|
Is there a described mechanism for transferring shares from BitFunder to Crypto-Stocks?
|
|
|
|
|
OBO mean "OR BEST OFFER"
Edit the title if you don't want offers.
The next difficulty increase is predicted to be substantial (38%). So you would be wise not to insult buyers you will be begging in a week.
|
|
|
|
|
4 @ 0.40 BTC / blade 1.60 BTC
Offer expires in one week.
|
|
|
|
|
pm made with reasonable offer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll give you 10 billion SHT coins not to make said guide available. (jesting, of course) You'll get nothing—(10 trillion SHT coins)—and like it.
|
|
|
|
No, it's a hub for FIFA14 editing, and I posted the bounty there originally. But, considering the abundance of cryptographic decryption talents and love of BTC here at bitcointalk.org, I thought I would post a link to the bounty here also. Here is some preliminary analysis of the challenge by soccergaming.com forum user malloc84. If datax.big is encrypted like it was in the prelaunch build then there will be problems.
It is a AES encryption which opens and reads file at fifa runtime when appropriate key is sent from the game. Simple but very effective.
I found where it checks for the decryption key and where the key is generated in the prelaunch build but I guess its gonna be different in retail. |
|
|
|
EASPORTS has added encryption to plaintext files .ini, .lua files in FIFA14 and Battlefront—I offer a bounty for a critical problem: solve the EASF encryption! To win the bounty of 0.25 BTC, you must post at this soccergaming.com thread a working quickbms script for the EASF encryption EA has added to the product.ini, CM storyline .lua files, and others files in FIFA14. Head over to soccergaming.com with your solution. |
|
|
|
|
Streets,
Please update the 1st post of this thread regarding Avalon Chips, eASIC announcement, and board composition.
|
|
|
|
Just come online today to see the Avalon stuff. Lawsuit would be madness, as I posted on the Avalon thread some days ago. Get the refund asap if it's on offer.
As for what to do - re-invest or dividend minus the costs incurred? Any other options?
Thoughts?
What about a 50/50 split on reinvestment and issuing of dividend from any available refund? The shareholders need to be taken care of in some fashion surrounding this Avalon flub. Thoughts? A one time lump dividend payment is bad for business. If it was 50/50 then it should be given out over time. There is no need for a one time lump dividend its bad for the long term goals of the company. We just want to get a feel for what it is shareholders envision as a solution to Avalon's fiasco. It would be nice to see the Avalon money re-invested, but what I would really like to see is the money invested in the 28nm project (which btw, is there any progress on getting a progress report on the eASIC deal?) |
|
|
|
LTC-GLOBAL going belly up? Yeah, they only made a 20.000 LTC+ Profit last month.
Swede75, 1st, Please don't quote images. 2nd, I'm simply asking for CIPHERMINE's strategy in that scenario. If you look at LTC-GLOBAL's income sheet, most of the revenue comes from BTC-TC, so I think there is a very real possibility the litecoin side of their business drying up if the Litecoin value slide continued indefinitely. The trade volume on litecoinglobal exchange is abysmal. The point I am trying to make is I believe the company's share price is being de-valued by people pulling out of CIPHERMINE and the litecoinglobal exchange to avoid Litecoin value loss (when in fact, the price should be going up given that revenues are not dependent on litecoin's value). This is not a worry for shareholders in the long term so long as there are contingencies to move the shares to another marketplace if litecoin's become valueless or another altcoin supplants litecoin as the most stable and high valued alt-coin. |
|
|
|
Why is CIPHERMINE in decline?  programs to take screenshotsIt's even worse (in terms of BTC value) when you consider that LTC/BTC price is in decline, too. CIPHERMINE doesn't specifically mine Litecoin, and in fact, has many BTC ASIC miners on order (and some deployed); therefore, shouldn't CIPHERMINE's value be going up when LTC/BTC goes down? Are investors pulling out of CIPHERMINE because of the drop in Litecoin value (and they want their BTC back)? Good time to buy or solid security in a dying marketplace (LTC-GLOBAL) denominated in an alt-coin in long-term decline? Are there contingency plans to move CIPHERMINE over to a BTC-denominated marketplace in case LTC-GLOBAL and/or litecoin go belly up? |
|
|
|
|
Obvious ponzi scheme. buyer beware.
|
|
|
|
Hi Namworld, For the benefit of fellow alt-coiner's, I added a last price look up function for mcxNOW (which uses XML). // mcxNOW #######################################################################
function mcxNOW(currency){
// Fetch altcoin exchange data from mcxNOW
// Ex: "XPM" for last XPM price
// https://mcxnow.com/orders?cur=XPM
var mcx = fetchCached("https://mcxnow.com/orders?cur="+ currency )
var data1 = Xml.parse(mcx, true);
var doc = data1.doc
var lprice = data1.doc.lprice
var lastprice = data1.doc.lprice.getText()
return lastprice
}
|
|
|
|
ASICMINER's next generation chips will be out by November... do you honestly think any of these IPOs will produce functional products by then? We don't know the specs of the next AM chips... but there is every reason to assume they will be in line with the specs these other companies are promising, if not superior.
The primary difference is that ASICMINER has proven that they can deliver.
Great so... lets invest in an unknown. I don't doubt they'll come up with something awesome, but they also have a glass ceiling in the percentage of network hash rate they can take. They've currently got 12% of network hash rate, so they could double that, but not really any more than double... that's their major class ceiling. Whereas ActM can increase their hashrate by a few hundred times, plus hardware sales. Their franchising plans means no hashrate glass ceiling. Plus hardware sales. Well no, potential franchises will have to consider the value proposition of the cost of operating an ASICMINER franchise versus holding mining security, buying hardware with higher GH/watt, or investing in growth funds. There are no sure bets (especially in bitcoin). |
|
|
|
|
Free Stuff? Consider me entered.
|
|
|
|
\The fact of the matter is, multiple groups are trying to get into the industrial mining game and are offering IPOs.
Most of them are trying to get money together from other people to order mining equipment. Of all the new companies, only ActM is assembling their own equipment and looking to design their own chips. BFL is a big, terrible joke. AsicMiner stock is slipping and who knows when and what they will produce next. Although those USB Eruptors are brilliant. They make mining available to everyone, even if the ROI is months. It at least gives more people a chance to experience mining and understand it. My hopes and expectations are that ActM will have its FastHash machine out by October. Who needs another IPO? Any money I might have spent on a mining IPO will instead be spent buying a Fast Hash 80 and perhaps another Fast Hash machine.
Just so you know, both Labcoin and BitGarden are also producing their own ASICs. There will be winners and losers in the coming battle for institutional bitcoin mining dominance, so pick your horses, sit back and watch the race. P.S. It doesn't matter anyway: Satoshi told me in a dream that Primecoin wins out in the end after optical-based quantum computing becomes popular in 2021. He was riding his unicorn, of course  |
|
|
|
also I assume with the way your handling the situation your going to keep the dividends since the shares are still with your address?
also for future reference I should never try to withdraw shares just sell off and withdraw bitcoins because obviously this cant be done correctly
I don't know why your slamming burnside. What is he supposed to do? Friedcat isn't the most responsive guy in the world. Why don't you go raise some noise in the ASICMINER thread? (BTW, Friedcat doesn't read it, so don't bother). |
|
|
|
|
Smidge, I would prefer you do not list on BitFunder. Please consider Havelock or BTC-TC, which both have trading API's. Also, WeExchange sucks—6 confirmations, no 2FA required on withdrawals, & no address book.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
