I already heard about those inexpensed paid trips but not the free shopping one. It was like they will give a free voucher? But, I think this one is kinda hassle. You know, they will still need to deliver it to the gamblers address and what if they are from far away places? It will be better if the casinos put the option to convert physical rewards into cash so that some people in those places will just opt for this.

It's a must that they also give offers to the low spender gamblers because I believe every gambling site is mostly composed of them. If we total all their small bets, they must be bigger or at least will be in the level of the bets made by huge gamblers.

When it comes to choosing a platform, there are a few factors to consider, including security, fees, ease of use, and reputation.

Both Trust Wallet and Binance are reputable platforms for investing in Bitcoin, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages, but none of them should be used to keep your assets for the long term.

Trust Wallet is a mobile wallet that allows you to store, send, and receive Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies on your smartphone. It's known for its user-friendly interface and strong security features, including two-factor authentication and support for biometric authentication. However, you should know that as a mobile wallet, Trust Wallet is more vulnerable to hacking than a hardware wallet.

Binance, on the other hand, is a cryptocurrency exchange that allows you to buy, sell, and trade Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. It offers a wider range of features than Trust Wallet, including margin trading, staking, and lending. But, as an exchange, Binance charges fees for transactions, and there is always a risk of hacking or security breaches.

So, what I would suggest you is to use Binance to purchase Bitcoin, and then use a wallet to store them. If you can afford a hardware wallet, that's much better, but if you can't, Electrum should do. Electrum is also available on mobile.

I think it's clear that we started bullish, but it all depends on that 25k level. If we can break above that level, then we are going to end up with a good return, if we can't break above it then we are going to end up with a bear run probably, or even if it is not a bear run at least a stagnant one where the whole year it will be between a little lower than 20k (above 18k I assume) and under 25k and keep going up and down.

Since I do not believe that bitcoin could stay that stable for a whole year, I support the idea that it will go above 25k without a doubt, but there is no proof of this so I can't guarantee that to anyone at all and advice anyone.

SEC's recent statements indicate that they will be applying the Howey Test, which is a set of guidelines used to determine whether or not a financial instrument qualifies as a security, to all cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin. While this decision may seem arbitrary, it is actually based on the fact that Bitcoin is decentralized and operates without the involvement of a central authority, making it less likely to qualify as a security.

SEC's determination of whether or not a particular cryptocurrency qualifies as a security is a complex and fact-specific analysis that takes into account a variety of factors, including the manner in which the cryptocurrency is marketed and sold to investors, the level of control that its developers or promoters have over its operation, and the extent to which investors rely on those developers or promoters for the success of the project.

If a cryptocurrency meets the definition of a security, it will be subject to the same regulations as any other security, including registration requirements and disclosure obligations. If a cryptocurrency is deemed not to be a security, it may still be subject to other forms of regulation, such as anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws.

Stake became this big thanks to all of that. When they first started they weren't this "big" company, sure they had some money, but not as much. Obviously the fact that bitcoin went up multiple times higher, allowed them to get a lot more richer than just the amount they made, because thousands of bitcoins back when primedice started wasn't really a wealth, nowadays it is, and that helped a bit too.

But from the early days of primedice, to this day right now, they have grown all thanks to caring about what the customer says, and of course insane amount of marketing as well because they are spending unreal amount of money on everything these days.

I'm a bit confused about that too, that how are they actually broadcasting those live games if they are not licensed. How would a casino allow a platform without a license to use their live cams to run their business? I think we need more details about these matters from the creators. And if they impose KYC in the future, that will totally make it look bad since they say they won't ask for any documents or verifications and it's a totally anonymous casino.

About the website and it's look, I don't think that the look is bad, but there are some works required in the back end and I think as OP mentioned earlier, they are already working on them, so it should be good once they do that.

CZ actually gave the correct answer though, that is the problem . They are not located in a headquarters, working from there to make everything work, and have nothing else. Like just for example they have offices in the USA and UK too, why? Because they have to, based on the rules and regulations imposed on them, sure it is not the main office, but that is an office if you really want to visit.

And they do have Malta and even Cyprus locations too, for tax reasons to make it look more legit. But aside from that, it is an online company and mainly managed online and have offices all around the world where you can go if you want to work in the office, otherwise it's spread out, there is no single office that everyone gets together, it is basically global.

Your project looks great, The user interface is decent as well. The detailing and everything when a book is clicked is pretty awesome. I wonder how much time did you spend on creating the website? Are you the designer yourself or have you hired someone to design it for you?

As said by someone else as well, it would have been great if we could purchase the books directly with Bitcoin but since all of them are on Amazon, that's not an option. I also have one suggestion. I would have liked it better if there was a button that said, "Load more" at the bottom when we scrolled to the end instead of the entries loading up themselves. That would make it easier for visitors to also have a look at the footer of your website.

I agree that it is not going to be based on the previous years, just because March was good or bad, doesn't mean it will stay good or bad. I have seen plenty of times when things changed, even that chart alone shows one month being great one year and not so great next year.

This is why I think it is important to take what is happening right now into consideration before we could go on. In any case, I believe that it is going to be pretty tough to overlook the fact that we have gone up decently, forced to backdown a bit, and we are going to keep trying to go higher more and more. Obviously it is not going to work for the quick term or anything, but it could probably work a bit better long term.

I think sports betting would be my answer to extra 50 bucks. I know that there are some very important UCL games are coming up, the next stage will be great, quarter finals and semi finals are great to bet, and finals is definitely the most money I spend, so anything extra for that would be lovely, if I am allowed to deposit my own and add that on top of that 50 bucks, then I am pretty sure I can stretch it to the finals easily, both by winning some, and depositing a bit more, it will go until the finals.

If I am lucky, I could make a profit until the finals and wager even more for that. League games are fun and all, but they do not really feel like big bets to me.

I would consider it foolish or wasting money if someone places a bet on a sporting event based on a prediction made by an AI model unless they are extremely lucky and still win the bet despite any research and analysis of the game or the competing teams/players. There is absolutely no doubt about the abilities of AI models or what they can deliver, but they are not yet ready to take on such responsibilities considering their training data is not always up to date.

I can use AI to write articles, generate emails, make social posts and copies, and even double-check those since AI is not always right. How could I put my money at risk based on a decision made only by AI? Doesn't really sound wise to me for now.

Well, turns out he didn't lose, but it wasn't KO by anyone neither, just a disappointing entertainment fight and nothing more. His brother is out there making a legendary name out of himself that will stand the test of time, and the lil bro is just making a name by fighting youtuber brothers instead. What's next Logan fighting the big bro as a revenge? Lol.

All jokes aside, this was a fight that was never really meant to be taken seriously and I would never wager on something like this, there is absolutely no guarantee that it won't be fixed, like why would they even care, it is not even an official fight. This is why it is too dangerous for me to bet on it.

If you want what you mentioned in the opening post, and also want to make more expansions later on, then you will probably need a pretty high budget for that. Developing costs along with resources and other maintenance expenses will surely be costly.

Hiring novice developers wouldn't be a good idea for the long run. Experienced developers will surely cost more but the work they'll do will be free of bugs and issues that could be an hassle later on.

I agree that it is old news by this point, and I think 30k people in Miami just for crypto was also a bit of a success of the Mayor as well. He is famously a pro-bitcoin person and helped with everything from licenses to basically all kinds of help they may need, even arranged frequent busses as well.

So all in all, this was a success but it wasn't the cause of this recent increase in price, couldn't be because it's different time periods and I would guess that a conference in Miami, no matter how good it was, wouldn't be really that much of a big deal, it would be something a bit less interesting in the long run and would not be a reason for bitcoin to go up.

Yep, the ability to participate in the global economy without the need for traditional banking services has the potential to greatly benefit those in developing countries or those who may be underbanked. Also, the anonymity offered by Bitcoin can also be seen as a benefit for those who value privacy in their financial transactions no matter how some may argue that this anonymity is not total and there are still ways to trace transactions.

Though Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have the potential to disrupt traditional financial structures, it is still a relatively new technology and there are still many challenges that need to be addressed such as scalability, regulation, and security.

Still, I believe that the benefits of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies outweigh the challenges, and they have the potential to greatly benefit individuals and communities around the world. With any new technology, it is important for individuals and institutions to approach it with caution, but also with an open mind to its potential benefits.

Just like others, I have some concerns about the practicality and safety of this solution.

First of all, relying solely on signals from Twitter to make trades is risky, as the information on Twitter can be unreliable and manipulated. The crypto market is volatile, and making decisions based on unverified information can lead to significant losses.

After that, connecting a third-party platform like Napcat with a trusted broker like Binance raises questions about data privacy and security. How will Napcat ensure that user data is protected from potential breaches or misuse? As a user, I would want to know how my data is being handled and protected.

Last but not the least, the use of automation platforms in trading can be both a blessing and a curse. We know that automation can streamline trading and reduce human error, but it can also lead to significant losses if not used correctly.

As it seems, that website looks like an affiliate marketing website to me with all the casinos given on the home page as soon as the website loads up. Also, since that is for Australia, it may be of no use to OP since he is asking for slots and providers from Asia, and I would definitely recommend Stake.com to him.

I've tried running a free game from the website you provided, and it took way too long to load up. I'm not sure if there was an issue with my internet or if the website itself loads very late. It shows that you can also play with real money, but I wonder if it's safe or not.

A lot of things to talk about in this but let me start with the website. The color scheme is so bad, the designer didn't even bother to check that the sign-up button isn't clearly visible since the background is already red and the button is made red as well. The menu, the layout of the website, all of it just doesn't really impress someone at all.

Coming to the second point, in the footer section, it says (c) 2004-2023, which actually refers to the starting and the current date from when the service was started and whether it is still continued or not. And, as per whois, your website was registered on 2022-06-03. How do you explain that?

Surely? I mean I wouldn't be so sure about that if you asked me. I am not saying they won't be, they could still very well be the eventual champions and the odds look that way as well if you look around the sportsbooks as well, most think they will win.

However, it is not over yet and that means we are going to end up with some more fights before it gets there. Look at them failing to win against Leipzig for example, if they played a game like this in premier league and got a draw, that would be 2 points lost, plus Arsenal winning that extra game and suddenly we are talking about a big difference. I still think City has a chance of course, a big one, but not enough to say "surely".

While it may be challenging to find direct evidence of their contributions on public repositories like GitHub, many companies do contribute to open source in various ways. For instance, some companies sponsor open-source projects or provide resources such as infrastructure or funding to support open-source development. Others may contribute to open source in a less visible way, by providing feedback, testing, or even adopting open-source technologies in their products and services.

While the extent of their contributions may vary, it's safe to say that many of these big businesses recognize the value of open-source and actively participate in its development and maintenance.