Basically, US is still the number 1 power in the world and they have held this position for nearly 105 years since World War II, and what they are doing is finding ways to maintain their position against opponents like China. They do not see Japan as a rival because Japan is their close Asian ally and depends on them militarily.

As for debt to the Government, as you said, that is just the Government's strategy in balancing and promoting the domestic economy. In addition, I think it is a binding strategy of great powers towards other countries, and here it can be said that the US. The US always tries to make other countries indebted and dependent on them. As for America's public debt, I think those are just numbers because they are still the ones holding the world's money printing machine, they have more than enough power to pay off debt by printing money and exporting inflation to the world. 

By the way, do you have any proof that India is debt free?

The whole Manchester City club changed when the ownership of the club changed. Pep Guardiola got a rich owner and after that, they did not have to go back. Guardiola can get the players that he wants. You know Guardiola's side are also very much better aware of Manchester United. Now if they play against Red Devils, they are the favorite ones. Like in the past, a lot of people thought that we should support the Red Devils just because they have a good history. But I do not understand that. I think people should be much more interested in the future instead of the past. And the future is better for Manchester City.

Like Manchester United literally had to struggle a lot to actually even participate in the Europa League. They finished in the eighth position. The only reason the Red Devils have been able to play in the Europa League is because they are the winner of the FA Cup.

Silver is not more valuable than gold because it is easier to mine and process, and there are more silver resources on the surface of our earth than gold. You don't know where silver is mined because you don't care about it like gold, and focusing on gold has been a human habit for thousands of years and has spread until now. Therefore, it is not surprising that when discussing gold, people are very interested and have many things to discuss, but with other metals such as silver and copper, people do not show any interest.

Not only gold mining, mining any mineral resource also carries a lot of risks because we have to mine deep underground and this is not as easy a job as above ground work as we see.

Silver does not depreciate, but its value is unlikely to increase as high as gold or bitcoin because the demand for it is not so high and as I said, mining and the amount of silver on the surface of the earth is not as scarce as gold.

Ok, can anyone actually tell me why the Barcelona authority decided to let go of Xavi? What was the actual reason? I thought he was actually doing a good job. Especially with the money that he was provided with.

Now Hans-Dieter Flick is going to have to start from zero, yes that is absolutely right. Most importantly the work that Xavi had actually done, is not going to matter now. Because every coach has their own plans and they like to do things differently in general. so it was not a good decision. And now the players that are in the Barcelona squad might also not feel that good. Because Xavi was just starting to bring in players that he wanted. I wonder if Hansi Flick will even find them useful

If you want to take a CEO as an example, Michael J. Saylor would be more suitable than Richard Teng. The CEO of a leading centralized exchange bullish on bitcoin is neither surprising nor admirable. But a CEO of another industry investing and being bullish on bitcoin is notable and sounds more appealing.

But investing in bitcoin will not guarantee us becoming rich or our business becoming more developed. We need to evaluate the current situation as well as the business's budget and balance the use of capital for investment and business. They should not be lumped together because the high volatility of bitcoin will sometimes cause our business to suffer if the budget is used incorrectly.

No one wants bitcoin to fall because it reduces our profits, but we also know that bitcoin moves in a parabolic pattern, so we don't need to panic. Instead, we should take advantage of this moment to accumulate more bitcoins if we have any money left, otherwise sit tight and everything will return to normal soon. Bitcoin reaching $80k or $100k is just a matter of time.

In my opinion, bitcoin is better and that is why we are here and choose bitcoin.


Of course, we choose bitcoin because of its profits, bitcoin clearly brings significant profits and outperforms other investments, not just stocks. But apart from the profit factor, bitcoin is far superior as it is not just an investment but also provides us with use cases. With bitcoin, you can manage and store your assets yourself without depending on third parties, you can use it as currency, cross-border payment method...The stock market does not provide you with these facilities other than using them for investing.

Biden is also a politician, is he more trustworthy than Trump? If we talk about politicians, no one is trustworthy and what they do is only for their power and benefits. But Americans and the crypto community do not have a third choice, and we only have the right to support one of the two, and each has their own reasons for which one to support. You and I as well as the Winklevoss brothers are all bitcoin investors but each of us has our own goals so just because we vote for different people doesn't mean they are stupid and we are smart. It's simply a choice based on personal interests.


According to the report, in May, Mr. Trump's campaign raised $141 million, while Mr. Biden's camp only raised $85 million, but overall there is not a big difference between the two.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-campaign-says-it-raised-141-million-in-may-compared-to-85-million-for-biden/

On what basis do you assert that the demand for gold will never go away, and that the demand for bitcoin will go away? Are you from the future or do you have a crystal ball? What evidence do you have to prove what you say will happen in the future? Or just pure guesswork like me or anyone else?
I don't like to hypothesize "if" because you also failed to acknowledge it when I hypothesized that gold will no longer be needed in the future. Likewise, the disappearance of computers will never happen.



You think bitcoin will be replaced, so what will replace bitcoin? To me, this world is very large and colorful, anything can happen, nothing is permanent.

Keeping a player in the squad and giving him salary every week is definitely not ideal for any club. for Giallorossi, they will have to look for every opportunity to improve the squad. That's why I said they would have to try to sell the players like Lukaku, Abraham, from such types of players Giallorossi does not find anything useful right now but draining the money of the club. It does look like this is going to make Roma lose a lot of money. Because they will not be able to sell the players at the price they want to sell them for. But it is what it is now. Keeping them is going to make the club lose more money in the long run. If I talk about the player's side it is better to let the player go earlier. Maybe he will also be able to find his form in another club as well.



I'm not saying it is definitely Lukaku & Abraham, it does not matter who the player is.
Roma will have to find unnecessary players and sell them for the most amount of money that they can.
Yes, De Rossi must be very careful in making these decisions.

Sevilla is probably the king of inconsistency in La Liga, lol. 

Whatever, I have not seen any other team be as inconsistent as them recently in this La Liga competition. for some reason, Enrique Sanchez Flores lead the team very well while playing in the Europa League. But they are not good at all when they are playing in the La Liga competition. It feels like Enrique Sanchez came with different teams in two different competitions. They were actually under threat to get relegated in previous few seasons. In the end, they were able to avoid the relegation and actually stay in the La Liga competition. But I don’t think that is what was expected from them. Expected performance from them is probably to finish in at least in the top six positions so that they can play in the Europa League competition. I don’t know how long it is going to take them to recover. But things do not look very promising right now with Xavier García.

But what about introducing someone to bitcoin? I mean we don't encourage or force anyone to invest in bitcoin but it wouldn't be bad if we introduce bitcoin to someone because this is also the way to make bitcoin more popular. We can introduce bitcoin and provide the necessary documents for them to learn about bitcoin themselves and the decision to invest or not will be theirs to decide instead of us forcing them.

Additionally, I think with its current popularity, surely many people have heard or even know about bitcoin but they are not confident enough to invest in bitcoin. We are people who have knowledge about bitcoin and influence them, this can also be a catalyst for them to be more motivated to invest in bitcoin. Bitcoin is a potential asset these days and missing out on it will make many people regret it so recommending it to some specific audience is not so bad, but don't force them or try to convince them if they don't like it.

That will depend on each item, not all items will decrease in price and not all items will increase in price when a crisis occurs, and it also depends on each country. If the OP is from my country then he's probably right, the prices of essential items such as food, gasoline, electricity...all increased by 30%-40%. But land and real estate prices in my country are quite cheap compared to previous years because the business situation of many businesses is at a standstill, many businesses and stores have to close and return their premises because of business losses.

It sounds harsh and a bit greedy when we take advantage of other people's difficulties to enrich ourselves, but in business it's called strategy. Just like investing in bitcoin, when you want to take profits or want to sell at a high price, there will need to be someone to buy at a high price and they even lose money. But that is how the financial market works, they cannot call you greedy or evil just because you win.

On what basis do you say that he only plays the lottery when investing in bitcoin? Just because someone invests an insignificant amount of money doesn't mean they're playing the lottery or gambling and aren't serious about their investment. Each person has a different economic situation and they are investing with what they have. It may be an insignificant amount of money to you but it could be a large amount of money to them, you should not underestimate others just because they don't have as much money as you.

More than a year has passed since this topic, I think the OP is mature enough and experienced enough to make his own decisions instead of needing more of our advice with his investments.

The value of any asset is determined by supply and demand. If one day the demand for gold no longer exists, do you think it will still be valuable? Also, you're claiming gold has uses because it's made into jewelry and used in certain industries...and bitcoin isn't? So the fact that we use bitcoin as a payment method, a store of value...that's not a use case or uses, what do you call that? Because bitcoin cannot be touched with hands nor can it be used for jewelry like gold, it is considered useless and has no use case. Is that true in a world gradually digitizing everything we live in?

It's true, we are attracted to this industry because of greed, because of the stories about bitcoin being able to yield thousands of percent profits, not because someone is looking for a payment method as some are saying. Because as far as I remember, in the early days bitcoin was given out for free through faucets, games...it was even used as rewards for ponzi projects, HYIPs...I was quite surprised when some people said they were looking for a new payment method and were attracted to bitcoin because hardly any businesses were using bitcoin as a payment method at that time.

Even in these days, many businesses have used bitcoin as a payment method but most of the newbies to the market are also attracted because of the profit story of bitcoin, they didn't come to Bitcoin because of its benefits. Only those who have been in the market for a long time and have spent time learning about bitcoin will gradually become interested in its technology and use cases, and newbies will come for greed like we did.

As far as I know, as a businessman or entrepreneur, you will receive more special benefits from the bank than ordinary users. Banks will provide more services and incentives to business customers so I am a bit surprised that banks in your country are introducing restrictions on businesses. That not only hinders the development of businesses but also directly affects the interests of banks and the country's economy. What happens in your country is completely opposite to my country, banks in my country always offer the best incentives and policies for businesses because they are big, potential customers.

If your business wants to use bitcoin and persuade partners to use bitcoin as a payment method between the two parties. It is a good solution because bitcoin will solve the limitations set by banks but you need to consider its volatility because bitcoin does not always increase in price and bring more profits. If it is dumped, how will you and your partner handle it? Using bitcoin as a payment method for businesses will also have pros and cons, it is not as perfect as you think.

In my opinion, memorizing the seed phrase is not a bad idea because it has advantages such as we will never have to worry about others stealing it or being able to use it at any time. But we need to think about its downside: if our memory fails and it is the only backup, we will completely lose access to our bitcoins. It can be seen that this method has more disadvantages than advantages it brings, so it is really not recommended.

In general, each method will have advantages and disadvantages, so it wouldn't be bad if we combined 1 or 2 methods to achieve maximum effectiveness.

OP, why don't you try combining phrase memorization with one of the methods people have mentioned?

I have fought against the criticism that trading is a waste of time because most of the results from trading are losses, just because they fail at trading doesn't mean others will too. But that doesn't mean that when you see someone succeeding in trading, you think you can do the same thing as them. Because each person has different strengths, maybe that formula helps others succeed but you will never be successful when applying that formula, you need to remember that success cannot be copied.

In investing or business, failure is normal, and when you fail and choose a different path does not mean you are too weak. I'm not saying you should give up if you fail, but you should also reevaluate whether your choice was the right one and whether it's right for you. You need to make other choices instead of persisting until you lose everything. What I want is that the people who give up trading and choose to hold for the long term are not weaklings but they realize that they are not suited to trading and that holding is better for them.

As _act_ explained, those exchanges are also not completely decentralized and they can still be hacked, they are not quite as secure as you think. Not to mention, as you know, they have low liquidity and higher fees than top centralized exchanges like binance or biget. Everything is so clear, I think you already have your own answer instead of wanting everyone to confirm it again for you.

Once you want to become a trader and want to make money through spot or futures trading then I think you will have no better choice than centralized exchanges. CEX has large liquidity, many trading pairs, low trading fees as well as providing high leverage...clearly CEX is superior to DEX in this aspect, we should not deny that.

I actually am expecting Barcelona to make some stupid changes again. If you think about it, Barcelona is actually prone to making many mistakes right now because they do not have the necessary amount of money. So they will always be under some kind of pressure & under pressure mistakes. At least that’s what I can see. It is going to be a stupid decision if they actually did let Fermin López go. This midfielder is performing pretty well for the club. He is also contributing with his goals, last season López was able to net 8 balls without any assist. Without López midfield area of Barca will be turned into fragile, Barca should keep him.

Barcelona had a problem previously. It was that Barcelona was giving too much money to the players as salary. I don’t know if Barcelona has actually faced such problem or not. But paying a high salary is definitely a big problem it was one of the main things that actually draining the financials of Barcelona. So I agree with you they should sell those unnecessary players who are draining the financials.