 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
|
I tried mining LBRY on Suprnova pool last night but there's hours of no activity on my graph and lower than expected credits. It looks like it was mining for a few hours stopped for hours and then started again. In CCminer there were no errors and it shows it hashing throughout the whole night. Anyone else seeing issues or have any idea?
You can check your mining history in the 'graphs' tab. Is there a blank space in between? That would mean either your miner lost connection to the pool during that time or the pool had an issue though I see no problems in the logs for the last 48h or so. Ya there's a huge gap in the graph but ccminer shows that it was mining the whole time and confirming. My connection was up because my other rig mined ETH the whole night through. |
|
|
|
|
I just started mining LBRY on yiimp.ccminer.org with version 1.8.1 and am also getting like 5% or a little more rejects...is that normal then?
Also, how do payouts work on that pool? Are they auto when you hit a certain amount or is there a manual method? Sorry if this is listed on the site, I couldn't find it.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried mining LBRY on Suprnova pool last night but there's hours of no activity on my graph and lower than expected credits. It looks like it was mining for a few hours stopped for hours and then started again. In CCminer there were no errors and it shows it hashing throughout the whole night. Anyone else seeing issues or have any idea?
|
|
|
|
What hashrate are you seeing? If anyone wants share their mh/s and card model info that'd be awesome.  |
|
|
|
Some news:
- Finally AMD released ADL10, so I can add temperature/clocks management for Radeon 4xx cards.
- I almost finished NVIDIA support.
I will release new version in 2-4 days.
PS. Still no good nvidia driver for 1070 card for Windows 7/10 for ETH mining? Right now I see ridiculous 1MH/s speed.
There is a driver that works. You need the latest Windows 10 update (anniversary edition 1607) and then you need to update the driver through windows (weird I know, nvidia hasn't published it yet). You can find the details here: https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/2227/cuda-miner/p64Then the 10xx series will work with Win 10. I'd like to test it on Win7 firstly, I don't like Win10 with its paranoid defender, updates, two control panels, etc. Anyway, I will try to make it work in Win7, if it fails I'll try Win10. Ya, the fix seems to be exclusive to Win10 but people are getting 30+mh/s now with the 1070s. I have a GTX 960 in my desktop system and the only way to get more than 3mh/s is to use a build of Genoil's miner on CUDA 6.5 and use the older 347 nvidia drivers. Then I get around 10mh/s with it. GTX 960 MAKES ~10MH/s MINING ETH-- I have a five card GTX 960 rig on Ubunto 14.04 and it makes about 52MH/s total. A properly configured GTX 1060 will do twice that, 18-20MH/s, same as a good GTX 970. --scryptr Ya I know 10mh/s is about all a 960 will get, just saying it requires me to use an older driver and CUDA version to get it unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Some news:
- Finally AMD released ADL10, so I can add temperature/clocks management for Radeon 4xx cards.
- I almost finished NVIDIA support.
I will release new version in 2-4 days.
PS. Still no good nvidia driver for 1070 card for Windows 7/10 for ETH mining? Right now I see ridiculous 1MH/s speed.
There is a driver that works. You need the latest Windows 10 update (anniversary edition 1607) and then you need to update the driver through windows (weird I know, nvidia hasn't published it yet). You can find the details here: https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/2227/cuda-miner/p64Then the 10xx series will work with Win 10. I'd like to test it on Win7 firstly, I don't like Win10 with its paranoid defender, updates, two control panels, etc. Anyway, I will try to make it work in Win7, if it fails I'll try Win10. Ya, the fix seems to be exclusive to Win10 but people are getting 30+mh/s now with the 1070s. I have a GTX 960 in my desktop system and the only way to get more than 3mh/s is to use a build of Genoil's miner on CUDA 6.5 and use the older 347 nvidia drivers. Then I get around 10mh/s with it. |
|
|
|
Some news:
- Finally AMD released ADL10, so I can add temperature/clocks management for Radeon 4xx cards.
- I almost finished NVIDIA support.
I will release new version in 2-4 days.
PS. Still no good nvidia driver for 1070 card for Windows 7/10 for ETH mining? Right now I see ridiculous 1MH/s speed.
There is a driver that works. You need the latest Windows 10 update (anniversary edition 1607) and then you need to update the driver through windows (weird I know, nvidia hasn't published it yet). You can find the details here: https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/2227/cuda-miner/p64Then the 10xx series will work with Win 10. |
|
|
|
|
With the 1070s shaping up to be decent miners is there any chance we'll ever see nvidia support?
|
|
|
|
Windows 10 now detects v4.5 as a virus (Trojan), it deleted the file from my computer and when I try to download it again, it says: Virus detected... Is it safe to restore it?
Yep, my rig stopped mining and I realized it was because Windows Defender updated and then quarantined the exe. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone else noticing some sort of memory or power leak with this?
I'm mining on Win10 with a 370 and 390 in ETH only mode. When I start mining I draw about 470 watts at the wall but over the hours this keeps increasing. I checked my rig today after about 18 hours and it was pulling 570 watts! I restarted the miner and it instantly dropped back to 470 watts. My CPU and system memory were normal during this so the problem doesn't seem to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a GTX 760 and interestingly enough the build with CUDA 6.5 and the 347 driver have not helped me at all on Win10. It seems to work for the 9xx series cards, but not the 7xx. Not sure why.
|
|
|
|
It's not all about hash, more important are shares submitted.
True, but in this case they are the same. I was citing fully realized 24 hour effective hashrate, which is derived entirely from ... shares submitted. Most important of all is that the pool I am in is paying at the new rate- instead of mid 1.8'ish daily ethereum going into my account, finally it is the full 2-something eth that napkin math and eth calculators always said I should be getting. Because miners, calculators, and pools all seem to have slightly different ideas about the hashrates rigs actually generate, the truest measure of gpu mining ability is how much ethereum is paid over time. In my rigs, running the Claymore instead of Ethminer, I get more pay. But effective hash rate depends to some degree on luck, right? What pool are using now? |
|
|
|
look at Genoil's first post in this thread, FAQ #1
Edit: if you're already using the old drivers, verify it is NOT using WDDM 2.0
if it is on the old WDDM, then just give up and put the cards into a spare Win7 box (is what I would do - some things are not worth the effort fighting with)
Speaking of fighting with something - I've managed to get this far building it on Ubuntu Xenial:
- built the miner only without setting -DBUNDLE to cudaminer
- tried running cmake again with -DBUNDLE=cudaminer
got this far:
[ 35%] Building NVCC (Device) object libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
nvcc fatal : redefinition of argument 'std'
CMake Error at ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o.cmake:207 (message):
Error generating
/home/pcchip/try2/cpp-ethereum/build/libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir//./ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o
libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/build.make:63: recipe for target 'libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o' failed
make[2]: *** [libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/ethash-cuda_generated_ethash_cuda_miner_kernel.cu.o] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:320: recipe for target 'libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [libethash-cuda/CMakeFiles/ethash-cuda.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Maybe I should take my own advice and switch it to a Win7 box ?
Thanks, I'm using the 347 drivers and a build compiled with CUDA 6.5 so I think that's what he's talking about, that's why I was confused as it's still not working on Win10 unfortunately. |
|
|
|
switch to the custom old WDDM driver
Sorry, which driver is this? |
|
|
|
So I tried a version compiled with CUDA 6.5 on Windows 10 with the nvidia 347.52 driver and I'm only getting about 3mh/s on an GTX 760. This same build gets me about 13-14mh/s on Win7.
Is Win10 just totally screwed up?
Still no luck figuring this out...can't get any decent numbers in Win10 even with the older drivers and CUDA 6.5. Anyone have any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
So I tried a version compiled with CUDA 6.5 on Windows 10 with the nvidia 347.52 driver and I'm only getting about 3mh/s on an GTX 760. This same build gets me about 13-14mh/s on Win7.
Is Win10 just totally screwed up?
|
|
|
|
Gridcoin http://www.gridcoin.us (rewards BOINC computation) has had GPU support for a while now. Why waste electricity on hashing with your GPU when you could be contributing to real scientific research? If you've got Nvidia you can crunch: GPUgrid: Full-atom molecular simulations of proteins Asteroids@home: Asteroid research - it uses photometric measurements of asteroids observed by professional big all-sky surveys as well as 'backyard' astronomers. The data is processed using the lightcurve inversion method and a 3D shape model of an asteroid together with the rotation period and the direction of the spin axis are derived. If you've got AMD you can crunch: Milkyway@home: Creation of a 3d map of the milkyway galaxy using data gathered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. This project enables research in both astroinformatics and computer science. POEM@HOME: Models protein folding using Anfinsen's dogma There's also some multi-gpu compatible projects: Collatz Conjecture: Attempting to disprove the Collatz Conjecture Einstein@home: Search for spinning neutron (pulsars) stars using data from the LIGO gravitational-wave detectors, the Arecibo radio telescope, and the Fermi gamma-ray satellite PrimeGrid: Search for prime numbers. Primes play a central role in the cryptographic systems which are used for computer security. Through the study of prime numbers it can be shown whether current security schemes are sufficiently secure. SETI@home: Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Probably because Gridcoin is an absolute nightmare to setup, the wallet takes hours to days to sync and the money you make is rarely even enough to pay for electricity. Not saying it's not a lofty idea, but most people here aren't going to jump through those hoops to lose money or barely break even. I love the idea of Gridcoin, but in its current state? Not so much. |
|
|
|
What determines what coin is being mined? For the last half hour it shows auto-switching is mining Crevacoin but there are multiple other coins listed as higher in profitability?
Auto switching only changes coin when target coin is mined. So, when we don't find new block for crevacoin, auto switch doesn't switch. Crevacoin has become big hash coin, and it needs quite time to solve new block. When pool hash increases, it will be solved smoothly. Maybe we would disable auto switching for crevacoin for a while. We'll monitor it. Thanks. Ok thanks, I understand now. It also looks like crevacoin is back up in price so maybe it's not an issue. I just didn't understand why it kept wanting to mine crevacoin when there were other coins listed as more profitable. |
|
|
|
|
What determines what coin is being mined? For the last half hour it shows auto-switching is mining Crevacoin but there are multiple other coins listed as higher in profitability?
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to use multi-algo switching including ethereum if we're GPU mining? It looks like any of the miners that are capable of being used to switch algos cannot mine ethereum or am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
