind response. See you there. Willing to support any forums that promote open discussion and quality content. Here's 29 Bitcoin forums in case anyone is curious. |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=261027 Suggests I am an account farmer. #1, no idea what that is. #2, probably not an account farmer as I have 1 account on here. #3, he read my old post and suggested that I was farming accounts because he MISREAD that I stated I have a few reddit accounts. #4, this place is just as shitty as r/bitcoin clearly he is a. theymos or b. riding theymos c. I won't be back to this shit ass forum. It's ironic to wreck peoples trust for literally 0 reasoning behind it. e. - Try to give that account negative feedback, it is somehow weirdly impossible because it is an invalid url. This post should be in the Meta Section. But to the point of your post, Have you contacted him and asked him to remove or modify it to neutral trust, due to a misunderstanding? Nope I will be out of here soon. This place deserves no participation. |
|
|
|
I understand there is a lack of alternatives, and there is not a better place for up to date information.
But, in the light of Bitcoin and what it represents, neither of these platforms promote the same ideologies.
Unless you can find a forum that is decentralized I'm not sure how you could have one that promotes the same ideologies. Bitcointalk is currently the best place and its hardly run by nazis though people complain whenever their thread gets moved into the correct section. Personally I wouldn't change unless a clear superior forum came about. The invalid URL claim is false, works fine for me. If you wish to leave feedback, you can try again later. If you could explain why you have 8 accounts, I'd like to hear it. Who doesn't have throw aways on reddit? |
|
|
|
I understand there is a lack of alternatives, and there is not a better place for up to date information.
But, in the light of Bitcoin and what it represents, neither of these platforms promote the same ideologies.
Unless you can find a forum that is decentralized I'm not sure how you could have one that promotes the same ideologies. Bitcointalk is currently the best place and its hardly run by nazis though people complain whenever their thread gets moved into the correct section. Personally I wouldn't change unless a clear superior forum came about. I now have negative feedback due to this post. Apparently I am an account farmer, which is basically as far as you could get from reality. In this post I suggested I have made multiple REDDIT accounts in the past, which now is reflecting upon my trust here negatively. If you decide to look, you can also note that the account who has left the negative feedback is immune from negative feedback, I ask you to give it a shot. visit the account that provided negative feedback due to misreading this post, and try to leave negative feedback, it brings you to an INVALID url. It;s kind of ironic that after this post my account is now hindered with negative feedback, on a clearly flawed system that represents nothing but what I assume to be theymos. Whether it is or it isn't, the trust system here is botched, and so is the communication element for a decentralized system when theymos owns it. It's too bad that you cannot voice an opinion without the friendly forum host here basically wrecking your account based on nothing. have a great day. If you feel as tho it is wrong and by looks of it is and no dubt theirs plenty of people who abuse the rating system. Take it up with support and ask them to review it maybe will remove it for you. I don't have such features like this because it can wreck a persons account and some have the ability to us but only trusted members or have to be approved by mod. I don't feel it is wrong, it IS wrong. I have not farmed accounts on here, and my negative trust is basically solely guaged on this misreading of this original post which I suggested I have made multiple accounts on REDDIT, not here. I invite you to try and leave negative feedback on the account that did mine, and you will be brought to an invalid URL page. I do find that quite ironic, and am wondering if the account is one of theymos', or another Bitcointalk moderator that clearly got their panties in a bunch due to my negative post. It is a little frustrating and I will be leaving this forum shortly, as clearly it is not a fit place to judge content or trust in any context. The fact that I have negative feedback due to a lie, is comical. The fact that the account who left the negative feedback based his trust rating on MIS reading this post, is also quite humerus. The fact that you cannot leave negative feedback in return to his (or) her lies, is eye opening. Clearly this place is subject to the same type of selective censorship and negativity as r/bitcoin. It's a little frustrating after working to do my part in this community for so long but I will get over it. |
|
|
|
They have no other arguments any longer. The only remaining talking point they have is that if we raise the block size limit too much that it will result in centralization (without a clear definition for what this means).
So we don't have 1% orphan rates at 1MB blocks? So the orphan rates would not grow if we had e.g. 8 MB blocks right now? It really seems like they don't really have any arguments. You should really discuss this with other people (not if you're going to be closed-minded) before making slides that are incorrect (hint: Luke-Jr said something about one on IRC if I recall correctly). It is the risk of having a block orphaned that creates the cost. Do you see what I mean? If I'm a miner, why would I bother to make an 8 MB block if it had (e.g.) a 25% chance of being orphaned? I would only do so if it included enough fees to offset this risk. This is the essence of my fee market paper. There were 155 orphaned blocks in Q1 2015 and 97 in Q2. The average orphan rate is about 1%. It is the fact that block propagation is slow that makes it costly for a miner to even attempt to produce an 8 MB block. I estimate that, given the current network propagation impedance, a miner would only be wise to attempt to publish an 8 MB block if it contained 3 to 6 BTC of fees (due to his increased risk of orphaning).  As block propagation improves, it gets cheaper for miners to build larger blocks. There is a natural balance that occurs without the need for a tight limit. This is how Bitcoin has always worked. The free market solves the block size problem without centralized intervention. source: https://scalingbitcoin.org/papers/feemarket.pdfVery interesting. I feel this deserves this deserves its own thread. I feel like you should do your research, or at least provide valid information behind your negatvie trust. I am not an account farmer, and now my reputation on here is wrecked because you have decided to lie on my trust. In addition, it's ironic that I cannot provide negative trust back although you are clearly not trustworthy as you have lied in regards to my reputation. This place is gettin bad theymos, you should probably chill on the trigger pulling. I am no account farmer, and have done nothing wrong except create a post to gauge the communities input on your gold fist. |
|
|
|
You shouldn't believe everything that others tell you on the internet yeah they could be a 17 year old girl who doesn't know the first thing about professional escrow. This guy is an account farmer, don't trust him. |
|
|
|
|
