There is, and has been, a misconception about the economics of free things for a long while now, this movement or ideology started from the premise of government hand-outs to the least economically developed citizens. When we do talk about the economics of free things(which is rarely) we usually associate it with the idea that it involves a regulatory central agency distributing the wealth amongst its people.  However when it come to the free market this type of leniency is not available at all. Day to day people don't have access to stocks or derivative markets for example, and that helps to increase the gap between the rich and the poor(which in turn requires the intervention of the aforementioned central authority).
New technologies however provide an opportunity for this gap to be closed. When a technology is in its infancy the interest for its development and widespread adoption from the creators is big enough to try and exchange portions of the value of their product for market depth. Put in other words and in regards to token economics, ICO's are so desperate for the widespread use and adoption of their product that they will literally give away portions of the participation of their product, in the form of tokens, in exchange for network effects and market depth. We now have an interesting concept formed from this: airdrops and the difficulty that this companies are going to have to achieve their  desired market depth.

Many wrote that we need to regulate the global cryptomarket:

i know how to do this and i can explain it to you:


1. you need to create a registry where all cryptocurrency owners are being registered with their adress they must respons, not just through it systems but also physically

2. you force them to show and open their data

3. you write and publish the regulation form, description and goals.

4. you create a global strike force or so called economic hitman to execute sanctions if a cryptocapitalists fails to achieve that regulation

5. you will have create an insitution that regulates cryptocurrencies.

-> all cryptocurrencies that follow that regulation are regulated, and under enforcment of that insitution.

regards

you see its actually possible to create a regulation if you can create an institution which is the equivalent of standards and poor. but for crypto and you get a global hitman in work.

for that you need good contacts either to interpol or to a global mercenary group. like blackwater. or those secretive agents/economic hitmans

There are advantages that can be from Bitcoin and will have the shortcomings that will happen as criminals will be easier to make transactions.

Usually, we choose brands that reflect our identity and values.
But is the same for coins and tokens? Do we choose coins based on our values?
Are coins are brands?