It seems like a you are trying to compare dreams and nightmare, matrix is far ahead of Oyster shell, just look at the websites of both projects to compare and contrast. maybe you can do 80%:20% of Matrix to Oyster shell, just to edge yourselves in case there is a significant gain in both

The first pick is BTC, the whole market success depend on it and believe it would start its bull run soon, one project I think the space is greatly undervalued is Bluzelle and it is going to be compactible with NEO and Ethereum platform, also have strong partnership

I think he has a point but may be he has taken it too far, the team has shown nothing recently to give token holders hope, by now I was expecting the team to have come up with something better than all these ethereum forks, because i know for a fact it is the first successful Ethereum fork but now the smart contract space is very competitive and don't know how thy want to compete in the space like this, when we have new platforms like NEO, ICON, and Wanchain going toes to toes with Ethereum market share

I still need more information on this so called partnership, I could remember when IOTA announced their partnership with Micorsoft which seems to be something else, the only way I can see this affecting the price is if Amazon is going to be using Ethers, which is what affect we the tokens holders.
Just don't count your hen before it hatched

One thing I observe about Waves is that time has pass them bye, what they can show for is the WavesDex that lack volume. if one remove the Waves trading volume on it can calculate the remaining it amount to nothing when compared to other exchanges like Binance and Kucoin. You can hold small but I would advice you to sell most of your holding. I don't see this platform catching up with the market

I know of Japan, Malta and Gibratar. These 3 countries are very friendly to exchnages. Malta President recently personally woo Binance to their country and I have seen some of their ads on bloomberg claiming to be a open to a blockchain and fintech companies. Why are you asking do you want to move to one

I think security tokens are now the new black, what is funny is that ICOs are in trend, there was a time when new projects cming ut are all about smart contract, early this year it was AI and now it is security tokens. I know of Polymath, Tzero and now Desico. I would need to read more about it before deciding on this

The main issue I have with these government people is the believe that Crypto is mostly used for all these illegal activities, and there have beens tudies on these that shows that just 1% of these transactions are used for illegal activities. I won't expect much from them until it is passed and I see the content of the legislation

I think this is a result of better exposure to new technology and better understand of it, it is a know fact that most of these countries with better economies attract the best minds all around the world so they have upper hand over poor countries where access to internet is still poor and not affordable to most of the citizens

To be sincere for me it would be a great thing to know who Satoshi is, the gift of Bitcoin is one of the best in my life time but with the look of things I doubt the market care gain about who Satoshi is. Coming out and proofing that he is Satoshi would create alot of heat and could affect the project negatively, knowing also for a fact that Satoshi is one of the richest man on earth, there could be a fear of him start to move his BTC from his wallet to exchange

This is a good advice but it doesn't work always the way you want it, for me as long as the team has the capacity to develop a sound platform and have the track record of delivering on their promises I have no problem with this. The reason people are clamoring for this is because of the number of failed ICOs last year

I have not because I believe it is better to spend bad money (Fiat) than Bitcoin. I know BTC was designed to be a digital cash but also serve this purpose of store of value and I think its plays the later role better. It doesn't make sense to me spending BTC just for the sake of buying things

Your summations are true but no one can stop people on gambling with their money, if people can invested heavily into Bitconnect which it is very obvious to people with average intelligent level that this is a Ponzi then what can't they invest into. I think the reason now is that the ICO space has been hijacked, before almost anyone have access to this project and can invest but now they were being bought out in Private sale level, so what an average Joe find to invest are mostly scam projects

I think you say it well, Altcoins just keep making holes in my portfolio, only few projects I invested into have out performed BTC within a year, the worse ones are those I invested in this year. I want to ask you what percentage of your portfolio did you allocate to BTC and Dollar

IT is a bitter- sweet situation, no one want to see his portfolio keep decreasing and it also present a situation where one can buy into a good project one miss out on at cheap price. What I have come to terms with is that this space is in cycle and unless the space grown to Trillions of Dollars when we won't be affected by most of these price swing often

There is no doubt Ethereum has significant effect on the Crypto world, the smart contract platform is a lift for the space, though it has not scale up the way most people were expecting. Another thing is that raising capital for a project has been made simple as A,B,C by Ethereum, Billions of Dollars had been raised using Ethereum platform which makes it possible for us to see so many new interesting projects

Diveristy is part of investment from time, just becaise most of this projects have different roadmaps, just look at Tezo for example, no one anticipated what happens among the team, just imagine one has invested all what one has in that ICO, on would have missed so many returns on investment, like ICON, Wanchain, Cindicator etc

This is a very subjective topic, it all depend on the team, I have seen many hybrid of bounty reward and you opt for the one that suit you. Some team don't have money for marketing and see bounty as a means to promote and market their project so they go for 100% tokens most of the time. I read somewhere than some team spend more than $1 million to promote and market their ICO

I think teams wish to treat bounty hunters very well not saying few of them are not guilty of this, but at time when you see some bounty hunters behave then you ask do their life depend on this, the way people talk to these people are some how annoying, they have pressure from investors to deal with and bounty hunters will also want to hunt them down also. For now, I even doubt the future of bounty with time

I know the talk of Government regulation is a grey area, one need to understand fully what one is wishing for, but I think time as come to use some of these developers as scapegoat, this has happened over and over again and because no one is punished for this, they keep doing it. This was a planned work and the developers would have made a kill from this