Half of the people in this forum are Asians trying to spam the forum while joining a signature campaign. They are happy with the few bucks they earn from signatures and thus they continue doing so. While these scumbags actually do get some "free cash" the forum become the trashcan toilet for their half-english shitposts and vomitted half-english nonsense in "Bitcoin Discussion". Thats why people are angry at them and this is the what they face. However this is not generalized we have many contributory people here but the alt account making spammers and ICO shill bumpers are pathetic.
Also lets not bring up the recent issue where you sent me a unwarranted negative trust for no reason as retaliation.
Most of your posts aren't better than "trash".Your English isn't that good either.So does that make you an asian? No. He is a prince from 1st world. |
|
|
|
You are serious asking that question, after members here on the forum are named as "3rd world monkeys?"
3rd world monkeys is not racist.. its a categorization of the total dumb shitposters that we have on the forum, the guys who spin up 100 accounts a day and spam the forum with "when moon" "good project" etc etc. those guys then go onto bounties and sig campaigns and spam 100+ characters of broken English and total eye cancer that the rest of us read all so they can earn $10 x 100 accounts per month to feed families.. this place isn't a welfare state, this used to be a decent community where people learnt, traded and grew a decent community - now its a total shit show. So call me racist if you wish, but I will call them Pajeets, 3rd world monkeys, bottom feeders and cunts all day long. Serious? Not racist? I thought you called them "3rd world shitposters" but 3rd world monkeys... But it's ok, racism is allowed for a DT Member as long as he tag "scammers". Good Job Blazed. Half of the people in this forum are Asians trying to spam the forum while joining a signature campaign. They are happy with the few bucks they earn from signatures and thus they continue doing so. While these scumbags actually do get some "free cash" the forum become the trashcan toilet for their half-english shitposts and vomitted half-english nonsense in "Bitcoin Discussion". Thats why people are angry at them and this is the what they face. However this is not generalized we have many contributory people here but the alt account making spammers and ICO shill bumpers are pathetic. Also lets not bring up the recent issue where you sent me a unwarranted negative trust for no reason as retaliation. I am sorry sir. Your tag for me was unfair. But we can discuss it like adults if you wish. I can explain you my side and you can understand what really happened. Otherwise I move on with my tag and you with yours. |
|
|
|
You are serious asking that question, after members here on the forum are named as "3rd world monkeys?"
3rd world monkeys is not racist.. its a categorization of the total dumb shitposters that we have on the forum, the guys who spin up 100 accounts a day and spam the forum with "when moon" "good project" etc etc. those guys then go onto bounties and sig campaigns and spam 100+ characters of broken English and total eye cancer that the rest of us read all so they can earn $10 x 100 accounts per month to feed families.. this place isn't a welfare state, this used to be a decent community where people learnt, traded and grew a decent community - now its a total shit show. So call me racist if you wish, but I will call them Pajeets, 3rd world monkeys, bottom feeders and cunts all day long. Serious? Not racist? I thought you called them "3rd world shitposters" but 3rd world monkeys... But it's ok, racism is allowed for a DT Member as long as he tag "scammers". Good Job Blazed. |
|
|
|
I feel that Lauda does a lot more good than harm for the forum and that is why I keep him in my trust list.
I'm not going to be the only person that's disappointed by this being the voiced criteria and reasoning for this. I don't disagree with the statement, but I disagree that this should be the criteria for keeping them on your list. There are plenty of people that do more good than harm that still do a tremendous amount of harm, so much so that it would be very dangerous to use this reasoning. You should keep them on your trust if you feel that they are very unlikely to do any meaningful damage to the forum in a way that violates or abuses the responsibility that comes along with DT; plus there should be significant benefit for their addition. This reminds me of Dave Chapelle's bit about Bill Cosby; "He saves more than he rapes!"  The significant benefit is that he tags scammers and helps keep that under control. Will he sometimes mess up with a rating?? most likely, but if/when he does he just needs to make it right. The trust system is not perfect, but no one can come up with a better one so it is what it is. Obviously other members of DT1 agree he is valuable otherwise he would not be back on. Thanks for leaving Lauda in your trust list. You are the reason why the forum is chasing away good members. Good to know that moderators and DT members accept extortionist in their trust list. Looking at his feedback I am not seeing good members being chased off...please give me some examples of his feedback towards good members that should be changed? I do agree with scammers and account selling (with proof) being tagged.But Blazed, just see the reputation topic. Everyday there is a new thread about Lauda's abuse. I am ok if there was just a few like it is with Vod and other DT members, but the most of people tagged can't even argue with Lauda. There are people trying to get rid of negative rate for years... Please, this has to end. Put some other people in your trust list. It's time to change. Edit: Why are you ok with Extortion attempt from Lauda one year ago? Why should you trust her? |
|
|
|
I feel that Lauda does a lot more good than harm for the forum and that is why I keep him in my trust list.
I'm not going to be the only person that's disappointed by this being the voiced criteria and reasoning for this. I don't disagree with the statement, but I disagree that this should be the criteria for keeping them on your list. There are plenty of people that do more good than harm that still do a tremendous amount of harm, so much so that it would be very dangerous to use this reasoning. You should keep them on your trust if you feel that they are very unlikely to do any meaningful damage to the forum in a way that violates or abuses the responsibility that comes along with DT; plus there should be significant benefit for their addition. This reminds me of Dave Chapelle's bit about Bill Cosby; "He saves more than he rapes!" The significant benefit is that he tags scammers and helps keep that under control. Will he sometimes mess up with a rating?? most likely, but if/when he does he just needs to make it right. The trust system is not perfect, but no one can come up with a better one so it is what it is. Obviously other members of DT1 agree he is valuable otherwise he would not be back on. Thanks for leaving Lauda in your trust list. You are the reason why the forum is chasing away good members. Good to know that moderators and DT members accept extortionist in their trust list. Good members help spam announcement threads so that they are bumped up?  Of course not! Who did that? You? "Offering "ICO bumping" services, also known as paid shill bumping. This is a highly shady offer which helps generate fake buzz for various projects." hmm... Please don't act dumb. Ahhh you are talking about me? I didn't know. Thanks captain obvious. No I don't do this services. But the God Lauda said I do. I almost forgot that there is no reasonable conversation with you guys. Edit1: FYI I tried to expose a Bump Service but I was ignored. Here it is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2864567.0 |
|
|
|
I feel that Lauda does a lot more good than harm for the forum and that is why I keep him in my trust list.
I'm not going to be the only person that's disappointed by this being the voiced criteria and reasoning for this. I don't disagree with the statement, but I disagree that this should be the criteria for keeping them on your list. There are plenty of people that do more good than harm that still do a tremendous amount of harm, so much so that it would be very dangerous to use this reasoning. You should keep them on your trust if you feel that they are very unlikely to do any meaningful damage to the forum in a way that violates or abuses the responsibility that comes along with DT; plus there should be significant benefit for their addition. This reminds me of Dave Chapelle's bit about Bill Cosby; "He saves more than he rapes!" The significant benefit is that he tags scammers and helps keep that under control. Will he sometimes mess up with a rating?? most likely, but if/when he does he just needs to make it right. The trust system is not perfect, but no one can come up with a better one so it is what it is. Obviously other members of DT1 agree he is valuable otherwise he would not be back on. Thanks for leaving Lauda in your trust list. You are the reason why the forum is chasing away good members. Good to know that moderators and DT members accept extortionist in their trust list. Good members help spam announcement threads so that they are bumped up? Of course not! Who did that? You? |
|
|
|
I feel that Lauda does a lot more good than harm for the forum and that is why I keep him in my trust list.
I'm not going to be the only person that's disappointed by this being the voiced criteria and reasoning for this. I don't disagree with the statement, but I disagree that this should be the criteria for keeping them on your list. There are plenty of people that do more good than harm that still do a tremendous amount of harm, so much so that it would be very dangerous to use this reasoning. You should keep them on your trust if you feel that they are very unlikely to do any meaningful damage to the forum in a way that violates or abuses the responsibility that comes along with DT; plus there should be significant benefit for their addition. This reminds me of Dave Chapelle's bit about Bill Cosby; "He saves more than he rapes!" The significant benefit is that he tags scammers and helps keep that under control. Will he sometimes mess up with a rating?? most likely, but if/when he does he just needs to make it right. The trust system is not perfect, but no one can come up with a better one so it is what it is. Obviously other members of DT1 agree he is valuable otherwise he would not be back on. Thanks for leaving Lauda in your trust list. You are the reason why the forum is chasing away good members. Good to know that moderators and DT members accept extortionist in their trust list. |
|
|
|
Awesome coins! Thanks minerjones.  |
|
|
|
i can't figure out how to do any of this bounty program stuff.. i tried filling out the forms but i couldn't figure out where to get the information, i'd love to be a big part of this program, i am fluent in ENGLISH, ARABIC, and basic SPANISH... let me know which of these languages you would like translated.
Read the first page here. It is explaining everything you need to know. |
|
|
|
I have to agree with the gang thing. Everytime someone posts about Lauda the same guys come to defend her/him/it.
Simply because you are the one who does not deserve support?  Give it a bit of time and think over what you have done and why you got negged by DT. Being a hot-head or a stubborn person will never help here. If you have been associated with ANN shill bumping then you are calling your own demise. There are rules against this and even if mods are sometimes not able to take care of all the illegal bumpers DT tries to tag them to get the accounts marked. Its pretty simple - but in a hot-head (read butthurt) situation its sometimes tough to get the correct conclusion because every other person I see here is of the "who does not like free money" squad.  First I did not do anything. I had no clue what bumping thread meant, I realized this recquired to comment lots of times with alt coins which I do not have (You can see in the evidence, the 2 messages I sent to the guy who was offering the service. Second, even if I was willing to bump thread, they are allowed to do once a day. I was angry when I got tagged, but now I just don't give a fuck because I can keep using the forum anyway. I was talking about the gang defending Lauda everytime like she/he/it is always right. It's funny how the Reputation section has so many threads complaining about Lauda doing trust farming. I do not see threads for other DT members often (exception for ThePharmacist and Actyname last weeks). Just saying... If one person complains about you, this person might be wrong. But when 1000 people complain about you... |
|
|
|
|
I have to agree with the gang thing. Everytime someone posts about Lauda the same guys come to defend her/him/it.
|
|
|
|
6 de Fevereiro evento chave para Cryptos,será colocada claramente quais as regras da regulamentação nos Estados Unidos - CNBC - 02/02/2018. https://youtu.be/aCLKd2s90vQErrado. É apenas um encontro da (US Securities and Exchange Commission) e CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) que discutirão a questão de regulamentação ou o "green light" para investidores norte americanos. Pode ser uma notícia negativa pela questão de "banirem" cryptos por lá ou pode ser muito positiva, pois podem discutir regulamentações para investidores norte americanos poderem entrar em ICO's, etc. No seu post deu a entender que é certeza que as criptos serão regulamentadas por lá. |
|
|
|
may I can ask?
15 coin lunes for week with FB campaign?. it depend on friend on facebook or not? and How many weeks of this FB campaign
anyway, I read information about your project. I so wide, it maybe take a long time to success.
I hope your team keep hard working.
Thanks
The campaign will run for 13 weeks because ico ends on 2nd week of april afaik. You must have at least 100 friends. Just read the rules |
|
|
|
|
I put my email adress and is not showing in the spreadsheet. You have to use same email that you used in the Lunes Wallet.
|
|
|
|
Participating of signature campaign of course. |
|
|
|
|
So proud to be part of Lunes project. The best project in South America.
|
|
|
|
This isn't sufficient to take any action unless you want to analyze 27 pages of shitposts.
Ok no problem. Just trying to help and to show my neg tag wasn't deserved. |
|
|
|
You kidding me. you tagged me with Negative trust I will not post any single word. I just used your reply as an answer. btw I gave you same gift.
There is no point. I can leave merit to whomever I want[1], wherever I want and in whatever amount I want. If you don't like it, then ask theymos to change the rules.
Oh my God. You've been tagged because of this? Really I feel sorry for you bro. Took a lot to get to Legendary and now your account is ruined because of merit shit... |
|
|
|
This guy came to talk with me in telegram offering this so called "bumping threads services" because I am part of a team in a new ICO and I tried to take something from him. This is what he said to me. It's in my Telegram and his user is @michael500650. He said me he worked at this Litra Coin project: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2145201.0The said project already has on-going discussions in their thread about the scammy ways they have adopted.And yes taking this post into consideration https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2145201.msg27073561#msg27073561 (and others obviously) they did seem to have bumped their tread.Not sure if they did that using the same person that offered you the service.You could have played along a bit more and tried to get the accounts involved so it would have been easier to tag those accounts.For now,there isn't any information on the user on bitcointalk or the certainty of their services. He blocked me. I think he discovered I was trying to get something from him. Anyway my report is here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
